THE PRINCIPLE- The Movie Big Science Does NOT want YOU to see. SEE IT NOW.

The Principle
Page 45 of 45 FirstFirst ... 35434445
Results 441 to 450 of 450

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #441
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    February 16 at 5:40 PM

    For All The Jural Assemblies - 34 Reconstruction: Your Mission
    Strange as it may seem to us today, the Reconstruction required as a result of the Civil War has never been finished. In truth, it was never properly started. No adequate Notice and Disclosure of the circumstance was ever given to the general populace of America. And there are obvious, self-interested reasons for that.

    Let's take a step back and look at the close of the Civil War.

    We have now properly understood who the parties to the armed conflict were: commercial corporations owned and operated by the States went to war with each other. These entities operated as, for example, The State of Ohio, The State of Florida, The State of Wisconsin and so on, chose sides and fought, but this was a private sector quarrel among corporations --- as if General Electric and Westinghouse hired mercenaries and solicited volunteers and got into an armed conflict in the middle of the village green.

    As such, it was a patently illegal and lawless event, and by definition, there could be no actual Declaration of War, no Peace Treaty, and no actual Victory.

    The idea behind The Articles of Confederation was to create an internal alliance of "capital business interests" devoted to the welfare of all the States and People. This is why The Articles of Confederation which sought to bind together the commercial corporations operating as an "instrumentality" of each State in the global municipal jurisdiction overseen by the Office of the Roman Pontiff, proposed to be a "perpetual" union.

    From the very first, it was realized that if commercial interests were in conflict such that The States of States opposed each other, and this schism was allowed to spread far enough, it would endanger the entire country. So the Founders were at pains to impress upon The States of States the necessity of working together for the common good and maintaining the perpetual union of the original Confederation ---and a united front in the global municipal jurisdiction.

    Unfortunately, agent provocateurs --- as we now know, members of the Rothschild banking cartel and other European banking interests --- kept watch for an issue that might create such a schism between The State of State commercial corporations, and they found it: slavery.

    The last Congress of the Federal States of States adjourned for lack of quorum when the Southern States of States walked out.

    The Deputies known as "United States Senators" who were essentially the CEO's and Fiduciaries of these commercial corporations could no longer conduct business.

    The remaining Delegates representing the Northern commercial corporations collaborated with the British Territorial Government to continue operations under the guise of acting to "preserve the Union" and "the Constitution" --- meaning the Territorial Constitution and its role for the British King as Trustee over our Naval and Trade and Commercial activities.

    The entire "war" was fought by colluding American commercial corporations and foreign interests and had nothing to do with our actual States and People, except that the conflict was fought illegally on our soil, many of our people were killed, maimed, and otherwise harmed, the Federal State of State commercial corporations were decimated, and the British-backed Territorial Branch of the original Federal Government installed itself as a military junta.

    Even Ulysses S. Grant was stunned when, after the end of the hostilities, he arrived in Washington, DC, and realized the extent of the manipulation, corruption, and hypocrisy involved in promoting the Civil War. As a man and a soldier he had been sure of his moral cause throughout the actual fighting, only to discover that slavery was never the actual issue at all, and that those who now claimed victory were intent on creating a new kind of slavery: public slave ownership, instead of private slave ownership.

    What remained was this: the Northern Federal States of States -- commercial corporations owned and operated by the Union side of the conflict were bankrupt and in reorganization. The Southern States of States --- also commercial corporations owned and operated by the Confederate States were bankrupt, too, but never sought bankruptcy protection. A British Territorial Military junta was in control of Washington, DC, and soon puppet governments installed by force in the South would send Territorial Delegates to Washington.

    These Territorial Delegates would join their colluding Northern brethren who had operated in the same Territorial capacity throughout the war to operate a British Territorial-level "Congress" as a substitute for the Federal Congress.

    There were still enough people left alive who knew the truth and who wished to restore our rightful Government, so numerous attempts were made to do so.

    President Andrew Johnson did what he could to protect the States and People by formally declaring the land jurisdiction at peace, three times, in public. (May 10, 1865 - April 2, 1866 - August 20, 1866)

    Members of the Territorial "Rump" Congress admitted the circumstance by passing the "Reconstruction Acts". These were undertaken as "emergency" measures by a foreign military government -- essentially, an American "Raj" -- to maintain control over the civilian population during a transition back to normal government operations.

    That transition has never taken place. The vast bulk of the Reconstruction Acts have never been repealed and are still in full force and effect.

    The Reconstruction Acts which were supposed to be temporary measures violated the original Constitutions at least five different ways, but the three most immediate violations did three things that we still struggle with today.

    Article IV, Section 4 was violated when, under the Reconstruction Acts of the Territorial Congress, the actual Southern States were denied their republican form of government and control of their own soil jurisdiction after the end of the "war".

    Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 was violated by the Territorial Congress unlawfully exercising exclusive legislative power outside their Districts.

    Article IV, Section 3 was violated when the Territorial Congress formed Territorial "States of States" to replace and substitute for the Federal States of States.

    The sum total result of all this is that the Federal Government --- three levels of subcontracting commercial corporations that are supposed to be providing our States and People with Good Faith Service --- have been operating unlawfully and illegally ever since.

    Remember that there are in fact three Branches of the Federal Government, all composed of either our own or foreign commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services:

    Federal Branch = The States of States chartered by our States, like The State of Maine, The State of Iowa, etc. These self-chartered commercial corporations are supposed to be providing us with all goods and services stipulated under the Constitutions except for those services noted below:

    Territorial Branch = British King acting as Trustee of our private, trade, and commercial business interests on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways; caretaker of our Territorial holdings.

    Municipal Branch = Holy Roman Empire -commercial jurisdiction, supposed to be controlled by the Territorial Government and limited to the ten miles square of the District of Columbia, with plenary control of the Washington, DC Municipality. Supposed to provide a safe meeting ground for commercial business and uniform laws and standards for conduct of such business.

    After the Civil War, only two out of three Branches of the Federal Government remained in operation. The primary and most important subcontractor, the Federal Branch, was never "reconstructed".

    Instead, our primary contractor, the States of America organization was knocked out of commission, left disorganized (reconstruction never took place), and the secondary British Territorial subcontractors secretively usurped in and substituted their own Territorial "States of States" in 1868.

    We have been operating on two wheels instead of three, our guys have been cut out of all the juicy government contracts since 1868, and as a result, the Brits and the Popes have been in illegal and unlawful control of our Federal government ever since.

    The substitution of British Territorial "States of States" for American Federal "States of States" was accomplished via similar names deceit (fraud). The average people were left unaware of any change. To them and to their eyes, there was a "State of State" government before the war and after. The switch from The State of Georgia to the State of Georgia passed them by.

    In the same way, the switch from the unincorporated American Holding Company doing business as The United States of America ---which is another level of our American Government entirely--- was deliberately confused by the introduction of a Scottish commercial corporation doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated" as of 1868, so as to illegally access our credit and make it appear that we were bankrupted, when in fact no unincorporated entity is eligible for bankruptcy protection.

    This is all identity theft of the same kind that occurs when a credit card hacker illegally accesses your accounts.

    The Popes who were supposed to be running the Holy Roman Empire/Office of the Roman Pontiff and policing commercial operations worldwide--- and who are obligated by treaty to act as our Trustees in the Global Jurisdiction of Commerce--- sat on their velvet tuffets and did nothing to stop it. Instead, they happily profited themselves and helped organize the expansion of the fraud.

    The British Kings ordered the members of the Territorial Government to keep mum about it --- see 18 USC 472. The military was told that all this was a matter of "National Security".

    What it is really a "matter of" is gross Breach of Trust, Treaty Violations, Theft, Embezzlement, Fraud, Inland Piracy, Racketeering, and other Crimes by Treaty Allies against the interests of the American States and People.

    Your Mission as members of your State Jural Assemblies and as members of your State Assemblies proper, is to reclaim your stolen identity as American State Nationals and American State Citizens and to Assemble your State and finish the Reconstruction.

    Only you have the power to re-charter your Federal States of States and retrieve their assets-- that is, all the State land trusts doing business under names like: the Wisconsin State, Ohio State, et alia., from the Territorial Caretakers.
    Only you can put the American subcontractors back in place and in control of the services we are owed by the "Federal" Government.

    One of the great ironies is that in spite of all the evidence of fraud, bad faith, the use of similar names deceits, rampant identity theft, securities fraud, and other crimes committed by our purported Trustees and Allies against us, they still attempt to blame us and say that it's all our fault because we didn't boot up new Federal States of States after the Civil War.

    Well, folks, lets put that complaint to rest, act in our actual capacity as State Nationals and State Citizens, and do the work of Reconstruction---- create our own American Subcontractors to do the principle share of work as assigned under the actual Federal Constitution.

    The People of each one of our States need to charter their State's commercial corporation under their own State's sovereign authority, and then join as a member of the States of America----- a perpetual union and Confederation of States of States serving as the Federal Branch of the Federal Government.

    That will put an immediate end to a lot of monkey business and leave nobody any cause to complain about our action to take back control of our country and its assets and its service contracts.

    Also, acting as the People, as members of our State Assembly and our State Jural Assembly, we can address the multitude of international crimes which have been practiced against us.

  2. #442
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Arthur R. Thompson provides a glimpse into his newest book, "To the Victor Go the Myths & Monuments," which focuses on the history of the first 100 years of war against God and the Constitution, 1776-1876, and its modern impact.

  3. #443
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    February 16 at 7:19 PM

    Clearing the Air
    The first concept that needs to hit home is that all the actual States are sovereign entities. This is a violent departure from the realm we are used to and the States of States we have grown up with. It's a whole different world and a whole different government.

    The State Jural Assemblies are part of the American Government, not the Federal Government.

    Michigan has no special role or right to dictate how other States organize and operate their State Jural Assemblies, much less how they operate their State Assembly, sometimes called "State General Assembly".

    I simply recommended the Michigan General Jural Assembly template because it is basically sound and available. That doesn't mean that it is perfect or without errors or some kind of mandate from God that all the other States have to follow.

    Some members of the Michigan General Jural Assembly seem to think that it is the only State to maintain or start or use a State Assembly process --- and that is far from true. They also seem to think that Michigan is the only State with standing, and that isn't true either.

    Some States are just now putting out the call and are resuming activity of their Assemblies after a long pause between meetings. Other States, especially those in the West, are meeting for the first time since they met to sign their Statehood Compacts. The point of being sovereign entities is that they can conduct their business when, where, and as often -- or not -- as they please.

    Many States have continued to Assemble at various times in response to various threats and they have conducted their business properly and taken actions nationally, internationally, and globally ever since the Civil War. Some States, like Vermont, have been especially jealous in guarding their State sovereignty.

    So any idea that all the other States have to fall in line and conduct their business just the way Michigan conducts its business is way out of line and I certainly have never knowingly promoted such an idea.

    Most of us are familiar with Due Process,including Due Notice provisions, also with conducting proper and secure elections, keeping meeting Minutes, using Rules of Order to conduct meetings. etc., etc., etc.

    We are also familiar with basic court functions, juries, the qualification of jurors, the number of persons on juries, the kinds of juries, etc., and if we have questions there are plenty of sources available to us to find out answers.

    None of this is rocket science, except that we all need to know the difference between the American Government and the Federal Government that the American Government created.
    We all have to know that actual State Assemblies (General, Legislative, and Jural) are part of the American Government, not the Federal Government.

    We all have to know that actual State Assemblies can only lawfully be convened by people owing singular allegiance to the State. No Dual Citizenship is allowed by the actual States.
    Dual Citizenship is allowed by the States of States, but that is a different jurisdiction.

    There are apples and there are oranges.
    If you want to act as member of the actual State Assembly, the actual State Jural Assembly, or the actual State Legislature, you have to expatriate from any and all Federal Citizenship(s).
    If you want to live in America, live in America. If you want to live in "the US", live in "the US".

    Landsmen, who are Free Men, are Landlords in this country. The State belongs to the People of the State, not the Persons of the State. The People populate their State of the Union. They are natural born members of their State Assembly, their State Legislature, and their State Jural Assembly, too.

    Federal Citizens, whether Territorial or Municipal, are temporary "residents" in our actual States, just as we are temporary "residents" in their "States of States". They act as Persons, not People, and "inhabit" their foreign jurisdiction instead of populating it.

    The States of States and the Federal Government allow Dual Citizenship. You can be a citizen of the Territorial US Government and a citizen of the Municipal US Government, too. You can be a citizen of a State Government (so far as they know or care) and a Territorial citizen at the same time. You can even, as some members of the Territorial Congress have done, be a citizen of Israel and the Territorial United States at the same time.

    The same cannot be said of the actual States of the Union. Our soil and land jurisdiction States operate according to the Law of the Land (and no, that does not mean any form of Constitution in this context) which is derived from the Biblical Law including the premise that "no man can serve two masters". So when you choose to live in America instead of "the US" you have to renounce any foreign duty and expatriate from any foreign entanglement.

    The concern dictating this is eminently sensible. The Federal States of States are all commercial corporations operating in foreign jurisdictions, and someone having profit motives and duties attached to foreign commercial corporations should not be entrusted with making decisions for our States.

    This is the history and the Law and the reason that our States only allow one kind of citizenship ---- State Citizenship.

    When we expatriate our Federal contractors are obligated to respect their employer's wishes and cannot impose any requirement of citizenship related to them and their corporations. Doing so would amount to involuntary peonage, as all these Federal entities, including all Federal "States of States" are commercial corporations.

    Those who wish to operate as Americans standing on the land and soil of their State are lawful State Nationals and can choose to serve as lawful State Citizens. They can operate their State General Assembly, their State Legislature, and their State Jural Assembly unimpaired. But they cannot at the same time maintain employment, duties, or obligations as any form of "US" citizen.

    By the same token, Federal Employees and Dependents are able to serve as members of State of State Jural Societies, State of State Legislatures, and as State of State Executives --- and we can't.

    They can't act as State Electors, and we can't vote in their elections.

    This is because we live/inhabit completely different jurisdictions that are separate and foreign to each other, as the land is foreign to the sea.

    So this squabble with certain members of the Michigan General Jural Assembly who don't want to give up their Federal Citizenship and don't want to declare themselves as Americans is not a matter of pride or place or seniority.

    I am a State Justice doing my job and informing everyone of the actual Law that applies --- and if you don't follow the Law of the Land while attempting to operate a part of the American Land Jurisdiction Government, I have to object and bring this to your attention for the sake of everyone concerned.

    First, because no matter how well-intended your efforts are, you can be arrested if you aren't operating in the correct capacity.

    Second, because if your groups as a whole are not operating in the right capacity, nothing you do will hold water. It will be a wasted effort.

    Third, because if I know that you are off-track and I don't speak up and offer correction and that leads to you being harmed, I would be guilty of negligence.

    I trust that this is "enough said" and that everyone will duly consider the facts.

  4. #444
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    February 16 at 9:32 PM

    Quick Permanent Remedy
    Anna von Reitz:
    9:22 PM (1 minute ago)
    I think all we really need to do is en masse declare our birthright political status as Americans and take over.

    I know it's a mind bender --- but it is their (the Federales, that is) JOB to protect us --- so long as we are Americans.

    They have created a false legal presumption that we are NOT Americans ---- and created falsified records in order to claim that we are "US Citizens" ---- as if we were born in Puerto Rico or (working as) Federal Employees.

    They can abuse "US Citizens". "US Citizens" have no constitutional guarantees. "US Citizens" have no recognizable Natural and Unalienable Rights.....

    Some people think they are denying us access to the Public Law and our Constitutional guarantees, but that isn't what is going on. They haven't touched that cheese.

    What they have done is to "redefine" us as being "United States Citizens" or "Citizens of the United States" or "US CITIZENS" and we are provably none-of-the-above. We have been "presumed to be" in the same political status as Puerto Ricans, and until we rebut that and provide superior evidence, we've got no constitutional guarantees, no rights, no call on them to defend us.

    That's how they are subverting the Constitution and getting around the Public Law to do all this crap--- by stealing our identity as Americans!

    So what happens when fifty million of us realize this and say--- I am an American born on the land and soil of New Jersey (for example) and I have Expatriated from any form of "Federal Citizenship" and provided Notice to all you rats on your own Public Record.

    Big news, rats --- I am your Employer. The guy you owe all your Good Faith Service to. I am here to collect on that. You boys are on the hook to defend me, so better get busy defending me and my State and my best interests, or Bubba, it's Pink Slip time....

  5. #445
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    February 16 at 10:58 PM

    Do We Really Have to Reconstruct the Federal States of States?
    Yes, we do, if we want to put the Queen and Pope back in their boxes without a fight. Simple as that. And meantime, we need to expose what skunks they've been to the entire rest of the world.

    But I think there's more to this question.

    Our States can do whatever they want or need to do. They can conduct international trade and commerce all by themselves and we can "float our boats" in international and global jurisdiction just fine.

    Our battered old "Ship of State" The United States of America--- the unincorporated version--- still sails the seas just fine.

    Our Forefathers did exactly this same thing from 1776 to 1781 when they created the original Confederated States of States. We can, too. We don't need any franchises from foreign governments to conduct our business.

    Never did. Karen Hudes' "presumption" that our government is now or has ever been in "abeyance" is dead wrong.

    Our actual government was never vested in the commercial corporations that went haywire in the so-called Civil War. When they ceased operations, our States continued on with hardly a ripple:

    "Oh, dang! My favorite Laundry Service went out of business....."

    All the "extra offers" that the British Territorial Government and the Pope's Municipal Government lavish on us are bogus.

    They don't give us anything we need or want, and then they claim (falsely) that we owe them for the use of their "gift" franchises. It's like a "free" magazine subscription that secretly obligates you to receive and pay for fifty unwanted subscriptions.

    Or all the churches incorporating their operations to avoid taxes they never owed in the first place, or all the American workers being deliberately misidentified as "volunteer warrant officers in the British Merchant Marines" --- the entire identity theft and "enfranchisement" scam is a fraud, a sleight of hand, a false offer, a Trojan Horse "gift".

    The sooner people wake up, recognize the fraud for what it is, and put an end to it, the better.

  6. #446
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    Yesterday at 12:39 PM

    Reply to Sun Tzu
    Americans are not naturally "U.S. Citizens". They have to be converted into "U.S. Citizens" and they have to be re-conveyed out of "U.S. Citizenship" if they want to get out of it once they stumble into it. Like stumbling into a cow pie. Once you put your foot (or your name) in, you have to take your foot (or name) out.

    All the concerns in this letter
    [FB friends who want to read the letter from Sun Tzu go to my website:]

    are predicated on the wrong idea that you are naturally some form of "U.S. Citizen" and that you could "lose something" by denying such citizenship.

    The only "United States" that any of us are associated with is "The United States". Notice the "The". And we are not even "citizens" of The United States. We are nationals of The United States. When is the last time you or anyone you know took a soil jurisdiction office? I can tell you: 1851. So there are at this time exactly zero Americans owing citizenship obligations to "The United States".

    Whether you like it or not, your Proper Name has been kidnapped and transported into the realm of Commercial Fiction and falsely identified as a franchise corporation --- like a Burger King franchise --- belonging to the British Crown. That franchise is a United States Citizen under their "diversity of citizenship" clause and no United States Citizen has any rights or guarantees or treaties or constitutional guarantees.

    This is a process begun when your Mother unknowingly "surrendered" your name at the hospital and they "seized upon it" in Breach of Trust.

    Their "franchise offer" is a false gift you are offered before you are even competent to accept an offer, so they get your clueless Mother to sign "for" you and then they use that to concoct claims in commerce against you. It's like the free magazine subscription that obligates you to pay for fifty other subscriptions you don't want or need in the first place.

    Breach of Trust and fraud are the only issues and they can only be addressed once you rebut their evidence and their presumptions via Expatriating from all forms of "U.S. Citizenship" and developing superior evidence of your true identity and standing.

    As for how do we get our stuff back --- get fifty million Americans up to speed and claiming their proper identity and political status and exposing these vermin for what they've done and you will have more than just your own stuff back. You will have your country back.
    Continue down the road you are on, trying to straddle the fence, and all you do is leave people as sitting ducks ready to be plucked off by the Brits and the Pope's men--- who will exercise control over anyone presumed to be working for their corporations and over any "property" presumed to be donated to them.

    Americans who have been falsely conscripted into "service" as "U.S. citizens" have nothing to lose and everything to gain by coming home to the land and soil they are heir to. The Brits and the Holy Roman Empire won't like this, because they have been holding false title to us and to all our property and using us and our assets as collateral for their debts. Ask me --- do I care what they like?

    The process that I have suggested to recoup and evidence your actual identity and standing allows you to "re-flag" the "U.S. Citizen" NAMES as American entities, put all and any assets belonging to those entities back on the American land and soil of your States, subject them to the Public Law of our country, and control them yourselves.

    You have an "Authorizing Signature" so use it. And be sure to copyright it with a by-line or a copyright symbol (small "c" inside a circle") whenever you do.

    Just take all the playing pieces associated with your Name and permanently domicile them on the land and soil of your State, so that the Queen and her Bar Attorneys no longer have jurisdiction over your playing pieces and no authority to address you.

    "U.S. Citizenship" in any form is not anything that any American should cherish or regard as a benefit and it is not possible to retain it and enjoy your birthright as an American. So just ditch it and be done. If you are not a Federal Employee --- Civilian or active duty Military --- there is no reason for you to adopt "U.S. Citizenship" of any kind, and once you leave such employment, there is no reason for you to stay in that status.

  7. #447
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    23 hrs

    For the Pope and All My English Friends
    I struggled for forty plus years to find all the playing pieces, stood back, looked at the history, knew what was going on and "who" was doing what in what capacity, and then logically, according to Maxim of Law ----- "As a thing is bound, so it is unbound."-----hit the reboot button. They began this process by seizing upon our Lawful Person --- our Given Name --- and trafficking it into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea and thence into the even more foreign realm of global commerce....

    So, I began the reversal by seizing up my own Given Name, and trafficking it back to the international jurisdiction of the land, permanently domiciling it on "the land and soil" jurisdiction of my State (would be the County and Province most places on Earth), Expatriating from all foreign citizenship obligations "conferred" on my Good Name, and then seizing upon all the related NAMES and issuing a Certificate of Assumed Name(s) and trafficking them back and permanently domiciling them on the land and soil of my State of the Union.

    This is all a process exactly like re-flagging a vessel.

    Pretend that you buy a sailboat in Greece named "The Jolly Ann" and it is registered in Spain. You can sail that boat anywhere on Earth, and it will still be under Spanish law until you change its registration. So you, coming from England, might want to change that, and take it to the British agencies in charge of registering "vessels" and you might then "re-flag" your sailboat as a British "vessel" operating under the law of Great Britain and Presto! You are now internationally identified as a British sailboat and globally recognized as a "UK" sailboat, instead of a Spanish sailboat --- and you are sailing under British law, instead of Spanish law.

    This is the same kind of process. I was born as an American, one of the natural born people of Wisconsin. The Queen's Agents operating the hospital where I was born as a disguised military facility (See Territorial Title 37 that illegally conscripted American doctors) "offered under force" to register my Given Name. They didn't disclose the end result of this to my Mother, and she unknowingly signed "me" over as a "ward" of their Territorial State of State commercial corporation. So, I -- my Proper Name -- was misidentified almost from birth as a "U.S. Citizen" and a chattel property owned and operated (like any other "vessel" at sea) by the British Crown Corporation. They subsequently copyrighted my Given Name in Breach of Trust and subjected "me" to British Territorial Statutory Law.

    So I am rightfully an American State National, a Wisconsinite, but as a result of this primary Breach of Trust and Fraud against me, I have been misidentified and "sailing around" the world as a British Territorial United States "Vessel". My identity has been stolen, in exactly the same way that a credit card hacker steals identities.

    There is just one other twist to this particular story --- the British Commonwealth of Puerto Rico operates under Spanish Law, which still allows them to impose The Inquisition on all "vessels" registered in Puerto Rico. This creates a back door for the Pope to profit from this identity theft, too, and also a means for the Holy Roman Empire to get its claws into innocent people worldwide.
    So, after the first fraud and breach of trust by the Queen's disguised agents, they created a Roman Inferior Trust benefiting the Pope and named it after my stolen Proper Name. They removed this Cestui Que Vie Trust operated as "ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER" to Puerto Rico and registered it there.

    Now this leaves me with a British "Vessel" operating as a franchise of the British Crown Corporation under British Territorial Law, registered to a British Territorial State of State doing business as "the" State of Wisconsin.....and, a Puerto Rican "VESSEL" operated by the Holy Roman Empire under Spanish law, also drifting around --- and all of this is happening via a process of totally "unconscionable" and undisclosed contract, without my knowledge, and against my will. Totally non-consensual.

    I never knew a thing about any of this skullduggery being done "for" me by Undisclosed Foreign (British) Territorial Agents.

    And there is absolutely no plausible reason --- other than pure profit and self-interest --- for any of this to have taken place.

    As an American, I didn't ever need or want any of their international or commercial franchises to operate my business interests, because my State of the Union, Wisconsin, is perfectly intact and competent to float my boats as American "Vessels".

    The British Territorial United States is under contract to provide me and my State of the Union with Good Faith Service under the actual Territorial Constitution ratified in 1789, and the British Monarch is under contract as a result of the Treaties of Versailles (1778-1784), Treaties of Westminster (1784-1794) and Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783 ---- to act as my "Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways".

    Like Evil Uncle Ernie, the Queen has been caught diddling the children, making contracts with infants, trafficking us into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, and then letting her Bar Attorneys pillage and plunder us under false pretenses, and letting her bankers "salvage" our ESTATES under the same outrageous false pretenses.

    Then, using our own Delegated Powers against us, and again, in Gross Breach of Trust and criminality, she has ordered her Territorial workers to keep mum about all of this ---- 18 USC 472---- in an effort to ensure that all these false claims and all this chicanery would never be discovered, and if it was discovered, the people who knew could not talk about it. And all the Americans bound up in this scheme were told it was a matter of "National Security" and not to be questioned --- they just weren't told which 'nation" was securing itself.

    And the Popes, who are supposed to be our Trustees in the global jurisdiction of commerce, have not been a bit better. Oh, no, they jumped on the bandwagon, and their only objection to all this fraud and racketeering and identity theft has been to demand a cut of the action.

    The same thing has been done to people worldwide. The Queen created and condoned this "system" in Britain, too, and orchestrated it while sitting in The Chair of the Estates, instead of the British Throne.

    By rights, they all ought to be taken out and shot, and they know it --- which makes them desperate and unwilling to come to an accommodation, because that would admit their guilt. It would also divest them of a large portion of their ill-gotten wealth.

    I have been repeatedly asked ---what do I want? What do I want?

    I want what most people want. I want my freedom, control of my own life and assets, and to be left alone. I am not offering to cause anyone any harm but by the same token, I have not donated my assets to the British Crown. I want this identity theft and fraud and all these false claims in commerce to stop. I want those responsible for this situation to disgorge the profits from it back to the people who have been harmed by it. And I want peace and a normal course of business from now on.

    Since disgorging the profits all at once would cause chaos and devalue the assets, I have directed them to convert the debt system into a credit system and begin paying everyone on Earth a Basic Living Stipend equivalent to $2000 in local currency per month per person. I have also told them to issue an equivalent $1000 in local currency per month per person as an "Investment Credit" that people can use to make investments of their own in any peaceful business enterprise, with the principal and the profits becoming available to them for their use upon reaching the retirement age of 60.

    Those of us who have been defrauded and suffered and who will not be able to benefit from the long term enactment of this remedy are owed the return of every penny we have paid into fraudulent mortgages, "federal income taxes" paid by people who were never actually federal citizens or employees or dependents, federal pension "contributions" (Social Security, etc.) by people who were never actually federal employees, property taxes on our own property---- etc., all to be calculated and returned to us with reasonable interest as completely non-taxable dividend earnings. Any service, such as medical services under SSI and Medicare, and all insurances that we are owed, will continue to be owed together with free pharmaceuticals and physical therapy and hospice care --- full boat.

    Everyone on Earth has more than enough reason to demand such reasonable settlement of their personal accounts.

    As for our national accounts owed to, for example, our actual States of the Union, they need to similarly be paid off and accounted for in a forthright and proper manner. allocated to our State Trusts, and passed through to provide infrastructure and environmental remediation and long term caretaking and management of natural resources (not including people as "natural resources" -- thank you, very much) that belong to the People of each State.

    And no, we are not fooled by the Carbon Tax fraud-in-the-making. We will not be diapering our cows any time soon. Please take the fake "Treaty" agreeing to carbon taxes being proposed by the commercial corporations involved --- and have a nice bonfire as it passes into the dustbin of history.
    Anna Maria

  8. #448
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    2 hrs

    Second Reply to Sun-Tzu
    I don't deal in incorporated entities at all.

    None of the organizations I represent are incorporated.

    So your idea that I am somehow associated with ANYTHING calling itself "United States, Inc." or "United States of America, Inc." or any other foreign corporation is outrageous---- and in view of the fact that I have been the principle party bringing attention to the existence and meaning of these unauthorized incorporated entities for the last several years, it is nothing but ironic that you have seen fit to display your ignorance in public like this.

    I will be publishing an article re-iterating the fact about these corporations and the differences in jurisdiction involved between the unincorporated States of the Union and the incorporated States of States, also the differences between the unincorporated union of states known as The United States and any incorporated "ringer" calling itself "the" United States, Inc.

  9. #449
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    8 hrs

    For All The Jural Assemblies - 35 Lawful Persons
    It important for the State Jural Assemblies and the State General Assemblies, which follow, to understand the concept of 'Persons".

    A "person" is created every time we name someone or something, be it a baby or a business--- every time we create any form of office, job title, military rank, pen name, married name, performer's name or nick name, too.

    A person is not a living being. Your name is not you. It is a "handle", a "utility", a means of identifying you among billions of other people. It is a "representation" or "image" or "persona" of yours, that you are supposed to own and care for in the same way that you own a bicycle.

    Your Proper Name, also called your Good Name, your Trade Name, or your Given Name (because it is given to you---literally) is your Lawful Person when you are standing on the land and soil of your State.

    Persons fall into three basic categories:
    (1) unincorporated,
    (2) corporate, and
    (3) incorporated.

    The first two kinds of Persons---unincorporated and corporate -- are "Lawful Persons". The distinction between unincorporated and corporate is based on degree of separation from physical actuality.

    Unincorporated Lawful Persons are sometimes called First Degree Sovereigns and Corporate Lawful Persons are considered Second Degree Sovereigns.
    Sovereignty is an element of free will and it is only possessed by Lawful Persons; only unincorporated entities are truly free.

    So we each have our own Proper Name, which is a Lawful Person---sometimes referred to as a "Natural Person".

    Private unincorporated businesses are another class of Lawful Persons known as "Business Persons". These also naturally occupy the land and soil jurisdiction of the American States.

    A third kind of Lawful Person is called a Corporate Business Person -- not "incorporated" -- merely "corporate".
    A Lawful Corporate Business Person is typically formed by one or more unincorporated businesses. Unions, Leagues, Clubs, Holding Companies, Fellowships, Federations, and some forms of Trusts are Lawful Corporate Business Persons.

    Our unincorporated state republics joined together to form the unincorporated union of states doing business as The United States.

    The United States is a "Lawful Corporate Business Person" called a "Union" doing business for other businesses--- the member state republics.

    The United States of America is also a "Lawful Corporate Business Person" called a "Holding Company" doing business for other businesses -- the member States.

    All Lawful Persons are unincorporated entities. All Lawful Persons can freely conduct domestic trade and international trade on the land or sea.

    Lawful Persons are of a different class and kind of Person than Legal Persons.

    It's important to know that the entire actual American Government is unincorporated and populated by Lawful Persons.

    When you return "home" to the land and soil of your State of the Union, you do so as a Lawful Person. When you act as a State Citizen and as a member of your State Jural Assembly, you do so as a Lawful Person.

    It's equally important to know that the Federal Government --- all three branches of it: Federal, Territorial, and Municipal --- is incorporated and inhabited by Legal Persons, instead. All Federal Citizens whether defined by Article 1 Section 2, Clause 2 or Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 or by the 14th Amendment are acting as incorporated franchises or agents or officers of commercial corporations and are acting in a different capacity and a separate jurisdiction. We shall treat Legal Persons as a separate topic.

    The American Government is composed of Lawful Persons and the Federal Government is composed of Legal Persons.

    This is an important distinction and deserves your careful thought, notice, and consideration.

    The Bible, which is the source of Land Law throughout most of the world, takes a dim view of "persons" and "personages" ---- criticism which is largely addressed to officials bearing titles, royal persons, and legal persons who fail to live up to their duty:

    Acts 10:34
    Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

    Psalms 26:4
    I have not sat with vain persons, neither will I go in with dissemblers.

    Job 13:10
    He will surely reprove you, if ye do secretly accept persons.

    James 2:9
    But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.

    Proverbs 28:21
    To have respect of persons is not good: for a piece of bread that man will transgress.

    Psalms 82:2
    How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked?

    Proverbs 24:23
    These things also belong to the wise. It is not good to have respect of persons in judgment.

    Proverbs 28:19
    He that tilleth his land shall have plenty of bread: but he that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough.

    Zephaniah 3:4
    Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: her priests have polluted the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law.

    Proverbs 12:11
    He that tilleth his land shall be satisfied with bread: but he that followeth vain persons is void of understanding.

    Ezekiel 27:13
    Javan, Tubal, and Meshech, they were thy merchants: they traded the persons [Slaves] of men and vessels of brass in thy market.

    Ephesians 6:9
    And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.

    Lamentations 4:16
    The anger of the LORD hath divided them; he will no more regard them: they respected not the persons of the priests, they favoured not the elders.

    Malachi 1:9
    And now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious unto us: this hath been by your means: will he regard your persons?saith the LORD of hosts.

    1 Peter 1:17
    And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:

    1 Timothy 1:10
    For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

    1 Samuel 22:22
    And David said unto Abiathar, I knew it that day, when Doeg the Edomite was there, that he would surely tell Saul: I have occasioned the death of all the persons of thy father's house.
    These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.

    James 2:1
    My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.

    2 Chronicles 19:7
    Wherefore now let the fear of the LORD be upon you; take heed and do it: for there is no iniquity with the LORD our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts.

    Deuteronomy 10:17
    For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nortaketh reward: [Work for free in other words, as 'everything acquired by the Slave/Person is acquired for the Master' ]

    Colossians 3:25
    But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons.

    Jonah 4:11
    And should not I spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than sixscore thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?

    Deuteronomy 1:17
    Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God's: and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I will hear it.

    Deuteronomy 16:19
    Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.

    Romans 2:11
    For there is no respect of persons with God.

  10. #450
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 1,317 Times in 761 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    3 mins

    Third Reply to Sun-Tzu
    The War Powers Act has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual States of the Union nor the People of this country. Likewise, the Reconstruction Acts concern only the "reconstruction" of Federal States of States. Not States of the Union.

    Two different things. Apples and oranges. American and "US".

    The Lieber Code and all the rest of it applies only to "US citizens" --- that is, Federal Civilian and Military employees and their dependents. Just like any other corporation's administrative "codes" and "polices" apply only to the employees of that corporation. This is not rocket science and it is nothing that we don't already know as a result of dealing with other commercial corporations every day.

    So, if you aren't actually getting a paycheck as a Federal Civilian or Military Employee or Dependent, what in the name of Charles Bronson are you doing claiming to be or wanting to be a "US citizen" of any kind?

    Once you realize that --- and know for sure that the rest of us realize it, too--a great many other things fall into place.

    The War Powers Act is applicable to the Territorial Military Government under contract to our American Government and all its "US Citizens" in the same way that the laws of Mitsubishi Corporation apply to Mitsubishi employees, but not to the owners of a Mitsubishi motorcycle.

    You are still mistaking the Federal Government for the American Government, and they are not "the same" and never were. The Federal Government, including the Territorial Branch of it, is under contract to provide services to our States as clearly explained in all three Constitutions. The Territorial and Municipal Branches of the "Federal Government" both operate as commercial corporations, like General Electric and IBM. Hello? Hello?

    The American Government --- our States of the Union -- created the Federal Government to provide stipulated mutual services. We did not create it to rule over us. We did not give our employees carte blanch to boss us around and abuse us in the name of protecting us.

    And we are not naturally "US Citizens" of any kind. We are not receiving a paycheck from the corporation. We are not obligated to wear a uniform. It is not our "duty" to serve the corporation, it's the corporation's duty to serve us.

    We are the employers and the "US Citizens" are the employees.

    So, we've got a whole lot of people misidentified as employees of the Federal Corporations --- Americans who are wrongly being taxed and bossed around and held to the Public Policies of the Federal Corporations who are in fact customers of the corporations, and not employees at all.

    It's like being commandeered by J.C. PENNY.

    You and your idiot buddies are stomping and ranting and trying to say that we should consent to this and we should just comply and be nice little US citizen slaves for Wall Street ---when we own Wall Street and don't have to live as slaves.

    There is nothing sacred about US Citizens or US citizenship sum total. For the vast majority of Americans, it is not a beneficial political status to be in.

    If an American decides to go to work for the Federal Corporations providing our States with services --- federal civilian and military contractors --- that's fine. They need to obey every jot of their Federal Corporation's policy and code or quit their jobs.
    Not the rest of us.

    The rest of us are being unconscionably imposed upon and pillaged, using the excuse that we were somehow all transformed into "US citizens" without our knowledge or consent--- and all as the result of falsified registrations misidentifying us as "US citizens" and all done "for" us by our "US citizen" employees.

    That is not a service we authorized the Federal Corporations to do "for" us.
    That is called kidnapping, shanghaiing, mischaracterization, impersonation, and press-ganging.
    And you are telling the victims not to take action to free themselves from this outrageous criminal "presumption" of "US citizenship"?
    And pretending to be their friend and giving them good advice? Bushwah!

    Here's my advice:
    Any American who can expatriate from such a false and foreign political status as presumed "US citizens" should immediately do so without a backward glance. Then you can start telling your employees --- all those actual "US citizens" --- what their job really is.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts