Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

What State Assemblies Can Do

Many people are just plain missing the point.
Not only do you have to reclaim your political status as an American to be able to access your rights and guarantees under the Constitution and to avoid foreign taxation, you have to do this to re-populate, officially, your States of the Union.

If your State is "vacant", the Pope and the Queen will seize it as abandoned property and steal it without firing a shot.

So there you have the carrot and the stick.

Now let's add another carrot.

Once you have your State Assembly up and functioning, that State Assembly (not "State of State" Assembly--- State Assembly) can tell the State of State Legislature how high to jump and what you want corrected.

Bogus Mortgages and Lending Practices leading to equally bogus Foreclosures? Tell the State of State Legislature that the State Assembly demands a Moratorium on all Foreclosures affecting State Nationals within the borders of your State.

Fed up with CPS stealing kids? Tell the State of State Legislature that the State Assembly supports keeping families together and objects to mis-characterizing marriages as Joint Business Ventures and to the licensing of marriages in general.

Tell the State of State Legislature that you are dissatisfied with their presumptions and their activities registering American babies improperly as British Territorial or Municipal citizens --- and you want it stopped in your State.

Tell the State of State Legislature that you displeased with the racketeering that agents of the IRS (Municipal) and Internal Revenue Service (Territorial) are carrying out against people in your State who don't receive any Federal Income and aren't obligated to keep records for foreign governments.

Your State Assemblies formed by properly declared American State Citizens have vast powers that can be exercised to correct all of these evils and many more.

So quit whining and crying and fighting with these yahoos. Adopt and declare your proper birthright political status, join and operate your State Assembly, and start cracking the whip. Issue Declarations of Protest and Remonstrance to the State of State Legislature operating in your State of the Union, and if it is a "Federal Issue" to the Congress as well.

They work for you, you don't work for them.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

American Catholics

In Southcentral Alaska we have a Catholic radio station. It re-broadcasts Catholic news and views programming from around the world. It often pops up loud and clear on my radio dial as I am driving around and if there is an interesting discussion going on, I listen in.

This week I caught a discussion about the sanctity of life and how the answer to the one question, "Is life sacred?" then leads to extremely disparate results.

If life is sacred, the speaker, a senior cleric explained, then we must respect the dignity and rights of living beings.

But if life is not sacred, then nothing connected to life is sacred, either.
It is then possible to justify murder and rape and theft and all sorts of immoral things based on the assumption that life is not sacred. It all becomes "relative", if life itself is not sacred.

I could have joined in and said, well, then, if you understand that, why has your Church tolerated The Collective Entity Doctrine, which claims that living people are equivalent to and interchangeable with dead legal fiction entities?

Why has the Church stood by and allowed members of the Bar Associations, including Catholic Attorneys, to use grossly misleading "terms of art" like "human" (colored people) and "natural person" (corpse, dead body) and let them create "infant decedent estates" to defraud and manipulate living people?

Why has your Church carried on a de facto persecution of innocent living people of all faiths, knowing that most Americans don't actually owe "Peter's Pence" at all?

If life is sacred, why stand by and allow living people to be demeaned as "dead" legal fiction entities or literal corpses, either?

I was steaming away like The Little Teapot.

Oh, I applaud the Roman Catholic Church for holding the line against abortion. But what good does it do, when the same Roman Catholic Church oversees the "killing" of these same babies on paper, denies them their sacred nature, and reduces them to the level of legal fictions a few days or weeks after they are born?

If life is sacred, then it must be sacred in all times and places, including courtrooms, and the ownership interests owed to living people must be respected in all jurisdictions of the law.

Nobody blessed to live can be reduced to the level of a fictional character or an inanimate thing-- a corporation of any kind; life, if it is sacred, can never be diminished by the color of anyone's skin, and nobody can be described as a "corpse" while still drawing breath.

I'm sorry, but you can't preach to me about the sanctity of life with one breath, but then, with a few lies and the stroke of a pen, reduce those same living babies to the level of corporate fictions--- a dead man's estate, a public transmitting utility, a public charitable trust, a foundation, an LLC.....

I pulled into my driveway just as the next topic came up: original sin.
Again, the speaker explained the standard Catholic doctrine -- that Original Sin resulted in man trying to play God, and make moral judgments that mankind is incapable of.

But, just that morning, I had read in the news that Pope Francis is considering making environmental damage a sin. A sin. And an excuse for more blame and taxation, of course.

Looks like Francis is ready to eat the apple, core and all.

In the early 1960's at the time of Vatican II, just about the same time that President Kennedy was killed, the Roman Catholic Church went off track.

It eschewed Latin as part of the Mass, but vastly stepped up the use of DOG LATIN to tax and defraud and mischaracterize living people as THINGS---- in direct contradiction to its avowed stance on the sanctity of life. It has been merrily committing paper genocide, indulging in the Justinian Deceit, denying the living status of living people ever since.

The Roman Catholic Church has been preaching one thing and practicing another for decades, until now we have the spectacle of pedophiles as priests and Jesuits as Popes and Pope Francis defining new sins.

Apparently, God forgot one?

How about this? It's wrong to lie about and defraud little babies in their cradles. It's wrong to steal from, enslave, harass, disrespect, cheat, lie to or lie about anyone.

I sat there in my car and watched the snow falling in the twilight. The priest on the radio seemed so calm and reasonable. His voice was reassuring. He seemed to be saying, everything's all right, the snail is on his thorn and God is in his heaven....

I could see why a presentation like this would be very comforting to Catholics hungering for positive, simple, solid, spiritual guidance.
If you weren't also aware of the double-dealing going on at the Bureau of Vital Statistics---and the Catholic Church's role in it, you would certainly never suspect that anything was amiss and never imagine that the Church was in on the Dead Baby Scam and still promoting it.

Just as Americans in general have to wake up and smell the garbage, American Catholic have the extra duty to smell the rot in their own Church and they bear the ethical and practical responsibility to clean it up.

This is not a task I envy anyone, and given the strict hierarchy of the Church, I am not sure how such a clean up and clear out can be done. I only know that it desperately needs to be done and I hope that the many sincere Catholics I have known will be guided, inspired, and enabled to shut down the "Dead Baby" identity theft scam, racketeering "gifts", and all the other criminal and quasi-criminal activities their Church has been involved in.

The ends do not justify the means, no matter what you say or how you say it, or whatever excuses are made for the violent racketeering and other crimes that have been committed here and all over the world by the Roman Catholic Church. Nobody here attacked the Church. The Church attacked us in Gross Breach of Trust and profited from it.
That's the ugly truth that is owed sincere amends to the actual victims.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

The Montana Question

One of the people in Montana who has worked hard to help build the State Assembly there was forced to leave Montana seven months ago.
She has continued to try to help organizing efforts there, but, because she no longer lives in the State (despite still owning land and property there) and has no set plan for returning, there is no basis for her to act as Coordinator for Montana nor to retain State Citizenship there beyond the limits of the State residency requirements.

When we move from one State to another, we have to establish "residency" in the new State. "Residency" is a temporary status and does not imply that you are settling down forever and ever in that State. Ironically, most of us have unknowingly been living as "residents" in our own home States because we didn't know we had to record our being born there, or because we failed to actually adopt a new State when we moved.

Most States have published standards for how long you can be out of State before you are no longer considered to be living in that State, and for how long you can be a visitor in a new State before declaring residency there. The key words to look for in the General Session Laws are "living" and "homestead" and "residency".

I don't off-hand know the Montana laws for this, but I know that in Alaska, if you are gone more than 180 days out of the year, you no longer qualify to be considered an Alaskan.

The States of the Union have never allowed Dual Citizenship, and that includes Citizenship in any two States as well as State-Federal combinations.

The Founders considered Dual Citizenship to be a potential conflict of interest and against the Biblical injunction that "No man can serve two Masters" so none of the soil and land jurisdiction States allow it.

If you think about it briefly, you will see that State Citizens by definition need to be living in the State where they claim State Citizenship.

Otherwise, you could have people who were actually living in California, for example, but claiming to be Nevada Citizens, and then deciding the fate of people and assets in Nevada.

Nobody on the receiving end of such an arrangement would consider that fair or equitable, so it is not allowed, nor should it be.

For some reason, our friend in Montana is struggling over these facts and claiming that people outside of Montana are deciding things "for" Montana and "meddling" in Montana's affairs and so on and so forth in her struggle to remain active in Montana and not establish new State Citizenship where she is living now-- but it has always been this way and it has nothing to do with anyone meddling with anything.

We can't be two places at once, though sometimes we all wish we could.

State Coordinators are volunteer State Citizens who have taken on the job of helping others get their political status declarations done and recorded, and who are spearheading the effort to organize their State Assembly. This isn't any official "office" of the State Assembly. It's just another job that needs to get done.

It wouldn't be fair to have people who are living in other States acting as your State Coordinator(s), just like it wouldn't be right to have people from other States voting in your State elections.

So, no, you can't be living in California for most of the year and claiming to be a State Citizen of Montana. It just doesn't work that way.

Please note: you have to live and make your permanent home in the State where you claim your State Citizenship, but your State National status travels with you.

In other words, I will always be a State National of Wisconsin because I was born in Wisconsin, but unless I actually live in Wisconsin, I can't be a State Citizen of Wisconsin

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

Understanding Source and Cause; Q and The Plan

There are three (3) dates and three entities that every American should have cause to know and to memorize. All three occurred during The War of Independence.

The first is the publication of The Unanimous Declaration of Independence on 4 July 1776. This created "The Union" known as The United States.

The then-colonies redefined themselves over a period of years first as the "United Colonies" and later as "estates". The soil jurisdiction holdings were defined as private holdings of separate nations and the geographic bounds of what would become States were recognized as (e)states belonging to the people living within those boundaries, both as public and private holdings.

In the Roman system of nomenclature this gave rise to states including: new york, massachusetts, rhode island, new hampshire, etc. while in the English nomenclature, gave rise to New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, etc.

The second is the creation of The United States of America on 9 September 1776. This created "The Federation of States", an unincorporated Holding Company.

This secondary "union" represents the international land and sea jurisdiction which underlies the soil of each (e)state and the international powers accorded to each State which were combined for mutual aid and benefit. This Federation of unincorporated States is the "doing business as" name of the American States and People.

The third is the creation of the States of America on 1 March 1781. This Confederation of States was formed under The Articles of Confederation to serve as an incorporated business structure doing business in the global jurisdiction of the air under the charter of the Several States and in their mutual behalf.

Both The United States and The United States of America are unincorporated entities, free-standing and existing under the direct provisions of the sovereign States and People.

By contrast, the States of America was created as a separate chartered business enterprise of the Several States and People to provide essential government services in the realm of global commerce.

There is a clear progression and delegation of power inherent to this process.
The (e)states (national jurisdiction) gave rise to the States (international jurisdiction) and the States gave rise to The States of States (global commerce jurisdiction).

There is an equally distinct progress in kind.
The Union known as The United States is "corporate" in that is stands apart from each separate and sovereign (e)state and so is our Federation doing business as The United States of America, but neither one of these entities are incorporated. They are independent, free-standing entities that are designed to do mutual business for the (e)states of the living people and the Estates of the Lawful People of this country, in two separate jurisdictions: national and international, respectively.

The Confederation begun in 1781 is chartered by the individual States and incorporated by them using The Articles of Confederation.
The difference is akin to the difference between two independent businesses and a commercial corporation.

Thus you may think of Massachusetts as an independent business and The United States of America as a Federation of independent businesses. You may also think of Massachusetts and the People thereof as granting a charter to The State of Massachusetts and then authorizing its membership in a Confederation of similar state-of-state franchises doing business as the States of America.

So there are three (3) different entities right from the start, separate in name, separate in jurisdiction, separate in date of creation, and separate in kind: union, federation, confederation.

The United States, The United States of America, and the States of America each served a different function and were designed to operate in different capacities.

The United States, a union of states formed by Unanimous Declaration, derives its existence from the (e)states and living people of this country.

The United States of America derives its existence from the land jurisdiction States and the Lawful Persons known as People of each State.

The States of America derives its existence from the States and People granting charters to States-of-States and thence to their Confederation.

The States of America, the Confederation of States of States, is the missing piece that went off-line during the Civil War.

This country has been operating like a 12-cylinder engine firing on six cylinders ever since and nobody bothered to explain the situation to the populace so that this could be corrected.

Therein lies the specific Gross Breach of Trust amounting to Fraud which has been committed against us by our own Government Service Subcontractors and Employees, both Military and Federal Civil Service.

People often ask me about "Q" and "The Plan".

It seems like that elements in the Military and Intelligence Community have been working for some time to correct their operations and honor their actual service commitments; I have no argument against "Q" and their treatment of the Deep State Actors as criminals --- for such, they are.

This is not now and never has been about politics, race, religion, or much of anything other than fraud and commercial crimes.

This is about identity theft, impersonation, constructive fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, inland piracy, human trafficking, enslavement, illegal securitization, patent, trademark and copyright fraud and infringement, press-ganging, peonage, extortion, racketeering, kidnapping, collusion, conspiracy against the Constitutions and a host of other heinous crimes-- mostly of a commercial nature-- and all committed against the people of this country and our estates.

Perhaps it was the existence of 800 FEMA camps and industrial-scale foreign military operations staging out of Free Trade Zones within these United States that finally jolted at least some members of the Joint Chiefs awake and alerted patriotic members of the Officer Corps and Senior Enlisted.

Maybe it was our General Civil Orders issued in July of 2014, denying them all any plausible deniability, that kicked the football hard enough to get things moving.

So long as the ball is moving in the right direction, and the restoration of good order and public safety is secured, we can't complain about their initiative and the arrest of large numbers of criminals.

We estimate that if law already standing on the books were to be satisfied, upward of two million people in this country would have to be arrested and charged with heinous offenses against their fellow man and against the lawful government of this country.

We must, however, point out that these actions are not, by themselves, sufficient to restore the government we are heir to, nor to provide for its correct functioning.

In order to get the 12-cylinder engine back up and running, we have to assemble our States of the Union, we have to severally charter new American States of States, and restore the States of America Confederation in order to do that.

Beyond that, we must invest in educating a great many people about their actual government and their responsibility for it. Self-governance begins with attitudes learned and responsibilities accepted at home, at school, at work, and in the social fabric of a country. It cannot be achieved by the promotion of dependency and victimhood and unearned trust.

Our country has been steered off track deliberately and kept off track for generations by foreign interests we mistook as friends, allies, and treaty partners. They have used us as gun fodder in their wars for profit, and stolen us blind for 150 years.

It cannot be supposed that restoration of our government or our educational system can happen over night, after such a long and damaging period of abuse by foreign powers and misdirected public employees. Instead, we must patiently expose and understand the rot we are dealing with, and secure as much assistance, good will, and understanding as possible going forward.

This same system of deceit, impersonation, identity theft, a commercial criminality has infested not only "the US" Territorial and Municipal Governments, but similar incorporated governmental services corporations worldwide.

So, by all means, let the Q Plan materialize, but let's not fall asleep again and think, oh, goodie, things are back on track....because it will take major work on all our parts to finally accomplish the restoration of our self-governance.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Land and Soil; Domicile and Home

When we formally and officially and in public record our re-conveyance of our Trade Name back to the "land and soil" of an American State, we are establishing our connection to both the soil (top 6 inches of dirt) and land (everything below the soil).

It's impossible to have land without soil or soil without land, so we say, "land and soil", yet under British land law, which is where we inherited this system, land represents a separate international jurisdiction, while soil is understood to be the national jurisdiction.

This same bifurcation of land and soil results in the concept of "domicile" and "homestead" as two separate but closely related aspects of actual life.

Living people have homes and homesteads. Lawful Persons and Legal Persons have domiciles - their principal places of business.

So when we say that we re-convey our Trade Name to the land and soil, we mean that we are conveying both our living self, one of the people, and our Lawful Person, one of the People, as the two unincorporated jurisdictions are inextricably linked: land and soil, domicile and home, Lawful People and living people.

And just like you can't have land without soil or soil without land, you can't have a lawful domicile without a home or a home without a lawful domicile, a Lawful Person without a living man or woman, and vice-versa,

So now we have people claiming that they have "a" domicile as a Person in Montana, but they don't actually live in Montana anymore.
This can only pertain to Legal Persons, which are not tied to carbon-based, actual, factual bodies.

Our Lawful Persons which are one of the People and which are State Citizens, are very much attached to our physical habitation, whether a house made of blood and bone or a house made of wood and stone, in the same way that soil and land are actually part of each other and inextricably combined.

As a result, it is impossible for a Lawful Person to exist and conduct business apart from a specific living man or woman being present. Lawful Persons are attached to us in the same way that the soil is attached to the land. State Citizens are all Lawful Persons.

I can't send my Lawful Person to school or market "for" me, because my Lawful Person does not exist apart from me. At most, I might send another man or woman to act as my agent or proxy.

So claiming that you have a permanent domicile in say, Ohio, while you are in fact living in another State, can only pertain to Legal Persons --- your STRAWMAN for example, was domiciled in Puerto Rico before you Expatriated the NAME and brought it home.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

For Steven Charles.

When you were a little kid and you did something wrong, what did you do?

You tried to cover up and remove the evidence of the wrong-doing. You swept up the broken pieces of pottery. You hid the ruined shirt in the rag bin in the garage.... and what else did you do? You lied about it if confronted.

I'm not a little kid, but the members of Congress have acted like little kids over the years that the Great Fraud has been ongoing. And so have the members of the Court System. There have been endless efforts to hide what they don't want us to see --- annotations, archiving, re-numbering, re-naming, and re-sorting---- all to obscure records. From time to time, they've even outright destroyed the evidence of what actually went on. We call this process "moving the cheese" and it is as common as dirt.

Without any reference to what you tried to do overall, it's impossible to comment, but what I can tell you is that back then the Congress was aware of wearing different "hats" as it dealt with issues coming from different jurisdictions.

The Continental Congress was in session on September 9, 1776, and any action that they took regarding the land jurisdiction would be properly recorded in the Congressional Record, not the Congressional Register; furthermore, they would be acting all across the board --- conducting air, land, and sea business as separate issues, but switching from one subject area to the next in an orderly fashion. This results in two different kinds of records -- the Register and the actual Congressional Record, plus three different venues: national, international, and global.

So what they did in fact in the air jurisdiction (which derives from the Unum Sanctum Trust that was established more than 400 years prior and is no more a figment of my imagination than you are) on that day ( which later becomes part of the records as a Municipal Government action and where you found this ) is what you posted above:

"Resolved, that in all Continental Commissions, and other Instruments where heretofore the Words, “United Colonies,” have been used, the Stile be altered for the future to the United States."

So, Steven Charles, Big Mouth, Accuser, Know-It-All ---- let's see if you know what a "Continental Commission" is? And in what context is this phrase being used here? And to which jurisdiction does this action pertain? Hmm?

What you have in fact uncovered is more proof of what I have said all along, though not the specific alteration being referenced by me. In the jurisdiction of the air (commerce) they began using the "United States" name at the same time that "The United States of America" was formed in the international jurisdiction (trade). This is the other half of the same action. They were trying to keep commercial accounts separate from international trade accounts.

You are just too inexperienced to read the tea leaves, but that doesn't stop you from shooting off your Big Fat Mouth.

If you don't care enough to learn these things and learn where to look for the evidence (obviously not in Municipal Government records) --- go back and suck up all the political rot and believe in that and be satisfied with your life as a slave.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

A Reply for "No One" ---- The Proof is in the Pudding.

What is, is.

Donald Trump is unique in my experience of Presidents--- and that now goes back sixty years --- in that he has kept or made very good faith effort to keep every single one of his campaign promises.
That is not the modus operandi of a "rat". That is evidence of an honorable man.

The modus operandi of a "rat" is clearly demonstrated by Barack Obama ---- "you can keep your health insurance" --- uh-huh and "I'm going to cut the federal budget" ---- after I inflate it by $12 trillion more in debt.......
THAT is a rat.

But a man who keeps his campaign promises? No, that is something different. Something really, really different.
So, based on The Pudding Test, Donald Trump gets high marks.
And I will stick with that until proven otherwise.

As for "Q" --- there has to be something in play and in a major way, or we would be at war by now. In fact, if Hillary had won, we'd all probably be in cattle cars by now.

Call it what you will -- "Q", the Plan, the White Hats, or the Good Angels. Whatever. All those federal indictments didn't just come out of nowhere, you know. So, there again, while I am waiting like everyone else for actual arrests of the criminals, the paperwork alone that went into that process is proof that "something major is going on".

And if it is what "Q" says, I am all on board with that, because it is a matter of criminality and not a matter of politics or economics or race or religion or anything else. It's all just ugly old garden-variety bunko and other forms of crime being practiced on a vast scale. So, yes, I agree with "Q" ---- it's a police matter.

With an estimated two (2) million felons at large in this country, it's more a matter of which variety of felon do you go after first?
For any competent and motivated police force, it's a "target rich environment".

And the next question is --- where do you put all these felons?
Look what happened to Jeffrey Epstein. Even if you find space for them, how do you keep the key contributors to the crime spree alive long enough to testify?

All that money put into Gitmo makes sense now, doesn't it?

And where do you find justices/judges competent to hold that many extra trials? A great many trial lawyers have to be trained to actually conduct admiralty courts, or, the normal caseloads of existing courts must be drastically reduced.

If I were a betting woman, I'd bet that there will be efforts to clear out jails by releasing and commuting the sentences of Americans who have been jailed illegally for regulatory infractions.

The impetus for that is two-fold: (1) we told the Pope and the Queen that we aren't paying for the cost of incarcerating those Americans, and (2) they need the jail space.

Again, if I were a betting woman, I would guess that they are waiting for the last shoe to drop in the Municipal bankruptcy that started under Obummer.

And then, technically, there won't be a Municipal Government left to protect the rats. They will all have to seek different cover.

Some members of Congress already have their Dual Citizenship set up to seek protection in other countries that don't have extradition treaties with us. Others will try to adopt back their American State National status ---- which is what Bill and Hillary have hidden behind for decades, but which will not be so foolproof now that our Government is operational again. We will be able to arrest them even if Mr. Trump can't.

Finally, if you were Donald Trump and you had around two million active felons at large, including the bulk of the Municipal Congress, which group of them would you focus your attention on taking down first?

He has chosen the pedophiles, and in my opinion, he has chosen wisely.

Why? Because they are universally detested as cowards and perverts, and that is well-earned; but, more importantly, because they prey upon the most vulnerable among us. As an extra reason to go after them first ---- the pedophiles span the whole spectrum of activities engaged in by all the other criminals and are often kingpins in additional crime syndicate activities.

That is, you can nail them for pedophilia and other gross moral crimes, and at the same time, take them out of their snuggled-up positions in banking and securities administration, government finance, records administration, Congress, the military, State of State administration, Court System.... all across the board.

I think Mr. Trump is doing a great job honoring his promises and taking out the worst of the worst of them in an orderly, non-destructive fashion. Godspeed and go for it.

But, one must remember --- Mr. Trump can only do what the parameters of his offices allow him to do. He cannot single-handed restore our lawful government "for" us.

The responsibility of self-governance remains our responsibility, and the authority of the land and soil jurisdiction can only be exercised by Americans claiming their unique birthright State National political status and then choosing as adults to act as State Citizens, operating their State of the Union.

Otherwise, we continue to operate a 12 cylinder engine on eight, and we continue to be at the mercy of the Pope and the Queen and whatever minions they have staffing their Territorial and Municipal Government structures.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

For the State Assemblies and New Readers

1. We have Admiralty/Maritime Courts operating in an improper way in this country because our own American Courts are --for the most part-- not operating.

This situation arose as a result of the Civil War. The solution for it has been on the books ever since.

Milligan Ex Parte provides that when our civilian courts are operational, their military and commercial courts must be withdrawn and transitioned back to their proper limitations.

So, while I appreciate the fact that many of you have problems with both the Territorial and Municipal Court Systems, and understand that you are being improperly "addressed" as Territorial or Municipal Franchisees, it's up to all of us to do something truly effective to end this situation on a permanent basis.

And that is?
Declare our proper political status as American State Nationals, and, as adults, step forward to engage in self-governance as American State Citizens.

Having the "right" to self-govern is not the same thing as doing the work of self-governance and thereby exercising that right.

Having corrected our own political status records and having formed our State Assembly, we are in position to begin the whole endeavor set before us ---- and to organize our own land and soil jurisdiction Courts to serve the People/people of our States and Counties.

Once our courts are up and operational, their foreign courts by prior agreement established by Milligan Ex Parte, must withdraw and stop presuming upon us and misaddressing us.

So, now you know all these troubles with their courts---foreign taxation, child theft, licensing, foreign "titles" and "descriptions" placed on your land, foreign mortgages and foreclosures, funny money banking, securitization of living flesh resulting in enslavement and peonage--- all these evils can be stopped simply by you and your neighbors declaring your proper political status and filling your jury pools and electing your court officers.

What's stopping you? You are members of a separate population and you exist in a separate jurisdiction and you are responsible for your own self-governance, which includes operating courts for your own people.

Step up. Let your feet be fleet.
If you are having trouble explaining this situation and garnering enough support from other Americans to assist you and join your State Assemblies, you aren't explaining freedom well enough.

2. Each FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE issued by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a foreign fiat currency, not actual money, being issued as an I.O.U. and as a military script by a foreign corporation.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is not The United States of America.

For the Newbies--- any time you see anything named using all capital letters, you are looking at one of two things: (1) a dead man's estate, or (2) a commercial corporation, and in either event, you are not looking at The United States of America [Unincorporated] --- which is the Proper Name of our Country and our Federation of States operating in international jurisdiction.

The potential collapse of this or any related foreign currency as a result of foreign counterfeiting and other criminal acts has nothing to do with us and emphatically does not mean that our country or our people are "bankrupt".

Far from it. American State Nationals and American State Citizens are the Priority Creditors of these organizations, commercial corporations, and the foreign governments supporting them.

So, again, give your friends and neighbors the benefit of an education in the value of being an American versus being a "US" citizen.

You can claim your true birthright political status and receive back all that is owed to you, including your State property assets, free and clear, or you can stupidly and stubbornly insist that you are "US citizens" of some kind or another, and be caught with your pants down.

So. Do you want your land, your gold, your silver, and your National Credit returned to your possession, free of debt and encumbrance?
Choice One.
Or do you want to be saddled with "infinite debt" that is actually owed by criminals --- but to be paid for by you and your children for generations to come? Choice Two.

Again, if you are having any trouble explaining this to your friends, neighbors, and countrymen, you're not trying hard enough.
These are not trick questions.

As an American State National or American State Citizen, you are the heirs and landlords and sovereigns in your own right.

As a "US" Citizen --- either a British Territorial United States Citizen or a Municipal "citizen of the United States" you are a servant and a debtor without recourse.

In fact, as a "US" Citizen [that is, a Federal Employee or Dependent] of either stripe, your only hope is that other Americans will step forward and reclaim your State for you, thereby preserving your inheritance free and clear of debt, for the day when you, too, can "come home" again.

3. Once you have your State Assemblies properly populated you are in position to begin issuing instructions to the State of State Legislatures and the Congressional Delegation.

You don't like being mis-addressed? You want the bogus tax bills to stop? You want the Post Office to operate properly? You want a foreclosure moratorium in your State? You want Child Protective Services to actually protect children?

Well, there's nobody but you to tell your public servants what you want done. And once you do, they are actually obligated (by their paychecks and pensions) to do what you tell them to do. Note the Emoluments Clause.

I can't do it for you. Mr. Trump can't do it for you.
Self-governance begins with you, your decision to take responsibility for your own life.

From that decision comes the decision to take responsibility for your own government, both at the county level and the State level.
From that decision comes the determination to take responsibility for the proper operation of the Federal Government, too.
Americans in charge of America.
What a concept!

And again, if you are having trouble garnering the understanding and support of other Americans and trouble filling the ranks of your State Assemblies, it is high time that you reviewed points 1, 2, and 3 with them.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

My Beef -- Military, Get a Clue: 30 November 2019

Some persons have attempted to paint me with an "anti-military" brush, and also with an "anti-civil service" brush, but generally speaking, that is not at all true. I am, in fact, holding the line and fighting the fight for our military and our veterans along with everyone else.

My beef is with the Pope, with Her Britannic Majesty, and with scads of high level politicians and administrative ne'er do wells, who have happily enriched themselves in gross Breach of Trust, and far too often, have enriched themselves via spilling blood. That blood is ours, whatever job description.

They have followed up by cheating the actual military out of the services and pensions they have earned at such a cost. And that is what they are intent upon, again, as part of their Grand Slam Plan right now: collapse all the Pension Funds, let the stock market crash, stand back and reap the "benefits" by being able to buy up companies like GE and 3M and Bayer and Mitsubishi and Sanyo at pennies on the dollar, using our gold and silver to do it.

Who cares that the military pensions and services will also be "discharged" in this hideously unfair and dishonorable manner?

I do, so I guess I am not the Enemy of the military, am I?

I am one of those who wishes to scuttle the rats and force the corporations to pay up, instead of sitting on my thumbs and letting the actual living people suffer.

The US NAVY is a foreign, for-profit Municipal Corporation. It is staffed by Federal Civil Service Employees working for the Municipal DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, also known as "the" DOD. Most of these people are "retired" United States military personnel and many of them don't have a clue that they are doing anything wrong.

Thanks to all the "similar names deceits" that go on, some people have mistaken this entity, the US NAVY, for the United States Navy, which is another animal entirely.

Let's make it clear: the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and the US NAVY are both corporations. Giant commercial corporations. Both operate under the auspices of "the" Municipal United States Government. And both have been known to go completely bonkers and operate as crime syndicates, especially under the influence of quasi-military Agencies like the CIA.

These are the entities that spend their days cashiering away the American National Credit owed to the American States and People, and pretending that we are "absent".

These are the entities that, for the most part, have established the morally and legally and lawfully repugnant patents and protected those criminal patents "in the name of" National Security. Never mind which "National Security" they may be concerned about, and the fact that all these miscreant patents are null and void for criminality on the face of them.

Imagine --- self-admitted, blatant, criminal schemes --- being protected by the US Patent and Trademark Office. Everything from mind control to geo-engineering to "systems" designed to lodge false claims to own our DNA, to deliberately conceived "educational programming" designed to undermine our ability to think, to bogus electronic 'trading systems" that bypass the necessity of having any actual interest in physical assets that are supposedly being "traded".

These are all violations in Gross Breach of Trust being practiced against us and the rest of the living people worldwide, by run amok incorporated crime syndicates that have been promoted and protected by the Office of the Roman Pontiff, and since 2011, by the Roman Curia, which is continuing to play Circle the Wagons and Hide N' Seek while they try to protect the Catholic Church on one hand, and move their seat of operations to the United Nations which they propose to use as a storefront, just as they used the Roman Catholic Church for the same deceptive purposes.

Just so we are clear, all the "governments" represented in the United Nations are private, for-profit corporations in the business of providing "government services"---- not actual national governments at all.

Let us further be clear that the majority ownership and administrative control of all those corporations is held by the UN Corporation, a nasty old Vichy French Nazi-collaborator formed during the Second World War, two years prior to the United Nations Organization being chartered, and which functions in the same way as the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia once did ----- as a Comptroller Umbrella Corporation owning the majority interest in all these individual governmental services corporations.

So with the Roman Pontiff (or whatever they are going to call "him" now) holding the majority interest in these "national government" corporations, whatever they do is only what the UN Corporation tells them to do, and the UN Corporation does whatever the Roman Curia tells it to do--because they hold its charter "for" the Holy See, and the Roman Curia, in turn, serves Whatever Name or Office for the Prince of Darkness.

So once again, no matter how you cut it, all this deceitful, nasty, double-dealing, all these dishonest and immoral corporations and their activities, including the issuance of criminal "patents" to the US NAVY---- it all comes back to the Roman Curia and the Roman Municipal Government and ultimately to the Holy See and the Pope.

So don't imagine that I am being mean or critical of Midshipmen and boat Commanders and Captains of Vessels. I am not after Shavetail Lieutenants, Bosun's Mates, or Quartermasters. My quarrel is not with Warrant Officers, Commissary Officers, or Sergeants, Engineers, or anyone else having an honest job and occupation in the Armed Services at all.

My beef begins with corrupt Admirals and Generals and it climbs the food chain from there.

None of this is about honest men and women serving in the United States Navy or any other branch of Military Service in any rank. It's about rats infesting and manipulating our actual military for no good reason and without any granted authority to do so.

This, among other issues, is about preventing the criminals from foisting their debts off onto our actual military personnel and civil servants and preventing these foreign governments from evading the payment of the pensions and services that our military and federal civil service members are owed.

This isn't just about American State Nationals or American State Citizens. It's about what our Federal Employees are owed, along with all the rest of us, too.

But bear in mind, it is the "People" of this country, that is the American State Citizens, who hold the other end of the constitutional agreements, and we --- those of us who adopt and hold this political status --- are the only ones that can hold the thieves accountable.

So instead of telling lies about me and about our State Assemblies, and trying to cobble together individual "deals" to save yourselves at everyone else's expense, or trying to front fake "State Assemblies" composed of US citizens --- get a clue.

This game of Musical Chairs has come full circle.

The American State Nationals and the American State Citizens aren't the only ones who got cheated and treated like rubes--- and we aren't the only ones that they have attempted to feed "carrots for jackasses", either. We just happen to be the only ones who can hold the feet of the Queen and the Pope to the fire, and you happen to be our employees, responsible for assisting.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Understanding States

A couple days ago I wrote an article about the concepts of Land versus Soil and Domicile versus Home and International versus National, and how the whole business of transition from Colonies to (E)states to States occurred in this country.

I also touched on the definition of soil -- the top six inches of dirt -- versus the land, which is everything under that skin of soil on top.
The way all this developed then is that the colonies became independent "landed estates" owned by the people living within their borders.

Perhaps the best way to envision this is a thin outline of your state's geographic shape, six inches thick, that you walk upon and plant crops in--- what we think of as our native soil --- and this soil comprises the National Jurisdiction belonging to you and the rest of the people who have adopted your state as their permanent home.

Your nationality derives from the soil. You are, strictly speaking, a Texan, an Ohioan, a New Yorker, and so on, at birth, and your State is your Nation. Because there are fifty States of the Union, we typically say we are "Americans" when someone asks our nationality, but in terms of actual law, that is not correct. We are Wisconsinites, Californians, Montanans, and Louisianans.... et alia.

Obviously, in addition to soil, your State also has to have land attached to and underlying the soil. This underlying subsurface layer plays by its own rules and is the home of many resources that your state shares with other states--- aquifers, oil reservoirs, mineral deposits and so on, don't respect political boundaries drawn on maps, so it should become clear why the land is an international jurisdiction in much the same way that the sea is an international jurisdiction.

For example, pollution of groundwater that occurs in one State may easily become a problem for one of more other bordering States that share the same underground resource. Such pollution becomes an interstate issue, which in this country means, an international issue.
Please note -- because our soil jurisdiction states are nation-states, the words "interstate" and "international" are synonymous in America.

Over the years, these technical differences between the National soil jurisdiction and the International land jurisdiction, have not been well-understood and are mostly only appreciated by miners and other subsurface resource developers and specialists in law and legal matters who have to deal with the interface between land and soil.

Most of us go our whole lives and when we say, "Minnesota" we automatically think of it as being one contiguous entity and we parrot the phrase "land and soil" without knowing the difference. We just lump these two things together for most purposes, the same way we say we are "Americans" though in fact we are Virginians or Wisconsinites or.....

So, one name, "Minnesota" stands for both the land in International Jurisdiction and the soil in National Jurisdiction, which is attached to and defined by the physical borders of Minnesota. This thing we call "Minnesota" is a physical place with borders, landmarks, land and soil, lakes and running rivers, and thanks to the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway, access to the oceans of the world as well.

All the other land and soil jurisdiction States of the Union have their own unique character, borders, landmarks, land and soil, etc., too.
These States, which are physical and which are geographically defined by borders and landmarks, are not created by any Constitution.

Like the people populating these States, the States of the Union are part of Nature, and to the extent that they exist as named entities, they exist because of State Compacts --- Common Law Covenants, which are agreements established among living people at a given time and which are memorialized and passed on to future generations of Minnesotans, Texans, Californians....

Neither the actual States nor their Federation doing business as The United States of America, owe their existence to any constitution.

It's the States of States that are formed by Constitutions.
As a result, the States and their Federation stand apart from and above and beyond any State of State or Federal Government Subcontractor.

When we are talking about States --- actual, factual States, we are operating under Treaties and Compacts, not Constitutions.

So the Federation of States, The United States of America [Unincorporated], is in a different class and realm than any of the Federal entities --- above and apart from the ruined Confederation of American States of States doing business as the States of America, also above and beyond the British Territorial Government doing business as "the" United States of America, and also above and beyond the Municipal United States Government doing business as "the" United States.

When you talk about the States and The United States of America, you are talking about sovereign unincorporated entities and a Federation of sovereign entities created by Compact and Sovereign Letters Patent, which are obligated by Treaties. Consider them "apples".

When you talk about States of States of any kind, including those chartered by the British Territorial Government and the Municipal United States Government, you are talking about corporations created by charters issued by sovereign entities (our States, the Queen, and the Holy See, respectively), defined by Articles of Incorporation and obligated by Constitutions. Consider them "oranges".

And know this -- the "apples" can do the work of the "oranges". They simply delegated portions of their own work and responsibility to other entities to perform.

I may give AB Lawn Services, Inc., a contract to mow my lawn, but if the corporation in receipt of the contract [described as a constitution] goes bankrupt, or fails to perform the assigned job in good faith and with reasonable competence --- guess what?

I still know how to pour gas into my lawn mower, I can still replace the air filter, and I can still mow my own grass, thank you, very much.
I am not rendered incompetent because of whatever ills befall my subcontractors, and neither is The United States of America rendered bankrupt nor incompetent because of things that happen to or because of its "Federal" subcontractors malfunctioning.

So --- repeat after me: States are apples. States of States are oranges.
States are formed by Compact and Sovereign Letters Patent, and are obligated by Treaties. Apples.

States of States are formed by Charters and Articles of Incorporation, and are obligated by Constitutions. Oranges.