THE PRINCIPLE- The Movie Big Science Does NOT want YOU to see. SEE IT NOW.



The Principle
Page 160 of 162 FirstFirst ... 60110150158159160161162 LastLast
Results 1,591 to 1,600 of 1613

Thread: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

  1. #1591
    Iridium
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    7,140
    Thanks
    4,704
    Thanked 3,798 Times in 2,310 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    putting this here first - also creating new thread so that internet researchers might learn of the data dump

    http://www.kiro7.com/news/trending-n...za-1/632342834

    FBI docs shed disturbing new light on Sandy Hook killer Adam Lanza

    link to the documents: https://vault.fbi.gov/sandy-hook-ele...chool-shooting

    by: Steven Yablonski, Boston25News.com Updated: Oct 28, 2017 - 8:16 PM

    NEWTOWN, Conn. - Newly released FBI documents are shedding more light on the investigation surrounding the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

    Adam Lanza shot his way into the school on the morning of Dec. 14, 2012, and murdered 20 first-grade students and six teachers.

    He later killed himself inside a classroom.

    The FBI released nearly 1,500 pages of information that detailed the investigation including witnesses and evidence collected from Lanza’s home that he shared with his mother.

    She was shot and killed by Lanza while she was asleep in her bed the morning of the massacre.

    Information in the report shows Lanza started plotting the shootings as early as March 2011 and hated Sandy Hook because he said his mother worked at the school and felt she loved the students more than she loved him.


    Lanza’s mother was a volunteer at the school.

    The report also details how Lanza researched and kept notes on other mass shootings and said he was “focused and obsessed with mass murders.”

    Investigators also said Lanza may have had an interest in pedophilia, but there was no proof that he acted on any of those urges.

    The report also said the FBI found a file on Lanza’s computer “advocating pedophiles” rights and liberation of children, along with a screenplay describing a relationship between a 10-year-old boy and a 30-year-old man.

    The FBI documents also said Lanza was into computers and even hacked into a government computer system.

    The report released by the FBI has been heavily redacted.

    An unidentified woman in the report told the FBI she had an online relationship with Lanza years before the shooting.

    She met him on a website devoted to the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. She recalled Lanza saying he may be asexual, but she also described him as depressed and cynical with a very negative view of life.

    The documents showed Lanza was a recluse and just three months before the mass shooting the 20-year-old’s weight dropped to 85 pounds.

    And according to the FBI’s behavioral analysis, Lanza didn’t “snap” but instead engaged in careful, methodical planning and preparation.

  2. #1592
    Administrator JohnQPublic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    8,834
    Thanks
    891
    Thanked 2,194 Times in 1,311 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    "What Difference, at this time, does it make?"

    "What is 'is'?"

    "Because you'd be in jail"

  3. #1593
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2,147
    Thanks
    594
    Thanked 1,111 Times in 770 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    Nothing good and no truth comes out of CBS news. Manufacturing new evidence on Sandy Hook and other fictional events in U S recent history is the FBI's stock and trade. The MSM and any of their outlets are something that we should not even honor with commenting upon. We know their game by now.

    There was no "massacre" and there was no "Sandy Hook shooter."

    Lie upon lie upon lie, typical of what the government and the deep state media do to hold up their manufactured false events.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Dachsie For This Useful Post:

    PatColo (4th February 2018)

  5. #1594
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12,121
    Thanks
    2,055
    Thanked 4,246 Times in 2,748 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    1 hr: Download

    Truth Jihad radio with Kevin Barrett 2018.02.05




    James Tracy: “My academic freedom fight continues!”

    Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, holds advanced degrees in English Literature, French Literature, and African Literature, and is the author of multiple books which deconstructs the "war on terror". Dr. Barrett has been a Muslim since 1993. Blacklisted from teaching in the University of Wisconsin system since 2006 for questioning the events of 9/11, Dr. Barrett now hosts radio shows and is a public speaker.

    Synopsis

    Florida Atlantic University communications professor James Tracy was tenured – meaning he was supposedly free to research and speak out on the most controversial issues without fear of punishment from his university. But the tenure system failed, and academic freedom was shredded, when FAU administrators harassed him, then fired him, for challenging mainstream reporting on the Sandy Hook school shooting, the Boston bombing, and the 2015 Paris terror attacks. Dr. Tracy sued the university administration, the individual administrators, and his faculty union (which failed to defend him and sided with the witch hunt). He lost at the first level, when a jury was bamboozled into accepting the university’s ludicrous assertion that Dr. Tracy’s firing had nothing to do with his controversial positions on false flag issues, but was instead due to Tracy’s filling out an obscure and absurd bureaucratic form a few hours past the deadline!
    But the case is far from over. James Tracy is appealing to the 11th circuit in Atlanta, where – away from the “company town” of South Florida where all parties conspired in his legal lynching – he may finally be able to get a fair hearing.
    Below are three articles covering the case’s most recent developments. The first provides a succinct summary.
    https://jamesftracy.wordpress.com/20...demic-freedom/

    https://jamesftracy.wordpress.com/20...rst-amendment/

    https://jamesftracy.wordpress.com/2018/01/31/cia-and-the-corporate-media-the-case-of-kurt-eichenwald/





    KevinBarrett.HeresyCentral.com
    TruthJihad.com

    24k CF Download
    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to PatColo For This Useful Post:

    Dachsie (5th February 2018)

  7. #1595
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12,121
    Thanks
    2,055
    Thanked 4,246 Times in 2,748 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    1 hr: Download



    April 18, 2018
    Kevin Barrett



    Today’s show is a protest against YouTube’s censorship of the Richie Allen show, following Richie’s interview of Jim Fetzer on the topic of the Sandy Hook and Parkland shootings. Jim Fetzer has impressive academic credentials and has edited a book on Sandy Hook. Jim’s views, whether correct or not, are newsworthy; no news outlet should be punished for reporting them and giving them a fair hearing. If Jim says anything potentially defamatory, sue him! Don’t kill the messenger—the alternative media—which enjoys First Amendment protections precisely so it can fearlessly pursue controversial topics. Challenge to Lenny Posner and Neil Heslin: If you don’t like what Jim says (and I’m sure you don’t) contact me at TruthJihad(AT]gmail{DOT}com and I will be happy to offer you air time to respond. (I am also trying to get an interview with another Sandy Hook parent who will presumably take issue with Jim’s position…stay tuned for updates.)

    First 25 minutes: University of Minnesota Duluth Professor Emeritus James Fetzer discusses today’s New York Timesstory: “Sandy Hook parents sue Alex Jones for defamation.” According to the Times: “Three parents whose children were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012 filed a defamation lawsuit on Tuesday against Alex Jones, the right-wing conspiracy theorist who has long claimed the shooting was ‘completely fake’ and a ‘giant hoax’ perpetrated by opponents of the Second Amendment.”

    Jim Fetzer claims he has more than enough evidence to prove Alex Jones right in a court of law. He has contacted Alex and offered his services as an expert witness and facilitator of other expert witnesses. In this interview, Jim challenges Lenny Posner and Neil Heslin to sue him, and says he is confident that he can prevail in court.

    Jim sends the following links that relate to assertions he makes during the interview:

    “Fake News on Five Fronts”: Latest on Sandy Hook et al.
    “Sandy Hook: Neil Haslim CONTRADICTS official narrative”
    “SANDYHOOKstarringWayneCarveras The MedicalExaminer“
    “How to Spot a False Flag” (exposing 10-12 examples)
    “Fake News: Issues of Identity”



    Final 35 minutes: Richie Allen
    interviews Kevin Barrett on escalating censorship of the alternative media, the Skripal and Douma suspected chemical weapons false flags, and other issues.
    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to PatColo For This Useful Post:

    midnight rambler (18th April 2018)

  9. #1596
    .999 Unobtanium Horn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Out
    Posts
    24,027
    Thanks
    1,407
    Thanked 2,502 Times in 2,063 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    Defamation, Cause the fame of having your children shot while at school is something some apparently can't live without.

  10. #1597
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12,121
    Thanks
    2,055
    Thanked 4,246 Times in 2,748 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    James Tracy, who was also dogged by "Lenny Pozner"-- see link for reader comments:


    ​​​​​​​
    INFOWARS AND THE LAWSUITS: A PINCER MOVEMENT ON FREE SPEECH? (VIDEO)

    APRIL 18, 2018 MHB ADMIN 2 COMMENTS


    In this debut of the MemoryHoleBlog’s news analysis and commentary video series we examine the lawsuits filed against Alex Jones and Infowars’ parent company on April 16, 2018.

    In 2017 when Jones was sued by James Alefantis over “Pizzagate” the broadcaster settled out of court and agreed to never use the term again, thus leading the way in chilling investigation and commentary on the scandal. Will the public witness the same tactic used in responding to suits filed by Sandy Hook massacre victims’ families?

    3m 27s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS6c2GXOW0g

    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to PatColo For This Useful Post:

    midnight rambler (18th April 2018)

  12. #1598
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12,121
    Thanks
    2,055
    Thanked 4,246 Times in 2,748 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    Fetzer:


    Thursday, May 24, 2018

    New York Times Exemplifies "Post-Truth Era" by Declaring War on Sandy Hook Truth

    Jim Fetzer


    In the latest absurdity publish by The New York Times, which pretends to be "our nation's newspaper of record" but which has a record of publishing false accounts of every major "false flag" carried out by local, state and federal authorities--most recently, about Charlottesville, where The Times celebrated a Charolttesville Stunt Man, a Photoshopped Photo and a Crisis Actor (who made her debut in Sandy Hook), we now have the further--and to my mind, conclusive--demonstration that The Times has gone "all in" on behalf of "fake news" in its own "Post-Truth Era":





    rest: http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2018...ost-truth.html
    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  13. #1599
    Iridium Joshua01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    7,694
    Thanks
    3,725
    Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,597 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    all will soon be revealed
    If you're offended by any of my posts tough shit!
    "Politicians Are Like Diapers, They Should Be Changed Often, And For The Same Reason"
    If you're not prepared for what's coming it's already too late!
    Niggers will never be satisfied!!

  14. #1600
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2,147
    Thanks
    594
    Thanked 1,111 Times in 770 Posts

    Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

    The link to Dr. Fetzer's article that PatColo provided was killed.

    the new link to the reposted article is here
    ...http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2018...-truth_26.html...

    The reason I am looking back in to the back thread here is that


    Dr. Fetzer in the lastest article states
    "Jim Fetzer
    malicious prosecution =df a legal action brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has commenced without probable cause and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice"

    That is true. This lawsuit against Alex Jones was brought not only "without probable cause" but glaringly without probable cause. Alex Jones has a record of not being for Sandy Hook truth at all.


    Dr. Fetzer's latest article,

    May 26 2018
    http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2018...-truth_26.html
    jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
    New York Times exemplifies "Post-Truth Era" by Declaring War on Sandy Hook Truth



    consists of a summary of all of the information he has amassed about the facts he and others have established about Sandy Hook.

    But there is no mention of Alex Jones having been one the most wishy washy of all "Alt Right" "truth" alternative media commentators when it comes to saying outright how phony in every way the Sandy Hook incident was. Alex Jones was totally trying to "ride the fence" on this issue and deflect from facts and truth while at the same time sorta kinda saying he was on the same side of Dr. Fetzer and all the others who were plainly saying the event was a giant hoax and saying so from the very beginning. But oh no, not Alex, he was tap dancing and doing his sleight of hand shenanigans at the microphone so that everybody wonders what the heck is his position on Sandy Hook. THAT "sin of omission" by Alex Jones commentary is what makes this defamation lawsuit so very and especially odd and deceptive.

    I seem to recall that this thread showed how Alex Jones took some odd actions and said some sideways things to divorce himself from "nobody died at Sandy Hook" idea which glaringly presented itself to most truth seekers from the beginning.

    Dr. Fetzer appears to be saying in his article...

    If Alex Jones defense lawyers would just contact him for the evidence, he would gladly give it to them and that evidence is so overwhelming that Alex Jones defense team will have no trouble at all winning the lawsuit.

    This is a lawsuit that is never meant to go to trial and is never meant to be won in court. Period.

    So supplying real facts in a real lawsuit is not what is on the agenda here.

    What needs to be pointed out is the oddness of a lawsuit against Alex Jones for defamation against the parents of Sandy Hook because Alex Jones made no defamation kind of comments at all against Sandy Hook parents and deaths of children. Alex Jones was oddly and consistently quiet about Sandy Hook so there must be some other agenda or goal associated with this law suit. It is not a real law suit. The one they are suing, Alex Jones, is very much on the same team that perpetrated the Sandy Hook hoax and many would say Alex Jones is owned and operated by the Sandy Hook perps and the plaintiffs in this phony law suit.

    Those are the facts that I see being skirted or not talked about. Instead we have to just take the lawsuit at face value and react accordingly, as though it was a genuine effort and a valid cause of a lawsuit with a genuine goal of seeking damages. That is what I mean by oddness and phonyness of this law suit.


    Saturday, May 26, 2018
    Neus in this articlew York Times exemplifies "Post-Truth Era" by Declaring War on Sandy Hook Truth

    Jim Fetzer

    [Editor's note: This blog was deleted--no doubt, in my opinion, by the man who calls himself "Lenny Pozner"--for calling The Times to account for the absurdity of its fake news coverage. I will republish it as often as necessary to cope with the Deep State.]

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Dachsie For This Useful Post:

    PatColo (26th May 2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •