Did John Brennan's CIA Create Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks? by Larry C Johnson

[Amanda]

This is interesting...Too bad there isn't any rule of law in this nation--if there was, Brennan would at least be in prison...

Did John Brennan's CIA Create Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks? by Larry C Johnson

https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_...c-johnson.html

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report insists that Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks were created by Russia's military intelligence organization, the GRU, as part of a Russian plot to meddle in the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election. But this is a lie. Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks were created by Brennan's CIA and this action by the CIA should be a target of U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation. Let me explain why.

Let us start with the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment aka ICA. Only three agencies of the 17 in the U.S. intelligence community contributed to and coordinated on the ICA--the FBI, the CIA and NSA. In the preamble to the ICA, you can read the following explanation about methodology:

When Intelligence Community analysts use words such as “we assess” or “we judge,” they are conveying an analytic assessment or judgment

To be clear, the phrase,“We assess”, is intel community jargon for “opinion”. If there was actual evidence or source material for a judgment the writer of the assessment would state, "According to a reliable source" or "knowledgeable source" or "documentary evidence."

Pay close attention to what the analysts writing the ICA stated about the GRU and Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks:

We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

• 
  
  • Guccifer 2.0, who claimed to be an independent Romanian hacker, made multiple contradictory statements and false claims about his likely Russian identity throughout the election. Press reporting suggests more than one person claiming to be Guccifer 2.0 interacted with journalists.
  • Content that we assess was taken from e-mail accounts targeted by the GRU in March 2016 appeared on DCLeaks.com starting in June.
  
  

We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the DNC and senior Democratic officials to WikiLeaks. Moscow most likely chose WikiLeaks because of its self-proclaimed reputation for authenticity. Disclosures through WikiLeaks did not contain any evident forgeries.

Not one piece of corroborating intelligence. It is all based on opinion and strong belief. There was no human source report or electronic intercept pointing to a relationship between the GRU and the two alleged creations of the GRU--Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com.
Now consider the spin that Robert Mueller put on this opinion in his report on possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. Mueller bluffs the unsuspecting reader into believing that it is a proven fact that Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks were Russian assets. But he is relying on a mere opinion from a handpicked group of intel analysts working under the direction of then CIA Director John Brennan.

More on this here:

Will the Central Myth of Russiagate Finally Fall? Increasingly that Looks Possible (except for the fact that the lying jewish MSM will never tell the truth about this--they will never let this Russia hoax die)

https://larouchepac.com/20191221/wil...looks-possible

Former CIA analyst and State Department counterterrorism expert Larry Johnson has produced a piece over at Pat Lang’s blog, asserting the likelihood that the Internet personas, Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks, were created by John Brennan’s CIA. If Johnson is correct, and we don’t have any reason to doubt his account, the entire fabric of Russiagate continues to be blown apart. We now know, thanks to DOJ Inspector General Horowitz, that the MI6’s Steele Dossier was a fabricated hoax. So, the ground is ripe to challenge the second evidentiary peg for Russiagate for which there is, similarly, no actual evidence.

Johnson’s piece arrives twenty four hours after leaks to the New York Times indicated that prosecutor John Durham is now focusing on John Brennan, with CIA cooperation in that investigation, and a piece in The Intercept indicating that former NSA Director Mike Rogers is cooperating with Durham and has met with him several times.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the Intelligence Community’s soon to be infamous Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA for short) opined (and that is what they did since they did not present real evidence) that these personas, a critical piece of the “Russia hacked John Podesta and the DNC narrative,” were created by Russian military intelligence’s GRU. Both Mueller and the ICA attribute the WikiLeaks document trove from the DNC and John Podesta, to a Russian internet hack performed by the GRU.

In his piece, Johnson points out that John Brennan reorganized the CIA in October of 2015 to create a new Division of Digital Innovation. This group immediately produced a program called Vault 7 and associated software called Marble capable of both conducting major cyber intrusions and then obfuscating their origin in such a way as to attribute what were really CIA activities to foreign actors. In the case of the Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks, these obfuscation activities included inserting Cyrillic characters into the code and creating a trail leading to a Russian name which translated to Felix Dzerzhinksy, the infamous founder of the Russian secret police.

Gullible, or entirely complicit, investigators ate up this “clue” without assessing whether a cyber force as capable as the GRU would really leave such a trail. True to the incompetence of Brennan’s CIA minions, both Vault 7 and Marble were hacked and turned over to WikiLeaks which published them in 2017, after trying to negotiate with the U.S. government for the opportunity to tell them the actual source of the 2016 DNC and Podesta documents they published as well as explaining the vulnerabilities which allowed the CIA’s program to be hacked --all in return for immunity for Julian Assange. That negotiation, conducted by high levels of the DOJ was blown up by Senator Mark Warner and FBI Director Comey, which is a separate seditious scandal. And, as most know, Julian Assange is being slowly killed in Belmar Prison in London as he fights extradition to the U.S. based on his indictment for a crime already beyond the statute of limitations

[Stop Making Cents]

Of course that fucking commie committed treason against the constitution. No question about it. Only quesiton is whether anything will be done about it.

[Amanda]

I seriously doubt anything will happen to him.

Swamp doesn't go after swamp.