Page 28 of 29 FirstFirst ... 1826272829 LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 290

Thread: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

  1. #271
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    FOOTNOTE
    [19] This is why the late “United States” Circuit Judge Richard Posner could make statements like those referenced above in Footnote 3 with impunity: He was not a judicial officer of the government established by the Constitution.

    FOOTNOTE
    [20] “Ubicunque est injuria, ibi damnum sequitur. Wherever there is a wrong, there damage follows.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 2166.

    FOOTNOTE
    [21] “Nemo damnum facit, nisi qui id fecit quod facere jus non habet. No one is considered as doing damage, unless he who is doing what he has no right to do.” Id. at 2146.

    “Nemo est supra leges. No one is above the law.” Id. at 2147.

    FOOTNOTE
    [22] “Income” means gains or profits, not“what comes in,” and in law all three words are synonymous and interchangeable; e.g.:
    [S]ubject only to such exemptions and deductions as are hereinafter allowed, the net income of a taxable person shall include gains, profits, and income derived from . . . Gould v. Gould,245 U.S. 151, 152-153 (1917), quoting 38 Stat. 114, 166, ch. 16, October 3, 1913.

    When one exchanges his life-diminishing labor for money he makes no profit or gain; it is an even exchange. Government allows people to act on the false belief that whatever “comes in” is income and preys on their general ignorance of the true import of the word.

    FOOTNOTE
    [23] Congress say that a citizen of the United States (resident of the District of Columbia) who employs another citizen of the United States (resident of the District of Columbia) must request of said person (citizen of the United States) an identifying number; to wit (Bold and underline emphasis added in all citations in this Footnote 23.):

    Any person required under the authority of this title to make a return, statement or other document with respect to another person shall request from such other person, and shall include in any return, statement, or other document, such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing proper identification of such other person. 26 U.S.C. § 6109(a)(3).

    Internal Revenue regulations—which are written by non-governmental, non-officer of the United States, private-sector businessman Secretary of the Treasury (no congressional statutory requirement to take an oath of office), and whom no one but a resident of the District of Columbia has a legal duty to follow—provides the procedure for an employer who does not know, after having requested it, a new worker’s Social Security Account Number (“SSAN”) (i.e., the new worker did not volunteer one); to wit (Bold and underline and emphasis added.):

    If the person making the return, statement, or other document does not know the taxpayer identifying number of the other person…such person must request the other person’s number. The request should state that the identifying number is required to be furnished under authority of law. When the person making the return, statement, or other document does not know the number of the other person, and has complied with the request provision of this paragraph (c), such person must sign an affidavit on the transmittal document forwarding such returns, statements, or other documents to the Internal Revenue Service so stating. A person required to file a taxpayer identifying number shall correct any errors in such filing when such person’s attention has been drawn to them.” 26 C.F.R. § 301.6109-1(c).

    Congress prescribe the alleged penalty for an employer who first fails to obtain from a new worker a SSAN and thereafter fails to sign and send an affidavit to the IRS:

    In the case of a failure by any person to comply with a specified information reporting requirement on or before the time prescribed therefor, such person shall pay a penalty of $50 for each such failure. . . . 26 U.S.C. § 6723.

    Wherefore, the total alleged potential liability to an employer for failure as aforesaid, if discovered by IRS, is $50 per new worker per Tax Year.

    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Ares (6th July 2018)

  3. #272
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    CITIZEN. . . .
    In American law. One who, under the constitution and laws of the United States, has a right to vote for civil officers, and himself is qualified to fill elective offices.
    Note that you have no right to vote until you have REGISTERED to vote. Therefore a citizen is a result of the action of registration.

  4. #273
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    After several months of silence Dr. Trowbridge has updated his SupremeCourtCase blog

    D.A. presents Petitioner’s criminal complaint on U.S. district judge to grand jury; IRS personnel retreat

    NOVEMBER 19, 2019SUPREMECOURTCASELEAVE A COMMENT
    Since the last post, some significant things have occurred regarding (1) United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil Action No. 17-mc-1557 Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Summons (“Civil Action No. 17-mc-1557”), and (2) IRS collection activities.


    Regarding Civil Action No. 17-mc-1557:




    • August 8, 2018 (15 months ago): Based on the contents of the Demand for Dissolution of this Kangaroo Court and Petitioner’s knowledge of felonious acts, Petitioner swears to a criminal complaint against the U.S. district judge and U.S. magistrate judge in the case, as well as their employer, the District of Columbia(3) and begins the process of getting it accepted by Texas authorities (but does not file it into the case);


    • August 30, 2018 (15 months ago): The judge in Civil Action No. 17-mc-1557 ignores the accuracy and appositeness4 of the contents of the Demand for Dissolution of this Kangaroo Court and unlawfully enters an Order concluding the case;


    • February 21, 2019 (nine months ago): After spending six months submitting, unsuccessfully, the criminal complaint to four different Texas authorities, Petitioner uses the “Official Sworn Complaint of Criminal Misconduct” form provided by the Public Corruption Division (“PCD”) of the Harris County, Texas, District Attorney’s Office, and submits to PCD the criminal complaint for the District Attorney to present to the grand jury;




    • April 2, 2019 (seven months ago): Petitioner does an “Amended Official Sworn Complaint of Criminal Misconduct” (the “Amended PCD Form”) and amends the criminal complaint (the “Amended Criminal Complaint”) so as to include only the subject U.S. district judge as a defendant and submits the Amended PCD Form and Amended Criminal Complaint to the PCD for presentment to the grand jury; and



    Regarding IRS collection activities:




    • April 30, 2018 (19 months ago): In response the above IRS Forms CP504, Petitioner sends IRS this IRS Form 9423 Collection Appeal Request and attached Notice and Warning of Commercial Grace—the subject matter of which is the (a) unlawfulness (for the same reasons delineated in the above criminal complaint) of the judge’s order which purportedly warrants seizure of Petitioner’s property, and (b) commercial, civil, and criminal penalties which will be enforced against any IRS personnel who seeks to levy / seize Petitioner’s property—the result of which is that no levy / seizure of Petitioner’s property occurs;




    • October 24, 2018 (13 months ago): Petitioner responds to the above September 25, 2018, letter (as prescribed therein in the second bulleted item at the top of page 2) from the IRS executive with this devastating October 24, 2018, Formal Protest and receives no further communication from IRS on the matter.




      1. kangaroo court. 1. A self-appointed tribunal or mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded, perverted, or parodied. . . . 2. A court or tribunal characterized by unauthorized or irregular procedures, esp. so as to render a fair proceeding impossible. 3. A sham legal proceeding.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed., Bryan A. Garner, ed. in chief (West Group: St. Paul, Minn., 1999), 359 (s.v. “Court”).NOTE: The greatest insult to a justice or judge is that his court is a kangaroo court.
      2. blackletter law. One or more legal principles that are old, fundamental, and well settled. ● The term refers to the law printed in books set in Gothic type, which is very bold and black. — Also termed hornbook law. Id. at 163.
      3. The District of Columbia is a municipal corporation (incorporated February 21, 1871), also known as and doing business as United States, in turn also known as and doing business as United States of America.
      4. appositeness: the quality or state of being highly pertinent or appropriate.


    SHARE THIS:





    Related

    IRS attacks non-judicially; Petitioner punctures purported authority for said attack, issues warning to IRSReblogged by 2 people
    Fatal defect in every federal case since March 1, 1991; all such decisions and judgments void
    Docket and record, Houston and Lufkin Division Federal tax cases.Reblogged by 2 people


    Post navigation








    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Ares (20th November 2019),Bigjon (19th November 2019)

  6. #274
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    This letter rebuts thoroughly the IRS agent’s demands

    https://supremecourtcase.files.wordp...al-protest.pdf
    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Ares (10th December 2019)

  8. #275
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Dr. John Parks Trowbridge Jr. has set up a mirror site as insurance should Wordpress memory hole his original site.

    Alternate website for this blog

    FEBRUARY 12, 2020SUPREMECOURTCASELEAVE A COMMENTS

    Should
    this WordPress.com blog ever become unavailable, you can access the exact same posts at this mirrored website: https://supremecourtcase.net.

    Please visit this alternate website and bookmark it.

    SHARE THIS:











    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Ares (18th February 2020),midnight rambler (18th February 2020)

  10. #276
    Bitcoin Miner Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,827
    Thanks
    6,609
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 4,306 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    Dr. John Parks Trowbridge Jr. has set up a mirror site as insurance should Wordpress memory hole his original site.

    Alternate website for this blog

    FEBRUARY 12, 2020SUPREMECOURTCASELEAVE A COMMENTS

    Should
    this WordPress.com blog ever become unavailable, you can access the exact same posts at this mirrored website: https://supremecourtcase.net.

    Please visit this alternate website and bookmark it.

    SHARE THIS:











    That was something I was actually worried about due to all of the De-platforming here lately for views and facts outside of the controlled narrative.
    "Paper is poverty, it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself." --Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1788
    "The greatest threat to the state is when the people figure out they can exist without them." - Twisted Titan
    "Some Libertarians are born, the government makes the rest."
    "Voting is nothing more than a slaves suggestion box, voting on a new master every few years does not make you free."

  11. #277
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Update from Dr. Trowbridge April 12 Easter Sunday


    Remedy for any assault / attack from any government officer

    APRIL 12, 2020SUPREMECOURTCASELEAVE A COMMENT
    If
    you have not done so already, please immediately bookmark this alternate, mirrored website:

    https://www.supremecourtcase.net

    Authority for the posting of the within Remedy:
    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Section 2.
    No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; . . . Fifth Article of Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Click here for a copy of the Constitution.

    This post introduces a Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace for your personal use against unconstitutional assault / attack from government officers.

    There are two hyperlinked PDF versions of the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace below: one with blank lines, to be filled in with your information, and another that shows exactly what information goes on which blank lines.

    You can print out and sign and present the below instrument to any government officer who confronts you and seeks to (1) deprive you of your unalienable Right Liberty without due process of law (constitutional authority), or (2) direct the disposition of your body or the body of your child / children without your consent or against your will (please note that your initials need to go in the footer of the instrument).

    Ideally one would retype the instrument and fill in all his personal information before printing, signing, and transmitting, but this is not a requirement.

    The Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace is a very sobering instrument that can get a government officer to come to his senses and decide to abandon his assault / attack on you or your family.

    This instrument is a last-measure of protection before you must either submit and comply with any and all demands made of you or decide to apply force in self-defense.

    It is recommended that you give out these links to your friends and family verbally over the phone (rather than by text or email): https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com and https://www.supremecourtcase.net.

    Click on the hyperlinks below to open the PDFs of the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace.

    Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace (with blank lines to be filled in)

    Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace (with blank lines filled in)

    NOTE: A second instrument—directed at the issuer of the Order (governor of your state or mayor of your city)—upon which alleged authority all state / county / city officers are acting, will be added to this post later today, April 12, 2020. Instructions for that second instrument will be provided at that time.




    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  12. The Following User Says Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    midnight rambler (12th April 2020)

  13. #278
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    Update from Dr. Trowbridge April 12 Easter Sunday


    Remedy for any assault / attack from any government officer

    APRIL 12, 2020SUPREMECOURTCASELEAVE A COMMENT
    If
    you have not done so already, please immediately bookmark this alternate, mirrored website:

    https://www.supremecourtcase.net

    Authority for the posting of the within Remedy:
    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Section 2.
    No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; . . . Fifth Article of Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Click here for a copy of the Constitution.

    This post introduces a Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace for your personal use against unconstitutional assault / attack from government officers.

    There are two hyperlinked PDF versions of the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace below: one with blank lines, to be filled in with your information, and another that shows exactly what information goes on which blank lines.

    You can print out and sign and present the below instrument to any government officer who confronts you and seeks to (1) deprive you of your unalienable Right Liberty without due process of law (constitutional authority), or (2) direct the disposition of your body or the body of your child / children without your consent or against your will (please note that your initials need to go in the footer of the instrument).

    Ideally one would retype the instrument and fill in all his personal information before printing, signing, and transmitting, but this is not a requirement.

    The Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace is a very sobering instrument that can get a government officer to come to his senses and decide to abandon his assault / attack on you or your family.

    This instrument is a last-measure of protection before you must either submit and comply with any and all demands made of you or decide to apply force in self-defense.

    It is recommended that you give out these links to your friends and family verbally over the phone (rather than by text or email): https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com and https://www.supremecourtcase.net.

    Click on the hyperlinks below to open the PDFs of the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace.

    Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace (with blank lines to be filled in)

    Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace (with blank lines filled in)

    NOTE: A second instrument—directed at the issuer of the Order (governor of your state or mayor of your city)—upon which alleged authority all state / county / city officers are acting, will be added to this post later today, April 12, 2020. Instructions for that second instrument will be provided at that time.




    If the asset forfeiture road pirates are served with the Demand, Notice and Warning of Commercial Grace under the UCC I suppose they will gladly return the loot once they realize their bond, hime and pension plan may all be seized if they fail to comply.
    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    midnight rambler (12th April 2020)

  15. #279
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Generally these folks don't see the need for a bond. And they work for the guy with the oath. They typically avoid all oaths themselves. As to seizing pensions and homes they have neither. Instead they have uses and USUFRUCTS rather than ownership. They don't believe ownership has any value and if questioned they would be astounded if you thought you owned anything. If they misbehave the state that allows them to operate in their de facto capacity can be billed through their liability insurance carrier where the claim may (will) be subjected to insurance fraud review.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to ziero0 For This Useful Post:

    midnight rambler (12th April 2020)

  17. #280
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Generally these folks don't see the need for a bond. And they work for the guy with the oath. They typically avoid all oaths themselves. As to seizing pensions and homes they have neither. Instead they have uses and USUFRUCTS rather than ownership. They don't believe ownership has any value and if questioned they would be astounded if you thought you owned anything. If they misbehave the state that allows them to operate in their de facto capacity can be billed through their liability insurance carrier where the claim may (will) be subjected to insurance fraud review.
    I was waiting for you to respond. Thanks
    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •