Page 29 of 29 FirstFirst ... 19272829
Results 281 to 290 of 290

Thread: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

  1. #281
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    I was waiting for you to respond. Thanks
    . Ziero0's 2nd law: It's not actually a remedy if all you get is an apology.

  2. #282
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,582
    Thanks
    5,071
    Thanked 4,815 Times in 2,260 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    . Ziero0's 2nd law: It's not actually a remedy if all you get is an apology.
    I guess an apology and a check might make a partial remedy. It is just a shame that individual enforcers are not held pesonally liable for their actions. Somehow, we the people seem to pay the bill.
    Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty." – Socrates


    "Communism can be summed up in one sentence: The abolition of private property." ---Karl Marx

    "Either you have the right to own property, or you are property." Wayne Hage

  3. #283
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by woodman View Post
    Somehow, we the people seem to pay the bill.
    That happens to the principal when the agent is a loose cannon. That is why I appoint my agent(s) rather than vote for them.

  4. #284
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Second April 12, 2020 update
    Lawful Remedy for any alleged shelter-at-home order issued because of COVID-19

    APRIL 12, 2020SUPREMECOURTCASELEAVE A COMMENT

    If you have not done so already, please bookmark this alternate, mirrored website:

    https://www.supremecourtcase.net

    There are three sections in this blog:

    1. Remedy for assault / attack from a government officer seeking to enforce an alleged executive order because of COVID-19 and deprive you of your unalienable and constitutional Right to Liberty without due process of law, i.e., law according to the Constitution;



    1. Remedy for any government official, such as a governor or mayor, issuing an alleged executive order commanding you to stay at home because of COVID-19; and



    1. A conclusion.


    Authority for the posting of the above Remedies is:
    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Section 2.
    No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; . . . Fifth Article of Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Click here for a copy of the Constitution.

    Remedy 1.Assault / attack from a government officer.
    Below is (1) a hyperlinked PDF of a Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace with blank lines, to be filled in with your information, and (2) a second that shows exactly what information goes in the blank lines in the former.

    You can print out and sign and present the below instrument to any government officer who seeks to (1) enforce any alleged executive order, or (2) direct the disposition of your body or the body of your child / children without your consent or against your will, and thereby deprive you of your unalienable Right Liberty, without due process of law, i.e., law according to the Constitution.

    Ideally one would retype the instrument and fill in all his personal information before printing, signing, and transmitting, but this is not a requirement.

    The Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace is a very sobering instrument that can get a government officer to come to his senses and decide to abandon his unlawful, unconstitutional assault / attack on you or your family.

    This instrument is a last-measure of protection before you must decide either to submit and comply with the demands made of you or apply force in self-defense.

    The United States Supreme Court decisions cited in Footnote 1 all echo the same thing:
    The Constitution must have given an executive or judicial officer the capacity to take jurisdiction before he can do so and perform any act related to his office.

    With respect to the aforementioned well-established principle of American jurisprudence: There is no provision of the Constitution that gives any executive officer the capacity to take jurisdiction anywhere in the Union and deprive any American of the unalienable and constitutional Right to Liberty without due process of law, i.e., law according to the Constitution.

    All alleged executive orders purporting to take personal jurisdiction over you or your body or that of any family member of yours without due process of law is void for lack of constitutional authority.

    What to do.
    Should a government officer threaten to impose his will on you or any member of your family and enforce an alleged executive order issued because of COVID-19, simply hand him the signed Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace, inform him that he has been given Legal Notice, and note the time and date and his name and the name of any witnesses to you giving the officer Legal Notice.

    Following this, if the government officer does not withdraw and cease his assault / attack on you, you have a choice to make: Whether to submit to the unlawful, unconstitutional order or defend yourself. These are personal choices only you can make.

    Notwithstanding whatever choice you may make, however: If the government officer attempts to enforce an unlawful, unconstitutional alleged executive order against you, he and any accomplice and his principal (the governor or mayor) is liable for life-changing penalties as set forth in the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace.

    You are encouraged to give out these links to everyone you know—but please do so verbally over the phone (and not by text or email):

    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com

    https://www.supremecourtcase.net

    Click on the below-hyperlinked documents to open each PDF version of the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace:
    Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace (blank lines to be filled in)

    Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace (blank lines filled in)

    A good idea would be to keep several signed originals of the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace with you and in your car, for quick access.
    Remedy 2.
    Formal demand of governor / mayor for unlawful, unconstitutional order.
    The Remedy for any unlawful, unconstitutional alleged executive order issued by a governor or mayor because of COVID-19 is also a Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace.

    As with the previous Remedy, there are two PDFs of the same Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace: one with blank lines to be filled in by you and the other with the needed information customized for the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

    1 – Governor’s Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commerical Grace (lines needed to be filled in)

    1 – Governor’s Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commerical Grace (lines filled in)

    Click here for the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s alleged Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s alleged executive order of April 1, 2020.

    Just customize your Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace to your circumstances

    Download and print the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace and either (1) customize it to your address, county, and state and Full True Name and sign, or (2) type out the whole thing on your computer and customize and personalize it to yourself and print and sign.

    Go online and find a PDF version of the alleged COVID-19 executive order applicable to your city or state, download it, and print it out and include it with your Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace.

    Once you have printed and signed your Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace going to the governor / mayor: Immediately Fax both it and the copy of the alleged executive order issued by the governor or mayor to the Fax number listed online for the governor / mayor’s office and retain proof of transmission of the Fax.

    Thereafter, at your earliest opportunity, go to the Post Office and mail your Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace and copy of the alleged executive order by USPS Priority Mail to the appropriate governor or mayor or both and get a receipt and USPS Tracking Number from the postal clerk.

    Keep your original receipt in a safe place, if ever needed.

    In a couple of days, go to USPS.gov and download Proof of Delivery of your USPS Priority Mail envelope and make several copies of the Proof of Delivery.

    It would be wise to keep several originals of your Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Graceto the governor / mayor and proof that you mailed it.
    Conclusion.
    The only law protecting your unalienable Rights to “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”[1]is the Constitution and the only thing holding the Constitution in place is the Second Article of Amendment thereto and your willingness to support and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

    Thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or, ideally, millions of Americans need to make this Demand of their respective governor or mayor.

    There is no penalty listed in the Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace that is not enforceable against any governor, mayor, or other government officer; all are liable.

    Bookmark and check back with one or both of the below webpages from time to time for developments:
    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com

    https://www.supremecourtcase.net.

    [1]Rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are equivalent to the rights of life, liberty, and property. . . . Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 116 (1872).




    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Ares (13th April 2020),midnight rambler (12th April 2020)

  6. #285
    Bitcoin Miner Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,828
    Thanks
    6,610
    Thanked 8,813 Times in 4,307 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Good info, thanks for posting it Monty.
    "Paper is poverty, it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself." --Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1788
    "The greatest threat to the state is when the people figure out they can exist without them." - Twisted Titan
    "Some Libertarians are born, the government makes the rest."
    "Voting is nothing more than a slaves suggestion box, voting on a new master every few years does not make you free."

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Ares For This Useful Post:

    monty (13th April 2020)

  8. #286
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Dr. Trowbridge managed to get the DOJ out of his life. But this Texas family wasn’t so lucky

    If the family has owned the property since 1760 title might have been granted to them from Spain.
    More historical Texas information here: ​https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/spanish-texas
    Other significant legacies can be found in language and law. Spanish is a second language for millions of Texans; for an increasing number it is their first. Although much of the linguistic makeup of the state is the result of Mexican influence, Spanish—not English, German, French, or Dutch—was the first European language spoken there. The lasting impact of Spanish jurisprudence is likewise of vital importance. Significant colonial practices survived to become a permanent part of Texas’s body of law, particularly in rules of judicial procedure, land ownership and water rights, family relations, and women’s rights. As examples, modern Texans owe Spanish precedent for the practice of adoption, protection of essential personal property from creditors, and the concept of community property.
    Texas land patents are probably different than those of the rest of the USA because first Texas was a Spanish colony then later part of Mexico and much of the land was granted to Mexican Citizens by the Mexican government like they did in California (some grants were huge like Rancho San Rafael) then being an independent republic and later voluntarily joining the union of United States.

    If this case is appealed and eventually gets Supreme Court and if SCOTUS takes it will they honor the patents?

    I don’t believe that U.S.A. Inc. needed to consficate the entire ranch to put a border fence when an easement on the border would have been sufficient.

    Biden DOJ Wins Lawsuit to Seize 260-Year-Old Texas Ranch Along Border

    Bob Price15 Apr 2021

    https://media.breitbart.com/media/20...X-Photo-BP.jpg
    File Photo: Bob Price/Breitbart Texas 2:57

    The Biden Administration took control of a Texas rancher’s border land on Wednesday. The action followed a victory by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas against the family which has owned the land since 1760.

    Texas rancher Fred Cavazon has been fighting to keep control of his 6.584 acre ranch along the Texas-Mexico border since the administration of then-President George W. Bush. The fight continued during the Trump administration, Law & Crime reported.

    That fight came to an abrupt conclusion on April 12 with U.S. District Court Judge Micaela Alvarez awarded the federal government control of the land. Two days later, the Biden Administration took possession of the acreage.

    In August 2020, then-candidate Joe Biden told reporters he would end all lawsuits seeking control of land along the Mexican border to be used to build border walls, the legal blog reported.

    “End it,” Biden said in an interview with NPR’s Lula Garcia-Navarro. “End it. End. End. Stop. Done. Over. Not gonna do it. Withdraw the lawsuits. We’re out. We’re not gonna confiscate the land.”

    The Biden Department of Justice took over the lawsuit in January 2021.
    Law & Crime reported:
    The government still wanted that land condemned. The Cavazos family and their attorneys had hoped the 46th president would stand by his August 2020 words and stop fighting in court for Trump’s border wall. But Biden didn’t do that. The lawsuits were not withdrawn.

    Citing the government’s need for “urgency of possession,” the district court held that the Biden administration “is entitled to immediate possession of the Subject Property.”

    “All pending border wall cases should have immediately been put on hold and not left open for judges to follow through on requests made months earlier,” American Immigration Council Aaron Reichlin-Melnick tweeted.

    “We took him at his word,” family member Reynaldo Anzaldua Cavazos told The Washington Post. “He is not keeping that word.”

    The family’s claim on the land is older than the United States of America. The property claim dates back to 1760, the Post stated.

    The Biden Administration appears to have no comment on the legal victory and seizure of the Texas rancher’s land.

    Case number 7:20-cv-00244 completed in the U.S. Southern District Court of Texas, McAllen Division.

    Bob Price serves as associate editor and senior news contributor for the Breitbart Texas-Border team.
    He is an original member of the Breitbart Texas team.
    Price is a regular panelist on Fox 26 Houston’s
    What’s Your Point? Sunday-morning talk show.
    Follow him on Twitter @BobPriceBBTX and Facebook.





    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  9. #287
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Was the land taken within the EXTERIOR boundary of the State or the INTERIOR boundary? If a Spanish land grant then the land was never within Texas or the U.S. of A. In this condition neither Texas nor the Supreme Court has any say. Best complain to the Spanish crown.

  10. #288
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Was the land taken within the EXTERIOR boundary of the State or the INTERIOR boundary? If a Spanish land grant then the land was never within Texas or the U.S. of A. In this condition neither Texas nor the Supreme Court has any say. Best complain to the Spanish crown.
    I had thought about that and considered perhaps the Spanish titles passed on to Mexico and then to Texas by way of treaties.

    There was, maybe sitll there, a lady lawyer in Texas who was in the business of researching the old land grants from the Mexican government to Mexican citizens living in what is now Texas. She was assisting her clientele in verification of chain of title.
    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  11. #289
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,940
    Thanks
    7,785
    Thanked 8,331 Times in 5,107 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Was the land taken within the EXTERIOR boundary of the State or the INTERIOR boundary? If a Spanish land grant then the land was never within Texas or the U.S. of A. In this condition neither Texas nor the Supreme Court has any say. Best complain to the Spanish crown.
    If that family has had title to that land since before Mexico, The Republic of Texas or the U.S. of A. existed you may be correct. How can the Southern District of Texas take a way private property from a citizen of the State of Texas? Their jurisdiction is supposedly coexistent with that of Congress. Eminent domain an international border?
    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  12. #290
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    If that family has had title to that land since before Mexico, The Republic of Texas or the U.S. of A. existed you may be correct. How can the Southern District of Texas take a way private property from a citizen of the State of Texas? Their jurisdiction is supposedly coexistent with that of Congress. Eminent domain an international border?
    Duty is derived from oath or contract. Pull up the guys voter registration card and everything he thought he owns attaches to the State of Texas and/or the U.S. of A.

    Believe it or not the government never takes something that doesn't belong to them. However frequently people don't realize what they sacrifice for a worthless benefit (or $24 in beads or baubles).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •