Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 7:38 PM ·

For the Bar Members to See and Know--- And Everyone Else, Too
This is from a member of the Living Law Team a couple years ago. Read it, Bar Members, and weep.

The Role of Counselors-at—Law and The [unincorporated] Delaware Statutory Trusts

Remember when you were told you that you "had to have a Social Security Number"?

Sometimes, that is true, but only if you are applying for employment with the federal government. For of course, you would need it to enroll in their retirement and employee benefits program....but you don’t have to have one otherwise.

It is the same scenario with the Bar Associations telling new JD graduates that they have to have a Bar Card....again, that is true, if they want to be a prosecutor for the federal government corporations and their "federated state of state franchises" and become an employee of the court…………but not otherwise.

The fact is that there is no requirement for anyone to be a Bar Association Member to engage in the profession of law in this country and there never have been.

I challenge anyone anywhere to prove that there is any general requirement to be a Bar Member, in order to use the court facilities, present cases, or offer effective counsel to others with or without pay.

The fact is that the perpetuation of these "mandatory" Social Security enrollment and Bar Association Membership half-truths are undertaken in self-interest by undeclared foreign interests.

Research the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) if you have doubts and also see Trinsey v. Pagliaro and the cases that Robert F. Kennedy fought pertaining to these very issues.

Happily, quite a number of some of the best minds working in the profession of law today have awakened to this realization and they are turning in their Bar cards and leaving the association to stew in its own juice.

This was precipitated as a direct result of Bar Associations kicking members out for committing the sin of actually defending and protecting their clients' best interest, as well as, a result of lawyers waking up and going, "OMG!" -- and exiting as fast as their feet would get them out the door.

The lawyers among us are waking up along with the rest of the populace and realizing that they have been sold a total bill of goods, and don’t have to spend their lives being professional “liars”.

The fact is, lawyers can function either as attorneys-at-law or as counselors-at-law. These are "capacities" within the profession in which a lawyer can choose to work, [just as you can choose to work in the capacity of a hotel manager or a hotel bartender and still be working in a hotel].

Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits. [Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders].

Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don't have any reason to join the Bar, because they aren't involved in the disposition of public property or addressing issues related to public employees-- that is, they aren't working in administrative capacities as members of an administrative court.

Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved in the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with in-house legislative "laws" and statutes.

This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be "attorneys" and Bar Members by their employers.

Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.

This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the federal territorial and municipal courts and their various state-of-state franchises operating on our shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.

"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).

Counselors-at-law traditionally function in judicial court capacities and have the duty to protect and defend their living clientele, unlike their attorney-at-law brethren who are limited to dealing with public property and public employees and incorporated "things", either belonging to or working for or working with the government corporations.

Naturally, when a counselor-at-law appears a number of things are different about the nature and tenor of the proceedings:
A counselor-at-law is not required to enter an appearance prior to a court date and may simply walk in with a brief explanation to the judge that he or she is working in the capacity of a counselor-at-law and providing effective assistance to the Plaintiff or Defendant.
Often, to further clarify things, the judge will ask if the counselor-at-law is a member of the Bar Association…….If not, the proper response is simply, "I don't have a card (or more properly, a "ticket") with the Bar."
This is referring obliquely to the Bid Bond that the Bar Associations post in maritime cases involving incorporated entities, thus, further signaling to the judge that the Plaintiff or Defendant is appearing in the capacity of a living man or woman and that the court has to shift gears from international sea jurisdiction to international land jurisdiction.

The first difference for the court's notice when a counselor-at-law appears is the explicit revelation of the capacity in which the Plaintiff/Defendant is operating.
If he or she is operating in their actual, living capacity as a man or woman standing on the land jurisdiction of the United States, they are owed all their constitutional rights and guarantees including a counselor-at-law who can advise them but not "represent" them, because they are presumed to be free people above the age of twenty-one and competent to make their own decisions. That's why they have hired a counselor-at-law instead of an attorney.

That is also why they are forcing the court to engage them as people under the Public Law of the
United States or the General Session Law of the State instead of as "things" subject to the Private Administrative Law of any foreign territorial or municipal corporation or state of state or incorporated county franchise tribunal.

Attorneys represent "things" --- corporate franchises, wards of the state, bankrupt businesses, murdered victims of crime, mentally incompetent people, --all things that cannot "stand for" or answer for themselves. That is why they have to be "re-presented" by a substitute acting "for" them.

Counselors-at-law assist in presenting cases for living people.
Notice the difference: attorneys "represent" and administer the affairs of their clients often without regard for or even consulting with their clients. For example, they cut plea-bargains and waive rights and sell off property in whatever way best benefits the court.

This is because they work for the court and the client is at best considered a public trust subject to the court's administration. [And this is true whether you pay the traitor or not].

Notice that counselors-at-law "present" cases with and for their patrons, who administer their own affairs and make their own decisions throughout the proceedings, retain all their rights and prerogatives and do not willingly subject themselves to the court's administration.

Now, obviously, from the court's standpoint, it is very convenient to be able to dictate whatever happens in each and every case, so as to "administer" it as best suits the "public good" and the "good of the court" ---and the court's corporate employers, of course, without regard for any such niceties as equity owed to living people, or any rights owed to living people.

Just as obviously, it is a death knell to justice and an end to all freedom for living people to allow this state of affairs to go on.
When even the lawyers among us are so dumbed down and ignorant that they think the Bar Association has the power to obstruct them from pursuing their vocation, it's time to outlaw the Bar Associations, because they are clearly over-stepping any rational function or status that they have.

U.S. District, State of State and STATE OF STATE courts can demand whatever credentials they wish from people that they hire to represent their interests, just as other private and public interests can demand whatever credentials they desire from their employees.

If a "State of State" Legislature can pass a statutory "law" saying that all its court officials have to be Bar Association Members, our State Legislatures can just as easily pass a General Session law saying that none of our courts will allow Bar Association Members.

Take Note:
State of Wyoming is a Territorial Franchise Court. STATE OF WYOMING is a Municipal Franchise Court…………. Both of these are foreign corporation franchises like the local Target store.
They are limited to running administrative tribunals and they can require all the people in their "court system" to be Bar Association members until the cows come home, because these are private administrative tribunals.

But the Wyoming State Court belongs to the people of Wyoming and they run judicial courts of record that are superior to any private administrative tribunals and they can mandate that no Bar Association members are allowed to practice law in their venue ---thereby providing plenty of work for counselors-at-law.

That this great country and its people have been hoodwinked and pulled off course for so long by selfish private interests is an immense and horrifying Breach of Trust, but it is one that is being swiftly rectified, when we change/correct our own presumed political status and consequently change the "presumed" capacity in which we choose to act in court; while changing the capacity in which lawyers act.

To all former Bar Attorneys and those who are [currently] thinking seriously of tearing up their [fraud] cards?
It is time to face the truth and set yourselves free of the imaginary shackles that the Bar Associations have placed on you.
You can enter any court in this country in the capacity of a Counselor-at-Law and there is nothing any of the courts can say except, "Yes, of course...."

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 6:05 PM ·

Great Quotes:
My detractors always try to make it seem like I am the only one out here saying these things, but that is untrue, too.

From Brian Kelly:
“When the UNITED STATES declared bankruptcy, it pledged all Americans as collateral against the national debt, and confiscated all gold, eliminating the means by which you could pay, it also assumed legal responsibility for providing a new way for you to pay, and it did that by providing what is known as the Exemption, an exemption from having to pay for anything. In practical terms, though, this meant giving each American something to pay with, and that ”something” is your [own] credit."

From Mr. Richard James, McDonald, former law enforcement, California:
“Unbeknownst to most people, the class termed “US citizen” did not exist as a political status until 1866. It was a class and “political status” created for the newly freed slaves and did not apply to the people inhabiting the states of the union who were at that time state Citizens.”

This is what people were talking about when they referred to a "second class citizen" ---- Negroes and other people of color including American Indians had this newly created status of "US citizen" conferred on them without their knowledge or consent. Over time, the Vermin have tried to extend this political status to everyone.

From Debt Discharge:
"The original birth or naturalization record for every U.S. Citizen is held with Washington, D.C. and the property and assets of every living U.S. Citizen is pledged as collateral for the National Debt."

"You" are being mis-characterized as a "second class citizen" traded as a commodity on the U.S. Stock Exchange.
Slaves, slaves for sale! Black slaves! White slaves! Red slaves! Slaves of every age, sex, and color!

This is why they want all the Hondurans they can get to come to this country---- U.S. citizens are worth more in the slave market than Hondurans. So for every Mexican or Honduran that crosses the Border and gets labeled as a "U.S. citizen" the cash registers go "Ca-Ching!" and the difference in value gets deposited in the coffers of the Queen, the Roman Catholic Church, and the worthless, feckless traitors in Washington, DC.

Can you think of anything more rotten? Telling these poor people from Honduras and Mexico that they are coming to the "Land of the Free" --- to purposefully enslave them and sell them at a higher price on the "U.S. Stock Exchange"?

It's time to make the soldiers and the politicians and the bankers and the stock brokers and the SEC regulators and the "U.S. Attorney General" and the Government of Westminster and Her Royal Majesty and the Pope and all the rest of them account for this criminality.

Because criminality, it is.
Personage is a crime. Knowing mis-characterization of our political status is a capital crime under the Geneva Conventions. They can hang for this.
Literally.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 7:09 PM ·

P.S. About Ram-Bubba....and My Position Regarding Manna Trust
I made a joke and said, "Ramses was my Uncle. We used to call him "Ram-Bubba" behind his back."

My point is to shed light on the ridiculousness of claiming to be heirs to ancient trusts that are--purportedly-- thousands of years old, and claiming to be heirs of Ramses and heirs of Montezuma and heirs of Big King Put and Tut.

The actual history is written in stone in Ten Mile Canyon, if anyone can still read it and needs to know. But it doesn't matter.

Because life goes on. People die, possessions are recycled, new generations take over and make their mistakes and their good decisions, too.

What we are left with is the present moment and the fact that some people gained more than others by fraud and deceit, and others gained more than others by hard work and diligence, and still others gained more than others by sheer luck and blessing.

It's not okay to universally hate and rob from rich people on the presumption that they all got what they got by crime and cruelty. Some of them did, but many of them didn't.

Why should the good suffer with the bad?

And what kind of judge would I be to stand here and agree to some kind of mindless pogrom against "the rich" any more than I should stand here and agree with some mindless pogrom against "the poor"?

Each situation has to be considered on its merits for justice to be done.
We all know that, as inconvenient as that may be.

So, no, I won't give a Green Light and Happy Happy to Kim Goguen seizing 5,000 private trusts that belong to families and organizations that deposited those assets in Good Faith, and just letting her decide who gets what.

These are private property assets and if you disrespect someone else's private property, you know what you can expect when it comes to your own.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 11:22 PM ·

Veteran's Day 2018

When my brothers came home
I was sixteen years old
And I didn't know why
They looked so haunted.

Now I know
The years have flown
I still see their faces
Etched with pain.

The weeds and flowers
Ramble over their graves
And the flag still waves
Over their heads.

I have to wonder what
Might have been
For all of us
For all of them.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 3:09 AM ·

Securitization is Illegal and Unlawful
Securitization is illegal and unlawful. And it has been the backbone of the world economy since 1934. Think about that.

I have pointed out that securitization of a man's Good Name and Estate is completely illegal and unlawful because it is an act of personage and results in enslavement --- both of which are crimes.

And here to discuss the point further is an excerpt from British researchers published in 2010, with more explicit detail of exactly why securitization, or, as the Brits write it, "securitisation" is illegal in the U.S. and throughout most the world:

WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW

Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.

To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.

Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.

In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.

Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.

SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES

In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.

The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).

Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.

Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.

Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
15 hrs ·

Counter-Offer to Manna World Holdings Trust, November 11, 2018
1. Perhaps you could explain how Marduk had any legitimate right of control or ownership of the assets he transferred to you? Because to my certain knowledge, you are claiming control of assets that weren't his and aren't yours to meddle with. The law is: possession by pirates does not change ownership. He could not give you authority or legitimacy he didn't have himself. So let's see Marduk's chain of provenance and bona fides establishing his interest and role in assets like the V.K. Durham Trust and the D'Avila Trust .... all approximately 5,000 of the private trusts that have been swept up in a big bag and handed to you to dispose of.

2. Renaming a trust or group of trusts to create a new legal person, e.g., changing the name of Alpha and Omega Trust to Manna World Holdings Trust doesn't give you any new authority or grant any new authority to the trust you made up out of thin air. Remember that these trusts contain actual assets, not digits, and fall under the Law of the Land, not legal and statutory provisions.

3. I didn't credit or accuse you of creating the QFS--- simply using it with Marduk's help--- to purloin control of approximately 5,000 Special Deposit Accounts, the actual donors of which never elected you (or him) as trustees. This is a sticking point. Actual assets deposited by people and organizations in Good Faith in a bank should not be seized upon by anyone but the lawful depositors. Interference with these assets and normal bank protocols is a threat to all private property rights and also whatever public confidence people can still have in the banks.

4. You are not the only good person out there. I have met plenty of good solid people who are legitimate private trustees with proof of trusteeship over accounts you are now controlling as an Executor de Son Tort. You blame them for not deploying assets to help Mankind sooner --- but surely you know or have cause to know that these same Trustees have been blocked from having access to their accounts for decades?

The Committee of 300, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderburgers, the Roman Cartel, and the guilty banks were all too busy using these private assets to make money for themselves.
The actual trustees AND beneficiaries went hungry to bed ---- some, like the intended beneficiaries of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust have been kept waiting for relief for literally hundreds of years and anyone who stepped forward as a Fiduciary to deploy the funding has been refused access, too. So it isn't like you can sit there and blame the people I am talking about. They have been victims as much as anyone else. Their Good Will should not be impugned for not doing something that they couldn't do through no fault of their own.

5. Generally speaking, the assets in the trusts you are seizing upon belong to private people, not "the People". Special Deposits belong to the Depositors, unless you can prove that the funds are the fruit of money laundering or other serious crimes---- and unless you have a receipt that says, "The People" on it, "The People" don't have anything to say. There are some trusts like those belonging to The United States of America [Unincorporated] and our member States that actually do belong to The People, but these are dedicated trusts in the National Interest.

In our case the plan is simply to transfer the assets to our International Trade Bank and from there disperse into fifty State accounts on a per capita basis. Each State Account will be assigned a competent Fiduciary CFO and from there, "The People" will be fully informed about their inheritance and enabled to make choices individually and via plebiscite. Each State Fiduciary issues a yearly online report and an abstract report. In this way each State is responsible for maintaining accountability to "The People" and reflecting the actual Will of the People in that State.

(6) Trust beneficiaries are not and cannot be "required" to appoint agents with plenary control over their assets, especially when the Donors didn't mandate any such condition. Rather, it's your job to liquidate or rollover the public trusts to the actual states and actual people and to return the private property trusts to their own trustees. If you want to help, you would be welcome by our Trust Association Members to do so.

Everyone understands the need for disciplined and organized deployment of relief efforts and infrastructure development
funding, so you might logically start with people who: (1) have valid claims and clear, public aims; (2) have already agreed to work cooperatively for the common good of all. I will point out that expecting one woman to act as Trustee of 5,000 trust accounts is sheer lunacy. The private trust trustees can help you as much as you can help them.

(7) As for getting four countries to release control of their trusts "back to their former trustees" --- there are no such valid trustees that I know of, because any valid Public Trusteeships have been usurped (in most cases) for over a hundred years. So why make such a reference to a system that was of the pirates, by the pirates and for for the pirates? It isn't like countries can go back to anything like a valid Public Trusteeship, and you know that. In virtually all cases, the purported trustees of the incorporated governments weren't even functioning in a fiduciary capacity--- and you presumably know that, too.

In the world I live in, rights go hand-in-hand with responsibilities. Anyone who doesn't take responsibility under The Prudent Man Standard has no right to act as a Public Trustee. By that standard virtually none of the incorporated governments on Earth even have Fiduciary Trustees---- the "United States" certainly hasn't bothered to have Fiduciary Trustees for decades--- and when you are talking about actual National Trust assets, Fiduciary Trustees are required. The United States of America [Unincorporated] does have Fiduciary Trustees in place, so we have our horses in front of our cart.

(8) As for the Indian Nations, most of them did sign deals with the Devil, but it is also true that most of those deals (similar to the U.S. Attorney General's claim to own all of us via donation) are fraudulent, void for non-disclosure, etc. We call such nations "dependent sovereignties" because some entity has to hold the responsibility in order to exercise the rights of the landlord, but many nations can co-habit the same geographical space.

We, The United States of America [Unincorporated], are the recognized landlords of this country since 1776. In 2015, we opened up the land jurisdiction to put an end to second class citizenship in this country. Those Native Americans who elect State Citizenship instead of U.S. citizenship have been free to come home to the land jurisdiction of this country since November 6, 2016, and once separated from the international jurisdiction of the sea, they own their own bodies, so also own soil.

Michael Stephen Young exercised this option in 2015, thus securing standing as an American and as a Tribal Chief in America. He waived his rights as a beneficiary of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust, formed a plan, established it as his Irrevocable Will on the Public Record, and has stood ready to begin implementation with our full support and approval for three years.

And here we are, looking at another bitter winter, still fuss-farting around and trading insults about this situation. A lot of good, worthy --- and needy --- people have been waiting over 200 years to see any benefit from that trust, and they are still waiting. One must ask if the trustees have any concern for the intended beneficiaries --- Native Americans, Hispanics and Cowboys and Traders in seven western states --- or sense of "reasonable urgency" in the performance of their duties at all. I certainly consider promptness an element of Fiduciary Duty and am bewildered how a Treaty Trust with us could remain in limbo, gathering interest and dust for over 200 years. And still isn't deployed.

(9) Since we are discussing actual, factual assets the legal/lawful requirements are a bit different than you suppose. For example, we don't need to be in good "legal standing". We need to be in good "lawful standing".
Actual assets exist in the realm of sovereignty, not the realm of legal fictions. We are the ones that give corporations licenses -- that is, corporations are licensed by us, not the other way around.

(10) It appears that you have your heart in the right place but are confused about various points of law and nobody is blaming you for that. It is confusing. You have also come out of ---and cut your teeth inside of--- a criminally malfunctioning system, so it's not like you have any experience or knowledge of what a correctly functioning world economy looks like or how it is SUPPOSED to function. Perhaps, just maybe, if we got together face to face we could iron it all out enough to MAKE A START.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

Dear Kim – A Reply, November 12, 2018
First, I had visitors come here today and threaten to kill me over this conversation.

Ever see what happens when arrogant idiots get the attention of a Battle Class Seraph from the Age of Storms? Let’s just say that they left here considerably faster than they came. I doubt that you will get a full and honest report about this from them, but the Galactic Council certainly will hear about it.

Second, we are the “unknown country” --- the "dust that returneth to dust" (land and soil) fixed in “a time that is not a time and a place that is not a place”. We are not his dominion and the unknown country has nothing whatsoever to do with the family business of Marduk, Satan, and Sons, which was supposed to be turned over to new management circa 500 AD. They decided not to keep their end of the bargain they made with The Anointed One, so that resulted in a major diplomatic faux pas. New Precessional Guardians have been dispatched to replace the Saturnine Brotherhood and more than sufficient firepower is present to blow any resistance clear out of this sector of the Galaxy.

They are not going to get their way. In fact, they are just going to sit down and shut up and observe basic math. A negative seven plus a negative seven equals negative fourteen. They are, by my count, 1500 years and counting behind on their rent. And this planet, which actually belongs to the people and other beings who live here, is long past due for maintenance and renewal.

Third, you must realize that “money” is a child’s game where I come from. It’s like everyone is expecting me to play Barbie’s Pet Shop with them, which is very frustrating for me. Money and routing it around and sharing it out so that people can live decent lives should be the least of our problems. It's like telling me people can't move widgets from Point A to Point B because Standard Oil still controls the oil pipelines in Texas. Say what?

Fourth, there’s no need for all this distress. I already have what you need as a system to trade freely and to get relief to everyone on the planet. It’s already here, ready to deploy, safe, private, seamless and 200 years ahead of anything that now exists. A brand new clean and supremely user-friendly worldwide system could have been in place months ago---- which is what winds my clock. We can simply bypass the existing banks.

Fifth, each one is indeed sacred and doesn’t need “management” in the form of oppression and Group Think, however, until education and emotional support catches up with everyone -- there has to be a transition. We both know that. Thanks to the way this world has been plundered and mismanaged, the majority of adults are like children ---scared, miserable, confused children. And you know that, too.

These people need help establishing self-rule because they have been abused and oppressed and not just for a little while –for generations.

Sixth, Bank of Dene is not my bank and never has been. Our International Trade Bank is called The American States and Nations Bank, “ASAN” for short. It isn’t part of the commercial system. As you have so clearly described the endless rabbit warren of their corruption, I don’t have to explain the desirability and even the necessity of starting over.

Seventh, like most of those who have fought with this “System” Michael has had his share of troubles and run-ins with what passes for law here in a country which depends on securitization --- completely illegal and unlawful processes--- to generate an economy for itself. Most of my friends have spent time in jail, been hauled over the coals, and many have suffered alcoholism, drug addictions, broken marriages and heartbreak of all sorts, because they haven’t meekly gone along with injustice and criminality.

I don’t know where you are getting your DNA results, because I have seen reports confirming not only his Native heritage, but everything else he has claimed in his book, The Shekinah Prophecy. Maybe you are the one that needs to take a second look? In any event, my support of Michael is based on his heart, not his war record. I can see his heart. I know what he wants. And he truly wants nothing for himself, but to share in building something beautiful for all the people he loves --- which is darn near everyone. Not just the Natives. Not just the Hispanics. Not just the Cowboys. And that, IMHO, is exactly the kind of man that is needed to build a new world --- a man who still has his heart intact. Think closely --- there aren’t that many of them left.

Eighth, my political system and their political system are two different things, operating under different forms of law --- and they are subservient to my system which is sovereign. We charter and license and if they misbehave, we liquidate corporations, not the other way around. Now, that is hard for people to understand because they are used to being bullied by corporate bureaucrats, but it is nonetheless the truth. We have Law. They have what passes for Law. So when you are dealing with huge issues like rebuilding the entire world and providing new banking services and new medical tech and all the rest of what needs to go on ----

it’s my brand of Law that you need to be using, not theirs. I am sorry if you got the impression that I wasn’t willing to help you, because I am willing to help anyone (see above) who wants to do the right thing by the Earth and its people.

Ninth, for the purposes of the current discussion I am not talking about all the accounts. I am talking about the approximately 4,800 Historic Trust and Private Accounts held as Special Deposits that contain the bulk of the precious metal assets on Earth. What we are left with are two basic kinds of accounts containing large quantities of gold, silver, and other assets that people have traditionally used as tokens and commodities in trade that have been left on deposit in banks and which you have gained control of via computer programs. Control of the assets needs to be returned to the Depositors, both Public and Private. There needs to be a cooperative but honest effort on all parts to resolve these issues.

Tenth, one of the exit interviews I had with Marduk and with Satan was about the Big Lies they have told. If you listen to them, black will be white and up will be down, because truly, actually, factually---- and despite all their intellect and knowledge --- the Truth is not in them. Even basic logic such as Who Owns What gets distorted in their presence. This is because the Truth departed from them when they rebelled, and has never returned. This leaves them and their progeny in the unenviable position of being permanently out of tune with the Universe, living in their own self-created and egotistical world, separated from All That Is.

Eleventh, if we were to allow all their premises and what they have taught about the “Unknown Country”--- which is not their dominion, then this alienation and separation from the Truth would continue for more generations on Earth. I don't want that. I don't get the impression you want that, either. So why not focus on resolving the nuts and bolts and getting on with it?

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
46 mins ·

Clarifications About Kim's Problem, Oil, and Money Systems
Yesterday, in my Reply to Kim Goguen aka "Kim Possible" I noted my frustration with the whole topic of money and moving it around by saying that, "It's like telling me that people can't move widgets from Point A to Point B because Standard Oil still owns all the pipelines in Texas."

Apparently, that flew over many people's heads and caused confusion ---- what was I talking about?

J.D. Rockefeller made his fortune --- not on oil, but on oil pipelines. That is, he didn't get rich on oil, the product, whether crude or finished commodity. What he made his money on was a monopoly of pipeline infrastructure. This was the basis of "Standard Oil". By controlling the pipeline infrastructure old J.D. could move or block the flow of oil and by controlling monopoly interest, he could grant favors to whomever he chose in terms of access to getting oil to refineries and to markets --- both. He could also charge as little or as much as he liked for the pipeline service he provided.

Thus, by controlling the pipelines he could make or break any oil company and even manipulate the prices of crude oil and finished products.

What finally caused the "busting up" of Standard Oil was that they went too far in their monopoly interest activities and their coercive control of the commodity transport and therefore, the commodity supplies.

What I meant by my comment was--- we have the same problem now, with the banks. This is exactly what Kim was describing as her problem --- owning the commodity (oil) and not being able to move it reliably (through the pipeline) because those controlling the transport system (Standard Oil) were blocking and shunting and causing problems.

So, in banking terms, Kim, the Comptroller, is having trouble moving the commodity (money) through the transport system (banks) because the people that own the transport system are, like old J.D., playing games -- blocking, locking, shunting deliveries, etc,, etc,. etc, ------ so I was, in essence, saying ---WTF?

We have been here before. We know how to solve this particular problem. Why isn't someone doing what needs to be done?

And what needs to be done is that Interpol (which controls the U.S. Attorney General's Office) needs to be outted as a criminal organization and shut down. The USAG works for them since 1976, not the President, even though the Department of Justice is a Federal Agency and even though the President appoints the Attorney General.

So we have a key Office in our government under the blatant control of Globalist interests and those Globalist interests have been running a white collar slave market on our shores and harming our people, which is both illegal and unlawful.

Shut the rats down. Kick them out. No more participation in Interpol. No more kidnapping American babies as "alien property" donated to the U.S. Attorney General.

If necessary, do what they do: rename the "Department of Justice" and rename the "Office of the Attorney General" ---- shift the contract over to the "new" Agency and place it back under American control. Just vacate what is there now.

That's Job One. Regain control of the Justice System in this country and stop all the game playing.

So, now we move on to Job Two.

Job Two is analogous to busting Standard Oil. We need to bust the banks that are abusing their privileges and acting as obstructive monopoly interests.

We know how to do that.
We liquidate them --- or threaten them with liquidation --- under a vast variety of laws and regulations that forbid what they are doing already. If they won't play ball according to the rules, we take the ball away. Boom. Shut their doors, take over their operations, and that is that.

And all that is just a matter of correcting the existing system and bringing the oversight tools (the Justice System) and the commodity transport (the Banking System) back into alignment and control.

If I were President, I believe I could have this problem fixed in less than a week. So.....once again, if a Grandma in Big Lake, Alaska, can see the problem, analyze it in fifteen minutes, develop a general plan of action and be ready to move on it ---- why in blazes is the entire federal "system" all bolluxed up and constipated over this nonsense?

And that's just the existing system. Who says we have to stick with the existing system?

We have the technology and the means to deliver a totally new and "fool proof" banking system to the entire Earth and everyone on it. Kim can just move the old accounts over to the new tech and that really solves the problem once and for all.

Put the records onto a new communications platform that is so transparent and user friendly and yet so private and seamless that all the banks will be begging to use it.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
12 mins ·

Ah-ha Moment Regarding Health and the DOD
Now, I know that my Readers are not coming to this page for health advice. They want to know what-the is wrong with the government and what to do about it. This article only obliquely addresses a problem with the government, which is the over-protection of Aluminum Industry profits by the Defense Department at the expense of public health ----but read it anyway, because it could save your life and improve the quality of your life and the lives of those you love.

I've thought for years that there is an obvious link between the proliferation of aluminum cookware and the vast "mysterious" increase in Alzheimer's Disease which involves plaque deposits in the brain containing --- what? Aluminum.

The Aluminum Industry has a very shady history of pollution and self-interest going back many decades. It got its big boost (not with Reynold's Wrap) with the use of Aluminum in air craft sheet metal during World War II. Because it was a necessary "war material" the industry as a whole got all sorts of perks and open doors. After the war, the growth of the commercial airlines and the need for new commercial transport planes continued to guarantee the demand for aluminum.

Almost as an afterthought a burgeoning business in aluminum cookware and disposable bake ware sprang up after the Second World War as aluminum manufacturers sought to increase demand for new aluminum-containing products.

Aluminum has several properties that are good for cookware -- it is light weight, fairly rigid, and a good even heat conductor.

Unfortunately, it is also quite poisonous when ingested. That's hardly a concern for airplane fuselages but is a concern when you are boiling water in an aluminum tea kettle day after day. While the amount of aluminum ingested as part of a cake baked in an aluminum pan is truly minute, aluminum is very hard for our bodies to get rid of once ingested, and builds up causing an anti-poison inflammatory reaction. The body tries to save itself by insulating the aluminum in a blanket of fatty acids ---- plaque.

When you consider the exact correlation between the increase in the use of aluminum cookware and the increase in Alzheimer's in the adult population --- it does not take rocket science to figure this out, even if it does take aluminum to make rockets.

Another way that the Aluminum Industry harms our health is the addition of Fluoride to toothpaste and to our community water systems. Fluoride is touted (ironically enough) for its anti-bacterial and plaque-fighting abilities without any disclosure of why Fluoride has these properties. Fluoride is a low-level poison, just like the aluminum ore it comes from, and while it "kills" the kind of bacterial plaque that forms in our mouths, once ingested, it forms the other kind of plaque that gunks up our vascular systems and brain synapses.

The Aluminum Industry thus found a highly profitable market for its poisonous waste products at our expense, and it was allowed to promote this because aluminum is a protected "Defense Material" and the mining and manufacturing related to aluminum has been a protected industry ever since WWII.

Now, I have nothing against the use of aluminum in conjunction with aerospace and the airplane industry generally, and I see nothing wrong with the government protecting the Aluminum Industry in regard to its importance to the military --- but I draw the line when the known ill-health affects of aluminum are ignored and people's lives are ruined and truncated because aluminum is being used in inappropriate ways (such as cookware and bake ware) and its poisonous by-products are being marketed (and even mandated!) for use in toothpaste and added to municipal water supplies.

I count myself extremely lucky that my Mother stuck to black cast iron and stainless steel and I highly recommend that everyone else do the same.

There are other cookware dangers from non-stick and ceramic surfaces, too. A friend forwarded this little gem to me from Buzz Video this morning:
Four Types of Toxic Cookware to Avoid and Four Safe Alternatives:
https://www.buzzvideo.com/a/6561018307401482762…

So to help my Readers have healthier and happier lives, here is a piece of Ancient Chinese Wisdom passed on from my Mother, LaVera, to all of you:
"Hot pan, cold oil, food won't stick."
That is, you don't need non-stick cookware to enjoy non-stick food. You just heat your pan up BEFORE you add the cooking oil. This causes the cooking oil to form a protective layer of natural non-stick between the food and the pan, and you can have fuss-free scrambled eggs and pork chops to your heart's delight.

Buy cast iron and stainless steel and the other safe alternatives and use this little trick to make your own safe "non-stick" cookware.

Also, you can get all the benefits of Fluoride-containing toothpaste with none of the nasty risks and side effect by buying Flouride-free toothpaste and simply rinsing your mouth with a couple tablespoons of coconut oil mixed with a couple drops of cinnamon or clove essential oil. Just swish the oil around like you would use any mouthwash, then hold in your mouth for 30 seconds.

This oil combination is naturally anti-bacterial and anti-plaque and gets under your gums more efficiently than any toothpaste --- and unlike Fluoride-containing toothpaste, this option continues to fight plaque-forming bacterial for many hours afterward.

You can also lobby for the end of adding Fluoride to municipal water treatment programs and expose the Dirty Little Secret of the DOD connect via its protection of the the Aluminum Industry and therefore, Aluminum Industry profits. They are, after all, supposed to be protecting us, not poisoning us.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz
14 hrs ·

RFID? Beat Them With Their Own Stick.
For reasons that should now be self-evident, Satanists have been persecuted and suppressed for centuries. This is part of the reason that they hide and pretend to be Christians, Muslims, and Methodists, Greek Orthodox and Korean Buddhists and adherents of every other religion you can name.

It's cover for what they really are, and gives them a means to undermine and steal from and gain the confidence of the people who really ARE Christians, Muslims, Methodists, Jews, and so on.... and they exercise the influence they gain however they will.

This is how the "Jews" were successful in bringing America into World War I. They weren't really Jews, but they influenced people who were Jews under the pretense of being Jews themselves.

They can do the same thing with Germans or Chinese or anyone else. Same Schtick.
Once you are aware of that and how effectively these quick-change artists have defrauded and made use of the rest of the world for their own profit, you are prepared to take advantage of them in the same way.

What? What?
The one tenet derived from the actual Constitution that they adhere to rigidly and which remains the ONLY exemption to the gross military dictum that was established here after the Civil War, is the Freedom of Religion exemption.

Because they fear being found out and having their religion suppressed again as it was under the Romans and later under the Holy Roman Empire, they are always in the forefront of the Religious Freedom bandwagon.

You can rely on the fact that Freedom of Religion will remain a rock solid guarantee, because if it were not: (1) they would face the possibility of governmental suppression and (2) they could face suppression against other religious groups that they are sheltering under and that would be bad for business.

This then becomes your shield as well as theirs. And they can't take it away without exposing their own backsides and business interests.

Now, here's how we apply it to the "Real ID" and the RFID chipping of people like cattle with ear tags:

"I'm sorry, but the 'chipping' of living people is against my religion and dignity."
Period.

Christians and Muslims can both legitimately claim that it is against their religion.
Christians because of the warnings against the Mark of the Beast and Muslims because they accept Jesus as a Great Prophet. Hindus and Buddhists, Shintos and Sikhs can object to it as a desecration of the body.

We can all find plenty of religious reasons to say no to RFIDs.

The Vermin among us who have no respect for themselves and certainly no respect for others, will try to push it, and will argue it and attempt to force feed this final devaluation of our uniqueness and sacredness, but if enough people remove themselves it will undermine the marketplace, and there will be no "Real ID" and the rats in the legislatures will have to go to bed without supper.

They only do things that are profitable for them, so make the RFID idea as unprofitable as possible and voice your objections loud and strong.

And now, prepare yourselves for a delicious irony: the people who are responsible for all the gross identity theft that has gone on for the last 150 years, will try to sell you RFID chipping as a solution to the problem they caused: identity theft.

However, the answer to this is easy, too. RFID's can be duplicated and forged and counterfeited like any other product. And the potential end result is even worse than having some transvestite from New Jersey pretending to be Anna von Reitz.

Imagine a few hundred thousand impostors claiming to be you and accessing your credit on the same day?

Tell that to your legislators.
And as for the "Mark of the Beast", which in these days is actually the "Mark of the B.E.A.S.T" ---let's just skip it, and for the sake of the prophets, say we did.

The B.E.A.S.T. is the Belgian Electronic Asset tracking system. Because you have been misidentified as an "asset" --- a chattel slave in their "System"---- they want to use the RFID chip to locate you in their worldwide warehouse, like a lump of cheddar cheese.

Just say no, it's against your religion.