Page 57 of 121 FirstFirst ... 747555657585967107 ... LastLast
Results 561 to 570 of 1201

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #561
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    1 hr ·

    The Reason for All the Paperwork

    There is really only one purpose for all this paperwork, and that is to establish a public record and evidence of who you are and the capacity in which you choose to act. There is in turn only one reason to do that --- and that reason is to protect you and your family from oppression and foreign subjection and false claims in commerce.

    Your identity has been stolen and false claims have been established against your Good Name in violation of treaties, conventions, and commercial service contracts that both the Territorial and Municipal Governments owe to you.

    Just as it requires action on your part to reclaim your identity after a credit card hacker makes unauthorized charges, this situation requires you to take action to reclaim your identity from this abuse by government service providers.

    Beyond the paperwork involved, you need to educate yourselves about the actual Public Law you are heir to.

    Last, every American who can qualify to serve as an American State Citizen is encouraged to join their lawful State Assembly and serve. There is a large back log of issues to be addressed and work to be done.




  2. #562
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    19 hrs ·

    Ron Vrooman is Simply Wrong

    He thinks he is acting as an American. But he's not.

    He thinks that a "US Citizen" is the same thing as an American.

    In fact, as can be simply proven, the two things have never been the same.

    He thinks that a "State" is the same as a "State of State".
    That, too, is simply wrong.

    He thinks that he can act in the capacity of an Oregonian -- a State National or State Citizen of Oregon -- and at the same time continue to claim that he is a "US Citizen".
    That's wrong, too.

    He even claims that he is the coordinator of the Oregon Assembly, but that's wrong also.

    You can't act as a US Citizen of any stripe and act as the Coordinator (or even be a member of) the Oregon Assembly.

    In these delusional assumptions, Ron is not unlike many other Americans who persist in error even after they have been shown the truth and even after it has all been patiently (and repeatedly) explained to them.

    The ONLY thing that a "legal person"---- and all US Citizens are legal persons by definition ---- can assemble is by definition a State of State corporation, not a State.

    People acting in the capacity of Lawful Persons are the only ones who can assemble a State of the Union.
    Period.

    This is the Law, the Fact, and the History of it.

    Ron Vrooman is welcome to stay a US Citizen of whatever kind, but he is not welcome to make false claims of American State Citizenship while he is doing so.

    This is like a Spaniard claiming to be Irish and a member of the Irish Government to boot.

    What he is doing is in fact anti-American.

    Until he understands the requirement of singular allegiance to his State of the Union, he can't do what he wants to do as an Oregonian and he can't lead others to success, either.

    Everything he is saying, preaching, doing is wrong and it is wrong because he can't or won't grasp the difference between "America" and " the United States" and can't see the difference between a "State" of the Union and a "State of State" corporation.

    Don't follow Ron into the same old trap.

    He is doing and assuming the same kinds of things that I warned Bruce Doucette and the Colorado Nine against.




  3. #563
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    18 hrs ·

    About Law and Lawyers and Practice Thereof

    From time to time we get accused of "practicing law without a license". As with other licenses, we don't need a license to practice law.

    We also get "returning lawyers" ---- Bar Attorneys and former Judges and Magistrates who are disillusioned or who have one way or another stumbled on the truth for themselves, and who are looking for a way forward. We all need to be able to shepherd these people into a new life along with the rest of us. So here, first of all, is a good succinct run down of the facts provided by Kelby Smith:

    "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) "The practice of law is an occupation of common right." Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedures, Title 12, sec. 2017 (C) "If an infant or incompetent person does not have a duly appointed representative he may sue by his next friend or by a guardian ad litem." Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969).

    Members of groups who are competent non lawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "Unauthorized practice of law."
    And furthermore, former Bar Attorneys who revoke their membership in the Bar, can continue to function lawfully as Counselors of Law. The one thing they can't do is speak directly for anyone who is not an infant or otherwise incompetent, and instead must "stand at the elbow" of the actual litigant, giving blow-by-blow advice.

    Loss of a Bar Card does not mean the Soup Kitchen for former Bar Attorneys. For many, death to the lies and frauds is a new lease on life and a new relationship with law in all its many forms.




  4. #564
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    18 hrs ·

    The Jester's Defense

    Yes, you can claim to be an "idiot" and walk out of almost any imaginable court scenario that doesn't involve actual harm to people or property.
    This is because when an idiot admits being an idiot, he cannot be held responsible and cannot be expected to make a sensible or responsible reply. There is nowhere the court can go with him and make it stick.
    Why? Because he's an idiot.

    This is also called "The Jester's Defense".

    Monarchs were prevented from killing, fining, or otherwise harming Jesters under the same provisions of law.

    So long as you have done no actual material harm, and stand there and claim to be an "idiot" every time the court or prosecutor addresses you, they are stuck honoring the among the oldest traditions of all law: The Jester's Defense.

    As damaging as this might be to one's pride, the assurance of an almost certain dismissal of charges when faced with charges related to taxes and infractions of vehicle codes and thought crimes and small quantity marijuana possession and 80 million other such legislative horrors, it could be well worth smiling at the judge and loudly proclaiming, "I'm an idiot!" every time anyone says anything to you.

    Especially for poor people and those unable or unwilling to spend large portions of their lives learning administrative and martial and international and municipal law, this particular defense strategy is very simple and very hard for any prosecutor to overcome.

    It does not require you to be or claim to be an "absolute idiot" ----
    like a Medieval Jester, you may be perfectly functional, witty, light on your feet, and still successfully make The Jester's Defense.

    Likewise, it does not suggest mental illness, just an incapacity.

    Just remember that once any questioning about pleas and so forth begins, you are limited to one reply: "I am an idiot!"

    There's a popular country song right now called, "What Was I Thinking?" --- which describes a young man's response to his own behavior and risks he took to romance a certain young lady at the risk of a shotgun.

    Many young men who find themselves on the short end of a situation that leaves them wondering the same thing--- what was I thinking? --- would be well-served and well-advised to just throw up their hands in front of the judge and the prosecutor and say, "I'm an idiot!"




  5. #565
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    12 hrs ·

    Factoids From Tonight's Conference Call -- March 25, 2019

    I hate it during teleconferences when people go blat-blat-blat and spout out names of legislation and books and everything else so fast and I am left wondering if I heard it right or got the right number, etc., so I am doing a little due diligence here to help the Listeners and recap for everyone:

    About our American Government:
    The Republican States of the Union [The United States--- unincorporated] own the Republic States of the Federation [The United States of America--- unincorporated] which control and own the Confederate States of the Confederation [the States of America] which are actually "States of States".

    Notice "Republican" and "Republic" --- two different words.

    The states own the States which own The States of States.

    This is why it is necessary for the living people to correct their political status records so that they can act in their capacity as People, assemble their States of the Union, and finish the reconstruction of The States of States we are owed.

    As you can see from the above, only Lawful Persons can operate Republic States, and only the Republic States can create and charter their own Confederation States [aka States of States].

    This is what is necessary to finish the restoration and reconstruction of our lawfully mandated government.

    Our American Government operates by Declarations known as "Freeman Letters" and does not function on Executive Orders or Municipal Code.

    The book I mentioned that explains "Republican in Form" --- that is, the Republican States, is Emergence from Illusion -- Nation Building Should Begin at Home, by Ricardo Johansson, pages 77-91. The author doesn't understand some of the fine points of other issues of jurisdiction and our peculiar American History, but his explanation of the form of government we are owed is spot on. So is his expose of University Publishing and the Confederation Congress and the promotion of Hickey's corporate charter "constitution" from 1847 onward.

    The other reference I made was to the Lanhan Act, also known as the Trademark Act of 1946, which prohibits Trademark Infringement, dilution, and false advertising. It's important to know that your Proper Name is a Trademark protected under the Lanhan Act, Title 15, Statutes at Large 60 Stat 427, 15 USC 1051 et seq, which especially protects Unregistered Trademarks--- 15 USC 1125 (a).

    This is protection that the Territorial Government owes to you and to millions of private unincorporated business owners throughout the county whose Business Names are also Lawful (Common Law) Trademarks and therefore Unregistered Trademarks: Joe's Bicycle Shop, Kate's Dog Day Kennel, and so on.

    When you record the Re-Conveyance of your Proper Name to the land and soil of your birth State, you are recording your Trademark's permanent domicile and leaving no doubt as to its lawful ownership and provenance. This is an Unregistered Trademark in Common Law protected by the Lanhan Act. So is your thumbprint or any other unique Seal you use for business or Trade purposes

    Many State of State organizations also provide additional protections as part of their General Session Laws, which are designed to administer State Trust interests owed to the People of each State.

    As living people we are not party to nor subject to any of these codes or regulations, but we may invoke these public obligations of the Territorial Government for our private purposes, especially when dealing with employees of the Territorial Government. They have a commitment to fulfill regarding the protection of Unregistered Trademarks and you now know exactly where that commitment is stated --- and thank you for the reminder, C.Johnson!


  6. #566
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    40 mins ·

    Fiduciary Deputies v. "Representatives"

    As I have repeatedly been drumming into heads from here to Lithuania, our actual American Government is separate from the United States Government and always has been.

    The actual American Government is not based on "Representatives". It functions via Fiduciary Deputies.

    A Fiduciary Deputy is paid to perform a service and that service is to responsibly and accountably manage money and resources in Good Faith and according to The Prudent Man Standard. A Fiduciary Deputy must be discreet, logical, attentive, and loyal in promoting the best interests of the people they work for.

    When the People of Minnesota choose two Delegates who are Fiduciary Deputies to represent the interests of Minnesota as Senators attending a Continental Congress, you may be sure that those Senators are there to promote the welfare of Minnesota and Minnesotans within the larger framework of the entire country and the world as a whole.

    If such Fiduciary Deputies sell out Minnesota, America, or the Global Good for money, power, prestige, or for any other selfish ill-gotten motive, they can be held 100% liable--fired, fined, or jailed. Throughout their term of service, Fiduciaries have to report back to the People and can be removed from office by a recall initiative.

    Fiduciary Deputies, whether they act in a public or a private capacity, are thus accountable and required to act as honest men and honest caretakers of money and resources belonging to others. You tell your Fiduciaries what you need done, and it is their job to do it.

    Compare that with "Representatives".

    Once you give them your permission to act in your behalf by participating in their elections, they are off like a herd of wild horses, doing whatever they want to do.

    You are in fact giving your own Proxy Vote to a member of a Political Lobby, and this amounts to handing him or her a General Power of Attorney obligating you to pay for and support whatever your "representative" votes for.

    99% of the time, you don't even know this person. All you see is their smiling face and a few words on a poster or heard on a radio or TV ad.

    Does this make sense to you, that you would give your Power of Attorney to a total stranger and agree to pay for whatever they vote for?

    Such a Representative is not accountable to you. Once you hand him or her your vote, they get to exercise it with complete impunity and immunity, and all you get is the bill.

    If they sell you and your State down the river, your only recourse is to oust the rat in the next election cycle. If the Little Piggy buys off enough other voters via his bad behavior, greases enough palms, hands out enough candy from your purse, he is likely to stay in power despite your wishes.

    And since balloting is secret, there is no way to wash your hands of these representatives whether you actually voted for them or not. If you participate in such an election at all, you are accountable for the results.

    The bad smell of all this follows you like a garlic and baloney sandwich.

    The lack of accountability of these representatives and their basic nature as political lobbyists guarantees a virtual feeding frenzy when they meet in their version of a US Congress --- and it is always a frenzy in which the Public Good is sacrificed to lust for money, power, votes, expedience, commercial expansion, favoritism, and most of all, unbridled control.

    The Democrats openly buy votes and shamelessly promote political agendas that they just as shamelessly undermine. The current Border Crisis is a good example of it.

    To hear the Spin, you would think that their support of Open Borders and opposition to the Border Fence was grounded on ideals and principals of "Human Rights" and schlock of the "Give me your poor...." kind.

    Their actual victims, the newly arrived immigrants, are naturally beguiled and encouraged to vote Democrat the rest of their lives.

    However, the instant that Juan Julio Cortez from Honduras crosses our border, his value as a slave increases a thousand fold. Why? Americans are far more valuable in the world slave market than Hondurans.

    Clink-clink, Juan Julio just handed his Power of Attorney and his vastly increased value as a slave to Nancy Pelosi. He doesn't know it, but just by being re-labeled as an "American", he is providing the political lobbies in DC new blood to suck, and here's the real kicker---- new assets to claim as chattel backing their spending habit.

    The Republicans are Pigs of a different kind. Instead of being complete hypocrites and whores, they only sell to the Highest Bidder, which in practical terms means Wall Street, the Churches, or the Military Industrial Complex. They are brutal, rapacious, often unkind and arrogant and clever enough to hide their total ruthlessness behind a curtain of civility.

    It's just a question of what kind of Nasty you choose, because its all the same motivations, all the same lack of accountability, all the same evil--- and just a matter of what kind of antacid you take after voting.

    The solution was provided to us by our Forefathers: don't vote in these elections. Don't register to vote in them. Ever. And if you make the mistake of registering to vote, contact their "State of State" Division of Elections and ask to be removed from their Voter List.

    This is anti-intuitive, as most people who care about this country think that they have to vote and believe that it is their last little shred of control over the madness in DC.

    However, what it really means is that: (1) you retain your General Power of Attorney and (2) you aren't obligated to pay the bill.

    When the British-backed Territorial Government adopted the "corporate constitution" in 1868, nine million Americans were disenfranchised and permanently prohibited from voting in their elections. It is in fact a crime to vote in their elections if you aren't a federal employee or dependent.

    So why are you voting in foreign elections? Why are you participating in this craziness at all?

    What you should be doing is to "Come out of Babylon" and restore your own sane and solid government of the people, by the people, and for the people, including hosting your own elections.

    This is the only way that Americans can regain control of America --- stop voting for Representatives and start electing Fiduciary Deputies instead.

    As you one-by-one stop participating in the political sideshow, your powers of attorney and your assets are returned and protected, which is a huge benefit to you and yours. As you assemble your actual State Government and start sponsoring your own election of Fiduciary Deputies, the world gets turned right side up again. Accountability comes back into view.

    Your votes are needed all right --- but they are needed in the right elections for the right fiduciary officers. They can then step into their place in the hierarchy and control all the rest of the now-run amok government service providers.

    Both from the standpoint of protecting yourself and protecting your country, you need to boycott all the political party elections and put your time and energy into restoring your lawful government and electing your fiduciary officers. Only then will you have the accountable and responsible government that you are owed.


  7. #567
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    The actual American Government is not based on "Representatives". It functions via Fiduciary Deputies.
    Or as I have been suggesting for years the U.S. is a charitable trust, these being the only legal entities entitled to exceed the 99 year limit on perpetuities. If you mentally treat government as a trust you may act as fiduciary or beneficiary ... your choice. Most people step into the fiduciary role when they select the CITIZENSHIP box. While I claim to be ELIGIBLE to be a citizen I appear to have no office at the present so a falsehood (aka 'lie') would be committed if the CITIZENSHIP option is chosen.

    If the point is pressed I might be tempted to step into an office that is currently vacant ... that of Art III judgeship. Let's select a bailiff and a clerk of court and let the trial begin.

  8. #568
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Or as I have been suggesting for years the U.S. is a charitable trust, these being the only legal entities entitled to exceed the 99 year limit on perpetuities. If you mentally treat government as a trust you may act as fiduciary or beneficiary ... your choice. Most people step into the fiduciary role when they select the CITIZENSHIP box. While I claim to be ELIGIBLE to be a citizen I appear to have no office at the present so a falsehood (aka 'lie') would be committed if the CITIZENSHIP option is chosen.

    If the point is pressed I might be tempted to step into an office that is currently vacant ... that of Art III judgeship. Let's select a bailiff and a clerk of court and let the trial begin.
    Well I guess most of the offices are empty. I believe Art III is for common law and therefore the Judge just keeps a level playing field and the jury makes the determination of how to make the claimant well.

    I think we need to abolish corporations and go back to sole proprietors.

  9. #569
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,332
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    I think we need to abolish corporations and go back to sole proprietors.
    Without corporations there would be no need for the corporate coupons known as FRNs. Only corporations use these things at the present time. They pretend they are money. Then stockholders get to place bets on how well they believe a corporation is going to do. Warren Buffet is one of the largest betters on corporate do-gooding in the world.

  10. #570
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Danish huh, pure or mixed breed?

    Living in Czech land. Snuck in?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •