Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

  1. #1
    Iridium
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    8,277
    Thanks
    6,154
    Thanked 5,214 Times in 3,001 Posts

    4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    nice

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/18/news...idy/index.html

    Republicans likely have only two weeks left to use their 2017 budget reconciliation bill as a way to dismantle Obamacare with a simple majority in the Senate. The Graham-Cassidy bill is the only repeal effort left on the table, coming even as a bipartisan Senate committee is working on legislation to stabilize the Affordable Care Act.

    The Congressional Budget Office said Monday it may take several weeks for it to release an analysis of the Graham-Cassidy bill so it remains to be seen how many fewer people could be insured under it or what the impact on premiums may be.

    Graham-Cassidy in a nutshell:
    Reduces federal spending and block grants it.
    Caps Medicaid.
    Waives community rating and essential benefits.
    — Larry Levitt (@larry_levitt) September 18, 2017

    Here's what's in the bill:

    Repeal Obamacare individual and employer mandates: Obamacare levies penalties on most Americans who don't have health insurance and larger employers who don't provide affordable coverage for their workers. The bill would eliminate the penalty, retroactive to 2016.

    Related: GOP isn't done with Obamacare repeal

    Repeals Obamacare subsidies and ends Medicaid expansion funding: The legislation would eliminate Obamacare subsidies that lower premiums, deductibles and co-pays in 2020. It would also jettison federal funding for Medicaid expansion, which 31 states use to provide coverage for residents with incomes up to about $16,000.

    The legislation would turn the federal funding for Medicaid expansion and the subsidies into a block grant program. States would be given a lump sum of money and would have a lot of leeway over how to spend it.

    For instance, they could help enrollees pay their premiums and out-of-pocket costs or set up high-risk or reinsurance pools to help protect insurers from costly enrollees and entice them to stay in the individual market. States could use a portion of money to help those enrolled in Medicaid afford care.

    Graham and Cassidy say that this provision would return power to the states and allow them to create programs that fit their residents' needs. Also, it would equalize Medicaid funding across the states. The bill's authors note that four states -- New York, California, Massachusetts and Maryland -- get 37% of Obamacare funding

  2. #2
    Chatmaster Flash vacuum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    7,790
    Thanks
    2,523
    Thanked 4,385 Times in 2,415 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    Those four states make up 22% of the US population, and yet get 37% of Obamacare funding.

  3. #3
    Iridium
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    8,005
    Thanks
    3,951
    Thanked 3,691 Times in 2,328 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    Quote Originally Posted by vacuum View Post
    Those four states make up 22% of the US population, and yet get 37% of Obamacare funding.
    Sounds good to me. I'm in CA, one of those four states. Pay up bitches!!
    life is good.

  4. #4
    .999 Unobtanium Horn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Out
    Posts
    25,647
    Thanks
    1,552
    Thanked 2,868 Times in 2,349 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    Stands to reason, a higher incidence of "HAPPY" prozac type pills are needed in those states

    for sane persons to live with their insane neighbors.^^

  5. #5
    Iridium
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    7,710
    Thanks
    3,772
    Thanked 2,254 Times in 1,607 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    progressive cites are like cancer tumors, they grow and fester until they kill the host
    If you're offended by any of my posts tough shit!
    "Politicians Are Like Diapers, They Should Be Changed Often, And For The Same Reason"
    If you're not prepared for what's coming it's already too late!
    Niggers will never be satisfied!!

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Joshua01 For This Useful Post:

    agnut (22nd September 2017),Neuro (23rd September 2017),Twisted Titan (24th September 2017)

  7. #6
    Unobtanium EE_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    1,086
    Thanked 7,956 Times in 4,576 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    Quote Originally Posted by cheka. View Post
    nice

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/18/news...idy/index.html

    Republicans likely have only two weeks left to use their 2017 budget reconciliation bill as a way to dismantle Obamacare with a simple majority in the Senate. The Graham-Cassidy bill is the only repeal effort left on the table, coming even as a bipartisan Senate committee is working on legislation to stabilize the Affordable Care Act.

    The Congressional Budget Office said Monday it may take several weeks for it to release an analysis of the Graham-Cassidy bill so it remains to be seen how many fewer people could be insured under it or what the impact on premiums may be.

    Graham-Cassidy in a nutshell:
    Reduces federal spending and block grants it.
    Caps Medicaid.
    Waives community rating and essential benefits.
    — Larry Levitt (@larry_levitt) September 18, 2017

    Here's what's in the bill:

    Repeal Obamacare individual and employer mandates: Obamacare levies penalties on most Americans who don't have health insurance and larger employers who don't provide affordable coverage for their workers. The bill would eliminate the penalty, retroactive to 2016.

    Related: GOP isn't done with Obamacare repeal

    Repeals Obamacare subsidies and ends Medicaid expansion funding: The legislation would eliminate Obamacare subsidies that lower premiums, deductibles and co-pays in 2020. It would also jettison federal funding for Medicaid expansion, which 31 states use to provide coverage for residents with incomes up to about $16,000.

    The legislation would turn the federal funding for Medicaid expansion and the subsidies into a block grant program. States would be given a lump sum of money and would have a lot of leeway over how to spend it.

    For instance, they could help enrollees pay their premiums and out-of-pocket costs or set up high-risk or reinsurance pools to help protect insurers from costly enrollees and entice them to stay in the individual market. States could use a portion of money to help those enrolled in Medicaid afford care.

    Graham and Cassidy say that this provision would return power to the states and allow them to create programs that fit their residents' needs. Also, it would equalize Medicaid funding across the states. The bill's authors note that four states -- New York, California, Massachusetts and Maryland -- get 37% of Obamacare funding
    That's why the democrats are squealing so loudly about the block grants. I hope this gets passed. The republicans have to own it in order to fix it. They can file waivers and make changes later. Time for the Lib states to pay their own way.
    DON'T TAKE THE VACCINE!

    THE SHIT HAS HIT THE FAN!

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to EE_ For This Useful Post:

    cheka. (22nd September 2017)

  9. #7
    Iridium
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    8,277
    Thanks
    6,154
    Thanked 5,214 Times in 3,001 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    Quote Originally Posted by EE_ View Post
    That's why the democrats are squealing so loudly about the block grants. I hope this gets passed. The republicans have to own it in order to fix it. They can file waivers and make changes later. Time for the Lib states to pay their own way.
    please expand on the block grant hate --- why dont the marxists like it

  10. #8
    Chatmaster Flash vacuum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    7,790
    Thanks
    2,523
    Thanked 4,385 Times in 2,415 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    Quote Originally Posted by cheka. View Post
    please expand on the block grant hate --- why dont the marxists like it
    Because if the block grants are distributed fairly, you no longer have Jim in South Carolina paying for Pablo's kids in California like you do now.

  11. #9
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,944
    Thanks
    7,797
    Thanked 8,335 Times in 5,109 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    The thing about block grants . . . A method to blackmail the States into subverting the Constitution
    The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”
    https://ConstitutionalMilitia.org


  12. #10
    .999 Unobtanium Horn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Out
    Posts
    25,647
    Thanks
    1,552
    Thanked 2,868 Times in 2,349 Posts

    Re: 4 states eating 37% of obombacare funding

    The only way government healthcare works is if you turn healthcare into a public utility.

    In the U. S. the entire market would need to crash or doctors from college level pogrammed into it.

    The entire U. S. has its head up its ass trying to solve the unsolvable. Anyone wishing for passage of. Gov healthcare at this or any point is an ignorant stooge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •