Assange dead?

[Cebu_4_2]

'tis why he can't hear our cries, for proof of life.

Incidentally, gsus/vBulletin is doing the "quick reply" bug again. My sentence above made it as far as "tis why he can't hear ou", then the "r" would only jump up to the line above. Had to go to advanced to finish.

veIf you try to correct anything on a reply that is standard GSUS issue v-bull. Have to go to the begining of your reply and backspace to the line above for the anomolie to be corrected... as I just demonstrated lol.

[midnight rambler]

Supposedly Hannity landed a sit-down ftf interview with Assange, splashing on Drudge now.

[crimethink]

Supposedly Hannity landed a sit-down ftf interview with Assange, splashing on Drudge now.

No longer just splashing!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...overnment.html

Video proof-of-life, but after this statement, maybe life not so much longer.


HANNITY: Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta's emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent that you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.

ASSANGE: Our publications had wide uptake by the American people, they're all true. But that's not the allegation that’s being presented by the Obama White House. So, why such a dramatic response? Well, the reason is obvious. They’re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House. They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate President...

ASSANGE: Our source is not a state party, so the answer for our interactions is no. But if we look at our most recent statement from the US government, which is on the 29th of December, OK, we had five different branches of government, Treasury, DHS, FBI, White House presenting their accusations to underpin Obama’s throwing out 29 Russian diplomats. What was missing from all of those statements? The word WikiLeaks. It’s very strange.

[crimethink]

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...gitimize-trump

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says there's an "obvious" reason the Obama administration has focused on Russia's alleged role in Democratic hacks leading up to Donald Trump's electoral win.

“They’re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House,” Assange said during an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity airing Tuesday night, according to a transcript of excerpts from the network.

“They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate president," Assange said during the interview, which was conducted at the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he has been staying.

"Our publications had wide uptake by the American people, they’re all true,” Assange continued. “But that’s not the allegation that’s being presented by the Obama White House.”

(...)

“Did [WikiLeaks] change the outcome of the election? Who knows, it’s impossible to tell," Assange said.

"But if it did, the accusation is that the true statements of Hillary Clinton and her campaign manager, John Podesta, and the DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz, their true statements is what changed the election.”

[Glass]

Not confident the Hannity interview is PoL just yet. Don't have a platform to watch with good enough audio at the moment. He looks younger than other recent interviews, change of hair, very clean shaven compared to recent interviews. Eye movements look consistent though. Having a Hannity team that close to your physical person would be extremely risky IMO.

Could the source be Braverman?

Whistleblower Clinton Foundation CEO Missing, Presumed Dead

Fears are growing over the whereabouts of Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman after he went missing in October following accusations that he leaked the Podesta emails to WikiLeaks.

Some fear that Braverman may have been killed, since an email mentioning his name was released by WikiLeaks in which Clinton Campaign chair John Podesta accused the CEO of leaking details about corruption in the organisation to the press.

n the March 2015 email exchange, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden told Clinton campaign manager and confidant John Podesta there was a mole within the Clinton Foundation. Podesta in his reply told Tanden the mole was Braverman.

Braverman had abruptly resigned from the Clinton Foundation shortly before this email exchange took place. And then, after the email exchange was made public by Wikileaks, Braverman vanished from the public eye.

This seems like a story that someone might want to report. The last evidence of Braverman’s public activity was October 12,

from here: http://investmentwatchblog.com/whist...presumed-dead/
Fairly balanced assessment of situation. Especially regarding the voracity of some sources. But does cite a Podesta email pointing the finger are Braverman.

Now this video is intriguing. The presenter is jamming a lot of information in to this video trying to explain what he is doing. It might seem overwhelming at first. Basically he is mapping the money trail and who it leads to with the Clinton foundation, Biden, Epstein. It ties in a lot of players and crosses over into the Podesta and Pizzagate situation and possible political leverage coming from that side of things.

I have only seen this video of his work but as can be seen he has produced dozens of videos to record his progress:

[Neuro]

No longer just splashing!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...overnment.html

Video proof-of-life, but after this statement, maybe life not so much longer.


HANNITY: Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta's emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent that you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.

ASSANGE: Our publications had wide uptake by the American people, they're all true. But that's not the allegation that’s being presented by the Obama White House. So, why such a dramatic response? Well, the reason is obvious. They’re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House. They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate President...

ASSANGE: Our source is not a state party, so the answer for our interactions is no. But if we look at our most recent statement from the US government, which is on the 29th of December, OK, we had five different branches of government, Treasury, DHS, FBI, White House presenting their accusations to underpin Obama’s throwing out 29 Russian diplomats. What was missing from all of those statements? The word WikiLeaks. It’s very strange.

He does look alive, without a doubt.

[monty]

..... http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/wiki...ill-blow-away/
WikiLeaks Hints At Huge Upcoming Revelations: “2017 Will Blow You Away”


January 3, 2017 TLB Staff FREEDOM, Spotlight, Tyranny, WORLD

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/wp-c...eat-1-3-17.jpgWikiLeaks Hints At Huge Upcoming Revelations: “2017 Will Blow You Away”

by Tyler Durden
Ahead of Jullian Assange’s interview tonight on Fox News with Sean Hannity, in which as we previewed last night the Wikileaks founder will again deny on the record that Russia was the source of hacked Democratic emails, stating that “our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party“, Wikileaks decided to engage in some creative marketing and, on Monday afternoon promised that 2017 will be an even bigger year for leaks than 2016, which saw the whistleblowing site publish thousands of documents exposing the dirty laundry of the Clinton campaign, US political secrets, covert trade deals and private communications from global leaders.

“If you thought 2016 was a big WikiLeaks year, 2017 will blow you away,” WikiLeaks tweeted on Monday, giving no hints as to what may be in store.



2016 was another game-changing for the whistleblowing site, as it delivered a massive trove of documents over the 12-month period. These included over 50,000 emails from John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair and more than 27,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee, which confirmed the DNC worked against Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, favoring Clinton, and ultimately led to the resignation of then-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

The emails relating to the US election rocked the Democratic establishment and delivered a blow to the Clinton campaign in the lead-up to the November election; according to many the Podesta revelations tipped the election against Hillary Clinton. The outcry against the the two sets of releases was so profound, it sparked a global diplomatic scandal between the US and Russia, and as a result of Obama administration accusations that the leaks were orchestrated by the Kremlin, the US expelled 35 Russian diplomats and seized two Russian compounds last week. Contrary to expectations, Putin refused to retaliate in tit-for-tat fashion, instead suggesting he is simply waiting for the arrival of the Trump administration to rebuild relations with the US.

Wikileaks also released more US State Department cables, as well as documents which gave an insight into the US arming of Yemen. Text from the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) was also revealed.

On Monday, WikiLeaks also confirmed that founder Julian Assange (who some have speculated has been compromised) will take part in a Reddit Ask Me Anything (AMA) on Thursday at 14:00 GMT (9:00 Eastern). The tweet announcing the AMA contained the hashtag ‘proofoflife’, presumably referencing concerns raised by some for the WikiLeaks editor’s wellbeing. [Links to take part, shown below. ~TLB ed.]

View image on Twitter

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1MfAiMWgAAXUI2.jpg:small
Follow
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...VS2_normal.pngWikiLeaks ✔@wikileaks

You can ask WikiLeaks’ publisher Julian Assange anything live at Thursday 9am EST on Reddit @Reddit_IAmA#AskMeAnything#IAmA#proofoflife
1:16 PM – 2 Jan 2017

*********

Original article


TLB recommends other pertinent articles at ZeroHedge

About the writer Tyler Durden
[Video Content edited]

---

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.

TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

[monty]

Hannity interview wiyh Julian Assange advance to 49 minutes for interview



https://youtu.be/CQogzU2_6v4

[old steel]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1MfAiMWgAAXUI2.jpg


You see that UN document Julian Assange is holding up?

You need to think bigger regarding the releases coming, much bigger, huge.

[mick silver]

Go back to sleep, little sheep.... it'll all be over soon! would it not be nice to see the UN come down