yes, the energy weapons has no legs. Neither has nukes, mini or otherwise IMO. Missile and or demo combined makes the most sense.
Given Pentagon = no plane wreckage yet obvious high speed impact / explosion (video and aftermath) and Shanksville = no plane wreckage yet obvious high speed explosion (possible impact but not necessarily) and BBC TV horizon footage showing no in bound 2nd craft in one pan and momentarily later 2nd in bound craft having traversed a significant distance across horizon that is not possible given duration of camera pan AND given 2 of 4 impacts (or explosions) were clearly not aircraft why conclude remaining 2 would be different causes?
Multiple B.S. stories. Doesn't matter which one you subscribe to so long as you subscribe to one.
Arguing over the how is time consuming and entangling. Review the material, make a decision and move on. Point new comers to the info you consumed but don't become entangled. Many people you encounter will be agents looking to tie people up in the various what ifs and doubt seeding theories.