Page 13 of 121 FirstFirst ... 311121314152363113 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 1201

Thread: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

  1. #121
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    11 hrs ·

    "Nobody Knows the Value of Anything".....
    This succinct and honest statement from a member of the GCR Committee sums up the problem they face. Think about that for five seconds.

    How does anyone know the value of anything?

    Does "what the market will bear" actually define the value of anything, much less the value of anyone?
    If you are scratching your heads, that's okay. You should be.
    Add to that the fact that we haven't had Free Markets for the past two centuries, so there is absolutely no recent data to support an actual "market value" based "what the market will bear" and you will have another Data Point.

    All Precious Metals have been stuck and propped and "fixed" by the London Gold and Silver Boards, and the members of Parliament have been kept in the dark like all the rest of us concerning the amount of precious metal both in the ground and out of the ground.


    And if you don't know how much of a commodity you have relative to the demand for that commodity, you don't have a blooming guess of what that commodity is really worth market-wise.


    All Currencies have been stuck and propped and "fixed" by the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) which has been used as a giant Commodity Price Fixing Mechanism with the keys to that kingdom in the hands of only two men -- the President of the Territorial United States (Mr. Trump) and the Secretary of the Treasury (Mr. Mnuchin, actually an IMF employee and Interpol Officer).


    Now before you go blaming us for this situation, this "mechanism" was dreamed up and implemented by the World Bank and European Interests, not by us.


    Apparently, nobody ever told them that commodity price fixing is a serious crime -- and that currency is a commodity.

    The reason that commodity price fixing and especially currency price fixing is a crime, is that it results in market and economic manipulations that undermine national independence and sovereignty and which gives unjust advantages to some countries at the expense of others via the artificial manipulation of the value of their currency.

    Such cornering of the market -- especially the currency market --- provides a means of secretively waging economic war, garnering Unjust Enrichment, and promoting political agendas via economic blackmail.


    As an IMF employee and Interpol Officer, the Secretary of the Treasury owes no allegiance to the American States and People per se. And as an Executive Officer of the British Territorial United States, the President has no particular allegiance to the American States and People, either--only a contract to fulfill.


    We were just a convenient staging ground for what amounts to international crime syndicates operating under Color of Law on our shores. We unknowingly provided them with a "storefront" for their operations and they took full advantage.


    Imagine being a member of the GCR Committee, faced with trying to re-establish a basis for Fair Market Trade of commodities under these conditions?


    Let's just pull out our hair and run screaming into the bushes right now.

    The Precious Metals Markets are stacked and controlled and have been for many decades. The Currency Markets are stacked and controlled and have been for almost as long.

    Nobody knows the actual honest value of anything anymore, because Crooks and Robber Barons have been manipulating absolutely everything to suit themselves since the 19th Century.


    It gets more complicated when you consider that all the collateral used as assets backing the Banks largely belongs to private people and private trusts and not to the Banks at all.


    And then the Banks tell Big, Fat Whoppers, claiming that all these private assets have been "abandoned" in their care and that these assets are actually their assets now ---- and issue seven to ten times the value of those assets as credit.


    What happens when the actual legitimate owners show up and want to move their assets elsewhere? What happens when they want to spend some of their assets? The bank is already grossly "over-extended" and can't afford that, can they?


    So they lie and they steal and they refuse to let the actual owners have access to their deposit boxes and "flats". The Trustees and owners are told, "we don't know who you are" and "no such assets on deposits here", and despite the receipts and proofs all these people have showing precisely when their deposits were made and what they consisted of and who signed off on them, the banks continue to stonewall.


    Oh, it's a matter of "National Security". Our banks are "too big to fail".

    They have already failed the most crucial test of honesty and good business practices, which is how they got into this trouble in the first place, and their failure and placement under new management is probably the best thing that could happen to them.

    So not only does the GCR Committee have no idea and no basis for placing a valuation on "anything", they can't even get an honest answer from the banks as to what assets the banks legitimately own and what assets belong to Depositors.


    Let's dance around on one leg, pull out our hair, and run screaming into the bushes. Again.


    The plain fact is that the Banks have been greedy and engaged in dishonest practices. They need to be shut down and restructured, but until we wake up and get our backs up and force the issue, they will just go on bilking Depositors and selling bogus "home loans" and "securitizing" assets they don't actually own any valid interest in.


    Bottom line --- they aren't cooperating with the effort to clean up their operations and are tucked down on the mattresses like old style New York mobsters.


    What? Audit us?

    Stop dancing around on one leg. Stop being confused. There is evil in our midst, both evil in High Places, and evil in these banks. It has to be stopped and until it is, there will be no rational basis for any economic system and no public trust merited by these institutions.

    You would be better off keeping all your money in your mattress, especially if you have a lot of money--- because although it is anti-intuitive, the more money you deposit, the more likely you will be the victim of Bank Theft.


    One wealthy guy deprived of access to his wealth is just one guy griping to the wind. Steal small amounts from 50,000 people and get them griping at you, and you've got political problems, but steal fifty billion from one man--- who cares? So that's what they've been doing.


    They've been stealing from the wealthy, but they haven't been giving to the poor.


    Twenty years ago these banks set up "Private Placement Trading Platforms" --- purportedly to generate profits for philanthropic purposes worldwide. I have yet to see a single philanthropic project actually funded from all this trading and all the secret profits generated by this blackmarket casino. Not one. And I have looked high and low.


    So what you've got is vast, vast, vast criminality entrenched in our economic and financial system, theft of Depositors' assets, illegal trading on other people's assets, and yes, casino-style gambling in the name of philanthropy. And this is going on, worldwide.


    Wake up, America. Get on your feet. Rub your sleepy eyes. You've got issues to settle with the banks. Big issues.



  2. #122
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,334
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,142 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    All the original laws are still in place and published as part of the US Code.
    The US code is based loosely on the statutes at large but a fair amount of interpretation goes into the code that never (ever) saw the light or authority of legislative act.

    Federal employees need the US code. They are the only ones though.

    The similarity is Kramer in Seinfeld in the episode where he reports for work without the ceremonial prerequisite of actually being hired. His manager tells him "We would like to fire you." whereupon Kramer states "Well, I don't really work here." to which the manager replies "That is what makes this so hard."

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to ziero0 For This Useful Post:

    Bigjon (26th September 2018)

  4. #123
    Gold jimswift's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    885
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 310 Times in 184 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    I'll start with saying that I'm only medium at the internet, so take my attempt to convey my inquiry with a grain.....also, thanks Bigjon.


    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjon View Post
    Where is your evidence that Anna says No Constitution until after civil war?

    I was told that The Articles of Confederation were used very early on in our history and then "replaced" by the Constitution.

    I would be willing to bet that 99% of the people reading this were given the same pat answer about The Articles of Confederation--- not because our teachers meant to lie to us, but because they were never taught the truth about this subject themselves.


    Still, even back then, reading both documents, I had a hard time seeing how The Articles of Confederation could be replaced by the Constitution? That was Sixth Grade.


    We passed over the subject again in Eleventh Grade. By then I had even more pesky questions in my mind.


    The Articles of Confederation proposed to create a "perpetual Union" so, logic dictates that for that Union to end, some official action would have to be taken by the States to end it. Where, I asked, is that official action?


    There's no record of anything like that happening at the Constitutional Convention
    . Nor is there anything like that in evidence anywhere at any time afterward.


    Like the missing Declaration of War and missing Peace Treaty ending the Civil War, it's what's not there --- that should be --- that exposes the lie we've been told.


    The Articles of Confederation were broken by Secession of the Southern States from the Confederation, but never by formal agreement.


    Under Law, you cannot force parties to remain in association once they have determined otherwise; pieces of paper have only so much ability to guarantee the future decisions of living men and so it was that the decision of the Southern States to withdraw from the original Confederation and form their own --- The Confederate States of America -- was what ended The Articles of Confederation as a viable instrument.


    They were not replaced by any Constitution. Self-evidently they were not replaced by the Founders at the Constitutional Convention, and were still in full effect in 1860 when The Great Schism occurred.

    I would say the beginning was The Declaration of Independence.
    it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
    What is a Constitutional Convention (were these rouge agents just BS'ing around, not delegates from states?) and what was the actual purpose of holding it?

    Did the CSA issue a direct "official" proclamation saying they were leaving the "Articles of Confederation" or something else?


    Under Law, you cannot force parties to remain in association once they have determined otherwise; pieces of paper have only so much ability
    What is Law anyway, other than scribbles on paper? If I say "that bullshit doesn't apply to me, get fucked.".....then surely, here comes the force.

    Which I recall a saying that I read from here or GIM1 "Rights are purchased on the battlefield"
    "Is it really a crime to report that the government is committing a crime?"

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jimswift For This Useful Post:

    Bigjon (27th September 2018)

  6. #124
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    10 hrs ·

    The Other Side of the Law
    I am sorry. Where I come from people are innocent until proven guilty.

    There has to be hard, logical, provable evidence present to back a conviction.

    People are tried in courts of law, not in the tabloids.
    Responsible members of society stand for these and other basic principles that help to guarantee justice for everyone.

    We do not marginalize actual rape victims by calling groping without penetration "rape".


    We don't hold witnesses to real crimes guiltless when they fail to report.

    People who don't report crimes at the time they happen are accomplices to them.

    Anyone who admits to willingly and repeatedly going to ten rape parties is either a willing participant or an accomplice -- and either way, I in no way, shape or form consider such people "victims".


    I consider them accomplice criminals and perverters of justice who grossly failed their most basic social responsibility to report crime--if any crime actually exists. And if it doesn't, what are we wasting time for?


    These women disgust me and I would not entertain any complaints from them in my Court for more than ten minutes. Tell that to Chuck Schumer.

    These irresponsible women either (a) stood by and let other women be date raped and gang raped and otherwise abused and said and did nothing to prevent it or (b) nothing actually happened amounting to a crime or non-consensual under age sex, in which case they are doing nothing but telling Big, Fat, Grossly Irresponsible Lies.
    Take your pick.

    I would have them and their lawyers for breakfast and Chuck and Diane for afternoon lunch in my courtroom. They'd all get a lecture they would not likely forget. And this nonsense would end right smart quick.


    Send me to Washington and see how fast all this bleeding heart nonsense lasts and how many of these actual criminals get moddle-coddled as "victims".


    I will take their lawyers to task and rub all their noses in actual crimes and show them what actual rape looks like and when I am done I will kick these sorry excuses so hard to the curb they might for once in their lives have actual bruises.


    Wah-wah-wah-wah and a wah-wah to all these useless, mindless, self-absorbed irresponsible "victims" who either (a) didn't care enough about themselves or anyone else to report the crimes 30 years ago or (b) are just callously making up politically motivated hokum to harm a good man who doesn't share their political ideology --and his wife and his family.


    I think we DO need to get to the bottom of this. REALLY get to the bottom of it. As a nation we owe it to ourselves to prosecute these women for failure to report -- because if there is anything to it, they stood by and let a lot of innocent girls suffer, and if there isn't anything to it, they are guilty of libel and slander and false accusations and should be brought to task for that, too,


    Hard? You bet I am. All my logic circuits still function. Too bad that the members of the Territorial United States Congress can't say the same



  7. #125
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    9 hrs ·


    Which "Supreme Court"?
    The thing calling itself the "Supreme Court" and squatting like a corpulent spider in the middle of Washington, DC, is self-evidently not our Supreme Court and everyone who has been reading my articles should know that by now, but let's review.

    The way the judicial system was set up was this:

    One Supreme Court for the States. This Court was called: The Supreme Court of The United States of America. It functioned entirely in international jurisdiction and decided cases in that jurisdiction for the States of the Union.

    This Court was established at Philadelphia, having retained all powers in all jurisdictions of the Law --- air, land, and sea -- as the final Arbiter of all questions that could arise among the States. This was meant to truly be a Supreme Court for the States to iron out their differences and decide issues in international jurisdiction affecting all of them.


    Once the Constitutions were adopted, some of the functions of The Supreme Court of The United States of America were shunted off to a new court, The Supreme Court of the United States, which was tasked with ruling on issues arising out of the Federal exercise of the "Delegated Powers".


    So after 1787 we were left in the inane position of having two "Supreme Courts" --- one for "Non-Delegated" issues arising under the Non-Delegated Powers, one for "Delegated" issues arising under the Delegated Powers.


    Sometimes "split jurisdiction" cases would arise and both courts would have to rule on different aspects of the same case.


    It was, admittedly, cumbersome and failed the original idea of having a Supreme Court, but there was (and is) no alternative that adequately addresses the Schism that occurred once the Constitutions were adopted and our Powers in International Jurisdiction were split into "Delegated" and "Non-Delegated" functions.


    Exactly what happened to The Supreme Court of The United States of America and how The Supreme Court of the United States usurped upon it and morphed into The United States Supreme Court is one of the best-kept secrets in this whole maze of lies and obfuscations.


    Maybe it was accomplished with nothing more than another semantic deceit.


    Maybe they just substituted the Territorial Court dba "The Supreme Court of the United States of America" for our Supreme Court dba "The Supreme Court of The United States of America" ---- the same way they substituted their States of States doing business as the "State of Georgia" for our States of State doing business as "The State of Georgia".


    This has yet to be thoroughly unraveled. We know that it happened and we know approximately when it happened; the details are murky, but the results are not.


    After the Civil War the Federal entities that were left minding the store --- the Territorial and Municipal Governments --- formed "The United States Supreme Court" and it has been that way with a few variations ever since.


    So that "Supreme Court" in Washington, DC which has been accorded such veneration and power actually has nothing to do with us or with our States of the Union.

    It's entire importance is to act as an Arbiter of the constitutional contracts and interpret those for the Territorial and Municipal United States and their foreign "citizenry".


    And now that both the Municipal and Territorial United States corporations are in bankruptcy, there is nothing to interpret. The Constitutions have been vacated except for our contracts with the Indian Nations which enclosed the constitutional contracts --and all the Delegated Powers have returned to us by Operation of Law.


    Judge Kavanaugh and Mr. Trump could both be spared the spectacle of fighting with these skunks, because the "prize" has already moved on: we moved the cheese.


    "The United States Supreme Court" no longer has any function or Office, aside from deciding whatever squabbles arise between us and our Native Corporation service providers.


    It's The Supreme Court of The United States of America that is accepting viable nominations.



  8. #126
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    7 hrs ·

    Mr. Trump, What's Wrong With This Picture?
    The Department of Justice works for you as an "Agency" --- it's a subcontractor under your own thumb and forefinger --- unless of course, the foreign "U.S. Trustees" named by the Secondary Creditors are interfering in your Administration?

    Otherwise, why are you finding it so hard to properly direct the "Department of Justice" to do its actual job?


    Aside from the meddling of bankruptcy trustees, there seems to be no plausible explanation for how and why Department of Justice personnel are so far off course. If this were a golf course and they were the ball, they'd be in a swamp behind the local fire station.


    So here is today's mystery. These guys who are supposed to be helping you in your executive duty to prevent, detect, suppress, and punish actual crimes, are wasting millions upon millions of dollars prosecuting you --- their Boss and the man they are directly tasked to assist.


    How is that even possible?

    I'd have an Attitude Adjustment Meeting with Jeff Sessions and tell him what his job is. I would give him a week to straighten this entire situation out or he'd be down the road with no return bus fare.

    And we'd have a new U.S. Attorney General.

    One that didn't have any flimsy excuse to take a powder and recuse himself, one that didn't have any "Baggage" from years in Congress, who would have no problem shutting down the ridiculous Mueller witch hunt, someone with some practical common sense and grit....

    How about Brett Kavanaugh? Withdraw his Supreme Court nomination and appoint him the new U.S. Attorney General.


    Get rid of Sessions.

    We have said it privately and now we are saying it in public. Jeff Sessions has personal liabilities and is useless as an Attorney General. He provides no competent leadership for the DOJ, which is why they are wasting our time and money and contributing to the Circus that Washington, DC has become -- instead of assisting you.

    He is supposed to work for you and the rest are supposed to work for him, but if there is nobody competent at the helm and in control of things you know yourself from your own experience that things just go to Hell.


    Please put an end to the Circus. Get rid of Sessions. Appoint Kavanaugh. Kill two birds with one stone.

    And watch the roaches run....




  9. #127
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    9 hrs ·

    The Pillar and the Post Revisited
    Pernicious Disinformation and confusion is ruining this entire country and the effort to restore its rightful government. Only you can make the needed difference.

    One old lady and The Living Law Firm can't do it alone, even with your donations of money toward the cause, for which we are truly grateful. (Paypal: avannavon@gmail.com and Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652)

    The American People as a whole must wake up and educate themselves and take appropriate action to disentangle the web of lies and "legal presumptions" that have been used to enslave us and then, must take appropriate political action.

    But what is the "appropriate" political action above and beyond reclaiming your birthright estate and Good Name? There are groups springing up like mushrooms and while many groups have good intentions, many do not.

    There are two principal groups that are promoting agendas that would be disastrous for our country, both very well-funded and also---
    foreign: British Territorial Templars vs. French Templars.

    They are both Templar groups, all worship Satan, all are steeped in gross deceit. It's the Old Choice. Would you prefer Vanilla Feces or Chocolate Feces?

    This goes back thousands of years and was enshrined in Solomon's Temple. Solomon was a Ba-El worshiper, too. He worshiped an entire Pantheon of Demons, including Ba-al, the Chief Demon.

    And what did his Temple famously display? The two pillars -- Joachim and Boaz, which symbolize the modus operandi of Satan and Satanism: False Choices.

    You can eat of the Tree of Knowledge or the Tree of Life....
    (Answer: Neither one, thanks.)

    You can have Bubonic Plague or Cholera.... which do you prefer?
    (Answer: Neither one, thanks.)

    A war in the Middle East or a war in Eastern Europe?
    (Answer: Neither one, thanks.)

    You can hate each other because of skin color or because of religious doctrine --- which do you prefer?
    (Answer: Neither one, thanks.)

    You can be undermined by Democrats or Republicans? Which brand of selfish incompetent nastiness would you prefer?
    (Answer: Neither one, thanks.)

    It's all predicated on "when did you stop beating your wife?" logic.

    With Vanilla Feces you get the Queen operating as Her Britannic (Satanic) Majesty while pretending to be a Christian. You get the Raj taxing you for salt that comes from the sea for free. You get brutal oppression wrapped in a tea cozy.

    With Chocolate Feces you get the French Republic operating our country as a Territorial "Republique"-- just take a look at what the French people endure and the scourge of Muslim invasion against a Christian nation and figure this out, please.

    These people are all Ba-El worshipers. They all hate Christians and hate Christian nations. The only difference is that the Talmudic Madmen at the very top of the pyramid hate everyone equally, while their minions below still have to be deceived to follow along using catch-all labels like "National Security Concerns" and lies like the "National Debt" to ensure their complicity.

    So they are doing their usual schtick and lining you all out with two bad choices---- the Same Old Same Old British Bunko enforced by the Roman Inquisition (Internal Revenue Service) or the French Republique also enforced by the Roman Inquisition (IRS).

    Take your pick.
    Or not.

    There are other choices, like minding your own shop and exercising self-governance, educating yourself about your birthright freedoms and responsibilities, correcting your own political status records, operating your lawful government to straighten out and "reconstruct" the Federal Government you are owed.....

    This is an option, too, one that you control. And its a Good Choice --- one with real ice cream and a cherry on top.

    But you have to recognize the Bad Choices and the Satanic Either/Or False Choice Set Up or you will be confused and not know who or what to believe and be wandering around like sheep "from pillar to post". Literally.

    Whenever you see anything about "Kim" or "Reno" or "North Carolina" you know that it is the French Templars. Whenever you see anything about Canada or China, etc., you know it is the British Templars.

    And when you see glimpses of Spain and Greece, you will know that you are seeing the real power players, rooted in places nobody suspects.

    You must learn to know your true Enemies --- the Haters from El Caziri -- the Black Magicians who promote perpetual war, whose entire belief system is rooted in duality, false choices, and conflicts.
    You must recognize their organizations --- the Bar Associations and "Secret Fraternities" established all over the world.

    You must also realize that the Talmud is not born of the Torah nor does it come to us from Judah, just like the Six Pointed "Star of David" has nothing to do with Judah or Judaism, either.

    This is the sign and emblem of two members of the Ancient Caste of Merchants having sex, each represented by an Equilateral Triangle.

    The remnant of the Ancient Caste of Merchants is who runs Israel and also who set up the Holocaust.

    They are Aryans (from the star system of Orion) not native to the Earth at all. And they marry each other in a vain effort to preserve their alien gene pool, not because of any religion.

    If this is shocking to you, well, read your Bible. I am told that Americans have more Bibles than the whole rest of the world combined. I am also told that nobody reads them. They just sit on the bookshelves and bedside tables gathering dust.

    You, my Readers, are especially blessed, because you have the benefit of our research and have the tools to figure out the :who is who" and the "what is what" in the midst of the Maelstrom these vicious enemies of Mankind have created.

    But you are especially tasked, too --- to get this information out to all who will listen and benefit and take appropriate action, and to support the effort with might and main, with prayers and pennies, with -- as the Founders put it: "our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor".

    There are enough Christian and enough sane countries left in the world to ensure that we have a choice. They are backing our efforts diplomatically, and if necessary, will intervene in other ways. But we must make the effort to educate ourselves and get our lawful government restored and operating -- and nobody can do that "for" us.

    We have to take the responsibility and do the work ourselves.


  10. #128
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    19 hrs ·

    It's Official. Hell Has Frozen Over.
    Decades ago we began a journey by the narrow path full of difficulty.... and it has been a weary and long and often heart-breaking road. But now the walls of ignorance and secrecy are falling like the walls of Jericho --- just tumbling down, one after another, as more people around the world are waking up and coming forward to help the effort.

    Because what we are facing is not just of concern to America. This has been a concerted effort by business interests to overcome the national sovereignty of all nations on Earth.


    And it has been thwarted.


    In the days to come many people will ask --- how did you do it?

    Answer: by the Maxim of Law: "As a THING is bound, so it is unbound." and by the Holy Scriptures.

    If I am relatively quiet the next couple of weeks, it should be no cause for concern. A huge amount of work has been done over the past several weeks, too much to even begin to describe. I am exhausted and my offices are stuffed floor to ceiling with paperwork related to all of this.


    So I am going to be taking a few days off to "mop up" and rest and recoup and spend time with my friends and family, who have been sadly neglected the past several years.


    Until you hear otherwise, we continue to need donations. We are operating your government of the people, for the people, by the people on your prayers and Cookie Jar Money, while the government of the persons, for the persons, by the persons is being reformed.


    Please do what you can to make sure our team is fully enabled to take all the actions (and pay all the fees and travel expenses, etc.). My PayPal is: avannavon@gmail.com and the Snail Mail address here is: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.


    It may take a couple years or more before all the issues are addressed. Believe me, I know how anxious you all are for relief and I know how urgent many needs are. We are dealing with vast problems that impact the whole world. I pray for your understanding --- The Living Law Firm is not able to take on individual cases and I don't have any way to respond to all the individual correspondence I receive.


    Please try to understand that as much as we wish we could just wave our hands and make the worst of it disappear, the actual world takes time to heal and to re-educate.


    The corruption of the economic and monetary systems has to be addressed.


    The corruption of the legal versus lawful system has to be addressed.


    Even the corruption of our own military has to be addressed.


    And the worst of it is that many of the people most in need of correction, don't have a clue that they are doing anything wrong. They will stand there and look me in the eye and say, "But, but.... this is the way we do it. This is the way it has always been done...."


    The plain fact is that they have been doing it wrong for so long that almost nobody remembers how to do it right. We face a gigantic task to re-educate not only the General Public, but the government employees.


    And a lot of the history that people learned in Grade School and High School has to be re-learned with all the actual facts revealed.


    The Split Title to your Good Name and Estate was divvied up between the Territorial State of State and the Municipal STATE OF STATE. The Territorial State of State held the "Beneficial Interest" -- the Equitable Title, while the STATE OF STATE held the Legal Title.


    You got nothing at all. You weren't even in the picture. You were a "discounted entity" to use the callous words of Queen Elizabeth II--- with regard to your own Good Name and Estate.


    You were totally disinherited. They had pulled off the ultimate identity theft and had succeeded in racketeering, plundering and pillaging on an unimaginable scale not only here, but worldwide.


    So that's how you've been treated -- as a "discounted entity", as "cargo" aboard a "derelict vessel". An inanimate THING, subject to "salvage" and claim by any passing privateer, or otherwise as a "Thing"--- an unpaid volunteer in the Queen's Merchant Marine Service, liable to pay every debt and obey every rule under martial law which was imposed on Territorial United States Citizens in 1863 and never released.


    In 1980, Jimmy Carter transferred all your Birth Certificates to the IMF as collateral backing the debts of the Municipal United States government--- that is, the government established under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, and which was run by the members of the Municipal CONGRESS as an international independent City State on our shores, and by their private governmental services corporation doing business as the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia and various related Names.


    All these atrocities have been allowed under the False Presumption that because the actual Federal level of our Federal Government was inoperative, "held in abeyance" since 1860, we were subject to whatever the Territorial and Municipal entities did to us, pending "Reconstruction" of the original States of States.


    So we have seen the depths of human depravity, greed, and most of all, Breach of Trust, because the Donor of all the Delegated Powers entrusted under the Constitutions was here all along --- simply kept in the dark, but fully enabled to operate the government in international trade and commerce, both.


    Left minding our store, so to speak, both the Popes and the British Monarchs grossly failed us and willingly joined in the feeding frenzy, racking up huge charges against us and our country's resources, then claiming bankruptcy protection for their "governmental services corporations" and leaving us to hold the bag.


    This happened in 1907 with the bankruptcy of the Scottish "ringer" calling itself "The United States of America" Incorporated.


    It happened again in 1933 with the bankruptcy of the Roman Catholic Church's deceitfully named "United States of America" Incorporated.


    And for the last several years they have been trying to execute a "Double Grand Slam" of criminality against this country and its people---- they proposed to bankrupt both the Territorial United States and Municipal United States at once, and leave this entire country at the mercy of their own creditors--- international banks that colluded with them in this horrifying prospect.


    The Municipal Government was accordingly bankrupted in 2015 and the Territorial Government was bankrupted in 2017 and with those two actions, all the remaining constitutional obligations were cancelled and overcome and vacated from the "federal" side of the agreements.


    You were to be left without a competent government operating in international jurisdiction, and at the mercy of their creditors--international banks like the BANK OF FRANCE and the BANK OF SCOTLAND.


    So they thought and so they planned and so they attempted to destroy our country via deceits and "legal presumptions" and self-interested fraud that would have left America subject to "resettlement" similar to what the British did to the Irish in the 1850's.


    What they could never win by force of arms, they proposed to take by guile and legal chicanery.


    Thank God that there were still a few Americans who hadn't fallen asleep.


    They were not paid to keep to watch. They weren't government employees. They were just plain old average Americans who knew that something was drastically wrong and who set out (a long time ago) to find out what it was.

    "Ask and ye shall find."

    At the end, the paperwork was reduced down like a soup stock to its barest elements. The Heirs came forward to claim the Kingdom. They proved their Provenance. They claimed back their Right, Title, and Interest. They locked down their claims in the Uniform Commercial Code system,. and then transferred everything back to the Land and Soil jurisdiction of the sovereign States. They demanded the return of the "abeyance" and received by Operation of Law and by their acknowledgment and acceptance, the return of all their Delegated Powers.


    The Vermin vacated all three levels of Federal Government, so we invoked the Operation of Law, which requires the return of all Delegated Powers, when the Agent receiving those Powers becomes incompetent.


    Against all the odds, The United States of America [Unincorporated] still stands, and has secured the assets belonging to the American States and People. There won't be an Irish-style re-settlement. And instead, both the British Monarch and the Holy See are on the ropes, called to account at last.


    Now it is up to us, to the American States and People, to regroup and recoup and take control of this country and its government. Mr. Trump has only a quid pro quo performance contract to provide the services owed under the actual Constitution.

    The members of the two Congresses still sitting in Washington, DC, are operating two bankrupt corporations, one in liquidation, one in Chapter 11, and trying to pull another "fast one" and establish new commercial service contracts by process of assumption.


    That possibility has been foreclosed by numerous facts and actions --- first, they have been served Public Notice of Non-Assumpsit via newspaper articles published all across this country.


    Secondly, no member of the Bar Association can hold any Public Office or position of trust related to our lawful Government and that has been the case since 1819. The vast majority of members of the Territorial and Municipal "Congresses" are precisely such Bar Association Members, rendering both those governments inoperative with respect to any action or claim related to us and our States and our People.


    Third, the Territorial United States has made a Big Deal of announcing to the world that they are a "Democracy" and it is absolutely just as well-known that our States are Republics. Since its inception, the British Territorial United States has never demonstrated any Public Mandate (51% of its eligible voters or greater) allowing it to exist, much less determine any public issue whatsoever. A more complete and demonstrable and irresponsible fraud can hardly be imagined.


    Fourth, the Municipal United States has operated as an independent, international City-State on our shores and as an oligarchy which is limited to the ten miles square of the District of Columbia. They usurped upon that and have lost their position as a result.


    Please see attached. (The referenced documents will be posted on my website: www.annavonreitz.com).



  11. #129
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    20 hrs ·

    Who or What is (Wrongly) Holding Equitable Title to Your Good Name and Estate?

    The Territorial State of State Department of Natural Resources Commissioner is holding your Estate captive under false pretenses and benefiting the "State of ________" organization and robbing you.


    So you have the Municipal Thieves acting as Gatekeepers for the Territorial Thieves and they are both complicit in the crime.


    If you did not "voluntarily" and "knowingly" agree to give your Name and everything you own to these Shysters, it is time to bring pressure to bear upon the Territorial Governors of these "States of States" dry-docked improperly on our shores and tell them to get off your backs.





  12. #130
    Iridium Bigjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,415
    Thanks
    3,154
    Thanked 1,932 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

    Anna von Reitz
    20 hrs ·

    Pernicious Claims of "Incompetency"
    The latest trick of the Foreign Vermin on our shores is to call our "competency" into question using their own bought and paid for "Uniformed Officers" --- medical doctors conscripted against their will and licensed under the old Federal Title 37 provisions -- to testify against us and claim that we are not "competent".
    This has been part and parcel of their deception and racketeering plan from the start.

    However, the "competency" that they are actually trying is our financial competence. They assume that we, like them, are bankrupt and therefore "incompetent". If so, they will gladly steal anything of value you have to underwrite their own debts.


    It's time for these criminal gangs to be (1) ignored and (2) arrested.

    The first question to the Judge should be --- "Are you a U.S. Citizen?"
    They will say, "Yes."

    And your second question should be --- "By what right then, are you addressing me, a national of The United States of America (Unincorporated)?"


    They are operating in a Foreign Jurisdiction on our shores and they have no right whatsoever to address any of us.


    Third question --- if there ever is one --- "By what right and for what reason do you question my competency?"


    Fourth question --- if there ever is one -- "By what stretch of imagination do you propose to use your own employees as supposedly expert and unprejudiced third party witnesses? Your doctors are all licensed to your State of State organization, therefore are incompetent witnesses for conflict of interest."


    Fifth question --- "Under what Treaty are you operating on our shores?"


    Sixth question --- "Are you aware that our Government, The United States of America (Unincorporated) has a permanent Treaty of Amity and Peace dated November 19, 1794 --- and that you are in violation of that Treaty right now? "


    Seventh question --- "Where is your proof that the entity you are citing as DEFENDANT or Defendant exists? I wish to see the incorporation documents, and provenance, if you please?"


    Start holding these vermin feet first to the fire. Use questions to do it. Give them no opportunity to gain any kind of excuse. If summoned, don't go to their courts. If you do know anything about a crime they are addressing, send your "Crime Report" to the District Attorney, Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested. Otherwise, stay away from these courts and if they interfere with you, refuse to sign or say anything to them and never give them any identification. Give them a card with your Counselor-at-Law's name and address and nothing more.


    If they seize upon you and detain you creating a charge of False Arrest, complain directly to the District Attorney.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •