Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Mexico's Election will be rigged to keep a Trump like candidate Lopez Obrador out

  1. #1
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Mexico's Election will be rigged to keep a Trump like candidate Lopez Obrador out

    http://82.221.129.208/.yp1.html


    June 27 2018
    SITE CONTENT HACKED TODAY, SOMEONE IS OFFICIALLY PISSED OFF


    Almost all reporting on the Mexican election was hacked off the site, because I have clearly shown a clear intent by someone to steal the Mexican election. However, I had two backups and restored it easily after hitting the site and seeing it gone all the way down to the report about there being no uprising in Iran.


    MAJOR DEVELOPMENT IN MEXICO'S ELECTION FRAUD


    THEY HAVE EVERY INTENTION OF STEALING THE ELECTION ANY WAY THEY CAN, THEY CANNOT LET LOPEZ OBRADOR WIN BECAUSE HE'S THE SAME ANTI-GLOBALIST TRUMP. THE REPORT BELOW TITLED "Why are mainstream media slandering Obrador", which is from another publication, explains it all well. EVEN THE AMERICAN MSM IS STARTING TO CALL OBRADOR "TRUMP".


    THE MEXICAN ELECTION WILL BE STOLEN, NO IFS OR BUTS.


    Yesterday, a large number of ballots were stolen, obviously enough to take away Obrador's lead, because low and behold, today, Meade is within SIX POINTS!


    They gave up on Anaya, which the public hated, and are now pushing Meade. Yesterday, when I posted the report below about the MSM slandering Obrador, Lopez Obrador had 46.5 percent support AT THAT TIME. Meade was more than 25 points behind. Anaya was 22 points behind.
    Now, overnight, they are claiming Meade surged ahead and is now within six points of Obrador. NOT POSSIBLE, the real deal is that they knew the public would never accept Anaya, but they could at least swallow Meade, so Meade it is, because with Meade as president no one who is corrupt will go to jail.Obrador has the same "drain the swamp anti-globalist" mentality as Trump. Obrador is facing off against George Soros. Most likely, Obrador has also been drugged because he is slurring his speech lately, I think it is time to call it - the establishment is not going to allow Obrador to be the Mexican president no matter what, even if it takes open aggression and obvious fraud to stop it. Meade behind by six points??!!?? THAT MAGIC NUMBER AGAIN, SIX POINTS??@@?? YEAH RIGHT!





    ANAYA UPDATE: That idiot just got on TV and said Pena Nieto was plotting to kill him. PROBLEM: Pena Nieto wanted Anaya to win. They are birds of a feather, both totally corrupt. All a stage drama.


    Regardless of what is being said by the MSM, I am absolutely correct about Lopez Obrador and the other candidates. Here is a near perfectly accurate report from elsewhere, which I will post a large portion of.


    Why Are Mainstream Media Slandering Mexico's Lopez Obrador?


    Instead of recognizing neoliberalism's failure, they attack the Mexican leader who has successfully indicted it.



    From The Nation


    If Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador-who by all predictions will be the next president of Mexico after the July 1 elections-lived in Eastern Europe or the Middle East, the US mainstream press would have already canonized him as a hero of democracy. AMLO, as he is universally known, would be praised for leading a nationwide, nonviolent, decades-long movement on its way to defeating a corrupt ruling elite at the ballot box.

    Instead, the US media continually slander Lopez Obrador as a dangerous "populist demagogue" with a "messiah complex" who could turn Mexico into another Venezuela. Among others, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and The Atlantic have misrepresented him; so far The New York Times has published four op-ed pieces, and three were hostile, even the article by a purported supporter. The nastiest attack so far, a June 17 Washington Post editorial, said that Lopez Obrador "bears more than a passing political resemblance to President Trump." The Economist repeated the slur, putting AMLO's picture on its latest cover next to the headline "Mexico's answer to Donald Trump."

    (MY INSERT: WHAT HAVE I SAID REPEATEDLY? OBRADOR IS MEXICO'S TRUMP. And that is NOT BAD, unless you are a flaming limp wristed liberal!)

    The US media are implying that AMLO's lifelong, nonviolent campaign for democracy is somehow more dangerous than the two candidates who oppose him, both of whom belong to the violent and corrupt political elite that has plunged Mexico into its worst crisis in a century. Mainstream commentators are afraid to say so, but they must privately hope that one of the two privileged-class candidates wins (which, given Lopez Obrador's overwhelming lead in all the polls, could only happen due to stupendous fraud).

    More than just personal pique explains why the mainstream is smearing Lopez Obrador. Mexico has for more than two decades faithfully followed the neoliberal orthodoxy about economic growth, vigorously advocated by the International Monetary Fund, the US Treasury Department, and Wall Street. Starting with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994, Mexico has been one of neoliberalism's most dutiful pupils in the Global South. And the result has been crushing failure: since 1996, a pathetic per capita economic growth rate below 1.5 percent, one of the worst in all of Latin America, and an exodus, starting in the mid-1990s, of nearly 4 million economic refugees northward to the United States that didn't stop until the 2008 Great Recession. The chronic stagnation has further discredited the traditional elite and boosted Lopez Obrador's calls for another economic path. But instead of recognizing neoliberalism's failure, The Wall Street Journal and The Economist attack the Mexican leader who has successfully indicted it.

    The media's animosity has distorted their news coverage so badly that most Americans could be surprised by what will likely be Lopez Obrador's smashing victory and stunned by the outpouring of optimism that will sweep across Mexico afterward.

    Mainstream reports have not conveyed the overwhelming sense of crisis there, and therefore leave the false impression that this is just another election. In just one example, the Post's June 17 editorial conceded that corruption has "afflicted" the current government. This is an astonishing understatement. In Veracruz state, for instance, the former governor, a man named Javier Duarte, who was once a rising star in Pena Nieto's ruling Institutional
    Revolutionary Party (PRI), is accused of presiding over reign of state-sanctioned terror in which between 4,000 and 20,000 people have "disappeared," and mass graves of up to 750 bodies are regularly uncovered. Duarte is also facing trial for stealing as much as 35 percent of the state's budget during his six-year term, and investigators have already found that he owns 40 properties in Texas. Several other governors are under official scrutiny, and one was even extradited from Italy.

    The US media have also failed to tell the whole truth about Lopez Obrador's lifelong commitment to economic and political justice. After leaving university, AMLO spent five years living with his family in a one-room shack in Nacajuca, a poor indigenous community in his southeastern home state of Tabasco, promoting health, education, and agriculture. He then entered state politics, and to protest chronic election fraud in 1991 he captivated Mexican opinion by leading a 450-mile march to the capital, called the Exodus for Democracy.
    In 2000, Lopez Obrador won election as mayor of Mexico City; governing the megalopolis is considered the second-most-important political job in the country. During his five years in office, AMLO started every working day with a 6 am press conference, allied with business leaders to restore the city's historic center, and launched an old-age-pension scheme. He lived in a modest middle-class home and traveled around in an old car-and he left office with a popularity rating of 84 percent.

    Also missing in most US mainstream coverage are conversations with the Mexican people who are going to vote for him in massive numbers. A Washington Post article on June 20 included five interviews with hostile, well-off critics like a "former undersecretary in the Economy Ministry" and someone who works at "a regional energy consultancy." The Post gave a couple of high-level Lopez Obrador supporters a brief chance to respond to their attacks, but not one single ordinary Mexican was allowed to speak up-no small farmers displaced by NAFTA, no urban poor people with stagnating incomes, and no women workers in the maquiladora assembly plants along the US border who earn $36 a week. The Post also failed to talk to the parents of the 43 college students from Ayotzinapa who were kidnapped in 2014; the parents are still trying to find out which branch of the Mexican government murdered their children.

  2. #2
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Mexico's Election will be rigged to keep a Trump like candidate Lopez Obrador out

    http://82.221.129.208/.yo9.html

    Lopez Obrador had entire last rally broadcast in full, stadium completely packed, AWESOME presentation


    I don't know how the MSM is going to present this, but the stadium had about 5 percent seats empty at the beginning, went to 100 percent totally packed in the middle, and had one end start to empty out towards the end. The media made sure it got a clear shot of the portion that emptied out toward the end.
    Trump never had a rally like this one. His crowds were huge (of course) but Obrador absolutely skunked every last Trump rally, it was a much bigger stadium and it was absolutely jam packed. The stadium can seat 80+ thousand normally, plus the ball field was shoulder to shoulder the entire way, The crowd was definitely 100,000+ and may have been as much as 120,000. It was obvious not everyone who wanted to be there got in. Whatever was there is whatever you could pack into a stadium while pretending it was a sardine can.

    It is obvious the real support is with Obrador, however, unlike Hillary, at least even Bronco, with about 4 percent support, could fill a medium sized venue with a few thousand legit people. Anaya the Kanaya could get about 10,000 as could Meade. It could not possibly be more clear from these examples that literally no one at all actually wanted Hillary.


    At any rate, Lopez Obrador got a REALLY GOOD last word in, and as far as I can see, that was a very good thing. He was nervous at first, reading from notes, and then suddenly that all changed and he opened up and let it all rip. It was PERFECT. If the American or any other MSM says otherwise, they are lying. Stadium absolutely packed, very great message clearly delivered.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •