Who Rewrote the Bible? Dr. Lorraine Day on Spingola

[PatColo]

Great 81 min comm. free podcast, mostly dealing with Dr. Day's new book, "Who Rewrote the Bible? How and Why The Translators Have Deceived the Whole World by Deliberately Changing the Truth of the Bible"

Some of the discussion of the first ~15 mins about the truth of many Bible characters, lost me coz I plead utter ignorance. But after that it gets lively until the end! Day is a historical revisionist, close friend of Ernst Zundel and other notable revisionists. So, WHO do you guess Day suggests rewrote the Bible?

Day's a cancer survivor, 75yo now and claims excellent health.

Spingola Speaks 2012.08.27

http://www.spingola.com/Deanna%2005.jpg

Guest: Dr. Lorraine Day, Natural, Alternative Therapies for all Diseases, author of Who Rewrote the Bible

Deanna's site

RBN

Listen

Download

Who Rewrote the Bible?

http://www.drday.com/images/rewrote-bible.jpg $38.00 ORDER NOW	900 Power-Packed Pages How and Why The Translators Have Deceived the Whole World by Deliberately Changing the Truth of the Bible Find the answers to the questions that every Christian should be asking!	http://www.drday.com/images/rewrote-lorraine.jpgThis book contains the biblical information Dr. Day learned in her “journey”

This book contains the biblical information Dr. Day learned in her “journey” to Knowing God and Getting Well from her severe, advanced cancer.

A Book So Fascinating you will not be able to put it down!

The definition of the word Gospel is Good News! If the Gospel is, indeed, Good News, then it should easily be identifiable as such by both Christians and non-Christians. Unfortunately, the message of the churches – that some will be saved but most will be tortured in hellfire forever or at least for some period of time – is definitely not Good News. Therefore, a re-examination of what the Bible really teaches about the salvation of humanity is long overdue. Obviously there has been some mistake somewhere, and it turns out that the translators are responsible, and pastors and Bible scholars are complicit in this travesty - partners in crime, if you will - by blindly embracing the erroneous translations. http://www.drday.com/images/rbul.gif If God tells us to LOVE our enemies, why is He going to DESTROY His enemies in hellfire? http://www.drday.com/images/rbul.gif Can Satan do anything if God does not allow it? If God allows it, is it God’s will? http://www.drday.com/images/rbul.gif Who is responsible for sin existing in this world? If the answer is Satan, then why didn’t God prevent it? Or is Satan equal with God? http://www.drday.com/images/rbul.gif If Jesus was resurrected on Sunday, why aren’t the words “Sunday” or “first day of the week” found anywhere in any of the original manuscripts of the Bible? http://www.drday.com/images/rbul.gif How is God going to “wipe away all your tears” if your loved ones are burning in hellfire? http://www.drday.com/images/rbul.gif Why have the words “Jew” and “Gentile” been written into the Bible erroneously. (They aren’t found in the original Bible manuscripts.)

[undgrd]

I'm about halfway though. The good doctor mentions a list of reasons why people get cancer. She basically blames the folks who get cancer because of diet and stress they internalize. Does she ever explain how/why children die of cancer?

[StreetsOfGold]

I'll give this a listen to later but I already have a critism.

The following 2 points listed (below) are already erroneous. Why? Becuase there is NO SUCH THING as the "original manuscripts" Every "original" ever written is long gone. There are ONLY copies and translations available. So this woman is already trying to "con" the unlearned by implying something exists, which doesn't. There are various fragments, minuscules (cursives), and manuscripts (NOT "ORIGINALS) available but, I repeat, NO "Original manuscripts". She is being deceptive in using this phrase. This same phrase (repeated) and used in "Bible" schools for decades that have been inflitrated by Jesuits to introduce the Alexandrian school of thought that the "oldest and best" (meaning the Roman Catholic) manuscripts are closest to the "originals". Of course, this is shear unadulterated baloney.

If Jesus was resurrected on Sunday, why aren’t the words “Sunday” or “first day of the week” found anywhere in any of the original manuscripts of the Bible?
Why have the words “Jew” and “Gentile” been written into the Bible erroneously. (They aren’t found in the original Bible manuscripts.)

[Nomoss]

Just one ? Who where the Jesuits.
Thanks for the link PatColo

[PatColo]

Just one ? Who where the Jesuits.
Thanks for the link PatColo

this guy's into the Jesuits being the top, with the rothschild zio's serving at their pleasure (their "accountants" )-- says the J's did the Biblical mal-translating:
Thread: Who Really Owns Your Gold, & the Planned Econ Meltdown

but he's really not religious the way Day is.

Thanks also to Streets of Gold; that "original manuscripts" question was one I want to learn more about.

I expect either of you can email Dr. Day with good questions based on her radio interview- tell her you're thinking about buying her book but first wondering...

[skidmark]

The first Jesuits were crypto-Jews. Ignatius Loyola himself was a crypto-Jew of the Occult Cabala. A crypto-Jew is a Jew who converts to another religion and outwardly embraces the new religion, while secretly maintaining Jewish practices. As John Torell explains: "In 1491 San Ignacio de Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati order in Spain. As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic. On May 20, 1521 Ignatius (as he was now called) was wounded in a battle, and became a semi-cripple. Unable to succeed in the military and political arena, he started a quest for holiness and eventually ended up in Paris where he studied for the priesthood. In 1539 he had moved to Rome where he founded the "JESUIT ORDER," which was to become the most vile, bloody and persecuting order in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1540, the current Pope Paul III approved the order. At Loyola's death in 1556 there were more than 1000 members in the Jesuit order, located in a number of nations."

Ignatius of Loyola's secretary, Polanco, was of Jewish descent and was the only person present at Loyola's deathbed. James Lainez, who succeeded Loyola as the second Jesuit General, was also of Jewish descent. Jews were attracted to the Jesuit order and joined in large numbers. Lacunza was no exception. He was a Jew, which explains why he introduced the eschatological teaching of a return to the Jewish animal sacrifices during the Millennium. (In a book titled The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty published in 1812, 11 years after the death of its author, Jesuit Emanuel de Lacunza who, wrote under the fictitious pen name of a purportedly converted Jew, Rabbi Juan Josaphat Ben Ezra, in order to conceal his identity and to make his writings more palatable to the Protestant readers. He promoted the writings of sixteenth century Jesuit priest Francisco Ribera, developing a futuristic perspective which restricted the prophetic fulfillments in the book of Revelation to the end of the world). Lacunza also wrote that during a millennium after the tribulation the Jewish animal sacrifices would be reinstated along with the Eucharist (the mass) of the Catholic Church. Lacunza has followed after Jewish fables and replaced the commandments of God with the commandments of men. That doctrine gives the Jews primacy in God's plan and relegates Christians to a prophetic parenthetical to be supplanted by the Jews during the thousand year earthly reign of Christ.


eaec.org

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl249.htm

[Glass]

from what I can tell so far in my research the bible has 4 layers of comprehension to it. I believe there are more but these ones I'm confident are identifiable.

1) literal interpretation of the words as they are written on paper - I estimate about 90% of people are here regardless of their spiritual persuasion
2) allegorical presentation of themes and concepts associated with law and contracts also messmerism and homeopathy. Jesus is illustrated as being a practitioner of both of these and many more hidden mystery skills.
3) numerology concepts associated with astrology and divination
4) kabalistic and masonic information coded into the book that tie in with a range of hidden mysteries including sorcery (pharmacology), homeopathy, mathematics of a couple flavours, mesmerism, divination, sacrifice procedures and other occulted material.

Jesus sending the evil spirits into swine is an example of mesmerism. Raising the dead is an example of homeopathy as is curing the sick. The dead being not actually dead but comatose. In those days coma's resulted in death because there was no means to sustain people in coma's as there is these days. This ability to bring people out of coma's was revered as being the performance of a miracle.

The allegory of the fishes and the bread is a description of alchemy which is the art of "increasing that which exists" not the creation of something from nothing.

There are also tie in's between information in the book and other sources. For instance the number of souls saved in Revelations has an exact tie in with the speed of light. The dimensions of Noahs ark, likewise have mathematical tie in's with the physics of Earths magnetic fields.

There is a huge amount of information in the bible as published however much of it is hidden in plain sight.

[Cebu_4_2]

For instance the number of souls saved in Revelations has an exact tie in with the speed of light. The dimensions of Noahs ark, likewise have mathematical tie in's with the physics of Earths magnetic fields.

What do you make of this?

[messianicdruid]

There is a huge amount of information in the bible as published however much of it is hidden in plain sight.

http://www.whatabeginning.com/Misc/Wonders/P.htm

My favorite question: http://www.gods-kingdom-ministries.n...yone-would-he/

Lots of good reading: http://www.gods-kingdom-ministries.net/teachings/books/

[singular_me]

I'll give this a listen to later but I already have a critism.

The following 2 points listed (below) are already erroneous. Why? Becuase there is NO SUCH THING as the "original manuscripts" Every "original" ever written is long gone. There are ONLY copies and translations available. So this woman is already trying to "con" the unlearned by implying something exists, which doesn't. There are various fragments, minuscules (cursives), and manuscripts (NOT "ORIGINALS) available but, I repeat, NO "Original manuscripts". She is being deceptive in using this phrase. This same phrase (repeated) and used in "Bible" schools for decades that have been inflitrated by Jesuits to introduce the Alexandrian school of thought that the "oldest and best" (meaning the Roman Catholic) manuscripts are closest to the "originals". Of course, this is shear unadulterated baloney.

If Jesus was resurrected on Sunday, why aren’t the words “Sunday” or “first day of the week” found anywhere in any of the original manuscripts of the Bible?
Why have the words “Jew” and “Gentile” been written into the Bible erroneously. (They aren’t found in the original Bible manuscripts.)

um-um... you already try to bias the audience.... allowing people to make up their own mind is essential... if there are NO original manuscripts, then maybe should you/one be less assertive when one/you refer(s) to the bible

personally I dont care about the originals... I dont believe in copyrights anyway, everything belongs to the Universe and goes back to IT. All religious texts were written by man anyway