Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·

Remembering Where We Are in Time

Today was memorable for many reasons, not the least of which was an extraordinary conversation I had with a man who actually thought that The Treaty of Paris, 1783, was the Founding Document of our country.

I had to tell him that no, The Treaty of Paris, 1783, is not our Founding Document.

Our Founding Document is The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, published in July of 1776.

The Treaty of Paris barely mentions us for the same reason that the Constitutions barely mention us.

Neither the Treaty of Paris nor the Constitutions are about us -- they are instead Power Sharing Agreements between European Principals, sorting out what they will do and what their responsibilities are, going forward.

Look at this circumstance again--- there are four separate entities operating under confusingly similar names.

The United States --- the proper name of our soil jurisdiction states acting as a Union of republican States.

"the" United States -- the name of the Pope's Municipal United States Government.

The United States of America -- the proper name of our land jurisdiction unincorporated Federation of States.

"the" United States of America -- the name of the British Territorial United States of America.

As you read The Treaty of Paris, 1783, you will note that the bulk of whole thing is about "the United States" --- that is, the Pope's Municipal Government, and "the United States of America" --- that is, the British Territorial United States.

Both these entities were to receive specific "Delegated Powers" from us as a result of the peace treaty; they were to exercise these delegated powers for us and in our behalf, so they were both allowed to operate "under our names".

So, from 1783 onward, when you see references to "the United States" you have to read the context of the document in these early years to know whether they are talking about The United States or "the" United States.

Past about 1790 when all this got consolidated, you can reliably assume that any reference to The United States is about our soil jurisdiction Union of republican states, and any reference to "the" United States is about the Pope's Municipal United States Government.

The same process applies to the use of The United States of America. When you see it presented as The United States of America without the word "Incorporated" you may assume that our Federation of States is being discussed unless there is a specific agreement otherwise defined by the text. When you see "the" United States of America it refers to the British Territorial United States Government.

The Treaty of Paris of 1783 set up and defined what was being agreed to between the British King and the Pope, and who was responsible for what in the new Power Sharing Agreement coming into effect; the Constitutions then implemented these agreements.

From 1781 to 1787, our own States of America Confederation provided all the Services and exercised all the Delegated Powers.
After the original Constitution was adopted in 1787, specific "powers" that had been exercised by the States of America, were split off and exercised by the British Monarch and the Pope, instead.

The States of America continued to exist and function as our American Federal Service Provider until 1860, when the Civil War resulted in splitting the original Confederacy in half --- what remained were the Northern members of the States of America, and the Southern members now functioning as the Confederate States of America.

See the similar names now?

The bunko artists have tried to obscure these facts and prevent them from coming to public knowledge, but praise God, we now know.

When the Constitution of 1787 was adopted, the State of America confederacy lost many vital powers which it had hitherto exercised for us; it was obliged to turn these enumerated powers over to the British King of the Commonwealth (King John's heirs) and the Municipal Government of the Pope, respectively, according to the agreements reached as part of The Treaty of Paris, 1783.

The States of America continued to function in this lessened capacity until 1860, and was never reconstructed after the so-called American Civil War, mainly because the two foreign subcontractors secretively usurped upon their employers--- the American States and People and our unincorporated Federation of States, dba, The United States of America.

So the States of America has been awaiting "Reconstruction" all these years, and generations of clueless Americans have been left unaware that this job has yet to be done.

It is important to understand that our Government "of the people, for the people, and by the people' is a living government operating in an independent and sovereign capacity. It is summoned into being when necessity demands, and it is being summoned now to assemble the State Citizens who are the "People" who are Party to the Constitutions and who are enabled to enforce them.

Thanks to General Ignorance and various actions undertaken by our Federal Subcontractors in Breach of Trust we have had a long journey home and have been forced to remember exactly how we got here and who we are.

[ziero0]

Thanks to General Ignorance and various actions undertaken by our Federal Subcontractors in Breach of Trust we have had a long journey home and have been forced to remember exactly how we got here and who we are.

Perhaps this exert from Hobbes Leviathan will help Anna on her journey:

Actor, Author; Authority
Of Persons Artificiall, some have their words and actions Owned by those whom they represent. And then the Person is the Actor; and he that owneth his words and actions, is the AUTHOR: In which case the Actor acteth by Authority. For that which in speaking of goods and possessions, is called an Owner, and in latine Dominus, in Greeke Kurios; speaking of Actions, is called Author. And as the Right of possession, is called Dominion; so the Right of doing any Action, is called AUTHORITY. So that by Authority, is alwayes understood a Right of doing any act: and Done By Authority, done by Commission, or Licence from him whose right it is.





Covenants By Authority, Bind The Author
From hence it followeth, that when the Actor maketh a Covenant by Authority, he bindeth thereby the Author, no lesse than if he had made it himselfe; and no lesse subjecteth him to all the consequences of the same. And therfore all that hath been said formerly, (Chap. 14) of the nature of Covenants between man and man in their naturall capacity, is true also when they are made by their Actors, Representers, or Procurators, that have authority from them, so far-forth as is in their Commission, but no farther.
And therefore he that maketh a Covenant with the Actor, or Representer, not knowing the Authority he hath, doth it at his own perill. For no man is obliged by a Covenant, whereof he is not Author; nor consequently by a Covenant made against, or beside the Authority he gave.





But Not The Actor
When the Actor doth any thing against the Law of Nature by command of the Author, if he be obliged by former Covenant to obey him, not he, but the Author breaketh the Law of Nature: for though the Action be against the Law of Nature; yet it is not his: but contrarily; to refuse to do it, is against the Law of Nature, that forbiddeth breach of Covenant.





The Authority Is To Be Shewne
And he that maketh a Covenant with the Author, by mediation of the Actor, not knowing what Authority he hath, but onely takes his word; in case such Authority be not made manifest unto him upon demand, is no longer obliged: For the Covenant made with the Author, is not valid, without his Counter-assurance. But if he that so Covenanteth, knew before hand he was to expect no other assurance, than the Actors word; then is the Covenant valid; because the Actor in this case maketh himselfe the Author. And therefore, as when the Authority is evident, the Covenant obligeth the Author, not the Actor; so when the Authority is feigned, it obligeth the Actor onely; there being no Author but himselfe.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·

Again, About the Arbitration by Phil Hudok and Others

The following is a snippet from a conversation with one of those advocating and all excited about Phil Hudok's Arbitration. It starts abruptly by answering the notion that the Queen or I or anyone else has the ability to determine someone else's political status....
________________

Pardon me, but neither I nor the Queen have a word to say about your political status choices.
You [those advocating Hudok's solution] are the ones claiming to be subjects of the Queen by continuing to (1) espouse "US Citizenship" without declaring which "US" you belong to; (2) by standing voluntarily under the King's Law, and (3) by accepting the relief offered by his courts (as in "welfare relief").

By these acts, you voluntarily subject yourself to the King (or Queen), and you look ridiculous if you then claim otherwise.

What you and others, too, fail to comprehend ---even though I place it before you almost daily---- is that there are multiple governments at work here in America. Not just one.

The American Government of, for, and by the people does exist, but so does the Queen's British Territorial Government, and the Pope's Municipal Government. All three.

That circumstance, of having three different governments actively employed here at the Federal level, is the result of the "Power Sharing Agreements" that are in front of your faces--- The Definitive Treaty of Paris, 1783, the implementing Constitutions, and if you were to dig further, you would find the related Treaties of Versailles and of Westminster dating 1778-1784.

Each one of these separate governments --- American, British Territorial, and Papal --- has specific jobs to do by contractual agreement. In performing those jobs, the subcontractors exercise our own "Delegated Powers" and operate "in our names". This adds to the confusion.

So here you are, claiming the leniency and mercy of the King on one hand, championing his law and subjecting yourself to it, and on the other hand, claiming to be an American Patriot. Pardon me, again, but I am not the one who is confused.

You can be counted as an American, and claim your birthright as a State National, or you can go a step further and claim to be a State Citizen. See the Definitions in 8 USC 1101 (a) 21 and 8 USC 1101 (a) 22 (B).

You can also voluntarily choose to be considered a British Territorial United States Citizen (which is what you and Phil Hudok are doing, whether you realize it or not) or, you can choose to act as a Papal Municipal "citizen of the United States".
These citizenship statuses were created by the Constitutions implementing The Definitive Treaty of Paris 1783 --- Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2, and Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3.

Both these foreign citizenship statuses cited directly above, were created by the Constitutions and without the Constitutions, they cease to exist.

This is why preserving the Constitutions is of primal importance to all those who claim their political status based upon the Constitutions.

We, Americans, don't base our nationality nor our citizenship status on the Constitutions. Our political status pre-dates the Constitutions by a decade.

So, if you want to style yourself as a British Territorial Citizen and wish to subject yourself to the Queen, who am I to criticize or say differently? The Constitutions give you that right, just as they preserve my rights and guarantees.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

Notice to Pope: Babylon is Fallen, is Fallen

Now, fully armed, locked and loaded, with the ---to many people explosive knowledge --- that there are three governments active in this country, and always have been, we must also realize that "President of the United States" refers explicitly to the CEO of the Municipal United States Government.

Anything done by "the United States" that is not specifically a "delegated power" entrusted to it, does not in any way apply to Americans.

So the USMCA Treaty is just about them, not about us ---- however, we need to impress them and everyone else with these facts, so that we are not presumed to agree with nor to condone the USMCA Treaty as anything undertaken for us and certainly nothing we are taking responsibility for, either.

We consider it nothing but a gross extension of criminality and fraud, destined for destruction.

The reason that the "Federal Reserve" has ever been considered "legal" is that it is a religious institution.

Yes, you heard that right.

In order to make their scheme work, the Federal Reservists -- members of a pagan religious order protected under the Roman Pontificate --- asserted their right to contract and their right to religious freedom.

They thereupon created the "reserve" defined as their blood and bodies, put a price upon these precious resources and upon their labor and upon all their interest in private and public property ---- and donated it all to their religious institution --- The Federal Reserve.

They also trademarked and created the "Federal Reserve System", which they bankrupted in 2009, ending any pretense that they would be responsible for their debts, including the "Federal Reserve Notes" that their Federal Reserve System issued as Promissory Notes from 1913 to 2009.

Since then, we've all be passing their vacated debts around as if there was anything at all backing them, and as if there was any hope of them ever being honored by the banks issuing them.

But, you say, ----I am not a member of this weird religion! I never even heard of it before! I most certainly never "pledged" my blood and body, my labor, my private property, my public lands, my children, or anything else to the Federal Reserve....
But guess, what?

By a process of deceit and purposeful non-disclosure and even physical duress and coercion, they got your Mother to "donate" your name to them when you were only a few days old.

This resulted in an "Unconscionable Contract" --- literally a contract that you were never aware of, and could not be aware of, being established "in your name" and granting your body and blood, your labor, your private property, your interest in the public property of this nation, your children, your marriage, and everything else including the copyright and trademark of your Given Name --- to the perpetrators of this Gross Fraud Scheme and Breach of Trust.

We are in the process of repudiating all such Presumptions, one by one, as millions of Americans return to and claim their birthright political status and deny any such obligation or religious connection.

Meantime, those who actually, knowingly, and willfully engaged in this grotesque self-immolation and religious idolatry, have continued on and retained their character as "citizens of the United States" ---- the Pope's Municipal Government.

That failed theocracy, which is not Christian, and which worships Mammon, is now ducking and running and collaborating with its sister organization, the International Monetary Fund, which is the bank behind the criminal UN Corp founded during the Second World War by Vichy French and Swiss Nazi Collaborators.

They propose to replace "UNITED STATES DOLLARS" with "SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS" also known as "SDR"s, all predicated on the idea that they have obtained some legitimate commercial right to "draw upon" ---- like vampires --- your blood, your body, your DNA, your private property, your public property, your progeny and your labor ---- all functioning as collateral backing for all their debts.

Shall we all stand up right now and tell President Trump and all the Politicos that we never accepted any such contract? Are not members of this religious cult? And neither were any of our ancestors?

Shall we tell the Federal Reserve and the IMF and the Pope and the perpetrators of this horrific enslavement scheme to Go to Hell?

Shall we demand the return of all right, title, and interest, all patents, and all labor resources that they have fraudulently conveyed and assumed an "ownership interest" in?

And shall we make sure that President Trump knows of our objections to his signature permitting "the" United States to participate in the IMF/UN Corp scheme "in our names"----- all based upon the Presumption of our "donation" of ourselves to their god, Mammon?

Yes, I think it is most appropriate, and I think that it is necessary for all Roman Catholics to come squarely to terms with what has been done "in their names" too.

Worship of Mammon is idolatry. Worship of Ashtoreth -- aka, "The Statue of Liberty" is blasphemy and is worship of "The Great Abomination", which is indeed standing "where it should not stand".

Worship of Nimrod-Satan-Poseidon is worship of a False God, known appropriately, as "The Father of All Lies". His emblem, the snake, is prominently displayed as an integral part of the Pope's Auditorium design, and also entwines itself around the Pope's throne in the Auditorium Chamber.

Roman Catholics, this cult is what has been using your Church as a storefront for generations, just as it has been using our country as a storefront, and just as it proposes to use the United Nations organization as a storefront for global enslavement of mind, body, and soul.

This is what we are all up against, and it must be destroyed, from within and from without.

Mr. Trump has made the error of agreeing to let "the" United States participate in the IMF/UN Corp scheme. Perhaps he has been swayed by their arguments of freedom to contract and freedom of religion --- without looking deeper and fully understanding that criminality cannot be excused as a "religion".

Before we all start bashing in skulls and slitting throats and chasing down Catholic priests and dismembering them in the streets and hanging nuns like grotesque black and white Christmas ornaments---- which is merely our Public Law and the Geneva Conventions for dealing with capital level felons ---- we need to take pause.

Most of these people had no clue what their church was getting into, just as most Americans had no idea what was being alleged and falsified about them and their country, either.

This evil cannot stand the light of day, and its intention, to enslave and suck dry the people of the entire world under the same False Presumption of contract ----can't either.

Pope Francis needs to deeply consider not only his own future, but the future of the Roman Catholic Church under his direction, and the likely outcome of continuing this drive to attain world domination via fraud and coercion "in the name of" Jesus, or 'in the name of" The United States, or "in the name of" the United Nations, either.

If he and his pagan cohorts want to do all this evil, they can attempt it without any reference to us and without any pretense of representing us.

The rest of us must confront the fact that none of this has anything to do with Jesus. Quite the opposite. It has to do with "cells" of Satanists embedded within the Church, within the "US" Municipal Government, within our military, and within many governments worldwide.

This is an ancient, venal, fecund evil which has been repeatedly suppressed ever since it first arose and led to the downfall of Ancient Babylon. It's time to not only suppress it, but to utterly destroy it.

If anyone is so mentally disturbed or stupid as to support a "religion" based on crime against oneself and one's fellow man, a "religion" that promotes the destruction of mankind and of all moral fiber, a "religion" that advocates worship of idols including Molloch and Mammon and Baal, a "religion" that practices infanticide, pedophilia, and cannibalism ---- then let them go to a mental hospital, where they belong.

As for the rest of us, it's time to stand up and put Pope Francis and the Roman Catholic Church in the cross-hairs and keep them there until they curl up and purge themselves of this Great Evil, and ditto-ditto the "Federal Reserve", the "IMF", the "UN Corp", the United Nations organization, the bankers en masse, and anyone, anywhere who dares to support their agenda.

Mr. Trump, kindly withdraw from the USMCA Treaty, and put these arrogant criminals back in their places --- a very dark box where they all belong. Do not venture to further sully our names with these acts and practices.

We'll put the two hundred or so Americans who knowingly, willingly, supported this to death in effigy, as the original perpetrators are all physically dead. We will provide safe mental institutions for those who are intractably and incurably addicted to these practices and delusions.

We will happily liquidate their corporations and put an end to this macabre bid for world domination using the Roman Catholic Church, our country, and the United Nations organization as storefronts for this profound Evil.

We will restructure the banks and the credit system--- which is actually an easy, quick thing to do --- and get the world back on track with no further adieu.
https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/…/so-you-think-trump-w…/

And everyone kindly remember that none of this has anything to do with America or Americans in general. The epicenter of this evil and this fraud lies with the Pope's Municipal United States Government----- "the" United States, not The United States.
It remains for the Roman Catholics and the United Nations organization members to do the same thing for themselves ---they need to declare their repudiation of all these fraudulent claims and falsified documents being held against innocent people worldwide.

They need to "come out of Babylon" or suffer Babylon's fate.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
27 mins ·

The Revolving Door

In the name of protecting the confessional and granting forgiveness to penitent sinners, the Church has harbored criminals.

As I have said often enough before, there is only One who can grant forgiveness, and as I will say again, in order for forgiveness to happen, our repentance must be sincere.

Repentance must cut to the bone and change our hearts, or we are just as guilty as we ever were --- maybe more so, because those who seek forgiveness without true repentance brand themselves as hypocrites, too.

This lackluster mundane chronic "forgiveness" offered by the corrupted Church leads to a revolving door syndrome.

Week One: "Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. I have had sex with my dog twice this week...." Week Two: "Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. I have had sex with my dog three times this week....." Week Three: "Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. I had sex with my dog, two donkeys and a really hot cat this week....."

You see what I mean and what this leads to.

The same thing applies to the Church's responsibility under both Ecclesiastical and Canon Law to liquidate corporations that engage in criminal activities. Witness the liquidation of the UNITED STATES, INC.

This took ten years to accomplish, was not properly administered, resulted in rewarding the criminals responsible, and then, these same criminals were allowed to form a new corporation under a new name, and allowed to sail on as if nothing had happened.

The form of justice was somewhat maintained. They went through the motions of a liquidation the same way they go through the motions of repentance and forgiveness ---- but nothing was bettered or altered, no justice was done, and the criminality fostered by this has continued unabated.

Here's another example: "Among those arrested, 36 men were charged with trying to buy sex [from children] and one man was arrested for promoting [child] prostitution. Forty-three women were arrested for selling sex — they were connected with social services aimed at rehabilitating human trafficking victims,
WBNS-TV reported."https://www.foxnews.com/…/ohio-sex-sting-104-arrested-docto…

You notice that last kicker? The women arrested were "connected with social services aimed at rehabilitating human trafficking victims" ---- the traffickers were the ones hired to "rehabilitate" the victims.

Apparently, "rehabilitation" means being abused some more, so that the victims learn to accept it better.

Think about it --- 43 grown women, involved in sex trafficking children. What possible punishment would be appropriate or sufficient for them? Branding a big red "T" in the center of their foreheads?

Many people are surprised when they hear about child sex trafficking in places like Ohio. I selected this story out of many to bring home the point that rural America and rural Canada are the favorite hunting grounds of these depraved criminals.

My Mother, a farm girl from Wisconsin, was attacked when she was only seven years old. It scarred her for life. She carried a gun wherever she went. And if anyone had ever again offered to harm her or one of her children, that person would be dead--- with extreme prejudice. She was connected to an entire group of adult women in Wisconsin who had been abused as children, and they were all the same. They all carried guns. And they were all sworn to use them.

My Mother's brothers were also members of a similar men's group, as a result of her abduction and abuse. They and their friends, mostly WWII buddies, were similarly dedicated to protecting the community's children. If any gang of pedophiles or child traffickers ever came into Jackson County, these people were unceremoniously fed to the catfish. It was "settled law", and that was enough.

Guys who stormed Anzio and the Normandy Beaches didn't give a rat's rump. Anyone --- and I do mean anyone --- who messed with their children, was going to wind up on the short end of a long stump.

As a result, nobody had to lock the doors of their houses. Nobody had to worry about locking their cars. We kids played wherever we wanted to play, carefree as the daisies in May. We stayed out in the evenings until the streetlights came on and fire flies came out, and nobody ever had to worry, because there were adults deployed all over that county watching us all like hawks. If anyone was caught harming a child, they died, and the Jackson County Coroner signed the Death Certificate "natural causes".

You can't get more natural than a big catfish.

Now, that's the reality of it all and that's what people of a new generation have to face. It's not all sunshine and roses and butterflies. It's not all unicorns and sly snarky jokes and name-brand jeans.

It's not that these same pedophiles and sex traffickers and cannibals didn't exist in my day. It's that they didn't exist for long. They got taken out and down and off the street faster than rabid dogs.

The local policemen, all three of them, didn't do the job of policing our community and protecting our children. A bunch of grim old men and women, teamed up with a few well-fed catfish, did that job. It was "settled law" and they enforced it.

Last time I was home in Wisconsin, it was late summer, a dark and beautiful moonlit night with a yellow full moon riding high in the sky. I stopped and parked my car and listened to the whippoorwills and watched the small ripples on one of the countless lakes. Behind me, across a two-lane asphalt road was a narrow three-story court building, built of grey limestone blocks.

That court building stands mostly empty and unused now, because it belongs to the actual County and the actual People of Wisconsin.
It's only when a grey-beard like me comes to town and the Justices of the Peace hold a meeting or when the County Land Surveyor brings in a new record, that it gets used at all.

One could think that there was nobody in a hundred miles. One could easily think that nobody had ever been there since the courthouse was built. It was that quiet.

But I remembered a night fifty years ago, when that same courthouse was anything but quiet.

A 42-year old man from Chicago had been caught red-handed raping a seven year old boy from Hatfield, Wisconsin.

A jury of twelve men heard the facts, heard the law, and delivered their verdict within about an hour. The Justice of the Peace pronounced the sentence. By two o'clock in the morning, everyone was home in bed, the boy was in his Mother's arms, being comforted, and our criminal visitor from Chicago was dead.

They netted and weighted and threw his hanged body into that same lake I was looking at. It was the established and published and settled law of our actual County, and they enforced it.

If Chicago wanted to gripe, they could sit on Lake Michigan and spin.

He was a big, fat, white man and he looked like a dead pig as they lowered him in, wiped their hands, and said a prayer for his immortal soul.

That's the way it was back then, and if the military and the police don't haul rump and get their heads wrapped around what we are facing in this country, it will have to be that way again, because nobody in their right mind is going to put up with having their children grabbed and raped and murdered.

I don't care if you are black, white, purple, LGBT or ET. Doesn't make a bit of difference to me. You're on our turf now. And its our law that matters.

As I started up my car to leave, I saw a shadow detach itself from the pine trees across the parking lot and saw a flash of white smile in the darkness. A Winnebago man from the Ho-Chunka Reservation out fishing for the evening. He was about my age and there was something familiar about him, but I couldn't immediately place who he was.

Ah, the younger brother of one of my classmates.

We greeted each other kindly, respectfully, and passed the time for a couple minutes, then he said, "I remember the way it used to be."
"So do I," I replied.

"We were poor," he said, "but people were honest."
I nodded.
"My own son stole my outboard motor and sold it," he told me, for no apparent reason.
People are forever telling me things they wouldn't tell their Mother.
"Did you get it back?" I asked.
"Yes, the motor I got back, but not my son," he said sadly. "He thinks that money is the important thing, not his Father's respect and love."
He was leaning against my car, looking up at the full moon. I could see the tears rolling down his face, but his voice didn't betray a thing.
What could I say? That our country has been deluded? That the whole world is led astray by con men? So that people value what is not valuable, and throw away everything that matters, even their self-respect?
"I don't think I will ever use that outboard again," he said finally. "I think I'll throw it away somewhere. Dig it a grave."
What could I say? I knew exactly what he meant and why he said it.

We've gained things, but not virtues. We have money, but not love. Whatever pleasure or utility that outboard motor once provided to him, it was nothing compared to what it cost him --- his pride and his trust in his son.

As I pulled away and out onto the road again, I tried to follow his shadow back into the trees, but he vanished back into the forest as abruptly as he came, and I knew that even if I stopped the car and cut the engine and listened hard, I wouldn't hear his moccasin boots on the soft ground covered with pine needles.

It all brought up an unexpected sense of loss. Harsh as it was, our justice was once swift and sure.

Hard as it was, to wear homemade cotton dresses and eat scrapple for breakfast all winter long, and share my portion with the dog so that he could live, too---- hard as it was, it was true. It was built out of our land and our labor, not out of cheating someone else, and not out of stealing, least of all, stealing from our family and our friends.

This, this ugly system of immorality, criminality, and greed is the "superiority" and the "sophistication" of the Europeans --- polite, white collar crime, murder carried out with a pen by clueless bureaucrats ---- and they can have it, too, I thought, as I shoved the old stick shift into third gear.

Predators of children and the elderly and our veterans, too, I thought, as I turned Old Bessie over into fourth gear and rocked on down the road. And they are going to give me a title, Esquire, so that I can work for them? And aspire to be like them?

Ha! They are on my turf now.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
15 hrs ·

I Will Make This Very Clear

When men and women sign up to serve in the United States Military, they adopt--- knowingly or unknowingly--- British Territorial United States Citizenship, one of the two citizenships created under the Constitutions, and they give up (hopefully temporarily) their status as American State Nationals or American State Citizens for the duration of their Tour of Duty.

It used to be that when a Tour of Duty ended and they received their Honorable Discharge, our service members were "assumed" to return to their normal civilian birthright political status as American State Nationals.

Somewhere between 1945 and 1950, all that changed, and unless one specifically gives Notice, the discharged service members have been "presumed" to remain in Federal Territorial or Municipal status--- that is, they never returned home. They remain classified as British Territorial United States Citizens.

Most former service personnel want to return home to the States after they are released from duty and would be very upset to know that so far as the Federal Government is concerned, they have stayed in Federal Custody--purportedly of their own volition.

This has made them subject to Federal Taxation and subjected them to the foreign law of the British Territorial Government and the Municipal United States Government and deprived them of the freedom and exemptions they are owed.

Now we are hearing all about Phil Hudok and the Big Arbitration Award, and many people are being seduced by the lure of easy money and fast results without being told the downside to all this.

So, here's the upside --- you get paid off, sometimes large amounts, of fiat script, and you get to hop around on one leg and crow for a while afterward.

And here's the downside --- you admit by doing this that you are a British Territorial United States Citizen, not an American State National. You admit that you voluntarily stand under the King's Law as a Pauper of the Commonwealth, owed "relief"--- as in "welfare relief". You lose your Natural and Unalienable Rights, and your Constitutional guarantees, you can never actually own land in the States, and you offer yourself as chattel backing the King's debts.

If you then decide to come forward later and claim that you are in fact an American State National and are owed your Natural and Unalienable Rights, and your land and your constitutional guarantees, you will be told-- "I'm sorry, we have a valid record here, signed in your own hand, claiming a share in this Arbitration Award as a British Territorial United States Citizen."
Oops.

I suppose it depends on your mindset and what your needs are.
If you really are a Pauper and desperate enough to sell yourself --including your soul-- to get some increasingly worthless military script as your "share" in the National Trust owed to the States and People of this country, and you are fooled by all the rhetoric that Phil and Company are blatting, then this might be just your ticket.

Who am I to stand in your way, if you want to "voluntarily" sell your birthright for a bowl of porridge?

Just leaves more for me and mine to claim as the actual, factual Landlords and heirs of the States and of The United States of America.

Your choice. But at least you know what you are giving up when you take the British sop.

The men promoting this are not trustworthy nor truly knowledgeable in my opinion, and appear to be willfully deluding themselves about the meaning and the effect of what they are doing.

I do not believe in Free Lunches, and I do not subject myself to the Pope nor to the Queen of the Commonwealth for any amount of debt-money.

As for me and my household, we'll stand on our flat little feet and hold the Queen and the Pope accountable for honoring their Good Faith Service owed to American State Nationals. We will demand that our Natural and Unalienable Rights be respected. We will claim our land freeholds and patents, all the way back to The Unanimous Declaration of Independence.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

For the Pope, the Queen and the Flag Officers:

You think that we are poor in spirit; but we are not deceived.
We are not fooled by your deceits.

We are not stumbled by your simple ruses, your attempts to hide your business affairs and avoid your obligations by doing business under many names.

We don't miss the point that the Queen rules the Commonwealth for the Pope. We see that the Pope working as the Roman Pontiff rules the Municipal Governments of the world.

We see how you have used similar names to "represent" us and our country and yes, even our Armed Services, seeking to abuse and destroy us from within.

We see how you have used both virtues and vices to your ends.

We see how you have used the Roman Catholic Church as a storefront for the benefit of evil, and how you move to use the United Nations organization in the same way.

We hear how you laugh at us and we know what you think.

You think that you own all that you see and that you have inherited the Kingdom of your God.

You think that all the Earth is in your power and you rejoice in the evil and the deceptions in which you are willingly participating.

You have always mistaken the Power of Death for the Power of Life.
And you think --what are we? Frail children made of dust?

We are those who have come from Heaven to collect your debts.

We are those whom the Living God has made. We belong to Him alone and His Spirit dwells with us.

We don't have to do anything, or make any war against you; indeed, we only speak to you so that you may be made fully aware of your own choices.

And so that your guilt or innocence may be firmly established for everyone to see.

Foolishly, you place your faith in death and in bombs and in poisons and in plasma technology. Our Father has made everything in this world to test you and your spirits.

Even now, you come to your own judgement and shall fully know what it is, and will have no questions about His Justice.

But as for us, we are incarnate by an Act of God: we do not have to work against you, because you undermine yourselves and choose against the better life and more abundant life we wish for you and which we would freely give you.

So be it. The Order is given.

By His Spirit you are overcome. By His Spirit is this battle won. Not by flesh and deeds of men, but by the Spirit of the Living God, making all things new.

As for Donald Trump he will triumph and his works will stand, because he humbles himself and does not rely on the wisdom of men.

He will put you to shame, even as Cyrus did; he will stretch out his hand and none of the guilty will escape. He will roar and the mountains will remove themselves.

You will witness this for yourselves, and even then, you will not believe it.

Oh, stubborn, hard-hearted sons! How easy it would have been for you to just come home at last, and be at peace. How easy to accept the truth that you cannot fight against... but now, as then, you will not humble yourselves and accept the gifts of your Father.

You will not hear the wisdom of His Counsel nor seek the help of His Fiduciary, so your troubles will mammothly increase, and all those evil things you seek to do will vanish like mirages from in front of your face. Your arms will be useless. Your faces drained.

From this moment on and until you repent to your bones and your heart, His Spirit will rest heavily upon you and your guilt will be illuminated as with a spotlight.

Nothing you do will come to harvest. No cruelty you inflict will have the result you expect. Those you mislead and misdirect have heard the words spoken by the Spirit; yes, they now awaken. They shake off the dust of ages and see you for what you are.

Let no man think you haven't chosen this misfortune for yourselves, for well and truly, you have committed these atrocities and told these lies, even after you have been well-warned, well-counseled, and well-advised.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

Silly People

Silly people still don't understand.

They think all this circumstance is about politics and religion and race and "culture wars" and even about what adult people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms.

It's not about any of that.

It's about crime. It's about fleecing and controlling us all. It's about keeping our house divided, so that Mankind cannot unite and overcome the demonic forces picking away at us day and night.

I got a piece of mail across my desk today saying that "sovereignty" is anti-Semitism. That is how crazy this narrative has gone. It's as if people are brain-dead. Not only are they too dumb to catch onto what is actually going on, but they can't even sort apples from oranges anymore.

They can't tell the difference between private business and public business, between one country and another.

We have Phil Hudok and others, including Flag Officers, too clueless or disloyal to realize that if they stand under the King's Law, they subject themselves to the King. And lose their heritage as Americans.

We have LGBTs "embracing" Pedophiles, as if the knowing acts of adults are comparable to and in the same league with parasitic rape of children.

Please do all that you can to wake these people up. Observe that we are all being fed a line of tripe and that all these "Issues" are being used as a smokescreen by real criminals.

First, they have constructed a phony public trust.

Second, they have set up a scheme to get your Mothers to unknowingly donate you and your assets to this bogus trust.

Third, they have used the falsified documents to create false legal presumptions.

Fourth, they have used these false legal presumptions about your identity and political status to prosecute you in foreign courts run by the same perpetrators.

Fifth, they have developed an institutionalized set of mechanisms based on criminal private patents to accomplish their racketeering and piracy under color of law.

Sixth, they have replaced civilian peacekeeping forces dedicated to upholding the public law with private "Law Enforcement Officers" loyal to their own corporate agendas.

Seventh, they have created a worldwide interlocking trust directorate scheme involving 147 corporations to set up a system of Commercial Feudalism to serve their ends of ruling over all the Earth and all Mankind, forever.

If we don't wake up and call upon the Spirit of the Living God to end this criminality, madmen and criminals will rule over us and the Earth will be destroyed.

It is that simple.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Long Overdue

This information has been "Flash Banned" by many sources, but it is brief and simple enough to understand.

The "Vice President" is an office that has always been charged with handling vice operations, as in "Vice Squad".

In the United States Municipal Government, this initially meant that the Vice-President was responsible for riding herd on the regulation of interstate manufacture, sale, and transport of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. These so-called "Sin Taxes" were established initially as the means to fund the operations of the Federal Government.

It falls primarily under the heading of the Municipal Government because it involves (or is supposed to always involve) business between organized corporations engaged in "interstate commerce", and commerce is the realm of the Municipal Government.

So from the very first, the Vice President's Office has been concerned with: (1) regulatory activity concerning commercial operations and specifically commerce in controlled substances and commerce in foreign trade; and (2) enforcement activities related to sin taxes, trade in controlled substances, and "vice".

Unfortunately, when the wrong people get into this Office, it is easy for things to go sideways and instead of being a comptroller and regulator seeking to promote Public Safety and collection of taxes and tariffs on controlled substances and oversight of commercial transactions with foreign business partners involving commodities subject to tariffs and fees of various kinds----- gross abuses occur, which is precisely what happened with Joe Biden.

Joe Biden couldn't resist feathering the family nest in a big way.
While there is no evidence that he, himself, directly received funds from these activities, it is clear that he abused his office to rig deals and peddle influence highly beneficial to his son, Hunter Biden.

By all accounts, Hunter Biden is a man with a troubled history of drug addiction and instability caused by drug addiction---- but because of his Father's office and deal-making and pressuring of foreign governments, Hunter received improper appointments and contracts.

In the first incident, Joe Biden got his son, Hunter, appointed to the Board of Ukraine's largest private producer of gas, even though Hunter knew nothing about gas production or the Ukraine and had no experience with either. This netted $50,000 a month, plus a $3 million backdoor payment laundered through other countries.

A Ukrainian prosecutor was alerted to the money laundering of the $3 million, and began investigating the gas company and Hunter Biden.

Joe Biden held up $250 million in aid to the Ukrainian Government for ransom, until the prosecutor was fired and this investigation quashed.
This is a crime. It's called Obstruction of Justice and Economic Blackmail. Joe Biden bragged about it afterward.

Nepotism, influence peddling, coercion, and other lesser crimes are also self-evident.

A second such intervention by Daddy Biden netted Hunter Biden over $1.5 billion dollars from China ---- that's "billion" with a "b".

Clearly, this not just some petty one-time dalliance of a morally compromised politician finagling a quid pro quo for his son.

This is a Vice President of the United States getting involved in vice for vice's sake, participating in vice and criminality for unjust enrichment, and abusing his Office "in our names" to do it.

This, when Biden's actual duty as Vice-President, was to control and combat such corruption, regulate vice-related substances, and collect sin taxes related to controlled substances and foreign commercial tariffs.

One wonders what the governments of Ukraine and China can think about our country and about us?

It is outrageous that Joe Biden abused his Public Trust and Office in this manner, but unfortunately, it has become par for the course in Washington, DC. This and behavior like it, is the reason that the voters hired President Trump to drain the swamp.

Obviously, those pigs--- or alligators?---- at the trough in DC, are resisting exposure of their dirty deeds and criminality, and so are trying to magically transform this information into a whole new fictional story line, claiming that President Trump did something improper by inquiring about Biden's activities as Vice-President.

News for the Beltway: Biden behaved as a criminal while occupying the Office of Vice-President of the United States.

Biden shouldn't be walking the streets, much less running for President.

More News for the Beltway: President Trump did nothing wrong.
Still More News for the Beltway: The Party is Over.

It also appears that the families of John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi have been involved in similar activities, and there may be Republican Lawmakers who have also engaged in this kind of criminality, too. It hasn't been investigated until now, "out of respect for Congress".

Obviously, our respect for Congress and all other elected officials has to be predicated on what Congress does, and influence peddling, economic blackmail, and similar activity don't merit our respect, our trust, nor our tolerance.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
14 hrs ·

Still More for the [Misled] Flag Officers:

Well, you are not all misled, just some of you. And it is to you Misled Fellows that this is addressed.

Here's the accusation:
She is again obfuscating the facts about what the founding docs really were/are. The King's founding and the foundations America was built on (follow the money please) was just a business venture documented in the 1606 First Virginia Charter of claims and was never canceled.
Virginia received three charters, 1606, another in 1609, and the third in 1612. The differences among the three charters lie primarily in the territorial jurisdiction of the COMPANY. He who owns the most land wins. He needed Real Currency so he claimed a share of all the Gold, Silver and Copper found in America by his surveyors and all that would mine for it. These shares would be passed on to his heirs in perpetuity. A good conquest businessman he was to even take care of his future family members. And all at the expense of the Native Americans.

Here's the answer:
Of course, the colonization was a business venture. Of course, the Virginia Company and the New England (Bedford) Company and several others as well were chartered by the King of the Commonwealth and other European Monarchs as well. So what?

The private business dealings underlying that progress has nothing whatsoever to do with the public business of our government as of 1776, other than the fact that the private British business interests were preserved by the Definitive Treaty of Paris, 1783, and again, all within the British Territorial Government doing business as "the" United States of America, operating "in our name" under our specific delegation of powers.

There's nothing exotic about any of this. The actual entities being referenced are clear throughout all the documents and the nomenclature is both specific and consistent throughout.

Our country and our Federation of States has a Proper Name. That Proper Name is: The United States of America.

There is also "the" United States of America, which is the British Territorial Government doing business "in our name" and functioning under our delegated authority. That government functioned as a business which was later, by 1856, incorporated as "the" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
And again, so what?

All that is about British corporations chartered to do private business and make investments in the New World and they were allowed to continue to function in their own Territorial jurisdiction even after The War of Independence.

If you bother to read the first few pages of "You Know Something Is Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probably Cause" you will find that I years ago described this situation and what everyone got out of it.

It simply doesn't have anything to do with our actual government and our actual country, The United States of America.

The King is Arch-Treasurer of "the" United States of America, not The United States of America.
Get it through your head.

And though they are very similar names, as any lawyer worth their salt can tell you, "The United States of America" is a very different beastie than "the" United States of America.

Here's the accusation:

That's it! Except as a CYA Act the Congress agreed 1789 no one shall take an oath to " the Constitution for the United States of America" because the United States of America was hi$.

And here's the answer:

No, again. As I explained yesterday, there are three (3) different Constitutions with three (3) different names.

The one passed in 1787 is the Original Equity Contract and Federal Constitution.

The one passed in 1789 is the British Territorial Constitution.
Therefore it makes perfect sense that the 1789 version included the prohibition against taking an oath to the 1787 Constitution, and also, the 1789 Constitution included the Federal Judiciary Act, allowing the Territorial Government to have Sea Jurisdiction Courts.

Until you get your heads out of your pockets and realize that you are dealing with three different governments all operating on our shores, each providing different governmental services, you will be left making stupid assumptions.

The Constitution for the united States of America--1787-- (American Service Provider).

The Constitution of the United States of America - 1789 -- (British Territorial Service Provider).

The Constitution of the United States - 1790 - (Municipal Service Provider).

Do you think they created all three of these separate documents and passed them over a period of four (4) years for no reason?

Whenever you see "the" United States of America or the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, they are talking about the British Territorial entities and the British Territorial United States ---- meaning the Insular States and Possessions.

Absolutely none of this is talking about our actual country or the States or its civilian government at all.

Here's the accusation:

The only thing I may add is basic contract law is simple the articles were overwritten ie replaced by the new Contract ie Constitution. In international law a sovereign needs another sovereign to co-sign so the articles agreed to the change in terms to be able to conduct commerce internationally which was needed at the time to pay off debts.. Classic case of those with power writing a one-sided contract.

And here's the answer:

The Articles of Confederation were never "overwritten", and neither for that matter was anything else. The entities involved had no such powers. The States of America ceased to function in the wake of the Civil War. They were American business entities operated by the actual States and thanks to British betrayal and duplicity, the American States never "reconstructed" these businesses. Until now.

Here's the accusation:

Further, the names she uses are not even used on official docs nor internal ones. And all the capacities, characters and conditions she speaks of, not one is explicitly authorized. Sounds like she is actually doing PR that jailed Heather tried floating, as well the one who claimed she was in illuminati, I and broke free. We did what we did because the Creator asked us to be evil so that you may see good. Remember, SHE came out initially saying it was all fraud. We were born free.

And here's the answer:
You are just too ignorant to know what the documents are or what they say. The language and the nomenclature is absolutely consistent in all the Federal Constitutions. The entities are named throughout the Congressional Records, throughout the Constitutional Conventions, throughout the Federalist Papers and it is all the same and exactly as I have described it. We have the documents and we have the dates when all these things were decided, named, and put into effect. We know why it is the way it is, and it all makes sense.

Our history is consistent. Our interpretation of the situation and the nomenclature fits.
And yours doesn't.

You're just talking through your hat and making assumptions, which is a dangerous thing to do, when the fate of your country hangs on it.

Here's the accusation:
Now she is saying you are subject to a state and what they did was ok - LOL. Claim your political birthright. She attacke Phil and for claiming the proper and recognized birth right. Sounds to me like a well-planned long term psy-op courtesy of the master manipulators. aka Tavistock. They were behind this long term ie late 50s and beyond social transformation. My my my where we have gone in under a generation.

And here's the answer:
The problem is that because Phil is acting from wrong assumptions, just like you, he didn't claim his "proper and recognized birthright" as an American. He claimed his birthright as a British Territorial Citizen, instead.

And he's allowed to do that and so are you, but as I also explained --- it means that you are a British Pauper living on the clemency of the King and standing good for all his debts.

That's all well and good, if that is what you want to do and mean to do, but if not, it's time to get your heads out of your nether regions and listen up. You can always admit to making a mistake, but the only mistake you can't correct is the one you won't admit.