THE PRINCIPLE- The Movie Big Science Does NOT want YOU to see. SEE IT NOW.



The Principle
Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst ... 15232425
Results 241 to 246 of 246

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #241
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,293
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 1,170 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    13 hrs

    Red Light, Green Light....
    This is the simplest explanation to date:
    They reorganized the "government" as a private, for-profit corporation in the business of governmental services.

    Without explaining anything to the people, of course.

    They then claim, falsely, that we are all knowingly and willingly standing as "surety" for their debts. They do this by undisclosed contract. They get our Mothers to sign paperwork at the hospitals "donating" us to the State of Wisconsin or whichever corporate government franchise is running the operation in the actual State where we are born.

    This allows them access to our assets and credit. They then run up huge debts against our assets and credit. Then they go bankrupt and leave us holding the bag as their "secondary" ----
    just like if you co-sign for a car loan. They set us up as their co-signer.

    And when they pull the plug, we get the bill, and if we can't pay we have to either go bankrupt to protect what we can---- and be part of the problem in the process, or, we lose our assets to pay for their debts.

    It's an identity theft scheme applied to our whole country and everyone in it.




  2. #242
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,293
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 1,170 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    12 hrs

    The Druid's Last Defense
    More than 20,000 Druid priests voluntarily sacrificed themselves and were interred on Bardsey Island to create a plasma seal that is now, after two thousand years, wearing thin.

    This was done to preserve the British Isles and the British Royals, come what may.
    It was the removal of the living to the Kingdom of the Dead, in order to defend the British Isles from "beyond the grave".

    Because we are immortal, there are two sides to the mirror of our reality. Hints of this are in literature, both secular and sacred, all over the world. The most popular and current and easily accessible example is the Lord of the Rings segment about the Army of the Dead, which Aragorn is able to summon from the distant past.

    Their blood and bones saturated that tiny Welsh Island, known as Ynys Enlii.
    Enlil, the brother and enemy of Enki, the Lord of the Earth, is the Lord of the Sea.
    And Barsey Island and the horrific sacrifices made there, are his to account for. It is his fading army that is under final siege, and that is good thing for the rest of the world, for the land and the people and the animals, for all that lives and breathes.

    For, as difficult as this is to understand for many, Enlil has been the bitter enemy of Mankind, an elitist of the Emerald Covenant, who despises people based upon their humble "polluted" DNA.

    Remember the evil Father of Draco in the Harry Potter books? An elitist who kept the poor house elf, Dobby, enslaved --- ?

    This is what we are dealing with, and what Bardsey Island's dead thousands supported, whether they truly knew what they were dying for, or not.

    They, the present-day followers, thought that with their "Dead Baby" sealing ceremony at the London Winter Olympics they were going to get away with it, and ensure themselves another thousand or so years of unrestricted hegemony.

    Instead, they exposed themselves to the discernment of those who have eyes to see and ears to hear. And now, it is all well and truly finished, but not in the way that they had planned.

    The Heavenly Host has arrived.
    For all those who are attuned to the Truth and the Beauty of the Creator, who made all things according to their kind, and who continues "to make all things new" again, rejoice. Bring your thoughts of peace to bear on Bardsey Island, off the Coast of Wales, and break the Seventh Seal.

  3. #243
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,293
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 1,170 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    2 hrs

    Hold the Presses! This is incredible ---
    I have a statement on my desk attributed to former Democratic Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa. He retired in 2015 after twenty years service in the U.S. Congress, ten years in the House, ten years in the Senate. So he should know what he is talking about, right?

    He is still alive so far as I can discover, so maybe someone in Iowa can track him down and ask if he actually said the things that have been reported to me and ask him to make additional comment, because what I am about to discuss is nothing less than astounding.

    According to these statements sitting here on my desk this morning, Senator Harkin believes the following quotes. My explanatory notes and answers appear in brackets [ ]:

    1. Senator Harkin: [The Internal Revenue Code] "or any other constitutional or federal provision [is/are null and void because] "those authorities fell with the loss of our national money standard in 1933." ----that is, because the (Territorial) United States went off the gold standard.

    [Obviously not, Senator, because the Municipal United States continued to function and the Internal Revenue Service continued to click along. Changing from the gold standard to the silver standard in commerce in 1933 could not possibly have any such international treaty consequence. Both forms of money, gold and silver, are actual money and they both pay debts which the American States and People continued to pay for stipulated services under conditions of contract assumption.

    Federal Codes established by the old service corporation may have been vacated, but if so, the members of the U.S. Congress failed to serve Public Notice of those facts, and continued to publish and use those same Federal Codes--- which means that just as the American People were "assumed" to bind themselves to the new service providers by process of assumption, the U.S. Congress is "assumed" to bind themselves to the provisions of the Federal Code they have published and used as a basis for suing people in courts all over this country. Anything less results in institutionalized constructive fraud on the part of the members of the U.S. Congress in 1933 and every year since then.]

    2. Senator Harkin: "Since 1933, the people have formed a new unincorporated United States in trust by their silence in accepting the loss of their ability for paying their debts at law."

    [We must immediately ask --- "Which 'people'? The actual living people of this country, or the invisible fictional "persons" of the Territorial United States? Because the States and People who actually own this country continued to pay their debts all along and have no reason to believe in the existence of any unwritten or implied "United States" trust.

    The bankruptcy in 1933 ruptured the assumed service contract with
    "United States of America, Incorporated" and ultimately led to the demise of that corporation in 1999, but so what? If a subcontractor goes bankrupt the only affect on the Principal is to hire new subcontractors or extend additional duties to already existing subcontractors --- which in this case meant, historically, the UNITED STATES, INC. taking over.

    Also, there is no such thing as a totally "unincorporated" trust. Trusts may be corporate or incorporated, but they have to have substance and form and a written indenture in order to exist. There are no Zombie Apocalypse States or States of States or Commonwealths in our country or anywhere else.

    Senator Harkin's belief ----if indeed he said all this -- that some kind of un-stipulated public trust exists then or now is straight out of the realm of fantasy and has no basis in law or fact.

    There are unincorporated state trusts, but they are not some airy-fairy merely "presumed to exist" construct. Our unincorporated state trusts are formed by declarations, not constitutions. Those declarations may take different forms -- they may be compacts, they may be sovereign letters patent, they may be commonwealth treatises --- but they all have definite written hold-in-your-hand provisions that include public trust indentures. All of them.

    Stop a moment and think about what this purported statement by Senator Harkin implies --- the members of the U.S. Congress think that our States don't really exist or have substance, because they are not incorporated? That's like denying the existence of chickens because you broke an egg. Our States are the authorities that charter all their States of States and if the members of the U.S. Congress missed that fact in Grammar School, we are all in a heap of trouble. You cannot ever have a "State of Florida" without first having a "Florida" --- does everyone grasp that fact?]

    3. Senator Harkin then quotes Russell v. Allen, 107 U.S. 163, 27 L.Ed. 397: "The United States Government may be the trustee of a charitable trust."

    [Well, I "may" act as a fan dancer, too, Senator. But in the absence of evidence, we cannot presume that I occupied that capacity, can we? Or any other "potential" capacity --- dog catcher, soothsayer, or rocket scientist. I might act as the trustee of a charitable trust, too. Might. Or might not. This is crazy stuff, right out of Loony-Tunes Central.... The Trust to which the delegated powers return by Operation of Law is and has always been The United States of America, Unincorporated, which was formed and announced to the public by The Continental Congress, September 9, 1776, and to all the State Trusts functioning under their statehood compacts, letters patent, commonwealth treatises, etc. If this is not perfectly obvious to the members of the "U.S. Congress" it is still perfectly obvious to the rest of us.]

    I literally can't believe what I just read. If this two-page statement by Senator Harkin is legitimate, and if this is representative of the level of understanding among members of Congress, our Ship of State has been lost at sea for over a hundred years, captained by pirates and crewed by imbeciles.

    And that discussion was just the first paragraph of this statement. There's more. Unfortunately. But I must stop and draw breath....

    Dear Mr. President Trump: there is no need for any vacuous supposition. The occasion of any service provider going bankrupt results in the delegated powers returning to The United States of America, Unincorporated. We were not given Notice by the International Trustees that they were unable to make provisions for new service providers (or were incompetent to do so) and in fact, new service providers readily came forward and assumed the service obligations and have been paid for those services since 1868.

    You can see that the obligations of contract by assumption swing both ways, and that any failure by the U.S. Congress to recognize this fact (such as their obligation to honor the entire Federal Code so long as they continue to publish and reference it ) results in constructive fraud against the sovereign States and People of this country and is in fact, treason.

    On this occasion with the failures of both the corporate Territorial and corporate Municipal service corporations, we have said --- "Enough." and have made public our non-assumption of contract and have also published our acknowledgement and acceptance of the returned Delegated Powers.

    It is now your turn to educate the members of Congress about life in the actual world and tell them that there is no implied United States trust charitable or otherwise available for the United States Government to (possibly) administer.

    Andrew Jackson sold off the unincorporated United States as a business in 1836 and used the proceeds to pay off all debts owed by The United States of America, Unincorporated.

    All variations of "United States" incorporation(s) since that time have been completely foreign operations acting under assumed contracts, both Municipal and Territorial --- and aside from being responsible to obey and execute the constitutional agreements they were assuming, never had any authority, business connections, or any other rights, titles, or interests related to this country or its people.

    We are now calling for the "Internal Revenue Service" to vacate our shores for lack of valid contract and lack of evidence that any valid Municipal or Territorial PERSONS exist. We also remind the American Armed Forces that if they want to work for us, they need a new contract. And as for the "United States" meaning the British Territorial United States and Municipal United States -- we are your Priority Creditors, and that is set in cement.

    Finally, as for the Office of the "US Attorney General" ---that whole mess needs to be straightened out along with dismissal of any claims that Americans "voluntarily" donated their babies as chattel "alien property" --- ASAP. Thank you, very much.


  4. #244
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,293
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 1,170 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    2 hrs

    Pedigree of the IRS
    For all those who need to know, this is what the IRS is and what it does and who it does it for--- I quote Pao L. Chang for convenience sake:
    "The Internal Revenue Service is considered to be a Bureau of the Department of the Treasury; however, like the Federal Reserve, it is not part of the Federal Government. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS, et al., CV-93-405E- EJE - U.S.D.C.D.I; Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148, page 5967; Reorganization Plan No. 26; Public Law 102-391---and is in fact incorporated in Delaware ...." ("Internal Revenue Service" was incorporated in 1925, the Municipal "IRS" was incorporated in 1933.)

    "It is pointed out that all official Federal Government mail is sent postage-free because of the franking privilege; however, the IRS has to pay their own postage, which [again] indicates that they are not a government entity."

    "They [the Internal Revenue Service/IRS] are in fact a collection agency for the Federal Reserve, because they do not collect any taxes for the U.S. Treasury. All funds collected [by the IRS working under color of law "as" a Treasury "Bureau" and collecting funds under false pretense as the funds are collected under what appears to be a Treasury presentment] are turned over to the Federal Reserve. If you have ever sent a check to the IRS, you will find that it was endorsed over to the Federal Reserve."

    "The Federal Reserve, in turn, deposits the money with the International Monetary Fund, an Agency of the United Nations (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 816.) where it is filtered down to the International Development Association (see Treasury Delegation Order No. 91) which is part of the "International Bank for Reconstruction and Development" --- commonly known now as the World Bank."

    Bottom line --- the so-called "Internal Revenue Service" is not now and never has been a part of our government and has been deceitfully misrepresented as such by our British Territorial and Municipal United States subcontractors.

    At the bottom of the dog pile which progresses from the U.S. Treasury to the Federal Reserve to the IMF to the IBRD ---- we find what? Ah, the World Bank.

    Karen Hudes' erstwhile Dropbox Fixer and sometimes employer.

    Please note that the Federal Reserve, IBRD, and World Bank are the Secondary Creditors that forced the "United States of America, Incorporated" into bankruptcy in 1933.

    And also note that the IBRD and the World Bank are the ones who, in 2000, following the settlement of the bankruptcy, showed up and lied through their teeth and without anyone giving any Notice to the actual Priority Creditors (The United States of America, the American States and People) claimed that all our assets were "abandoned" --- including approximately $387 billion dollars in gold that FDR confiscated from the American People under color of law as "surety" backing the bankrupt "United States of America, Incorporated" bankruptcy.

    Also please note that the bankrupt governmental services corporation doing business as the "United States of America, Inc." was fronted by the Roman Catholic Church as a religious non-profit.

    Ms. Hudes is still holding onto our gold and pretending to be our Trustee, even after we entered our objections (according to our Constitution no Bar Attorney can hold any position of trust) and collapsed any such "Trust" by directly presenting the Bill of Lading issued by the actual Priority Creditors.

    Let me interpret this situation --- these banks caused the problem, then profited from it under false pretenses for sixty-three years, and afterward lodged false claims of abandonment against the bankruptcy surety assets as Secondary Creditors. And they are still holding onto gold and other assets that rightfully belonged to your great-grandparents and grandparents and parents and now, also, to you.

    And now, to bring it all back "Full Circle" ---- the IRS got its start back in the 1100's in France and England, when the Pope (acting as Pontiff, of course) started collecting an income tax called "Peter's Pence" which was a special collection to support the cost of the Crusades, collected every April 15th. It was collected by members of the Dominican Order, the same nice people that brought us the Inquisition. They continued to pop up as Privateer organizations on the sidelines of every war thereafter, as this was the Holy See's way of supporting the cost of all the Pontiff's war-mongering.

    The Civil War was no different. The "Internal Revenue Service" back then was issued Privateer licenses and Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and they operated out of Puerto Rico and other Island bases, preying upon both Northern and Southern commercial vessels. Nice, huh?

    Just special.
    Things got reorganized after the Civil War and they moved onshore for a brief time, only to be repelled and sent packing by our more sentient ancestors, back to their base in Puerto Rico. After 1904, they were allowed back to operate on our shores via the Insular Tariff Cases, and particularly Downes v. Bidwell and Hooven and Allison v. Evatt--- for the express purpose of collecting from Municipal United States employees only. By 1916, the Pontiff was busy financing another war---
    World War I, so sympathetic war-mongers in Congress acting without a quorum majority on Christmas Eve, passed the "Sixteenth Amendment" to their corporate "Constitution"---- and set the wolves loose on the innocent American Public.

    And then came World War II.
    Things got "tight" for the Pontiff again. He couldn't collect enough from all those corporations and employees and dependents that were legitimately "U.S. Citizens"
    so the war-mongers in Congress came up with another plan: The Victory Tax.

    The Victory Tax wasn't a tax at all, really. It was a charitable donation toward "the war effort". American workers signed up by the millions and agreed to donate an amount equal to that paid each month by federal civilian and military employees and to have it deducted from their paychecks. The wording of the "Victory Tax" was vague and the sunset clause on this arrangement was the "end of the hostilities".

    Most of us understand that the "end of hostilities" came in September 1945, but the Internal Revenue Service kept right on collecting from all those millions of American workers who had so patriotically "volunteered" to donate to the war effort. If anyone objected, they were told that there was "still a war on"----- the Cold War.

    Since then we've had every kind of "war" you can think of --- wars on poverty, wars on drugs, wars on wars, as well as innumerable other conflicts ---- like Vietnam, like Iraq I and II, like Afghanistan..... and to hear the "Internal Revenue Service" talk, we are still volunteering and still obligated to be docked larger and larger percentages of our earnings in support of a Victory Tax that should have ended in 1945.

    How about this? A "War on Con Artists" and especially a "War on European Con Artists"? How about a nice big boot on Dominican Order rump?
    And all the members of Congress that have mindlessly, ruthlessly, undeniably furthered their power and paychecks by glutting on the extortion and racketeering profits rolling in from all this?

    For the life of me, I don't understand why General Kelly and General Mattis and General Dunford don't have Karen Hudes hanging upside down by her thumbs, why they aren't helping us recoup our assets---which would far more than pay for their services---?

    Why aren't they arresting at least all the Bar Members usurping upon our lawful government and occupying seats in Congress? They have cause to know that no Bar Attorney can hold any Public Office or hold any position of trust in our government. It has been this way since 1819. Think they'd get the news?

    And what is this nonsense of "Political Parties"----groups of lobbyists occupying Congress as "Representatives"? We are owed Fiduciary Deputies elected by the People (House) and State Legislatures (Senate). Not two colors of Tobacco Lobby on speed.

    Why aren't our military geniuses arresting and deporting all these undeclared Foreign Agents---- especially "IRS" employees--- and shutting down the phony Treasury Bureau? Instead of just stupidly standing here and letting these robbers steal and coerce and harm the people of this country---the same people they are hired to protect?

    I have a Big Question for the members of the "U.S." Congress---whichever "U.S." that is, and for all the employees sucking off this gigantic crime and for the Pope and his minions, too -----

    Just how long do you all think that you can abuse your employers and bite the hands that feed you, and get away with all this crap, before it all comes home to you?

    Hell, no, I'm not "volunteering".


  5. #245
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,293
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 1,170 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    5 hrs

    Hold the Presses -- This is Incredible 2.0 Recap
    Yesterday we began discussion of comments attributed to former Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa. He served in the U.S. House for ten years and in the Senate for ten more before retiring in 2015.

    Bearing in mind that we still don't have confirmation that Harkin actually said all this, if even a small part of this is typical of what members of Congress think and are taught about our history, we are in a heap of trouble and they, like everyone else, need to be brought up to speed.

    The first off-the-wall idea was that the Constitutions and the Federal Code went out the window because of the 1933 bankruptcy and going off the gold standard.

    Let's try to get this in perspective.
    We contract for certain governmental services with the British Territorial United States and its corporations. This would be analogous to contracting with a Property Management Corporation that also has subcontractors that work for it: a carpentry subcontractor, a lawn mowing contractor, a trash removal contractor, a snowplowing contractor.... got the picture?

    So the trash removal subcontractor went bust in 1933, stopped accepting gold as payment, and started offering I.O.U.'s in lieu of paying for its debts.

    That really has nothing much to do with us, does it? And it doesn't change what we are owed in terms of services by the parent Property Management Corporation, either. Our contract with them is still the same and it is their problem how they are going to get the trash removed. Not ours.

    It's the same thing with the 1933 bankruptcy. They stopped accepting gold as payment. We paid in silver instead. They started using I.O.U.'s instead of paying for their own debts. That's on them. And on their Parent Corporation. Not us.

    We are the Employer in this situation, and what is owed to us is owed to us regardless of how the Parent Corporation or their subcontractors operate or what they do with their money, and if they don't provide the service, we simply take out the trash ourselves or hire someone else.

    What we recently discovered was an outrageous and undisclosed ploy by Franklin Delano Roosevelt proposing that we "gift" ourselves and our assets as collateral backing the debts of their failed trash removal company---to underwrite their I.O.U.s. And then we discovered the actual means by which they extorted all these "gifts" under color of law.

    So the dirt is all on them and none on us, thanks. This whole debacle is now back on the laps of the Queen and the Pope, who are the Principals responsible.

    We are their Priority Creditors by several country miles as a result of all this malfeasance, fraud, extortion, and racketeering under color of law, and their only hope is that we agree to settle this without blowing them off the face of the Earth.

    The Constitution(s) owed to us are not affected by their bankruptcy, and all the debts they piled up "in our names" without our knowledge and free consent are fraudulent, going back to 1860, because, as we have discovered, 1933 was not the first round of this chicanery.

    The other idea that the Senator exposed is the idea that the Federal Code somehow went "out the window" because of the bankruptcy and end of the gold standard being used by their corporations.

    What happened in fact is that a Municipal Corporation doing business as the "UNITED STATES" came in and took over the trash removal contract by a process of "assumpsit". That is, nobody at the Parent Corporation asked us, they simply moved in a new subcontractor to continue taking out the trash. We have no contract with the "UNITED STATES" but because we received the trash service from them, we assumed the contract and paid them for it.

    But assumption of contracts swings both ways.
    We assumed and paid the contract under the provisions of the actual Constitutions, and the assumption that they owe us in return is that they are continuing to operate under the Constitutions and according to their published rules, codes, and regulations.

    Any deviation from that quid pro quo is not allowed, and in order for it to be allowed, they would have to make a very substantial Public Notice and Public Disclosure regarding the "sun setting" of the Federal Code. They would also have to stop publishing the Federal Code and stop using the Federal Code for administrative purposes and stop referencing it in court cases and stop repealing and amending and adding to it, too.

    Anything else would, as I explained, amount to knowing and purposeful constructive fraud by the members of the Congress.

    We have seen plenty of evidence of fraud and wrong-doing by the Congress and its members as a whole, but if Senator Harkin didn't understand these facts and circumstances after twenty years in Congress (and Tom Harkin was by far not the dumbest man in Congress) -- the only thing we can conclude is that the men and women in Congress are being misled by their legal advisors and dumbed down so that they make wrong decisions based on wrong information.

    It is up to us to inform them and hold them and their Parent Corporation sponsors-- the Queen and the Pope-- feet first to the fire. Get out your pens and paper, Campers, and send this to the appropriate Congressional Delegation that is supposed to be serving your state of the Union.

    You might also drop a line to:
    Office of the Prosecutor
    International Criminal Court
    Post Office Box 19519 - 2500 CM
    The Hague The Netherlands

    The "US" is not a party to the Hague Conventions, but they are party to the Geneva Conventions, and any enslavement racket involving securitization and personage of living people under color of law, especially innocent Third Parties who were never involved in their "wars" in the first place, is a major faux pas.

    We would, of course, like full recognition of our claims against them and the deplorable fraud that has been practiced against our States and our People, by treaty partners who owed us far, far better treatment and whose bacon we saved through two World Wars.

    Let all the innocent American blood shed at Bull Run and Gettysburg, at Flanders and in the Argonne Forest, the boys who gave their lives in North Africa and Normandy, in Germany and Japan and Okinawa and Korea and Vietnam---- let their blood rise up and reproach the very souls of the criminals responsible for this -- if they have souls. And if they do not repent, may they come to a swift and certain end without the protection of man or God.


  6. #246
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,293
    Thanks
    1,705
    Thanked 1,170 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    9 hrs

    For Uriah, the Hittite
    This message is coded, as it must be. The one receiving it will know to whom and for whom I speak:

    "Uriah....
    Bathsheba loved you. Only and ever and truly.

    It was you that she yearned for through all the lonely years.

    It was your voice that echoed in her heart. It is your voice that echoes still.

    Nothing can take your love away from you. Nothing can dim its glory.

    No man can tear away what God has joined or destroy what He has planned.

    She is still yours, Uriah, as she always was and is.

    In the days to come, the world will be made new again.
    The children that you have mourned for, the children that would have been, shall live. She will smile into your eyes again and take your hand.

    She is a Queen now and she will make you King. Your love for each other will be honored, and you shall never be parted again.

    Let this be a comfort to you, Uriah. Let it ease your way.
    She is coming to you now, pure and blameless as the snow. The sunrise is in her eyes and all her ways are peace.

    Receive the laud and honor that are yours, Uriah.
    Let go all pain and grief. Lift your gallant heart again and see what the Lord has said!

    You will rejoice and not be disappointed!
    You will come to her arms as a hero coming home, beloved husband.
    And all the suffering, all the injustice----will be gone as if it has never been."




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •