Anglin or (((Anglin))) ?

[Down1]

Heavy smearing going on.
I can see their point about the Nazi thing, but otherwise I am puzzled.
http://alternative-right.blogspot.co...th-anglin.html

https://hipsterracist.wordpress.com/...ack-npi-again/

[Shami-Amourae]

I'm getting tired of defending this shit. If they are calling for/or inciting violence, they are a Fed. That's how you tell. Feds are generally fucking retarded and can't figure us out.

There's a lot of lot of motivation for enemies of the White race to cause division and make people in fight within the Alt-Right.

In other words, Anglin is legit until proven otherwise.

Basically anyone who has someone to the Right of them thinks they are too "extreme". The Right-wing in general has a problem where they'll disavow anyone to the Right of them. They is why, for example Alex Jones put on scary Nazi music and flashed images of Hitler and the KKK before he had a debate with David Duke as a way to demonize him (this is Mainstream Media tier shit.) Alex Jones cucks to the Left and re-hashes MSM talking points the moment anyone to the Right of him is brought up.

Notice the thumbnail of this video to demonize Duke:

Watch this video and see how people on the Right cuck to the Left when they meet someone further Right-wing than they are



Notice Daily Stormer is much further to the Right than RamZPaul, so with the natural cuckoldry going on in the Right-wing, people to the Left will attack people to the further Right. They want to appease the Leftists who will keep calling them Racists and Nazis since they think it will save them.

Ramzpaul likes Jewish and Oriental women and made a Rotherham joke when he was in a Google+ hangout with Millenial Woes. He doesn't give as much of a shit about the movement anymore, and is terrified for his life. This is why you see him in Eastern Europe since he wants to distance himself since he realizes he's getting old and doesn't want a bone in this fight anymore.



I only attack people on the Right who attack people who are further to the Right to them.

This is a traitorous act and promotes White Genocide since we are few in number, and should not be infighting. People on the Left don't do this. This is why you'll never see Obama disavow Bill Ayers or the Communist USA Party that supports him.

[crimethink]

In other words, Anglin is legit until proven otherwise.

All Hollywood Nazis like (((Anglin))) are Federal and/or ADL/SPLC assets until proven otherwise.



https://alternative-right.blogspot.c...ew-anglin.html


Your inability to ferret out someone like him as a liability demonstrates why the "alt-right" is going nowhere.


He is apparently a race-mixer, too, although there is serious question whether he is actually an Aryan:

https://roguecartoonist.blogspot.com...view-with.html

[crimethink]

Basically anyone who has someone to the Right of them thinks they are too "extreme". The Right-wing in general has a problem where they'll disavow anyone to the Right of them.

(...)




Notice Daily Stormer is much further to the Right than RamZPaul, so with the natural cuckoldry going on in the Right-wing, people to the Left will attack people to the further Right. They want to appease the Leftists who will keep calling them Racists and Nazis since they think it will save them.

LOL

Notice that your "continuum" puts Ben Garrison to the right of St. Adolphus (!!) yet Garrison is clearly no fan of (((Andrew Anglin))), who is likely also part Google.

This is a traitorous act and promotes White Genocide since we are few in number, and should not be infighting. People on the Left don't do this. This is why you'll never see Obama disavow Bill Ayers or the Communist USA Party that supports him.

Those of the "Extreme Right" uphold ideals and principles, and attack that which is wrong and evil.

Those of the left appreciate the destructive nature of their allies, even when those allies are in great disagreement with them.

The treason in this matter is giving the benefit of the doubt (which there is none) to a liability like (((Anglin))).

"Unity" is for those who believe the lowest common denominator is of equal value to the highest quality.

A defense of (((Anglin))) against Paul Ramsey is both absurd and sinister. Any discussion of (((Anglin))) ends at this fact: Just a few short years ago, Anglin was recorded saying that the "white race should be bred out."

[Shami-Amourae]

LOL

Notice that your "continuum" puts Ben Garrison to the right of St. Adolphus (!!) yet Garrison is clearly no fan of (((Andrew Anglin))), who is likely also part Google.

You do realize that's a joke/meme right? You know nothing about memetics so of course you didn't get it.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/ben-garrison

I think I waste my time on this forum on people of your age demographic. You're either too brainwashed by egalitarianism, or your so defeated that you attack anyone who has hope, or a plan of action to fix the problems of our world. Younger generations eat memetics and Alt-Right tactics up. It's natural. We are the future.




Any idea where I can get some of this Jew cash to run my own Alt-Right website, since it's all run by Jews, it's all Fake News, is a secret homosexual cult, and a secret cabal of Crowley Satan Worshipers?

At least you have allies who agree with your worldview:


If Hitler was alive today you'd attack him and say he was controlled by Jews.

Why do you spend more time attacking your own people? I spend most of my time on this forum defending the White race. You seem to be siding with the same exact forces trying to destroy it.

If you want to shit on the future of the White race then I question your motives. A vast majority of young Conservatives are Alt-Right, NOT Paleo-Conservative or Neo-Conservative. This movement is exploding all over North America, Europe, and Australia. We are the first right wing movement that isn't afraid to be called naughty names, and the people in power have no idea how to fight us, except for breeding infighting.

[Shami-Amourae]

Daily reminder that Gavin McInnes (NSFW DON'T CLICK THIS LINK IT'S HORRIBLE) also pushes the narrative that Anglin is a Fed.

[Shami-Amourae]

If you're wondering where this narrative originates from:


Did Huffington Post Journalist Luke O’Brien Breach Ethics When He Sent Fake FBI Statements to Andrew Anglin?





http://www.dailystormer.com/did-huff...andrew-anglin/

You can ask the Huffington Post editorial team if it is their policy to have their journalists cooperate with private intelligence agencies and push their agendas through blatantly falsified statements from federal officials, things they just made up, etc. for the purpose of framing interviewees for crimes they did not commit.




Huffington Post editorial team

[crimethink]

I think I waste my time on this forum on people of your age demographic. You're either too brainwashed by egalitarianism, or your so defeated that you attack anyone who has hope, or a plan of action to fix the problems of our world. Younger generations eat memetics and Alt-Right tactics up. It's natural. We are the future.

You are merely LARPing. I know who you are. Look up George Burdi aka George Eric Hawthorne. Absolute faith in himself and "the movement." A combination of naivete and immaturity. And then burnout after a few years of denouncing everyone as a "race traitor" for not being on board with the delusions of grandeur. I confess: I was there with him denouncing those "brainwashed" and having a "defeatist attitude." But that's over two decades ago now.

Any idea where I can get some of this Jew cash to run my own Alt-Right website

Considering you run a website that is usually run by Jew pornographers, I'm not sure why you're lacking cash.

At least you have allies who agree with your worldview:

You are a member of a tiny sub-culture that has been catapulted to fame by the Cultural Bolshevists (like Clinton). If you had a clue about how to handle psy-war operations, you'd know that one does not publicize an effective enemy. In reality, your "movement" is Her Majesty's Emanuel Goldstein, controlled "opposition" that serves their purposes, all the while you fantasize about being "powerful."

All you are is the cyber version of Winston Smith. And, you, too, will love Big Brother in the end.

If Hitler was alive today you'd attack him and say he was controlled by Jews.

Neither you nor any of your associates is Adolf Hitler, nor even an SS-Mann. Most of you, wanking to anime (?!), would be "qualified" for Dachau as Volk-hostile degenerates.

Why do you spend more time attacking your own people?

(((Andrew Anglin))) is not "my own people." Why do you attack Paul Ramsey? Why are you attacking me for calling out a Hollywood Nazi of unknown racial origin? Is (((Anglin))) a personal friend of yours? Are you Anglin?

I spend most of my time on this forum defending the White race. You seem to be siding with the same exact forces trying to destroy it.

LOL

I am the most vociferous defender of Aryan racial integrity on this forum. I denounce all fakers and pretenders, but you embrace them.

If you want to shit on the future of the White race then I question your motives.

You are in no position to question anything.

You can't even properly identify a malevolent element (((Anglin))) within your own "movement."

A vast majority of young Conservatives are Alt-Right, NOT Paleo-Conservative or Neo-Conservative. This movement is exploding all over North America, Europe, and Australia. We are the first right wing movement that isn't afraid to be called naughty names, and the people in power have no idea how to fight us, except for breeding infighting.

The words of a child.

"And if it means that you are a Nazi and a Fascist because you fight for a White Christian America who will have no part of Communism and race mixing well then by George let's be Nazis!"

-- George Lincoln Rockwell

Despite his noble intentions, Rockwell failed.

You will to.

Because you refuse to do what is necessary to save the Aryan race...and that starts with you...the very thing you don't want to do.

[crimethink]

Losers, Hobbyists, and the “Movement”


An interesting psychological phenomenon on which I have commented on in several issues of the BULLETIN is that displayed by people who send hostile letters to the National Office saying, in effect: “You people claim to be Christians, but you ignore the teachings of the Bible, which says that all races are the same. Don’t you even know that Jesus was a Jew?” They have had the idea planted in their heads that the Alliance is some sort of Christian organization, presumably by Jewish propaganda linking us to Christian Identity and Catholic traditionalist groups, which also are on the Jews’ hit list. Reading our material or listening to one of my broadcasts should persuade them otherwise, but it doesn’t. It probably took quite a bit of effort by the Jews to pound the idea into their heads, and it’ll take dynamite to get it out.

Unfortunately, one can observe a similar phenomenon in many people nominally on our side, even in some Alliance members. I have announced over and over again our policy toward other organizations, and I nevertheless continue to receive letters to the effect: “All of us in the ‘movement’ must stick together. We should unite with all of the other patriotic organizations, and then we’ll be much stronger. Etc.” To me this view indicates either hobbyism or a serious deficiency in the writer’s powers of discrimination. If you don’t remember what hobbyism is, re-read section 3.c.iii.2 of your copy of the Membership Handbook.

The Internet has given many inadequate people the ability to pretend to be more than they are. Any troubled teenager or unemployed alcoholic can get a web site, set himself up as a phone-booth Fuhrer, and begin collecting “followers,” and many do. They are the ones to whom the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Southern Poverty Law Center are referring when they announce that “the number of ‘hate groups’ on the Internet is now 457, up 23 per cent since 1999.” Two outstanding examples are a teenaged Jew named Andy Greenbaum, who used the name “Bo Decker” and set up an “organization” he called “Knights of Freedom”; and a professional disseminator of disinformation named Harold Covington (a.k.a. “Winston Smith”). Greenbaum self-destructed last year, when he announced a giant march in Washington and only two of his “followers” showed up for the march. Covington occasionally still makes Internet attacks on the Alliance, but he is far less prolific than he was a year or so ago.

There are dozens of others who are still active, however. One is a TV repairman in California named Tom Metzger, who publishes a tabloid addressed primarily to skinheads and prisoners called “White Aryan Resistance’ (“WAR”). Metzger promotes an ideology that is a blend of racial nationalism and class resentment, commonly called “national bolshevism.” Another, also in California, publishes a newsletter called “The Nationalist Observer.” Both are proponents of an “strategy” known as “leaderless resistance,” according to which, at the appropriate time, hundreds or even thousands of revolutionary cells, consisting of one to five patriots each, will materialize spontaneously and will overthrow the government by sabotaging or bombing government and media facilities and assassinating politicians, leading Jews, collaborators, and other enemies of our people. All of these cells will operate independently, without centralized organization or direction or infrastructure, so that it will be nearly impossible for the government to infiltrate them or spy on them, and the government never will know where or when they will strike next.

Actually, Metzger and other “leaderless resistance” advocates are not so much in favor of “leaderless resistance” as they are against any sort of organized activity. Their thesis is that any organized activity is certain to fail because it will be infiltrated by government informants and provocateurs, and that any racial patriot who joins an organization is a fool who is allowing the government to get his name on the blacklist for unspecified, but presumably severe, reprisals.

All of this theorizing takes place in the make-believe world of revolutionary hobbyism. In the real world, “leaderless resistance” is simply an excuse for losers, cowards, and shirkers to do nothing except talk to each other. Building an effective organization of any sort is difficult work, and those who don’t like work or who have tried to build an organization and failed often are resentful of any effort that shows signs of success. Their reasoning is, “I tried it and wasn’t successful; therefore, it can’t be done.” And the reason that nearly every organizational effort has failed has not been government spies or provocateurs; it has been the low quality of the human material in the organization. Certainly, the Alliance has never had any damage done to it by government agents. Every major difficulty we have had has been the consequence of bad judgment or bad behavior on the part of a member.

It’s always difficult working with people. It must be a real nightmare trying to run an organization that has no quality standards for membership and that maintains a flamboyant and sensationalist public image attractive to hooligans, drunken brawlers, criminals, sociopaths, and other losers.

The latest issue of Resistance Magazine (of which I am the publisher) had an article written by a professional soldier who pointed out the unworkability of “leaderless resistance.” Unfortunately, he mistakenly used the “Order” organized in 1984 by Robert Mathews as an example of why it doesn’t work. In fact, the “Order,” based on the fictional organization of the same name in The Turner Diaries, was a centralized organization with a strong leader. Because of the author’s slip, a few of the phone-booth Fuhrers, who already were resentful of the Alliance’s progress and were stung by the article’s undiplomatic treatment of their favorite excuse for their own failure, saw an opportunity to criticize the Alliance and seized it. They Xeroxed dozens of copies of the offending article and mailed them to everyone on their mailing lists, including the imprisoned surviving members of the “Order.” They wrote a letter to go with the Xeroxed article, and although Robert Mathews is not even named in the article, their letter said, in effect: “Look, look! Pierce is attacking Bob Mathews, our martyred hero! Isn’t that shameful?”

Seeing the article described as an attack on Robert Mathews led some of the readers to look at it that way, and they duly registered their own indignation. The phone-booth Fuhrers then posted everything to the Internet, where it was the most titillating subject for gossip among the hobbyists for several weeks. The term “movement” was frequently used by the hobbyists, as in: “Pierce has shown disrespect for a martyr of the ‘movement.’ He should be expelled from the ‘movement.’” Or: “No, no! We must have unity in the ‘movement.’”

It’s a little hard to say exactly what the term means to the Internet gossips. To most, it seems to be a clubby sort of concept which includes all of “us” and excludes everyone else. Although I have found the term useful in some contexts in the past, it probably should be abandoned because it has been so badly misused by the hobbyists. Really, what self respecting racial nationalist wants to be considered part of a “movement’ which includes all of the phone-booth Fuhrers, the Internet gossips, and an embarrassingly high quota of born losers?

It’s easy enough to understand this club mentality. As our society disintegrates under the onslaught of Jew-instigated multiculturalism, people look for something to hold onto: a sense of belonging, of community. We feel more secure when we have a sense of solidarity with others of like mind. A comforting sense of security is not the primary thing that Alliance members should be seeking, however. We want strength. We want new capabilities. We want to gain an advantage over the enemies of our people. We want anything which brings us closer to victory, whether it is comfortable or not.

The truth of the matter is, there’s not much advantage to be gained inside the “movement.” It is too heavily freighted with chronic losers, incurable hobbyists, phone-booth Fuhrers, and other defectives. Perhaps the “movement” is no worse than the general public in this regard, but we’re looking for the best and strongest people we can find, and we find them much more often outside the “movement” than inside it. It is time for all members who have been focused on the “movement” either to reorient themselves in an outward direction or to find another organization to devote themselves to. As our tempo and our work load increase, being in the Alliance will be less and less fun for those whose primary aim is to amuse themselves with “movement” gossip. And I will have less patience with hobbyists and with those who believe that the Alliance is part of the “movement.” Our aim is not to be the biggest and best organization in the “movement”; it is to leave the “movement” to its clubby introspection while we get on with the job of building a revolutionary infrastructure.

We respect our martyrs, and all of those who have shown courage or made sacrifices for our people, but we’ll build monuments to them after the revolution. Meanwhile, winning is all that we care about, not the fun of playing the game by “movement” rules.

W.L.P (William Luther Pierce, Ph.D., March 2000)

[crimethink]