THE PRINCIPLE- The Movie Big Science Does NOT want YOU to see. SEE IT NOW.



The Principle
Page 56 of 56 FirstFirst ... 646545556
Results 551 to 558 of 558

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #551
    Gold
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    811
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 377 Times in 251 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by midnight rambler View Post
    Aren't those elected positions you refer to?
    Elected by whom? Some 14th amendment statutory slave? Hardly binding.

    Quote Originally Posted by midnight rambler View Post
    The district that Anna claims to be the judge in does not exist.
    Ahhh, existence. Ification is the process of being. Being is the process of changing. I try hard not to be impressed with the illusions that motivate crowds that get drunk on social welfare and Oxycontin. We are endowed with five senses. If none of them work to produce a direct stimulus that the brain can interpret then likely we are discussing inner workings of the brain to produce an illusion of something that has no existence.

  2. #552
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    2,043
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 790 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna tells how she got to be a Judge.

    Anna von Reitz

    1 hr

    For All The Jural Assemblies - 13 Judges, Justices, and Hired Jurists / Judge Anna Blows the Whistle on the Whistleblowers
    Imagine an apple. The apple has a skin, and inside the skin, it has sweet juicy flesh. You can't get to the flesh without piercing the skin.

    It is the same way with the land and soil jurisdiction we are heir to.

    The "soil" is the top six inches of the land, like the skin on the apple.

    All the rest deeper than six inches is "land" --- the flesh of the apple.

    By definitions long established, the soil comprises the National Jurisdiction of the States, and is managed by our unincorporated Counties.

    The land comprises the International Land Jurisdiction of the States and is managed by our unincorporated State Jural Assemblies.

    Land and soil are inextricably bonded together, like the skin and flesh of an apple. That is why we speak of "the land and soil" of Wisconsin or Virginia or Texas.

    That is why when you become a State Jural Assembly Member, the County Jural Assembly is also created, and vice-versa.

    Our Ancestors were determined that no king or government was going to control their lives again, so they made the County-- the skin of the apple --- the fundamental political unit and supreme political jurisdiction in the American Government.

    Strange but true, the County Sheriff elected by the County Jural Assembly Members is the top Public Law Official in the country. Within the physical boundaries of his County, he is the embodiment of the Public Law and its chief enforcer.

    Because he works for the soil jurisdiction, the actual County Sheriff is a "Peacekeeping Official" and not a "Law Enforcement Officer". See the difference?

    Peacekeepers work for the people, the land and the soil.
    Law Enforcement Officers work for "persons" --- the corporations and their shareholders operating as incorporated States of State, like the "State of Ohio".

    We have been well and thoroughly confused and duped into thinking that their "County Sheriff" is our "County Sheriff", when in fact an unlawful conversion has taken place.

    Many of those operating our Counties back in the 1960's took the bait of "Federal Block Grants" and elected to incorporate the unincorporated Counties they were working for.

    In doing so, they unwittingly removed and converted the actual County Government into mere commercial corporations operated as franchises --- like Dairy Queen franchises of Territorial and Municipal corporations.

    They handed over our sovereignty "for us" in exchange for racketeering kickbacks.

    Ironically, we are fortunate that those same people who voted for the unlawful conversion of the Counties were already unwittingly functioning as incorporated "persons", so had no authority to give away our Counties. They were merely employees of ours.
    They had already "vacated" their natural capacity as unincorporated Jurors.

    Many Counties tried to have it both ways and kept the unincorporated County running and simply set up a corporation calling itself something similar -- like, "The County of Jackson" instead of "Jackson County", so that the offered federal kickbacks could be laundered through "The County of Jackson".

    This set up a situation where County Officials were, for a time --- and some still are--- operating in two separate capacities. The Sheriff elected to the unincorporated soil jurisdiction office simply put on a different hat as the occasion demanded, and functioned as the "Sheriff" of the incorporated "County", too.

    But our ancestors set it up so that no man can serve two masters.

    The problem is that our actual Counties are political subdivisions of our States and they occupy an entirely different jurisdiction --- that of the land and soil -- which does not recognize or tolerate any form of "Dual Citizenship" at all.

    The land and soil jurisdiction of this country does not allow us to operate in incorporated and unincorporated capacity at the same time. It's one way or the other.
    Either you operate as the actual Sheriff of the unincorporated County and State, or you operate as a "Sheriff" of an incorporated "County" franchise of a State of State. See the difference?

    There is a Macon County Sheriff working for Georgia, the actual State, and then, out of the blue, there's suddenly a "County of Macon" and the "Sheriff" of the "County of Macon" is working for the [Territorial] "State of Georgia", instead.

    Sleight of hand. Presto-Change-O! One minute you are standing on the land and soil and your County Sheriff is your County Sheriff, and the next he is a patsy working for a foreign corporation. Go figure.

    In the years since all that happened, things have gotten even more balled up, and we've added another layer of this incorporation scam. Instead of working for the Territorial State of State, the man who appears to be working as your County Sheriff may be working for a Municipal STATE OF STATE corporation, instead.

    These moonlighting "Sheriffs" and other "County" Officials are --for the most part unwittingly -- functioning as impostors -- appearing to be land and soil jurisdiction County Sheriffs and County Officials, when in fact they are being paid by foreign corporations and not standing on the land and soil jurisdiction of this country at all.

    And this explanation actually does pertain to the main topic, which is Judges, Justices, and Hired Jurists.
    All the people you see inhabiting what appear to be your Courts are Hired Jurists, and they will admit it.

    Go ahead and ask them. Walk up to any of the State of State Judges or Municipal STATE OF STATE Judges and ask them the question: "Are you a Hired Jurist?" ---- and they will tell you, why, yes, I am.

    They will be surprised that you asked, but the vast majority will answer truthfully.

    The same scams and unlawful conversions that I just described with the County Sheriffs apply to the Judges, Justices, and Hired Jurists, too.
    99.9% of the members of the Bar Associations are not qualified to act as actual Judges or as Justices, either one.
    In the course of the long researches that led up to this moment, we surveyed the "Judges" operating in both the Territorial States of States and the Municipal STATES OF STATES courts, and out of approximately ten thousand of these Hired Jurists, we found one (1) guy in Wisconsin who was actually qualified to act as an actual Judge in a Public Court---- if and when he elects to reclaim his natural and unincorporated status as a Member of the Wisconsin Jural Assembly.

    The rest of these people are just Hired Guns, working in private quasi-military and private corporation tribunals.
    Instead of being employed by the actual unincorporated State or County as actual Judges and actual Justices,, they were suddenly reduced to the capacity of being Hired Jurists in the employ of foreign corporations doing business as
    either Territorial States of States Courts or Municipal STATES OF STATES COURTS.

    The California Courts ceased to function and the incorporated Territorial State of California Courts and the incorporated Municipal STATE OF STATE COURTS took over the "Judicial Functions"---- but the actual unincorporated Courts owed to the People of California and the people of each County in California, disappeared. Overnight.

    And that is why you can't find justice in this country anymore.

    Both the Territorial State of State and the Municipal STATE OF STATE are for-profit organizations in the business of providing governmental services. The service they are providing tends to be racketeering aimed at fleecing the actual living people out of their assets for the benefit of their respective corporations.

    And their Hired Jurists, are, after all, working for them, and not occupying any Public Office ---- so what the hey?

    They get away with what they can get away with.

    I had a moment of supreme irony the other day. One of my supporters was trying to explain why I am not a member of the Bar Association in Alaska and why in fact I couldn't be a member of the Bar and serve in the capacity that I am serving.

    He made the error of describing me as a "common law jurist", as if I were a Hired Jurist --- only operating a common law court like counterparts in the State of Alaska are operating commercial corporation courts.

    Closer, but still no banana.
    The Alaska Statehood Compact created a "National Trust" for Alaska operated as the Alaska State. That National Trust contains the land and soil jurisdiction of Alaska, even if Alaska has not yet been formally enrolled as a State in the Union. Therefore, I, as one of the People of this country, can invoke and fill the empty Public Office of Alaska State Judge or Justice or Justice of the Peace (at the County level).

    When we realized the scam being played our research led us to the old Government Land Office and the discovery that although Counties were mapped out and designated in Alaska at the time of Statehood, the land and soil jurisdiction of the State were never occupied. In a sense, our State did not exist, except as a National Trust laid out on paper.

    It was up to us to choose to act in our unincorporated capacity as County and State Jural Assembly Members, to occupy our State and our County, to hold our elections and conduct our business as the lawful Inheritors of the National Trust and the land and soil jurisdiction owed to Alaska and Alaskans.

    There were only a dozen or so of us up to speed to begin with, so it was a matter of staring at each other in disbelief, going through the motions, and everyone electing each other to different land and soil jurisdiction Public Offices, all of us serving as State Citizens.

    Fortunately, it doesn't matter how many or how few qualified State Jural Assembly Members there are for the land and soil jurisdiction to be occupied. Even one (1) qualified Elector operating in their unincorporated capacity prevents the corporations from claiming "exclusive legislative" control --- a condition that would leave us with no land and soil jurisdiction to stand upon and result in the collapse of our country and our States.

    I filled the Public Office of Alaska State Superior Court Judge. See the difference? Alaska State Superior Court Judge ---- not "State of Alaska" Superior Court Judge.
    "Alaska" and the "Alaska State" National Trust were not "abandoned" and no "exclusive legislative" hegemony was achieved by the usurping commercial corporations as a result.

    The actual State and People have survived by the skin of their teeth, much to the consternation and annoyance of the foreign commercial corporations that have labored so long and so hard to take over our country, steal our resources, and enslave our people for their profit.

    At the County level, the people are served by "Justices of the Peace". At the State level, the people are also served by "Justices" as in "Justices of the Supreme Court". Also at the State level, because not all of the State's international jurisdiction was ever delegated away, we have "Judges".

    All the "persons" are served by Hired Jurists arbitrarily calling themselves "Judges" or "Justices", none of whom are holding any valid Public Office in the American Government at all.

    So the additional irony is that I am an actual Judge holding an actual elected Public Office approved by the people of this State, and I am the one being accused of "lying" and being a "fake Judge".

    There are some people who are so stupid or so evilly anti-American, that they can't note the difference between "Ohio", "Ohio State", "State of Ohio" and "STATE OF OHIO", even when you point it out and explain the difference to them.

    The fact that there are, as a result of these different entities----
    both unincorporated and incorporated---- multiple court systems in play, also passes them by.

    Obviously, too, those who work for these foreign corporations and whose jobs depend upon them, are motivated to continue this scam and this effort to undermine the people and their government, just as the living people have an interest (once they are alerted to it) to regain their unincorporated status.

    I am willfully serving the People of Alaska, instead of the Persons of Alaska.

    The reason that I have not been arrested and charged with "impersonating a Judge" is that those who would have to bring the charges are in fact impersonating our Judges --- and as Hired Jurists, they know it.

    Strange and incredible as it may seem, I'm not the Fake Judge here. They are. Just as our elected County Sheriffs are the actual Sheriffs and their "Sheriffs" are just stand-ins, calling themselves "Sheriffs" but acting in completely
    different and foreign capacities.

    Now, with all of this in view, listen to this clap-trap from the "Southern Poverty Law Center" ---- which I have famously observed is not "Southern" has nothing to do with "Poverty" and is a "Legal" Center having nothing to do with the actual Public Law --- and you will see what we are up against, both in terms of
    bare-faced lies and misrepresentations and in terms of vicious self-interest on the part of these groupies feeding off the corporate court system.

    http://thewhistleblowers.info/warning-anna-maria-riezinger…/

    Please also note the deliberate mis-characterization of me as a "Sovereign Citizen"---- which is a meaningless oxymoron. It is impossible to be a "Citizen" and a "Sovereign" at the same time, thus these ignorant people --- who are claiming to be experts in the "Law" while offering "Legal Services", continue to act as Ignoramuses and to mislead people so as to prevent them from knowing and exercising their true power as State Jural Assembly Members.

    And thus also prevent us from restoring the government we are owed and keep us from acting in our natural capacities and seek to usurp our Public Offices and replace them with employees of their foreign, for-profit "governmental services corporations" instead.

    Wise as serpents and gentle as doves, folks. The ignorance we are surrounded with in the general populace is thick enough to cut with a knife. The guile and evil of the men actually "in the know" who are orchestrating all this is also not to be underestimated.

    Once you know who you are and how your actual government is supposed to operate-- and in which jurisdiction your actual government exists, you will realize how we have all been played and what you have to do to correct it.

    Reclaim your natural unincorporated political status, re-populate your unincorporated land and soil jurisdiction State, and, as members of the State Jural Assembly, occupy your "vacated" actual Public Offices ---- including the County Justices of the Peace, the State Justices and the State Judges.

    I guarantee that the phonies working as Hired Jurists won't have a word to say about it.


  3. #553
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    North of The Equator
    Posts
    6,591
    Thanks
    3,822
    Thanked 5,469 Times in 3,539 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    I
    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    We are all judges. In a Republic when you find a vacant office you can occupy it. For example, Obama happened to be wandering the halls of the white house and discovered an office that Bush had just vacated.The office of Article III judge is occupied by nobody at the federal level.The office of coroner is vacant in many counties. A medical examiner is not a coroner. This leaves the sheriff without anyone to be accountable to.
    The Court of Appeals ffor the Federal Circuit claims to be established by Atricle III of the Constitution in 1982. Are the judges Article III judges? According to their webpage yes:
    The judges of the court are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. Judges are appointed to the court for life under Article III of the Constitution of the United States. There are twelve judges in active service. When eligible, judges may elect to take senior status, which permits them to continue to serve on the court while handling fewer cases than a judge in active service. Each judge in active service employs a judicial assistant and up to four law clerks, while each judge in senior status employs a judicial assistant and one law clerk.
    http://cafc.uscourts.gov/the-court/court-jurisdiction
    http://constitutionalmilitia.org/
    "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State"

    "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the most Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." July 4, 1776

  4. #554
    Gold
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    811
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 377 Times in 251 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    The judges of the court are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate.
    uh huh. So an independent judiciary is composed of judges picked by the executive branch and approved by the legislative branch?

    I don't think so.

    You might want to refer to AmJur 2d for administrative law. It is described as the 4th branch of government. Hard to imagine a 4th branch of government when there are only 3 branches under the constitution.

    So then look at Bill of Attainder. It is prohibited because it represents the legislative branch telling the judicial branch what the punishments are for various crimes. A bill of pains and punishments is a less lethal version of a bill of attainder. What is objectionable about these is they shortcut the separation of powers between branches.

    Any structure that crosses branch lines is a bill of attainder. And that includes administrative agencies.

  5. #555
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    2,043
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 790 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    Yesterday at 2:43 PM

    Anatomy of a Birth Certificate - What It Means

    Take a look at the Birth Certificate issued in your NAME.

    What's the first thing you notice?

    It's on funny paper: hard surfaced, durable, heavy paper called "bond paper". This is your first clue that your estate has been seized upon and that bonds--- that is, promissory notes--- have been issued against your name.

    The next thing that will probably catch your eye is that there are all sorts of seals and blazons and watermarks on this piece of paper. It carries all sorts of emblems from a "State of State" organization, depending on where and when you were born.

    We know from our study of the history that these organizations are all foreign with respect to us, as our own American State of State organizations have been moth-balled since the Civil War.

    Look at the BC issued in your name. It will show either a Territorial State of State with its name written in Upper and Lower Case like this: State of Washington, or a Municipal STATE OF STATE written in All Capitals like this: STATE OF IOWA.

    All these seals and watermarks and other gee-gaws serve to identify the "Issuer" of the Birth Certificate, which is the foreign State of State Organization, not you. They are identifying your NAME as property belonging to them, which they are issuing bonds against.

    The next thing you will most likely notice is that your name is spelled out in All Capital Letters, and that, most likely, other words appear in All Capital Letters.

    According to the Bar Association Manual and the Government Printing Office and Federal Bureau of Engraving and Black's Law Dictionary and the Chicago Manuel of Style, the only things that can be named using All Capital Letters are: (1) Corporations or (2) Dead men's estates.

    The All Capitals names are a form of Latin called "Dog Latin".
    So, look at your name as it appears in All Capitals on that Birth Certificate.

    Are they issuing bonds against a Dead Man's Estate? Or against a corporation?

    If your name appears like this: JOHN ALLEN DOE, the bonds have been issued against your ESTATE on the presumption that you donated it to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.

    If your name appears like this: JOHN A. DOE, the bonds have been issued against a PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY franchise on the presumption that you donated that to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.

    In either case, obviously, so far as you know you didn't donate anything to any of these yahoos and you are not aware of having given them permission to bond your estate or any public transmitting utility, either. It all sounds bizzare, doesn't it?

    But there is the evidence in your hand.

    Now, who is the Birth Certificate Bond signed by? The Registrar. The Registrar is an Officer of the Probate Court. The appearance of their signature on "your" Birth Certificate is absolute proof that your property --- whether your ESTATE or your PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY --- has been probated and seized upon as property belonging to the State of State or STATE OF STATE that issued the Birth Certificate.

    Now look at the dates on the face of the Birth Certificate. You will see your actual birthday and also a file date ---- the "birthdate". These refer to the actual event of your birth, and then, some days or weeks later, the "filing" of the paperwork to either (1) pronounce "you" dead and create your ESTATE; or (2) to create "your" PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY.

    Either way, you arrived first and have first right of recall and ownership, known as a reversionary trust interest in your own Good Name and assets.

    After all, you are being misrepresented as the "donor" of all these assets and the State of State is claiming to be the beneficiary of your largesse.
    Having discovered this "mistake" made by your Mother when you were just a baby in your cradle, you have a right to come forward and correct it upon discovery.

    What else does the Birth Certificate represent?

    It is evidence of crime against you and fraud and non-disclosure against your mother.

    It is evidence of attempting to contract with and establish "unconscionable contract" with an infant.

    An "unconscionable contract" is a contract that you literally are not aware of. And how could a little baby be aware of a contract made "for" him when he was only a few days old, by a new Mother who was never given full disclosure about those papers she was signing at the hospital? She couldn't explain to you what she was never given to understand herself, could she?

    The BC is potent evidence of crime.

    Now, what are you going to do with it / about it?

    The first thing you are going to do is secure two Witness Testimonies from people who have "reasonable first hand knowledge" of you and your family, who can affirm that you are "the" living man or woman whose birth occurred at such and such a time and place and to your parents, etc.

    This establishes the fact that you are the presumed "Donor" of the property referenced by the BC and also establishes your standing to sue these criminals.

    Next, if you follow our advice, you will complete the paperwork to return your Trade Name (also known as your Good Name and Given Name -- "John Allen Doe" in Upper and Lower Case) to the land and soil jurisdiction of your birth State.

    This process explicitly demonstrates--- and recording of the action proves--- that you, the presumed Donor, are acting as a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person.

    This puts you outside their jurisdiction, so they can no longer "presume" anything about you.

    Next, having secured your Trade Name and having permanently domiciled it on the land and soil jurisdiction State, you will Expatriate from any presumed political status as a Territorial Citizen (like someone born in Puerto Rico) or Municipal CITIZEN (created in the Municipality of Washington, DC, for example).

    And you will revoke all Prior Powers of Attorney and name your Lawful Person ---John Allen Doe, in this example--- as the only Attorney-in-Fact authorized to do business for you and your estate.

    Finally, you will seize upon all the other Assumed Names and NAMES that are or could be associated with you in any regard, and all their variations and permutations and orderings and styles, and you will use a recorded Certificate of Assumed Name(s) to claim them and permanently domicile all of them on the land and soil of your State of the Union, too.

    This last is a process like re-flagging a ship. Instead of "sailing" under the auspices of the British Territorial Government or the Municipal Government of Washington, DC, you are now demonstrably sailing under the auspices of Maine or California or whatever other actual land and soil jurisdiction State.

    This also puts your Good Name and all the "derivative" NAMES under the Pubic Law, so that you are no longer subject to the codes and statutory laws and "public policies" of the foreign State of State or STATE OF STATE Organizations.

    In sum total, at the end of this process, you have: (1) damning conclusive evidence of their wrong-doing against a baby; (2) proof of your ownership of your name and your standing; (3) proof of your political status; (4) proof that you are the only authorized Power of Attorney; (5) proof that any "vessels" related to you stand under the Public Law and are not subject to any presumption or interpretation otherwise.

    You still have to learn how to use these documents in your defense and be able to describe this whole circumstance, but taken together they form a competent rebuttal and evidence trail removing you from any "US citizenship" status, and returning you to your rightful status as an American State National.

    And again --- why is all this necessary? Because your identity has been stolen. The Birth Certificate you hold in your hand is irrefutable evidence of the facts.

    You were deliberately misidentified as a baby as either a "United States Citizen" [Territorial] or "Citizen of the United States" [Municipal] and unless you rebut the evidence, you will be claimed as chattel belonging as a property asset to one of these foreign commercial crime syndicates.

    For additional insight, I recommend the YouTube videos of Jordan Maxwell and any and all lectures regarding the "Justinian Deception" --- the use of Dog Latin--- by Romley Stewart.

    Time is of the essence and numbers count, as these crime syndicates know that they have been discovered and that their system has been deconstructed, so that they either make amends or are destroyed by liquidation or worse.

    Please join the effort, correct your records, [for Do It Yourself Help go to PaperUpNow.com or see Article 928 on my website, www.annavonreitz.comor see the Help Service portal about midway down my website home page to request additional help] and then go to our new sign in service:

    signinamerica.com.

    SignInAmerica is an organizational tool to help us identify and as much as possible pre-qualify Americans who have corrected their political status to receive Credit Vouchers to offset debts of the STRAWMAN entities that have been created "in their names".


  6. #556
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    2,043
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 790 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    Yesterday at 12:00 AM

    An Apology to Robert

    Most of the time I am patient and explain things as well as I can and as often as necessary, but once in a while, I lose my temper --- just get worn down and pop off at someone who hits me at the wrong moment with something that has been a cause of irritation for days or months or even years. This recently happened with Robert and I would like to apologize.

    He wrote to me about the issue of "Affidavits of Truth".
    He assumed that I was using Certificates to replace Affidavits and referenced an article of mine where I explained that living people who are acting in their unincorporated Lawful Person capacity can't make Affidavits ----- only corporations (like franchises) or officers of corporations can make Affidavits. The rest of us must label our presentations as "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".

    This is part of the Court Rules and part of the reason that our Testimony doesn't get heard in Court. Another reason is that too many people file their paperwork with the Court Clerk and don't file it with the Prosecutor directly and with the District Attorney.

    They aren't obliged to accept your Testimony, read it, react to it or respond to it until and unless you label it properly for what it is and present it to them. Directly.

    There is a difference between an "Affidavit" and "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit", just as there is a difference between a "State of State" and an actual "State".

    I get worn out trying to teach people who don't read things closely enough to notice these differences for themselves, and I can get really frustrated with those who still don't notice these things AFTER I have pointed them out.

    If a man asserts that he is operating exclusively as a Lawful Person and is owed exemption and exoneration, but then turns around and submits an "Affidavit" instead of a "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" he has presented conflicting information.

    He is claiming to act in one capacity and then, by submitting an "Affidavit of Truth" instead of "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" is demonstrating that he is in fact operating in a completely different capacity. It's like a Colonel in the Army showing up in full dress uniform and claiming that he's a civilian.

    If we are going to deal competently with the many issues facing this country, we must all learn to read things much more closely, with more attention to what the words actually say and how things are labeled and named.

    So, I am sorry for losing my temper, Robert. It was just the straw that broke the camel's back after months of trying to draw people's attention to similar facts:

    A State is not a State of State.

    A State of State is not a STATE OF STATE.

    An Affidavit is not Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit.

    A United States Citizen is not a Citizen of the United States.

    An American State National is not a US Citizen.

    The United State [Unincorporated] is not the United States, Inc.

    The United States of America [Unincorporated] is not the USA, Inc.

    Indictments are not Presentments.

    A Republican State is not a Republic, etc., etc., etc...

    As confusing as the rats have made this, I actually have great sympathy with people who are threading their way through the maze and who care enough to do so.

    I'm sorry, Robert. Please forgive me for being Grandma Grump.


  7. #557
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    2,043
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 790 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    22 hrs

    Who to Trust?

    I often get asked who among the various sources should be trusted as reliable --- and the answer is that none of us get it 100% right a 100% of the time. Including me.

    Nor are we all "perfect" in all venues and respects, because everyone that I mention has their specialties and tends to work in some particular jurisdiction of the law or arena of historical inquiry. Some are focused on private relief and others are more focused on general relief/restoration of a proper lawful government and still others are focused on some particular historical research period.

    So when I make a recommendation like this it is with a built in caveat emptor, in that you have to know or learn where the pieces of the puzzle fit and define what your own needs are.

    In terms of people/sources who reliably make the Good Faith Effort besides my own team and who dig up good nuggets of Truth with the consistency of Truffle Pigs, I would include [in no particular order]:

    Rod Class
    -- PAGs and Administrative Law

    Kelby Smith of HISAdvocates -- Private Living

    Jean Keating -- Maritime and Admiralty Law

    Mark Emery
    -- Private Living

    Kurt Kallenbach - Paramount Claims of Life, History, DNA

    Romley Stewart - History, DOG LATIN, Fraud Investigation

    Neo - Statutory Law and Practical Quick Fixes

    Peter of England - Private Banking, Current Events

    SEDM - Federal Bureaucracy, Private Living, Forms

    Boris - Private Living

    Jordan Maxwell - History, Birth Certificates

    Robert David Steele - Natural Law

    Field McConnell - Military, Administrative History

    Neil Warren - Lawful Banking (England)

    Richard Cornforth -- Statutory Law, Legal History

    John Trowbridge - History, Statutory Law, Constitution

    Mary Croft - Government, History, Attitude Adjustment

    Brent Winters - History of Law, Constitutions, Common Law

    Freedom School - IRS, History, Statutory Law

    Isaac Witham - Early American History, Treaties

    Michael Kearns - Early American History, Treaties

    SPLSPro -- British Equity Law

    Emily Windsor - Cragg - British History, British Law, Monarchy.

    Republic of Texas - IRS and Tax Court, Land Patents

    No doubt I am forgetting very worthy groups and people at this moment and will think of them with a big "ouch!" as they (or their fans) call me to task. Please don't think that just because someone's name doesn't appear on The List that it is any strike against them per se. This is just an Off-the-Top-of-My-Head list of some of the many people and organizations who are contemporaries providing insights via websites, videos, teleconferences, or publications and who have consistently provided solid information in these subject areas.




  8. #558
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    2,043
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 790 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    11 hrs

    My Nightstand

    My Nightstand is large, indeed, capacious for a nightstand. It has room to hold a lamp, a clock radio/CD player, water decanter, and lots of books.

    There is room for the Bible to have its own space with no other books below or on top of it, and room for a stack of ever-changing books of other kinds.

    I try to keep a variety of books in that Big Stack. There are currently books about mathematics and medicine, law and journalism, Christian commentary, botany, mineralogy, early American History, and British History on my nightstand. They vary in difficulty from weighty and dense, jargon-filled tomes to light popular reading that keeps me connected.

    Thank God I learned to read and to write and --miracle of miracles, considering my eye-hand coordination-- also learned to type.

    There is always some new wonder or insight to discuss and share, some reason to be lost in contemplation. The whole glory of creation opens up, even in a jail cell, even in the loneliest and most remote place, if you have the companionship of a book. Late at night you will find me reading my share of the Bible and then trying to find a few extra minutes to address the Big Stack.

    Life being life and things being what they are, some books stay in the Big Stack for months as I gradually macerate them a few pages at a time. Other books are there and gone like a spark from a bonfire. I devour "light reading" like a box of bon-bons--- and mostly with the same kind of pleasure.

    A friend recently sent me a copy of Howard Storm's book, My Descent into Death. I recommend it. As I was hurtling through it I had to stop several times as the words on the page so perfectly and succinctly described my own experience of "Near Death" and the awareness I was given.

    Coming so very near to death changes your life in ways you don't even begin to imagine at the time it happens. It opens doors and insights that were hidden before. It expands your capacity to feel and to love and to be connected.

    Isn't it strange that death can be a portal to new life and purpose? And yet, it is. It was for Howard Storm. It was for me, too. And like him, I feel compelled to say something, to raise my hand and share the experience.
    Just on the other side of the veil separating the living from the dead, the Truth is fully known. There's never any reason to lie or keep secrets, because every tiny detail, every motivation, every circumstance is fully known. And not just about your life, about every life. It's all recorded on eternal Memorex.

    If I can share nothing else and convey nothing else to people about that blessed intimacy with God and the Angels that we are all invited to share, regardless of our sins and regardless of our religions, let it be that there are no secrets. There are no lies.

    So you have no reason to be anything but upright in your lives. You are free to be absolutely honest about all things, at all times, and it makes no sense to live your life any other way.

    And if I am gifted to share any other insight with all of you, let it be that every effort you make to be good and to love the Earth and to love other people increases the joy of all creation. Love is never wasted.

    Every time you choose good over evil, every time you make the thankless effort, every time that you sacrifice to help someone, every time you let your love extend outward -- it matters. So let those moments and gestures and efforts increase and let those sacrifices be made with faith and heart, to please Our Father in Heaven, to bless those struggling along with us, and to make our Choice for the future certain.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •