Jews, the children of Satan

[Tumbleweed]

What world famous men have said about the Jews. This video is long but speaks the truth from start to finish.

[Tumbleweed]

From the comments below the video above that tell us who the Jews are and who the real Israelites are.

The Marks of Israel In the story of Abram, Genesis 12-15 deals with the exploits of Abram and Lot and their travels through the lands of the Canaanites and Egypt. Three covenants are made, two prophetic and one contemporary, within Chapter 15.Verse 5 states: "And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be."


Verses 13 and 14 say: "And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years. And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance."


Verse 18 says: "In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:"


God chose to give that land to Abram at that time. But Verses 13 and 14 give a hint of future bondage for a period of 400 hundred years. Verses 5, 13 and 14, and literally scores of other verses can be adduced as being pertinent to the future trials and exploits of Abraham's seed. Exodus 13:40 states that the tribes stayed in Egypt for a total of 430 years. It is possible that a formal state of bondage began after the 30th year and lasted for the remaining 400 years. The probable date of entry into Egypt was 1710 B.C. and the probable date of the exodus was 1280 B.C., during the reign of Rameses II (circa 1224 B.C.). See These Were God's People, A Bible History by William C. Martin.


Who are God’s people? The Jews claim that they are; and they possess an exclusivist culture that finds its basis in various biblical claims, such as being descended from the tribes of Israel. They also claim that their religion, Judaism, is the same religion that was dictated to Moses by God. They claim to be the originators of monotheism and they claim to be the custodians of the religion of Moses. The point of this article is to show that these claims are false and easily disproved by a simple study of Scripture.


To understand the difference between Israelites and Jews, an analysis of the Marks of Israel must be made. In order to understand the clear Biblical distinctions between Abraham's seed through the line of Jacob/Israel versus Abraham’s seed through the line of Esau/Edom, we must understand the divergence of both the posterity and the history of these two distinct groups of people. The people who are today known as Jews derive both their heritage and their genetic composition not from Jacob/Israel but from Esau/Edom. Contrary to the wishes of his parents, and contrary to Yahweh’s Law against race-mixing, Esau “despised his birthright” by marrying into a Canaanite clan known as the Hittites. “And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and Rebekah.” (Gen. 26:34,35.)


This, despite Isaac’s warning: “Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.” -- Gen. 28:1. In other words, Esau became a race traitor. He joined the enemy. The Jews acknowledge their Edomite heritage in many of their in-house writings; but they do not admit this in their public proclamations for fear that True Israel might catch on to their charade. “Edom is in modern Jewry.”— Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, Vol. 5, p41.
Jacob’s mother, Rebekah, even went so far as to say that her life will have been in vain if her other son, Jacob, follows in the footsteps of the race-traitor, Esau. “And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth [Esau’s Hittite/Canaanite wives]: if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?” (Gen. 27:46.) (In other words, dear men of Israel, DO NOT MARRY OUTSIDE YOUR RACE!) Since Esau was the grandson of Abraham, his offspring can claim descent from Abraham; however, that is the end of their genetic and social relationship with Abraham.

Once Esau despised his birthright, he became a stranger, producing non-Abrahamic offspring among the Hittites and other Canaanites. Just look at a typical Jew and see the marks of the various racial strains that have been mixed into his blood. They are all mamzers (mixed race children)! “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them.” (Isa. 3:9.) They are the physical evidence of the Jewish violation of the Law against intermarriage! How much more evidence do you need?


In my previous JDP Newsletter, The Enmity, Part 1: The Two Bloodlines, I delineated the separate and distinct family trees of the Edomites of Esau’s seed and the Israelites of Jacob’s seed. If these two seedlines are indeed separate and distinct, then both biblical prophecy and history will demonstrate this distinction. The study of the Marks of Israel is the study of these prophecies and the related history. Isaac and his wife Rebekah disowned Esau and embraced Jacob for the clear reasons stated in Genesis, Chapters 24 through 28. (Please take some time out of your busy life and read these chapters so you will understand Yahweh’s displeasure in race-mixing.) From the day when Esau despised his birthright, both the Bible and secular history tell of these two antagonistic nations, as a continuing fulfillment of the Enmity as stated in Genesis 3:15.


Genesis 3:15 is the very first prophetic statement contained in the Bible. In order to emphasize the point, Paul, reiterating Yahweh’s words, in Romans 9:13, states, “Jacob have I loved; Esau I have hated.” The fact is that the prophecies regarding the children of Israel have been fulfilled only by the Jacob/Israel branch of Abraham’s seed. The prophecies concerning the children of Esau have been fulfilled only by the mixed seed of Esau/Edom, today known as Jews. (Read the Book of Obadiah to get a real eye-opening serving of Yahweh’s displeasure with Esau and his descendants.) These prophetic Marks must be analyzed; and it must be shown that the prophetic statements made by God with regard to Israel's descendants cannot have been and were not, in fact, fulfilled by the Jews.


Here follows a list of the identifying Marks as they occur in the Bible. Some will be quoted in their entirety and others will be merely adduced for the reader's own reference. The references are too numerous to be given individual treatment.
The passages referred to as the Marks of Israel are those which are the most obvious references concerning the fate of a distinct group of people. That group of people is the Israelites, but the promises made to Abraham apply to Israel because Israel is a direct descendant and because the promises (covenants) were distinctly remade to Israel.


Already quoted above were Genesis 12:2,3 ("I will make of thee a great nation."), Gen. 15:5, regarding Abram's innumerable offspring, and Genesis 15:13, regarding the four hundred year period of bondage.


The general nature of God's promise to Abraham is given in Genesis 17:2-6. "And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly. And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying, As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations. Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee."


Some very specific promises have been made in this passage. By looking at this small collection alone, we can already see that none of these prophecies have come to pass with regard to that group of people known as Jews. The Jews claim to be the only heirs of the promises made to Abraham, saying that the Lost Ten Tribes have been destroyed, never to be heard from again. The Jews cannot be said to have ever been known as "many nations", unless a case can be made for the internationally scattered ghettoes as "nations".


Also, they have always been a minority within the nations where they have lived. In their modern history, they have had only two nations of their own: 1.) The nation that the Idumeans, through Antipater and his son, Herod, stole from the Tribe of Judah in 150 B.C., and 2.) the so-called State of Israel. Because the Twelve Tribes of Israel were divorced by Yahweh and exiled into the wilderness starting in 745 B.C., True Israel did indeed become lost; but, as you will see, WE’RE BACK!Neither have the Jews multiplied exceedingly. Even today, their numbers, compared to other races and nationalities are very small. Nor can it be said that any number of kings have come from the ranks of the Jews. The Judahite Kings who remained in the land of Judah until the usurpation by Herod were all pure-blooded Davidic Judahites, not Jews. Remember, the Jews pretend to be Judahites, hence their anachronistic use of the word ‘Jew’ falsely applied to Judah.


To add to our list of the Marks of Israel, we will cite first the nature of the Mark and the Scriptural references, which say it either explicitly or in similar words.“And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to wife…and Rebekah his wife conceived. And the children struggled together within her [Ouch! – Eli]; and she said,…Why am I thus?…And Yahweh said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels…” -- Genesis 25:20-26.

[Tumbleweed]

The continuation of the comments above

Here is wisdom: Regarding the descendants of Adam, Seth, Heber, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel), as distinct from the descendants of Esau: The Biblical Marks of Israel


1.) The throne of David to be perpetuated forever. (The last king the Jews can lay claim to is Herod Agrippa II. This Edomite/Jewish dynasty consisted of only four kings: Herod the Great, 73 B.C – 1 B.C., Herod Antipas, 1 B.C. – 39 A.D., Herod Agrippa I, 39 – 44, Herod Agrippa II, 44 – 70 A.D.); II Sam. 7:13; I Chron. 22:10; Psa. 89:35-37; Jer. 33:17,20; Gen. 49:10. In contrast, True Israel (the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, and Caucasian peoples) can demonstrate that the ongoing dynasties of monarchic Europe, including the present British monarchy, are directly descended from King David. Charts showing these lines of descent are available from the various British Israel organizations in America, Canada and Britain. The Jews can demonstrate no such heritage.


2.) "A great nation and a company of nations." Genesis 17:4,5,15,16; 18:18; 35:11; 46:2-3; 48:4,19. A nation is defined as a country inhabited by a certain group of people having specific laws and customs. Throughout history the Jews have lived within the national boundaries of other nations, preferring to live in ghettoes or other small groups where their rabbis can keep close tabs on them. From these ghettoes have arisen numerous secretive enclaves conspiring against the very thrones of the Davidic dynasties. Through this parasitic practice of establishing a secretive State Within a State, the Jews have been successful in stealing our nations from us. Marrano Spain is a perfect example. Britain was stolen away from the British people by the House of Rothschild; and now America has been stolen away from us by the Edomites of the Federal Reserve System and the Neocons. The State of Israel is, in fact, the only nation the Jews have ever had; and even this nation was stolen from the Palestinian people and is parasitic in that it relies totally on outside funding for its existence. Pertinent question: Since the Israeli State is not self-sufficient, does it count as a “nation”?

Within Anglo-Saxon Israel, we have three solid representatives of a “company of nations.” These are the British Commonwealth, the Canadian Provinces and the United States of America. The Jews have never had a company of nations.

3.) "A multitudinous seed." Genesis 13:16; 15:5; 22:17; 24:60; 26:4,24; 28:3,14; 32:12; 49:22; Isaiah 10:22; Hosea 1:10; Zechariah 10:7,8. The Jews have always been one of the smallest ethnic population groups. This is still true today. Compare their population to that of the White Christian nations, True Israel.

4.) A leading nation in the world Genesis 27:29; 28:13; Deuteronomy 2:25; 4:8; 7:6; 28:10; Isaiah 43:4; 60:10,12; Jeremiah 31:7. The Israeli State can only be considered a “leading nation” to the extent that the American taxpayer allows it to exist. Certainly, no “great nation”, an alternate meaning, would have to depend on someone else’s money to survive.

5.) A mighty seagoing people Numbers 24:7; Deut. 33:19; Psalms 89:25; Isaiah 60:5. (No chance here for the Jews!)

6.) Israel to have a new language Isaiah 28:11. (The Jews have tried to preserve Hebrew – at least their corrupt version of it -- to this day. This is part of their ongoing cloak of masquerade as Israel.) We Israelites have a new language: English.

7.) Israel to be known by another name. (The Jews still claim the old name, Israel, for themselves.) Isaiah 62:2; 65:15. We are now known as Anglo-Saxons, WASP’s, Caucasians, Christians…take your pick.

8.) Israel to forget its identity as the Covenant people. (NOTE: The Jews have an unbroken historical claim on the promises bestowed upon Abraham's seed; thus, they never could have had the collective amnesia which Scripture says would befall Israel.) Isa. 29:10-12; 42:16,19,20; Hos. 2:1-8; Romans 11:7,8,25. Er, excuse me, Mr. and Mrs. Anglo-Saxon, would you please wake up to your true identity? It is essential that you know who you are if you want to be part of God’s Kingdom.

9.) Israel to be hidden because of its loss of identity Psa. 83:3; Isa. 49:2; Matthew 13:44. The Jews were never hidden. Indigenous populations (host countries) were always aware of their presence and their pretentious claim to being “Israel”. Throughout history, the Jews have made themselves so unwelcome that they have been expelled from virtually every nation that had the misfortune of letting them in. The Jews have always stuck out like a sore thumb.

10.) Israel to have a new covenant (a reference to the Last Supper Covenant) – Jer. 31:31-33. Daniel, Chapter 12. (The Jews deny that this prophecy was fulfilled by the Messiah.) Hebrews 8:10-13; 9:15-17; Luke 1:77; 2:32; 22:20; John 11:49-52; Galatians 3:13. (The Jews still claim to adhere to the Old Covenant (Torah). Just witness their eye-for-an-eye treatment of the Palestinians as opposed to the Christian concept of forgiveness.)

11.) Israel will remember its identity just before the last days Ezekiel 39:7,22-29; Hosea 3:5. (We are returning to Yahweh and have rediscovered our Davidic heritage!) This prophecy is highly significant for us today, especially since we are awakening to our true Identity at this very moment!

12.) A people who would recognize the Messiah. (The Jews, of course, did not and still do not.) – Daniel, Chapter 12 (the 70 Weeks prophecy), Acts 5:27-33; Romans 11:26,27.

13.) A missionary people. (The Jews have historically kept to themselves and have not tried, since the time of the conversion of the Khazars (around 800 A.D.), to convert others to the exclusive faith of "the chosen people". The only exception to this rule is when they convert people who can be very useful, either financially or politically, to their subversive causes). Gen. 22:18; 28:14; Isa. 43:10-12,21; 66:19; Micah 5:7.

14.) Israel to be kind to other people and set slaves free Deut. 15:11-15; Psa. 72:4; Isa. 42:7; 49:9; 58:6. (Actually two Marks in one!)

It was Anglo-Saxon Christianity which set the slaves free. Here, the Jews fail again, as the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers were the financial agents of the international slave trade up until the Civil War, at which time they supported both the North and the South. Judah P. Benjamin was their highly placed agent in the Confederate government. Even today, the State of Israel has been condemned for its tolerance of white female slaves used for prostitution. According to Christopher Bollyn in the Aug. 20, 2001 issue of the American Free Press, “Israel” is one of the top trafficking nations in the world: “The Trafficking Act calls for economic sanctions in 2003 against those countries that fail to act against traffickers. If Israel fails to take significant steps to end the slave trade it could face sanctions...Estimates range between 2,000 and 3,000 women and children being trafficked into Israel each year, 95 percent of them coming from the collapsed economies of the former Soviet Union. Although most are older, children as young as 12 are also involved.”) Still think the Jews are “God’s Chosen”? I think they work for the other guy. What’s his name, Satan?

15.) Possessing the gates of her enemies Gen. 22:17; Gen. 24:60. The Jews have never had a great military. The one they possess now is courtesy of the extortion extracted from the German people due to the hoaxacaust propaganda and courtesy of the U.S. Taxpayer.

16.) To colonize the world Gen. 28:14; 49:22; Deut. 33:17; Psa. 2:8; Isa. 26:15; 27:6; 54:2,3; Micah 5:7-8. Zech. 10:8,9. The Anglo-Saxons, again, have colonized the world. The Jews have merely followed us wherever we went in order to take advantage of our prosperity. (This is an especially strong fulfillment of Genesis 3:15, which tells us that “It [meaning Adam and Eve’s pure seed] shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his [the seed of Adam and Eve] heel.” Wherever Jacob/Israel has traveled, the Jews have been nipping at our heels. Their head was crushed once by General Titus, a Roman descended from Israelite stock. They recovered from that experience – Serpents don’t give up easily! – only to come back for more. Just wait until the Judgment Day! The proud head of the tares is sticking very high. “Pride comes before a fall.”)

17.) They shall make deserts blossom, an agricultural people. (The Jews are not known for their agricultural talents. A Jewish farmer is virtually unheard of except on an Israeli kibbutz. The Zionist claim to having made the desert bloom is mere propaganda. The Jewish tour guides who make this claim in front of Christian tourists in “Israel” must have a great belly-laugh every time the Christians swallow this joke. The Palestinians have always had rich groves and orchards in Palestine. The Jews have not increased the production of agriculture one whit. Mark Twain, as part of his world-wide travelogue tour a century before the Zionists invaded Palestine, wrote an excellent account of his trip to Palestine in which he describes the beautiful agricultural conditions there). Gen. 27:28; Deut. 8:7,9; 28:11; 33:13,14,28; Isa. 35:1-2 (“The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them.”); 43:19; 58:11,12. Historically, the Jews have never produced farm products at all. It has always been the Anglo-Saxons. Anglo-Saxon farmers have literally fed the world. The “holy” book of the rabbis, the Talmud, says, “No occupation is inferior to that of agricultural labor.” (Yeb 63a., Exh. 161.) Have you ever met a Jewish farmer? – even in “Israel”?

Because Cain murdered Abel, God said to him: “When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield to you her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.” – Gen. 4:12. This seventeenth Mark is especially damning of the descendants of Cain because Abel’s blood was spilled onto the ground; and his blood cried out for revenge. (Gen. 4:10). Who are the people known the world over for being fugitives and vagabonds? Could it be the “wandering Jew”? This is an undeniable aspect of Jewish heritage. When Esau married the two Hittite women, he married into the Canaanite lineage. Thus, Jews are the descendants of Cain. They possess his genetic material in their blood. Yahweh clearly tells us that He will exact His revenge on them at the Judgment Day. (Read the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares in Matthew, Chapter 13.)

18.) Israel to find a new home away from Palestine Gen. 28:14; II Samuel 7:10; I Chronicles 17:9; Isa. 41:1,5,9; 42:4,10,12; 49:1-3,12; 51:5; Jeremiah 3:18; 31:7-10. (Europe, America, Australia, South Africa! Yes, that includes the Canadians! Let’s not get too inclusive!)

19.) To be the lineage of the Messiah II Samuel 7:13; I Chronicles 22:10; II Chronicles 13:5; Psa. 89:35-37; Jer. 33:17; Luke, Chapter 3, in which the lineage of Jesus Christ is given from Adam to Jesus. (As we all know, the Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah; and the Bible clearly shows Jesus in the line of descent from which he was supposed to come. The Jews rejected Jesus because He was not one of them. He told the Jewish rabbis of His day, the scribes and Pharisees, “Ye are not my sheep.” Both Joseph and Mary are recorded in the Gospels as being descended from King David. The scribes and Pharisees, by that time, were a mixture of Idumean blood plus some Israelite blood. According to the Bible, no half-breed can be considered an Israelite. Therefore, the Jews are of a different genealogy and have no royal blood in them, unless you want to count the Dukes of Edom as royalty.)

20.) "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." (Beth-Sak = House of Isaac = Isaac's Sons = Saxons) Gen. 21:12. When I first read this passage, I said to myself, “This is no reference to the Jews!” The Jews never quote this passage of Scripture because they are not descendants of Isaac through Jacob. It is only True Israel which can lay claim to this genetic heritage: Isaac’s Sons = the Saxons = the Anglo-Saxons. We are named after Isaac. The Jews claim to be named after Judah. It would be impossible for them to explain away the plain meaning of this passage, so they suppress it. The pro-Jewish pastors of “Judeo-Christianity,” to their great discredit, ignore this passage as well. Conclusion The above are a quick scratching of the surface of the evidence which proves that the Jews are not Israel. These are only some of the most obvious references to the future Marks of Abraham's true Adamic seed, Israel. Many more descriptive statements could be adduced, but these should suffice for the moment. The cited list ought to be sufficient for distinguishing between the two different groups of people contending for the designation, "Heirs of the Promise", or "The Covenant People", or "The Chosen People". Score: Anglo-Saxons, 20; Jews, zero…and counting. Would someone care to calculate the odds against all of these prophecies coming true among one group of people? The odds are probably sixty kajillion to one. The odds for the Jews are also zero.

The only identifiable group which can fit the Marks of Israel is the three Houses of Isaac: the House of Israel, the House of Judah, and the House of David. The House of Edom is reprobate. The descendants of all three of these Houses of Isaac, yesterday, today, and forever, fall into the category of the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples; and NO ONE ELSE.

[Tumbleweed]

There is a genealogy chart at this link that is interesting to me because it shows the genealogy from Adam and Eve to Jesus Christ. You can zoom in on it and then scroll around. It helps me to sort of keep all the names in the bible in perspective.

http://www.actscambridge.org/assets/...y_a1_chart.pdf

[PatColo]

just the facts:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/DinJooz

[Tumbleweed]

just the facts:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/DinJooz

^ That was entertaining reading :-).

[Tumbleweed]

Bertrand Comparate explains how the Jews are the actual children of Satan. The trouble with the Jews started in the Garden of Eden. It helps me to understand the Jews hatred for the white christians who are the real Israelites and their desire to destroy them.

White people are the descendants of Adam through Seth and the Israelites but they don't realize it. The Jews are the descendants of Satan through Cain and they know it too.

This is long so I'll have to post it in three parts


https://israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIs...cainsatan.html


THE CAIN / SATANIC SEED LINE


It has been brought to my attention many times, that there are preachers and teachers in the world who don't recognize there are literal children of Satan surviving in the world today. Since this is one of the central themes of the Bible, the fight for supremacy between the children of Yahweh and the children of Lucifer, I wonder what Bible these preachers and teachers are reading and studying.


In these studies we will be using the proper name of our God, which is Yahweh and Yahshua for Christ. For documentation read, "Who Is Your God?”


The battle lines are drawn by Yahweh in Genesis 3:15, where He states he is going to put enmity between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent.


Let's start at the beginning; of course Satan wasn't a serpent. The entity that deceived and seduced Eve wasn't a scaly thing wriggling along on the ground. Serpent was translated from the word nachash, which means enchanter or magician. A fallen angel, still retaining a lot of his angelic powers, no doubt could be very much of an enchanter or magician.


Lucifer's children, and I do mean children not just followers, through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their ancestor, until they attached a secondary meaning of serpent to the word nachash. In Genesis 3:1-3 Satan said to Eve, "Is it really true that Yahweh said, You can't eat of any tree in the garden?" As it reads in the Hebrew, Eve replied to Satan, "And the woman said unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden". Now I am going to switch to the King James translation and I will correct it as I go.


"Of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Let's see what it actually said in the Hebrew. Fruit is the Hebrew word pirchach, meaning progeny, brood, children or descendants. Do you talk about the children of a walnut tree or an apple tree? Of course you don't!


Of the pirchach, of the descendants of the tree, which is in the midst of the garden, Yahweh has said, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it". That word touch is the Hebrew word naga, which is a more polite expression meaning, to have sexual intercourse with. Do you need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse with an apple? Of course not, it isn't that kind of a tree.


Yahweh had millions of the pre Adamic, Asiatic and African people around. If He just wanted somebody wide between the shoulders and narrow between the eyes to spade up the garden, He had them. He didn't have to create a special being for that purpose.


Satan had been the governor of this planet until he forfeited the right to this position by rebellion. Yahweh sent Adam here and it is recorded in Luke chapter 3 that Adam was the son of Yahweh. It doesn't record that about any of these pre Adamic people mentioned in Genesis chapter 1. Adam was the son of Yahweh and Yahweh sent Adam here to take over by force, kick Satan out and govern this planet. The trees in the Garden of Eden were the family trees of nations and races.


Adam and Eve weren't supposed to intermingle with these people. If Negroes and Asiatics were all that Yahweh wanted, He already had them. What He created was a different and separate being who was to be a different sort of person, whom the Negroes and Asiatics could never produce.


The Hebrew word Awdawm, which we translate Adam, means of a rosy, fair complexion. Adam was the first person of a specifically created new race. Adam and Eve were told not to mongrelize their race with these per Adamic people that were in the world.


When you come to Genesis 3:13, Yahweh has called Adam, Eve and Satan before Him to give an accounting of their misdeeds. According to the King James Bible Eve said, "The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat thereof". Here again is the Hebrew word nachash, meaning enchanter. Then there is the use of the word beguiled; the Hebrew word there is nawshaw, which means seduced.


Beguiled means no more than deceived. Somebody who sells you some mining stock in a mine that doesn't have any good ore in it, beguiles you. The word nawshawmeans seduced, not in any way or sense can it mean beguiled. "And Yahweh God said unto the woman, what is this thou hast done? And the woman said, the enchanter seduced me." This is what it says in the Hebrew and Cain was the product of this seduction.


In reply in Genesis 3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed". The same word zehra was used for both the seed of Satan and the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed; there is no other meaning. It also could be used as grains of wheat but it is used throughout the Bible as meaning the descendants of a person. Satan was to have just as literal children in this world as Eve was to have. The same word zehra is used for Satan's seed and Eve's seed.


The reply of the churchianity preachers is usually to quote Genesis 4:1. "And Adam knew his wife, and she conceived and bare Cain." Notice that what is not said is more significant that what is said, the Bible nowhere says Adam begat Cain. As you have read in the Old Testament, the monotonous regularity with which it always says, and so and so begat whosis and whosis begat what's his name and what's his name begat somebody else, and so on. It was important to know your ancestry in those days, because you didn't get your citizenship for two box tops and a dime. You got citizenship because your ancestors, for over twenty generations, were Israelites and no other way.


So Adam knew his wife and she conceived. I can tell you something and I can prove every bit of it by witnesses. I went to a movie one night and the next morning the sun rose in the east. I didn't say the one caused the other. I said two things happened, one happened first and the other happened second. I never said they were cause and effect. The Bible never says there was cause and effect here. If you want further proof of this, go right on to Genesis chapter 5 where you will find the list of Adam's descendants. Cain's name is nowhere to be found. Neither Cain nor Abel is mentioned among the descendants of Adam.


If you say Abel might have been omitted because he was probably killed before he left any descendants of his own, we don't really know. However, this isn't true of Cain because the Bible traces Cain's descendants for six generations, naming them right down the line. Never once does it record that Cain was a descendant of Adam, never in any way, shape, forms or manner. The first time it records that Adam begat a child is Genesis 5:3. "And Adam lived 130 years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth." This child Adam begat was not named Cain it was named Seth.


The satanic bloodline crept in through Cain, possibly earlier, among the pre Adamic people. There were pre Adamic people who were not necessarily satanic. There were some pre Adamic people into whom the satanic bloodline came, and there were even some of the descendants of Adam who probably mongrelized. In fact, it is evident they did mix their bloodline for the fact that those living around Noah were wiped out by the flood. The Bible tells us that Noah was perfect in his ancestry, with no mongrelization. He and his family were the ones in the area that were still pure in their bloodlines.


This is why the flood wiped out the mongrelized Adamites around Noah. As I documented in "Noah's Flood Was Not Worldwide", this flood did not cover the whole earth as is falsely taught in the churches of today.


The pure descendants of Adam multiplied and then you come to the fact of the satanic bloodline getting in there. Remember, Yahweh had announced His purpose; He was going to take back the world from Satan's domination. Yahweh was going to rule it according to His purposes. He was going to rule it through His children, through the pure descendants of Adam. What would be the obvious move on Satan's part to thwart this plan? The obvious thing to do would be to mongrelize the descendants of Adam, then he could sneer in Yahweh's face and say, "These are my children but where are yours? All these have my blood in them." This is exactly what Satan set out to do.


Genesis 6:2 records, "The sons of God saw the daughters of men (Adam) that they were fair; and they took them wives of all they chose". You don't get the full significance of it in this translation, "the sons of God" (beni-ha-elohim, also means sons of magistrates or mighty men of the earth and angels).


A double race mixing took place here; both the rulers of the pre Adamic races and the fallen angels took wives of the fair Adamic women. It is written with obvious disapproval. The male descendants of Adam were not allowed, by Yahweh's law, to marry anybody but the daughters descended from Adam. If they were marrying within their own racial line in this instance, it couldn't have been spoken of with disapproval. So the beni-ha-elohim are evidently those of the pre Adamic darker races and the fallen angels who followed Satan into rebellion. Greater details of this event are found in the book of Enoch.


Go on to Genesis 6:4 where it is speaking of the same subject, again it is botched up in the King James Bible. "There were giants in the earth in those days, and also after that when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men (enowsh) of renown."


This is what it says in the Hebrew. "There were nephilim (the fallen ones) in the earth in those days." They were fallen angels. That is what the bible calls them in so many places. Jude 1:6 records, "Angels who had not kept their first estate," who had fallen from heaven and from their former powers. "When the sons of God", and again it’s the beni-ha-elohim, "came in unto the daughters of Adam...” so it's the same thing.


Here we have the spreading of the satanic bloodline. Genesis chapter 6 goes on to trace many of these descendants of the fallen angels. You find that all through Palestine, on both sides of the Jordan river, clear down through Mount Seir, the rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea where Esau and his family lived, all through this area there are these various people with the satanic blood in them.


There are two different places, one in Isaiah the other in Ezekiel, where it speaks of what it calls a king or a prince. In the one case it speaks of Babylon and the other case of Tyre. Nevertheless it speaks of him in language, which could not possibly apply, to anybody except Satan. Therefore this indicates that at some time or other, Satan had incarnated in the form of these various kings, one king of Babylon and one king of Tyre.


Don't think this is so impossible because many times the Old Testament tells of these angels appearing in very solid form. They came and talked with Abraham on several occasions, one of them wrestled with Jacob almost all night.


Another of these angels came when the people of Israel were about to cross the Jordan River and take over Palestine. Joshua, making a scouting trip around his camp, saw this armed man standing there in armor and with a sword and Joshua asked, "Are you with us or for the enemy?" And the man said, "I am the captain of the hosts of Yahweh".


Let's take Isaiah 14:12-21 and note that these verses could not possibly apply to anyone except to Satan himself. We will quote from the King James Bible. "How art thou fallen from the heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations: for thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north." Lucifer then said, "I'm going to be the ruler over Israel (Yahweh's people). I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High".


Yahweh our God then told Lucifer the devil, "Yet thou shall be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee and consider thee saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms? That made the world a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof, that opened not the house of his prisoners? All the kings of the nations, even all of them lie in glory, every one in his own house; but thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcass trodden under foot. Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people; the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned."


You could not say this about any kings of Babylon. The only one, who may possibly have failed to get burial and an elaborate tomb, might have been Belshazzar. Belshazzar was nothing but an incompetent drunkard and nobody ever could say of him that he was the one who shook kingdoms and so on. He didn't even rule Babylon, because he was drunk all the time.


These passages are speaking of none other than Lucifer. Note how it goes on in Isaiah 14:21. "Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities." The word translated as children is from the Hebrew word Beni meaning sons. Satan obviously was to have children who could be slaughtered, to keep them from multiplying to the point where they would take over and rule the world. Old Testament? Of course it is, now let's see what the New Testament has to say about it.


Yahshua plainly says, in a number of places, that the devil has children, not merely followers. Remember the parable of the tares and the wheat. Yahshua spoke of the farmer who sowed good seed in his field and his enemy came along during the nighttime and sowed these poisonous weeds, the tares among the wheat. When the farmer's servants saw the tares growing among the wheat they asked him if they should go and pull them up now.


The farmer said, "No, you might pull up some of the wheat with them. Let them grow together until the time of the harvest, and then the reapers will first gather the tares into bundles to be burned, and then put the wheat in my barn".


Then Yahshua explains this parable to His disciples. In Matthew 13:38-39 Yahshua says, "The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom (the Greek word used here in the plural is huios meaning sons, the good seed are the sons of the kingdom); but the tares are the children (huios) of the wicked one. Satan has just as true children in the world as does Yahweh.


Speaking to the Pharisees, who as you know were Jews, Yahshua said in Matthew 12:34 (the King James Bible botches this up to an extent that seems to me often to be willful), "O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh".
The word is not generation at all. A generation is a number of people of not too different an age, living at the same time. You, for example, constitute one generation. Yahshua wasn't talking just about the people living then. They weren't any more wicked than the generation that lived before them or the generation that lived after them. What Yahshua said was, as we will paraphrase it (it's the Greek word genema which means children or offspring): "O children of vipers... sure all these centuries you Jews have used the serpent as the emblem or symbol for your ancestor. All right, taking you at your word, you children of serpents," right down the line they were vipers. Yahshua knew who they were.

[Luriya]

There is a genealogy chart at this link that is interesting to me because it shows the genealogy from Adam and Eve to Jesus Christ. You can zoom in on it and then scroll around. It helps me to sort of keep all the names in the bible in perspective.

http://www.actscambridge.org/assets/...y_a1_chart.pdf

Am I reading this wrong or is there NO female from after Adam & Eve to Noah?...so....?

[Joshua01]

Am I reading this wrong or is there NO female from after Adam & Eve to Noah?...so....?

You're not supposed to notice that. It ruins the fairy tale

[Glass]

Am I reading this wrong or is there NO female from after Adam & Eve to Noah?...so....?

your are reading it without thinking. Do you know of Eve's lament over Cain marrying with another race?

Most people, nearly all it seems, hold a misconception about the story.

1st major misconception is that the story of the first days, are days measured as 24 hours. There are multiple types of days and lengths. Just like there are multiple types of years and year lengths. For instance 1 of those years last about 26,000 earth years. We are in fact about to complete 1 of those years, a rotation around the galactic centre.

And the other misunderstanding is that Adam and Eve were the only ones on earth. They were the only children of God on earth at that time. There were others here. Whether they all could be called generally man or whether that is the label for the children of God I don't know. I'm inclined to go with the latter.