THE PRINCIPLE- The Movie Big Science Does NOT want YOU to see. SEE IT NOW.



The Principle
Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 8161718
Results 171 to 178 of 178

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #171
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks
    1,635
    Thanked 1,125 Times in 655 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    4 hrs

    For the General Staff About Nathan Rothschild:
    There are some of you who were very relieved when Nathan Rothschild stepped forward and agreed to front the expenses for the Scottish Interlopers doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC.

    You were duped into believing that this country was bankrupt and that you had to go lick his boots for funding to "defend" America.


    Not so. Mr. Rothschild and the European banking community as a whole are in fact our greatest debtors and owe the most money to this country, and to our lawful government, The United States of America [Unincorporated].


    What they are offering is to give you some of our money at interest and let you work for them, instead of us.


    Uh-duh.

    Did all your mothers drop you on your heads? Simultaneously? Or are you simply traitors in American uniforms?

    What should be happening is that you should be pressing Rothschild out of his ill-gotten "middleman" position and forcing him to not only make our American assets available to the actual American Government --- The United States of America [Unincorporated]--- but also make arrangements to start paying back what he owes us and has owed us since 1840.


    Furthermore, even if it means "picking shit with the chickens" for a while, no officer in our military should ever agree to place yourselves or our Armed Forces under the thumb and forefinger of any foreign power, much less a foreign banker loyal to a Queen who is in flagrant Breach of Trust and busily defrauding Americans both at home and abroad.


    We do not agree to contract with any of the Rothschild interests, British or French, which means that any money they use to support either "The Republic" which I more correctly call "Le Republique" or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC from Scotland, had better be their own money and not one penny of ours or any penny derived from our assets.


    You should all be most anxious to bust loose our assets which are being unjustifiably and illegally held captive by the same bankers who are trying to seduce you into working for them instead of the American States and People.


    Anything less on your parts would be disloyalty to the American States and People, which in our book, counts as mutiny and treason against the sovereign States of the Union.


    We will also point out that as our Delegated Powers have returned to us via Operation of Law, you need to get a new contract from us to provide us with military services and absent that, you have no jobs.


    We will have to hire other military service providers if you don't get your tails in a knot and go get our assets back from the Queen and these endlessly crafty bankers.


    You have thirty (30) days to:
    (a) negotiate a new service contract with us;

    (b) at our direction and with our help reopen our asset accounts in this country; and

    (c) get your heads out of your asses.


  2. #172
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks
    1,635
    Thanked 1,125 Times in 655 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    4 hrs

    About Federal Code....
    The first thing every American has to know about Federal Code is that only about 10% of all the Federal Code--- only those General Session Laws posted in the Federal Register -- ever applied to us.

    The rest is and always was just internal rules and rule-making for federal employees and dependents.


    The second thing that every American needs to know is that the "Revised United States Statutes" that would have applied to us were never in fact adopted or "revised" because neither the Territorial Congress nor the Municipal Congress had authority to "revise" anything done by our actual Federal Congress prior to 1860. So the old "unrevised" Federal US Statutes-at-Large still stand.


    The third thing every American needs to know is the organization that promoted and developed all the rest of the Federal Code structure from 1860 to 1999, went totally out of business when its bankruptcy settled November 7, 1999, and all those rules --- all fifty (50) "Titles" worth --- became "discretionary" -- that is, something that federal employees are taught as standards, but not obligatory.


    The fourth thing that every American needs to know is that you look like complete idiots when you go around quoting these defunct federal rules and codes. Why? Because you are like Dutchmen lecturing Australian Aborigines about their own history, and they could care less.


    Just stop.

    These people are your employees and that is what you need to drum into their thick, thick, thick heads.

  3. #173
    Gold
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    759
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 349 Times in 232 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    The first thing every American has to know about Federal Code is that only about 10% of all the Federal Code--- only those General Session Laws posted in the Federal Register -- ever applied to us.
    Is that a fact?

  4. #174
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks
    1,635
    Thanked 1,125 Times in 655 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    Is that a fact?
    I would say it is a generality like how much is ten percent? Or is it 10.4562390%?

    Otherwise I would say it is true.

    Most of the US Code is private contract law.

  5. #175
    Gold
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    759
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 349 Times in 232 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    I would say it is true.
    In the field of Justice it seems there are only two item of interest. One is Law. The other is Fact. Ignorance of Law is not a defense since ignorance of law, consists in the want of knowledge of those laws which it is our duty to understand, and which every man is presumed to know.. Ignorance of a Fact is not a crime. Moreover ignorance of a Fact is the want of knowledge as to the fact in question. It would be an error resulting from ignorance of a fact, if a man believed a certain woman to be unmarried and free, when in fact, she was a married woman; and were he to marry her under that belief, he would not be criminally responsible. Ignorance of the laws of a foreign government, or of another state; is ignorance of a fact.

    Now that a background has been established I would ask again: Is the Federal Code a Fact?

  6. #176
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks
    1,635
    Thanked 1,125 Times in 655 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    I would say, that the above depends on being a person as defined by the US Code.

    When someone else defines the terms, you have already lost.

    I don't volunteer.

  7. #177
    Gold
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    759
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 349 Times in 232 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    When someone else defines the terms, you have already lost.
    What is there to win? Define 'lost'.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    I don't KNOW.
    I fixed it for you.

    It is understanding that is voluntary. When you cease striving to understand then what you know will be without understanding.

  8. #178
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks
    1,635
    Thanked 1,125 Times in 655 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ziero0 View Post
    What is there to win? Define 'lost'.


    I fixed it for you.

    It is understanding that is voluntary. When you cease striving to understand then what you know will be without understanding.
    Still defining the terms I see. I understand you are lost.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •