Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Thursday Judge's Ruling on Sandy Hook Winchester (& Bushmaster) Trial

  1. #1
    Unobtanium gunDriller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,592
    Thanks
    5,778
    Thanked 2,058 Times in 1,395 Posts

    Question Thursday Judge's Ruling on Sandy Hook Winchester (& Bushmaster) Trial

    Thursday Judge's Ruling on Sandy Hook Winchester (& Bushmaster) Trial - Why I bought another Lower this morning.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=saND...pril+14+ruling

    http://fortune.com/2016/04/14/sandy-hook/

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/22/health...s-gun-lawsuit/

    http://portal.ct.gov/Departments_and..._Court_Ruling/


    They are going Full fvcking Metal Jacket with the gun control - and the thing they are concentrating on, I think, is Lower Receivers.


    The gun industry might have its "tobacco industry moment". Rulings like this judge's -

    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...oves-forwards/

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...chool-massacre

    increase the chance of a tobacco industry type settlement, the kind that adds 25% to the price of every hunting rifle - and makes modular AR type guns basically unavailable.

    I would say that the standard AR15 lower, the rifle butt stock or the CQB (close Quarters combat), at this point are worth their weight in Silver.

    They are using the civil courts to force the gun control agenda. I expect this will add $30 (or more) to the cost of some simple Winchester hunting rifle like a 300 WSM - just to help them cover the increased business expense of legal fees and liability insurance.


    Legal fees and liability insurance & gun control - see the hand of the Jewish Agenda running through this ?


    Schumer and Feinstein and Rahmbo are like the Russian socialists scheming to upset the Tsar, so they can set up a bureacracy run by Jewish socialists.

    2016 USA - 1916 Russia ... History repeating ?


    Possible silver lining - more transparency on Sandy Hook.


    So perhaps I should explain what happened.

    Persons who fall in the demographic category "Sandy Hook Parents who claim to have lost children in the alleged Lanza incident" filed a civil lawsuit.

    The judge whose name comes up, ruled on Thursday that the civil lawsuit can go forward.

    So now it goes to the next court etc. etc.

    "Judge Barbara Bellis denied Bushmaster Firearms and Remington’s motion to dismiss the case. The firm representing the families hailed the ruling as a victory. However, the ruling does not prevent gun makers from appealing and filing a new motion to strike the case."

    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/wp-...m_-712x900.jpg


    http://palmettostatearmory.com/media.../7/7781023.jpg

    The kind of rifle they are trying to sue out of existence (I think) is that kind of lower, with any of a variety of butt stocks. That image shows it with the rifle butt-stock.

    That can be combined with uppers from any of these calibers

    5.56
    7.62x39
    Bushmaster .450
    Grendel 6.5
    6.8 SPC
    .50 Beowulf
    .223, 6 mm, .250 WSSM

    458 Socom (super-expensive, sort of not relevant, law enforcement will still get their 458 Socom's).

    9 mm and maybe a few other pistol caliber lowers are also in the cross hairs of this kind of lawsuit. Anything that meets the 'semi-auto' criteria.


    I would say, this is and is not an important ruling.

    Not important because dismissing a motion to dismiss is standard procedure. That Winchester filed a motion to dismiss is also standard procedure.

    However, those are legal niceties.

    What happens next is, Discovery, Interrogatories, and more Motions.

    The Case goes Forward.


    I would guess the law firms involved are billing at least $250 an hour.
    Retired Director Morris Waxler says the FDA did not do their job for 15 years - and is not now.

    HelpStopLASIK.com

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gunDriller For This Useful Post:

    cheka. (15th April 2016),Down1 (16th April 2016),mick silver (16th April 2016),midnight rambler (15th April 2016)

  3. #2
    Potmetal Cebu_4_2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    24,277
    Thanks
    4,338
    Thanked 5,833 Times in 3,874 Posts

    Re: Thursday Judge's Ruling on Sandy Hook Winchester (& Bushmaster) Trial

    Fuck her. She will find much of the same answer from a lot of people.
    Jackie did it and you know it!

  4. #3
    Gold Half Sense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    707
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 411 Times in 221 Posts

    Re: Thursday Judge's Ruling on Sandy Hook Winchester (& Bushmaster) Trial

    Where's the proof an AR was even used? All they ever showed was a shotgun taken from the trunk of a car. Where's the proof that anybody died that day? The FBI says nobody died at Sandy Hook.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Half Sense For This Useful Post:

    cheka. (16th April 2016)

  6. #4
    Unobtanium gunDriller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,592
    Thanks
    5,778
    Thanked 2,058 Times in 1,395 Posts

    Re: Thursday Judge's Ruling on Sandy Hook Winchester (& Bushmaster) Trial

    Quote Originally Posted by Half Sense View Post
    Where's the proof an AR was even used? All they ever showed was a shotgun taken from the trunk of a car. Where's the proof that anybody died that day? The FBI says nobody died at Sandy Hook.
    That's why I made the comment about Silver Lining.

    If a parent claims to have lost a child "as a direct and proximate cause of Winchester's negligence" etc. ... well, you know what defense attorneys do - they DEFEND.

    Winchester will be spending a lot of $$ trying to break the false flag story. e.g. trying real hard to find just one (or more) of the children allegedly killed, by Lanza, using a Winchester-Bushmaster product.

    Perhaps with some NRA muscle & money helping with the search.


    Winchester + NRA vs. False Flaggers & Gun-Grabbers.

    could be a Show
    Retired Director Morris Waxler says the FDA did not do their job for 15 years - and is not now.

    HelpStopLASIK.com

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to gunDriller For This Useful Post:

    madfranks (16th April 2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •