Page 73 of 73 FirstFirst ... 2363717273
Results 721 to 728 of 728

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #721
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    8 hrs

    For All The Jural Assemblies - 59 Lessons in Sovereignty

    First of all, sovereignty is inherited. It is not something that simply devolves upon us by virtue of winning a war. You have all inherited "sovereignty in your own right" and the right to own property --- as opposed to being considered property -- by being born on the land and soil of your State of the Union.

    Second of all, the Delegation of Powers under the Constitutions would not be possible if the Americans had not established Sovereignty. A King can delegate powers to a Queen, or to another King, to exercise in his behalf, but no one of lesser standing can do this. The simple fact that the British Monarch has been in receipt of Delegated Powers of ours since 1787 is all the evidence needed to prove that we possessed sovereignty prior to the establishment of the Constitutions.

    Third, our actual claim to sovereignty is based upon the Norman Conquest and a particular kind of sovereignty called "sovereignty in one's own right" that William the Conqueror bequeathed to his loyal Barons in England. In essence, he made land grants to each one following the Conquest, and upon his death in 1087 A.D., he made all of them "sovereigns in their own right" in England.

    They were still "Barons" in France, and owed Williams's heir fealty in France; but in England, they were kings with permanent hereditary holdings of land. In England, King John was just one among many kings, and the only distinction of his office was that he was responsible for the maintenance and preservation of the Church's properties and the "Commonwealth" land.

    The Commonwealth was co-administered by the Church and amounted to waste land and property that the King entrusted to the Church to develop and manage for the benefit and support of the Paupers, the Sick, and others not able to support themselves.

    The Church took over these "commonwealth" properties and used them for good purposes in the communities they served. They used these properties to create common grazing fields, to establish orchards, apiaries, and herb and medicinal gardens, community vegetable gardens, and cemeteries. Rarely, the Church inherited "good wooded ground" --- woodlots, and more rarely still, they were able to convert swamps into arable land via installing drainage ditches, dikes, and dams. The profits were used to support the Church's charity efforts.

    So, it was King John's position as "the" King involved in these activities that gave him any special position in England at the time of the Magna Carta; if John had been King of the country in truth and fact, then he could not be held to the Magna Carta longer than the ink was dry and he denied his free-willing consent to it.

    The fact that the Magna Carta has stood on the land and soil jurisdiction until this day is again testimony to the fact that the French Norman Barons and their progeny, acting at the time of the Magna Carta--- basically a 128 years after The Settlement of the Norman Conquest, were certainly in possession of "sovereignty in the own right" and as equal kings on the land and soil of England were able to impose their demands lawfully upon King John despite whatever he wanted and despite what the Pope wanted, either.

    The Belle Chers, the family of William the Conqueror -- his Cousins and other relatives who remained in England, intermarried and settled in, all as sovereigns in their own right. Their names became Anglicized to "Belcher" and they formed a special alliance with the Clintwoods, a noble English family, an alliance that endured for many generations and followed them to America.

    In early America, one branch of the Belchers acted as the Royal Governors of areas that would one day become three States of the Union, but this branch -- headed by Governor Jonathan Belcher, founder of Princeton University, died out; the Belchers who remained in America retained both their ties to England and their ties to the Clintwood family.

    William Belcher (the name "William" is retained for many, many generations and derives from William the Conquer and Guilleroi de Lancelot du Lac the son of King Ban of Gaul, our common ancestor) was here and sided with the Colonists against George III, and as he possessed sovereignty in his own right, inherited from his Norman French ancestors, he was fully competent to stand toe-to-toe with George III, just as the Norman Barons were competent to stand down King John.

    Sovereignty operates in the national and international jurisdictions. When sovereignty is changed upon the soil, that is, the national jurisdiction, we see total regime change. The names of countries change. Their systems of government change. Most of the time, challenges to sovereignty occur in the international jurisdiction of the land and sea, with pushing and shoving over trade policies and offshore fishing rights and those sorts of things.

    In both cases, whether national or international (domestic or non-domestic) sovereignty is exercised according to the demands of the jurisdiction. On the soil, the sovereign acts as the personification of the people. In the international jurisdiction of the land, the sovereign acts as the Lawful Person personifying the People of a country. In the international jurisdiction of the sea, the sovereign acts a the Legal Person personifying the Legal Personages of a nation.

    But what happens when "sovereignty in one's own right" is bequeathed to many people, instead of just one? As William the Conqueror did, and as William Belcher did? Then every man and woman in inheritance of such sovereignty, becomes equal to the King or Queen of any other country, and the entire system of Monarchy is overwhelmed.

    From the standpoint of the British Monarchs and the Popes, this is the most damaging part of both the Norman Conquest and the American War of Independence, because it serves to destroy the elitist system of Feudalism (including Corporate Feudalism) upon which they depend. According to their reasoning, for one man to be king, all others must be in subjection.

    According to the Williams --- men whose names mean "Resolute Protector"-- this is hogwash. According to them, all Mankind can earn their sovereignty and as far as Americans are concerned, we need only seize upon our birthright and refuse the Nanny State options offered by the Queen and the Popes.

    As a result of our unique history and our unique Constitutional system, it has been very hard for them to weasel in and make false claims to the effect that we have knowingly and voluntarily "gifted" our Good Names and Estates to them in exchange for being taken care and bossed around and exploited as property by the Kings and/or the Popes.

    It has taken decades and not a little prevarication and clandestine undisclosed contracting processes, plus falsification of records, for them to establish the current system of Corporate Feudalism on our shores --- but all it really takes is for Americans to wake up and remember their inheritance, claim back their birthright political status, and take up the job of being sovereigns in their own right again.

    On the soil jurisdiction all such sovereigns are one of the people of the soil, on the land jurisdiction they are one of the People known to be Lawful Persons, and on the international jurisdiction of the sea, they are Legal Persons.

    When you return your Legal Person to the land and soil jurisdiction, it becomes a Lawful Person --- owed all the guarantees and protections of the Constitutions. You come back into your birthright inherited status as a "sovereign in your own right".

    When you return all the derivative names, including the STRAWMEN to the land and soil and declare their permanent domicile on the land and soil of an American State, they are lawfully converted and they, too, are owed all the guarantees of the Constitutions.

    Because sovereignty is inherited from other sovereigns, you cannot avoid being a sovereign in your own right from the moment of your birth, but you can (if it is done consciously and voluntarily -- which in our case, it never is) "pledge" allegiance to other sovereigns or symbols, and become subjected to them as a result.

    Generations of American school children have been taught to pledge their allegiance to an inanimate symbol --- the Federal War Flag --- without realizing that they are presumed to be subjecting themselves to the Queen who is flying our own flag under our delegated powers.

    Various means of entrapment and identity theft have been used to "capture" and "seize upon" American sovereigns and to unlawfully convert them into US Citizens who are subjects of the Queen and into Citizens of the United States who are subjects of the Popes, but all this activity has been without disclosure, rendering all such pretended citizenship obligations moot and unenforceable so long as you are prepared to stand up and exercise the sovereignty that is your inheritance and birthright--- the sovereignty in your own right --- of all Free Men and Women.

    Many questions have been raised about James Clinton Belcher and his role in all this. During the Theodore Roosevelt Administration the Scottish Interloper doing business as "The United States of America, Inc." founded in 1868, was preparing to go bankrupt. James' Great-Uncle, Clintwood Belcher, rode to Washington, DC, to take possession of the Great Seals --- The Great Seal of the United States of America and The Great Seal of the United States.

    On his way home, as he crossed over into Maryland, he was viciously attacked by men waiting to ambush him. In the resulting fight, he killed six of his attackers. His own horse was killed also. He grabbed one of the dead men's horses and rode off into the night, making for the western Frontier to save his life.

    They stole the Great Seals and they lied about the whole circumstance and branded Clintwood Belcher as a "horse thief" --- neatly omitting their own grand theft under deadly force, their intent to murder, their killing of his horse, and all the rest of it. He spent the rest of his life "on the lam", always looking over his shoulder, always moving from place to place to place. Theodore Roosevelt considered him "a danger to our government"--- self-evidently meaning the foreign Territorial usurpers on our shores.

    Clintwood died without issue, so the torch passed to his younger brother, James, and from James to his son Orville, and from Orville to his son, James Clinton Belcher. At the time my husband was born in 1941, Federal Agents were still hunting and harassing members of the family. Orville Belcher moved his young son twelve times in the first ten years of his life, constantly moving just as Great-Uncle Clintwood had to move and keep moving to avoid being arrested on false charges or be murdered outright.

    This is not a glamorous story. It's a painful, scary, shameful story, in which good men were replaced by bad men, honorable men replaced by crooks, and innocent people who were the victims of crime were portrayed as criminals ----while the actual criminals sat at ease on the White House lawn. The Belchers have lived poor and they have lived rough, but through it all, they remembered who they are. They remembered their hereditary offices. They remembered their lineage. They never ceased the search to recover the Great Seals.

    The Great Seals surfaced briefly in New York City in the possession of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. They have now surfaced again in Indonesia. From our perspective, the Belchers are still the owners of the Seals no matter how many generations of pirates may possess them --- under mandate and Maxim of Law: "Possession by pirates does not change ownership."
    Nor, obviously, do any documents that have been impressed with those seals since their theft during the first Roosevelt Administration have any validity or power to bind us, as they have been exercised without our knowledge or consent.

    The custodians of the Great Seals in Indonesia are under demand to return them to us as stolen property. If these heirlooms are not returned, we shall have them re-cast in their original form.
    It should be noted that the Office of Hereditary Head of State is not a Public Office. It is a Private Trust Office, a Lawful Person, and while it is an Office which James Clinton Belcher claims by direct descent, the reason for doing so is to prove to the Queen that yes, we still exist. It is not only those who received sovereignty at the hands of our ancestor: it is also those who received life from his body and soul who are still here on these shores.

    There is no plausible excuse for the Queen or the Pope to continue their pillaging on our shores.
    Now, you are being called upon to remember who you are, too. Americans. Sovereigns in your own right. Not "United States Citizens" who are subjects of the British Queen. Not "Citizens of the United States" who are subjects of the Roman Pontiff.


  2. #722
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    7 hrs

    The Existential Problem

    People often ask me --- how did all this get started?
    My mind reels. Adam and Eve, I think gloomily. But it is nothing so poetic.

    It's just the facts of our life cycle. It takes a long time to produce a fully functioning, educated, morally and emotionally sound, intellectually complete man or woman, and a lot of hard work, time, money, and effort to produce this result.

    Then, there are those who --- one way or another --- are hurt, damaged, unable to function and support themselves. They need care, therapy, assistance of all kinds, too.

    Finally, we have the seniors, who after working all their lives, are suffering the pains and problems of old age. Eventually, if we live long enough, we all need help just to get out of bed and eat and get to the bathroom and do our laundry and all the most mundane things.

    This is the reality. The 'burden" of the young, the old, the sick, the crippled, the mentally ill, the addicted, and everyone else who simply cannot or will not contribute, is all resting on those of us who are able to work and care and think and contribute, and that slice of the population -- about 35% of us --- has to pay for and carry all the rest.

    That is the existential problem.

    This is what the Church has struggled with for centuries. How do you get people to do the right thing?

    Left to themselves, people are mostly too selfish to provide enough money to feed and clothe and care for and educate orphaned children and abandoned elderly, too busy working for their own benefit and survival to take on the extra load of the sick and mentally ill, the victims of accident and those who have incapacitated themselves with drugs and other addictions.

    Above and beyond this reality, there is the constant need to build and maintain infrastructure --- roads and communications and ports and all the rest of the physical structure and service delivery systems that make life pleasant and business possible.

    So -- how to take care of people who need help, which is the duty of any decent culture, while at the same time building, expanding, and maintaining infrastructure and service systems?

    It's a tall order.
    For centuries the Church attempted to do this via voluntary collections and donations and "tithes" which are essentially taxes on parishioners, and also added in the volunteer work of the clergy and members of churches who contributed their time and labor and expertise for free.

    But now it's time to rethink everything that has gone before.
    The corporations of this world owe the people of this world, and it's payback time. The stellar operating feature of the Corporate Feudalism we have suffered is the amassing of gigantic Slush Funds that generate large amounts of profit and which allow for coercive control of commerce.

    So, why not re-task these Slush Funds to earn money to pay for all the existential needs we have --- set the people free and let the corporations be the slaves? Lift the burden off our shoulders and let the earnings of these already amassed Slush Funds go to new purposes? Existential purposes.


  3. #723
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    8 hrs

    Bottom of the Ninth

    It's the bottom of the ninth.....
    Grandma's cupboard is bare.....

    I normally give the lion's share of my income to support the efforts of The Living Law Firm and the researchers and paralegals supporting us, but it isn't going to happen this month. This month, Grandma has had problems of her own.

    My dog who famously survived lymphoma by eating dandelion root also suffers from laryngeal paralysis, an inherited affliction of older Labradors that affects their voice box -- their bark and the opening and closing mechanisms of their wind pipe. This in turn affects their ability to pant and cool down. In hot weather, it is potentially deadly.

    Now, my dog is old, but he is otherwise in good shape and as lively and playful as ever. So doing the Tie-Back Surgery has given him a new lease on whatever life he has left. I wish you could all see how happy he is, now that the surgery is over and he can pant to his heart's delight in this warm weather.

    So in terms of things that matter to me, taking care of my animals and giving them the best care and the most life and best life I can, is a priority.

    Also this past week, my son suffered a dental emergency that has resulted in dental surgery and we all know what that means in terms of the Big Bucks.

    So, no, I won't be contributing a whole lot to The Living Law Firm and the researchers this month, because I can't. Those of you who can---- we are sitting here with every free-booter in the Western World trying to overcome our claims to our own country --- and yes, we need your help.

    My PayPal is: avannavon@gmail.com and checks and other donations can be sent to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652. Please make checks payable to me, because I then distribute to researchers and paralegals and others in addition to just those non-Bar lawyers who are part of The Living Law Firm.




  4. #724
    Gold
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    950
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked 429 Times in 289 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    First of all, sovereignty is inherited.
    Definition of ALIEN ... American Sovereign in his probationary state.

    INHERITANCE, estates. A perpetuity in lands to a man and his heirs; or it is
    the right to succeed to the estate of a person who died intestate. Dig. 50,
    16, 24. The term is applied to lands.
    2. The property which is inherited is called an inheritance.
    3. The term inheritance includes not only lands and tenements which
    have been acquired by descent, but also every fee simple or fee tail, which
    a person has acquired by purchase, may be said to be an inheritance, because
    the purchaser's heirs may inherit it. Litt. s. 9.
    4. Estates of inheritance are divided into inheritance absolute, or fee
    simple; and inheritance limited, one species of which is called fee tail.
    They are also divided into corporeal, as houses and lands and incorporeal,
    commonly called incorporeal hereditaments. (q. v.) 1 Cruise, Dig. 68; Sw.
    163; Poth. des Retraits, n. 2 8.
    5. Among the civilians, by inheritance is understood the succession to
    all the rights of the deceased. It is of two kinds, 1 . That which arises by
    testament, when the testator gives his succession to a particular person;
    and, 2. That which arises by operation of law, which is called succession ab
    intestat. Hein. Lec. El. Sec. 484, 485.
    You see this is precisely why I suggest you not have a will and testament. Things such as incorporeal rights that are not addressed are not a part of this first kind of succession .. by testament. What is important is those incorporeal rights arising out of operation of law ... aka 'succession ab intestat'.

    This then reminds me of an observation from the 1983 farm crisis that goes

    Did you hear of the Nebraska farmer who got nabbed for child abuse?

    He tried to leave the farm to the kids.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to ziero0 For This Useful Post:

    Bigjon (23rd May 2019)

  6. #725
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    7 hrs

    The Smelly Roses -- Public Notice and Demand.

    When it comes to talking about money, I still have to overcome waves of cognitive dissonance. Here is a good example of it from Egon von Greyez:
    "In the West, ordinary people’s standard of living has been maintained by increasing personal debt and also by governments running ever bigger deficits. These deficits are used for buying the votes of the average citizen to improve the perceived standard of living at the cost of an ever increasing national debt. "

    This is an example of what everyone assumes, what everyone believes, and what everyone endlessly prattles--- but, this is not what is directly, observably true. What is true and what you can see for yourself is quite different:

    The foreign subcontractors running the Federal Government came in and passed "legal tender" laws, and forced everyone to accept "Notes" --- that is, I.O.U.s --- as money. As a result, you haven't been paid for anything, not your goods, not your labor, for decades. You haven't been allowed access to the corresponding National Credit you have earned, either. This is what causes any "National Debt" --- and it isn't your National Debt.

    It's the debt of the Queen and the Popes who created and enforced this system on their Federal Employees, and then failed to ride herd on it.

    We, Americans, were supposed to get exemptions and to be able to exercise Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges that were never provided to us. Instead, the vermin instituted a vast identity theft scheme to "redefine" us all as United States Citizens and/or Citizens of the United States, so as to deny us access to the Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges and exemptions we are owed.

    Mr. von Greyez has been bamboozled along with everyone else into assuming that we, rank and file Americans, are responsible for this " National Debt" and that it is the result of reckless overspending and under-producing on our part, or, that alternatively, it's all the fault of "useless eaters", all the poor people riding on our Socialist coat-tails....

    That's exactly what the perpetrators of this colossal scam wish for us to assume, but we have two eyes and two ears and a brain, don't we?

    Look at what has actually happened. We have contributed our goods and labor in exchange for corporate I.O.U.'s since the 1930's and we have never been paid anything for it, not money and not credit, either. That's what the "US National Debt" is--- THEIR debt to us, not our debt to them.

    So, the source of the debt and the problem is not reckless overspending on our part and it is not the fault of all the poor people receiving welfare benefits, either.

    This whole situation is the fault of the Queen and of the Popes who allowed: (1) the imposition of "Legal Tender" laws on the Federal Employees; (2) the identity theft of Americans and mis-characterization of Americans as either United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, thereby cheating us out of our exemptions and the Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges we are owed.

    These Grafters are running no less than three (3) primary Bunko Schemes at once on the American States and People, all under color of law:
    1. Identity Theft --- claiming that we are all either United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, that is, some species of Federal Employee or Dependent, and amassing falsified registrations and undisclosed contracts as evidence for their False Claims;

    2. Credit Fraud --- based on the Identity Theft -- they claim that we are accommodation parties and co-signers allowing them to access our private and public assets as collateral backing their borrowing.

    They access our credit via a process of "hypothecation of debt" which leaves us totally unaware of what they are doing. They charge our "credit cards" up over the max, then claim bankruptcy protection for themselves, and leave us on the hook as co-signers to pay their debts for them.

    3. Abandoned Assets Scheme -- based on Identity Theft -- as a result of mis-characterizing us as United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, they deny us access not only to any actual payment for our goods and services, they also deny us access to the credit that we earned as a result of their receipt of our goods and services.

    Over time, this results in the massive accrual of our National Credit which exactly mirrors their National Debt. Bearing in mind that they have deliberately kept us from accessing this credit via the initial Identity Theft, they then propose to come in and claim that our National Credit is a "gift" to the Church or that it is "Abandoned Assets" left unclaimed by unknown parties who are "lost at sea, presumed dead."

    The problem for them is that all of this was completely undisclosed and non-consensual and the result of unconscionable contracting practices and Gross Breach of Trust.

    A good 90% of us are not "United States Citizens" nor are we "Citizens of the United States". We were not given full disclosure and were instead deliberately misinformed.

    We aren't lost at sea. We are back home, standing on solid ground, and we are claiming all our rights, all our constitutional guarantees, all our assets, including our purloined credit.

    That includes all the Historic Trust Money and actual Assets left on deposit with all the various Federal Banks and Savings and Loans across the country and around the world. We are the Priority Creditors and we, the Lawful People, are also the actual Trustees--- not the Bank Trustees. Not, in other words, Kim Gougen, and not, for example, Manna World Holdings Trust. Not Karen Hudes and any Dropbox created to bail out the criminals at the World Bank, either.

    This is Public Notice and Demand:
    Deposits of actual assets in the possession of commercial banks are lawful goods and can belong only to Lawful People. That means us, the actual Depositors.

    Deposits are loans made to banks and are bank liabilities. Our deposits don't belong to the banks, and they are not abandoned assets, and they are not subject to claims by bank creditors. Those actual asset deposits belong to the depositors who are the Primary Creditors of all these banks. Period.

    Along with all the other criminal mischief promoted by our Federal Public Servants, both Territorial and Municipal, they have offered to mis-characterize Depositors as United States Citizens and/or Citizens of the United States, too, and thereby offer an excuse for stealing our Trust Deposits and actual assets left on deposit in Federal Banks and Federal Savings and Loans.

    The assignment of Bank Trustees by the Bank to oversee these accounts does not mean that the Bank Trustee takes precedent or authority over the actual Private Trustees who made the Deposit, and no phony claim that we are "acting as" United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States can stand in our presence otherwise.

    All the phony dossiers that the schemers have created via the IRS are also fully discovered. It turns out that, for example, I am not the manager of a rum distillery in Barbados and I am mad as Hell to discover than any such fanciful "colorable" idea has ever been advanced by any flat-rumped bureaucrat in my employment.

    It's time to make a deal or sit down and shut up. The Sword of Truth hangs over all your heads. The People --- not only of this country --- but the whole world, are now fully informed.


  7. #726
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    17 hrs

    Lawful People, Lawful Money, Lawful Remedy.....

    People come to me and they want to argue.

    They have a clear view of their part of the "Elephant" and they want to argue about it.

    If they have hold of the trunk, they want to tell me all about how it is long and flexible and tapered and seems to be hollow. If they have grabbed a leg, they are telling me about how it is rock solid and cylindrical. If they have hold of an ear, well, then, it is flat and flexible and flops back and forth like a piece of heavy cloth....

    Then, of course, they want to argue with each other, too.

    Which one is right? They all are.

    They are just experiencing the government and the court system from different directions.

    It's important to step back and realize we have a whole "Elephant" here.

    This morning I got a stream of emails because a "Petition of Remonstrance" was not heard by nor addressed by the State of New Hampshire Legislature. No big surprises here in Alaska.

    When you "petition" anyone or anything, you give up your sovereignty to them, like a little kid petitioning for a cookie. Does the parent have the right to ignore such a petition and go on doing the laundry?

    And as it turns out, the Petition was mis-addressed. Why ask Joe about Joseph's business? It doesn't make sense, does it? The names are similar, but there are two different parties involved.

    So there again, why would the State of New Hampshire have a word to say about New Hampshire's business?

    This was followed by more emails back and forth, with people discovering that we don't have any courts. Oh, my.

    If I recall correctly, I came to the conclusion that all we have functioning as courts here (with very few exceptions) are:

    (1) Administrative Tribunals that handle In-House disputes for the corporations;

    (2) Maritime (Commercial) Courts operating under Admiralty Jurisdiction granted by Article III, Section 2 and exercised via the Special Supplemental Rules of the Federal Code of Civil Procedure;

    (3) Admiralty Courts functioning under Article III and the US Code of Military Justice: Military "Common Law".

    That was about five years ago, but the startled squawking about this "discovery" goes on anyway. Then the same people who say that I am wrong go on to prove me right, and the only thing that is accomplished is that more time and energy is wasted while everyone gropes the elephant.

    The reason we don't have any courts is that we haven't been acting in our rightful capacity as Lawful People (we were unaware that we had been "redefined" as "Legal Persons" instead) and we have not, as a result, provided ourselves with the Lawful Courts we are owed under the Constitutions.

    That's right. We have been defrauded, that's true, and we have every right to bring claims and take action.

    But at the other end of the day, our lack of an honest court system for the service of Lawful People is our own fault. We are the ones we have been waiting for.

    There is a Lawful System. We have to build it back up.

    There is a Legal System. They own it "in our names".

    Deal with the facts, folks.

    We are naturally Lawful Persons known as "People", but when we are just babes in our cradles, the perpetrators of the Great Fraud sneak in, get our mothers to sign undisclosed contracts, and use that as the basis to redefine us as Legal Persons, instead.

    No notice is given, so of course, you are unaware and unable to rebut their legal presumption and their deceitfully fabricated evidence (the Birth Certificate) that you are acting as a "Legal Person" and not as a "Lawful Person".

    That is, until now, when you have all been given not only the history of how this came to be, but also the tools you need to correct the situation and reclaim your status as a Lawful Person and one of the People of this country.

    Go to: www.annavonreitz.com and scroll down to Article 928.

    There is a logic to be observed. There are Lawful People living under the Public Law of this country, and those Lawful People are owed all the Lawful Money and Actual Assets, and they are also the ones owed all Lawful Relief and Remedy as well.

    Legal Persons have no such rights nor property interests.

    Underline that statement, put it in large boldface letters in your mind. Think about it. Think about what it implies. If you don't get busy and reclaim your lawful birthright political status, you stand to be cheated out of your birthright and sold a bowl of porridge in purportedly equitable exchange.

    If you want to address the actual problem at its roots and stop flailing away like a flock of disturbed pigeons arguing about elephants, do the paperwork to correct your political status, enter into your Lawful Capacity as one of the Lawful People of this country, join your Lawful State Assembly, and restore your Lawful Counties, Lawful States, and their associated Lawful Courts to serve the needs of the Lawful People.

    Your country needs you to wake up --- all the way up. The watch fires are lit and burning.

    Go to TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net


  8. #727
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    16 hrs

    Lawful Marriage

    It's "Marriage Season" --- or so I am told. More marriages take place in June than in any other month of the year. I've been thumping on everyone about the word "Lawful" this week, as opposed to "Legal" so now we have the topic of "Lawful Marriage".

    What is a "Lawful Marriage" as opposed to a "Legal Marriage"?

    A Lawful Marriage is one that takes place on the land and soil of an actual, factual country. It takes place according to the Law of Scripture and the Public Law of the country and internationally it is recognized as a Simple Treaty under the Law of Nations.

    It's both a private agreement and a public agreement between two people to live together and enter into all the rights and responsibilities of married life.

    A "Legal Marriage" is a Joint Venture between two Legal Persons chartered by a State of State, subject to the Statutory Laws of that State of State. The State of State, like the State of Washington, issuing the new franchise charter is an undisclosed Third Party having an "interest" in the JV and the "products thereof"---- your children.

    Obviously, you want to have your ducks in order and be making a deliberate choice about which kind of "marriage" you are entering into.

    I've had distraught parents contact me seeking help to protect their children who are now planning to get married and not knowing the difference between these two kinds of marriage. They don't want their children and grandchildren to be reduced to mere businesses operating a JV under the thumb of State of State subcontractors.

    The basic situation is the same as what we encountered with the Baby Deed. If we don't record our baby's true identity as an American State National, the freebooters sneak in and register our baby's name as a Legal Person and Ward of their State of State organization, leaving him or her --- and their parents --- at the mercy of the Territorial State of State.

    To counteract, we record the Baby Deed at the land recording office and seize ownership to our own children on the Public Record. If the State of State then registers our baby's name, it is clearly and demonstrably a secondary claim and is not owed any enforcement against the parents.

    Straightening out your own political status records and recording that little Baby Deed on the land jurisdiction puts you back in control of your lives and the lives of your children. It's the same way with marriages.

    You need to record your Lawful Marriage with the Land Recording Office, prior to or in concert with any "registration" of the new "vessel" with the State of State organization.

    To that end, our team has constructed a new recording instrument that does for marriages what the Baby Deed does for babies ---- establishes your marriage as a Lawful Marriage on the Public Record.

    This document is called a "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" and will be found --together with instructions-- with the Article 928 documents at my website, www.annavonreitz.com and hopefully will soon also be available on TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net website.

    Those receiving this as an email will also receive a "red-line" copy of the form and instructions.

    Recording this "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" protects your marriage from being treated as a commercial contract and prevents you and your children from being subjected to the unilateral demands of Territorial and Municipal Agencies.

    For your own safety and sanity and for the well-being of your children, be sure to fill out the "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" and record it with the Land Recording Office nearest you. This is evidence that you are acting as living people getting married and not functioning as business entities engaged in a Joint Venture merger---- which is how your marriage will otherwise be "interpreted" by the existing court systems.

    I will also point out that doing this prevents a lot of the other heartaches that can be associated with marriages --- CPS, forced vaccinations, denial of home school rights, inequitable divorces, and a whole lot more can be settled privately and should be settled privately by arbitration. Just make sure to get your "Solemn Record and Proclamation of Lawful Marriage" properly witnessed and recorded and forestall any ability of the pirates to exercise their "discretion" with regard to what kind of marriage you have entered into.


  9. #728
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    4,234
    Thanks
    2,146
    Thanked 1,434 Times in 838 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    15 hrs

    Court Action versus Private Arbitration

    Most of what passes for "court action" in our present morass of ignorance is instead the private processing of corporate tribunal decisions that are not the actions of any Public Court at all.

    Any time you see a docket sheet where the style of the name of the Court and the Plaintiffs and the Defendants all match, you are looking at an action in a private corporate tribunal designed to administratively settle disputes among the officials and employees and shareholders of the corporation.

    If the court is captioned (named and described) in an Upper and Lower Case name and the Plaintiffs and Defendants are too, you are looking at a Territorial Administrative Tribunal case.

    If the court is captioned in all capital letters and the Plaintiffs and Defendants are also, you are looking at a MUNICIPAL COURT TRIBUNAL.

    These Administrative Court Tribunals conduct about 90% of all court actions in this country.

    They all function by presuming that you are either an officer or an employee or a shareholder or a dependent of a corporation, and assume that whatever is being brought forward for adjudication is an internal dispute to be settled according to the internal statutory laws of the corporation (Administrative Code) and State Statutes and Public Policies of that corporation.

    So, once again, it is up to you to "declare your law" and to choose which court you do business with, and also up to you to decide whether you address a court at all----- unless of course, someone else is trying to choose your law and your court "for" you. That's another whole discussion.

    For the moment, let's just concentrate on the fact that when you bring forward something for settlement, it is your choice of law and your decision to address either a court or seek private arbitration that largely determines the outcome.

    Most people in this country approve of land jurisdiction courts where the Ten Commandments form the basis for the Law being administered, but those courts were taken out of action surreptitiously by our "Public Servants" in order to better serve themselves.

    So now what? A corporate administrative tribunal doesn't fit who you are or what you need in terms of services, and the gozillion codes and statutes and policies of these corporations don't meet your needs as a living man or woman.

    Chances are you are just waking up to the fact that you are being "impersonated" as a corporate entity and a legal fiction entity, and not being recognized as a living man or a Lawful Person, either one.

    Chances are you don't know the variations of laws and codes and statutes and all the corporate legalese, all the court procedures, all the court rules.....

    So that leaves you a stranger in a strange land and makes you easy pickings for these predators. You really are unprepared to interact with these courts, and they know it. They set it up that way, the better to profit themselves and to keep rigid control of you and your assets.

    But when you are bringing the action, you do have an option. You can seek private arbitration instead. Arbitration has many advantages over court actions, not the least of which is simplicity. In arbitration all you have to do is establish the form of law, the identities of the parties, and the nature of the conflict.

    You can sit down together like rational people and speak plain English and be heard. The Arbiter is free to render a judgment based on the principles of justice apart from any corporate policies--- and they often do so with great prejudice against those perpetuating injustice. You just don't hear about these cases because they are private---- truly private, as opposed to the quasi-private corporate tribunal actions that are so common.

    An arbitration action does not establish any precedent for anyone but you and whoever else is party to the arbitration. It does not establish any res judicata. But what it can and often does manage to deliver is justice.

    So when you are standing there feeling utterly bewildered by the plethora of undisclosed courts and court operations that have nothing to do with you as a living man or woman, remember the option you do have --- private arbitration.

    As a result of the corruption of the corporate court systems and the basic fact that the courts are obliged to make insupportable presumptions against you to even bring a case into their jurisdiction --- a very lively business has sprung up for Private Arbitration Services and you will find them under that heading in many metropolitan areas.

    Make haste to make peace with your brother on your way to court.... and take a detour via private arbitration services instead. Until we have our own courts set up and functioning again, this is the best option for people searching for justice.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •