Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

[ziero0]

I would have to read law books.

You don't need a lawbook to let you know what your law is. A lawbook is useful to let you know what others law is. As there are some ideas you might not have thought of exposure to other ideas can be useful. Just as I have no authority to appoint a court trustee the court has no authority to impose it's concepts upon me.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

23 hrs ·

The Big Switch

So how did your nationality get combined with citizenship? A friend from Australia recently sent me a nicely summarized list of legislative acts from the 1920 through the late 60's, and what it very neatly summarizes is a fundamental change that happened in the 1940's and which has never been corrected.

At the beginning of the legislative history there were numerous "Nationality Acts" in the 1920's and 30's. Then, beginning in the 1940's all of these became "Nationality and Citizenship Acts". This is where your nationality got confused and "lumped together" with your political status as a "citizen" or not.

The organizations passing all these "Nationality and Citizenship Acts" were all functioning in Territorial jurisdictions, so it was no big leap for them to include "citizenship" presumptions with the topic of "nationality". For them, the two are synonymous.

If you live your life as a "resident" (temporary sojourner) in the "State of Wyoming" (a Territorial State of State) you are a federal "citizen" by definition, so that your nationality and citizenship are tied together.
If you live your life at home in Wyoming, you may or may not be a "citizen". It is entirely possible to live your entire life and never be employed by any "federally connected" employer and to never hold any office related to any federal corporation.

And that is the fundamental difference between "us" and "THEM".
We have no natural obligation to serve and obey the government. The government has a natural obligation to serve and obey us. Our nationality is not tied to any obligatory citizenship, but theirs is. And therein lies the rub and the misunderstanding.

People presume that you must be a citizen, because they are, but in fact this is merely a self-interested and unconscionable presumption on the part of the Territorial United States Government that began in the 1940's and which deserves to be soundly rebutted and refused now.

When you are born on the land of a sovereign State, say, New York -- you are under no obligation to act or serve as a Federal Citizen of any kind. They merely "presume" on the basis of a long-vanished war that you are a volunteer willing to assume "Territorial political status".

So that's how your nationality got balled up with the issue of citizenship, which is by nature entirely different.
We now know that the same thing happened worldwide during the Second World War and that "Nationality Acts" in places as diverse as Italy and Australia and the United States underwent the same kind of change to "Nationality and Citizenship Acts" at the same time. This implies in turn at that the participants were acting in Territorial capacity and that people were never returned to their natural birthright political status as non-citizen nationals after the Second World War.

This parallels what went on with the so-called Victory Tax. Prior to the Second World War, only Federal Citizens and federal corporations (like the big railroad corporations) were subject to pay "federal income taxes".
During the war the Territorial United States Congress passed the "Victory Tax" which allowed average non-Federal citizen Americans to "voluntarily" contribute an amount equal to that paid by Federal Employees as part of the war effort.

The sunset clause on this legislation stated "the end of hostilities" which by most reckoning means September 1945, but instead, the Territorial United States Congress just left everything in place as if the Second World War was still going on and people were still "volunteering" to pay federal income taxes as part of the effort to win it.

Eighty years later and millions upon millions of Americans have been deprived of their natural birthright nationality which does not include any obligations of citizenship and have paid trillions of dollars worth of federal income taxes they never owed.

It's easy enough to see why the Territorial United States Government wanted everyone to be in "citizenship" status so as to be able to control and commandeer the labor force during the Second World War. It is also easy to see why they wanted the extra income from American workers and why they acted in simple greed and continued on with both these false presumptions after the War---- both Territorial "citizenship" and "voluntary federal income tax" have been foisted off and presumed upon millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent.

And now has come the objection from the lawful government and from the people to this situation and the need to: (1) cease and desist these false presumptions and (2) make amends for them.

It is within our power as individual Americans to reclaim our "reversionary trust interest" in our own birthright prior to when the Territorial Government agents changed our fundamental nationality and citizenship status. We can revert back to being Americans standing on the firm foundation of our land and soil without any citizenship obligations and without any Territorial attachments to our earnings.

And this is why when we talk about Jural Assemblies it is so important for people to grasp what has been done to them in terms of damage to their natural capacities and political status, and why it is necessary for everyone involved in the Jural Assembly process to recoup their natural birthright political status which does not include any obligations of Territorial citizenship.

You were born in Vermont, not Puerto Rico. Say so and inherit the land and soil of your birth, your guaranteed exemptions and immunities, your Natural and Unalienable Rights, and be set free from the obligations of Territorial citizenship.

Run, don't walk, to the Recorder's Office and establish your claim. And if anyone tells you that it isn't "necessary" for you to make this change, tell them it isn't necessary to wipe your butt, either, but the consequences of not doing so have obvious drawbacks.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

August 15 at 10:29 AM ·


Important Point:
A couple weeks ago, I published an Article called "This is the Big One"---- in which I observed that:

(1) in commerce, the truth is established by Affidavit, and

(2) that corporations cannot possibly give an Affidavit because they have no "voice" or motive force enabling them to do such a thing, and

(3) since you have been "defined" to be operating in the capacity of a corporation (JOHN DOE, JOHN M.DOE, JOHN MARK DOE) you have therefore been deprived of having any voice or ability to make an Affidavit. Thus, YOU are helpless and cannot defend yourself or present the Truth in a commercial court.

So some people missed the point entirely, and others could not reason their way forward to a solution for this conundrum.

You will note that the exact verbiage of the Maxim is-- "Truth in commerce is established in the form of an Affidavit".

Thus, when you wish to act in the capacity of a Living Man in a commercial court, you do not offer an Affidavit --- because in the current scenario that allows them to ignore every word you say or write.

Instead, you offer "Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".

You follow the "form" of an affidavit which is to swear or affirm for the Public and Private Record and from without the United States that your testimony is true, correct, and not misleading-- and then you enumerate your facts: 1, 2, 3, 4....

This allows the Court to hear your facts and gives de facto rebuttal to the presumption that you are acting in the capacity of a corporate franchise.

And since your opponent is a corporation, it has no ability to answer your Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit with any countering Affidavit--- and your facts stand as Truth in Commerce by default.

If the opposing attorney attempts to say anything or make any further argument in the case, ask how a corporation pretends to issue any opposition to your Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit?

They are caught in their own net.
A corporation can't make an affidavit and as officers of the court, they are all operating as corporations, including the JUDGE and the Prosecutor and the PLAINTIFF.

Plus, the Prosecutor/Prosecuting Attorney has no first-hand knowledge so cannot serve as a Witness or make any statement in evidence.

Soooo...... that's what we call "end game".

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

August 15 at 12:56 PM ·


For Doctors, Lawyers, and Indian Chiefs
The doctors, lawyers, and Indian Chiefs among us --- as the old poem goes ---have an extra stumbling block between them and their freedom.

The corporations that we have been dealing with "as" our governments set "Public Policies" which are then enumerated into Administrative Code --- as in "Federal Code" and State of State Statutes.

In order to become Public Law these Public Policies/Administrative Codes have to be published in the Congressional Record and enumerated in the CFR and enrolled. Titles 17 through 50 have never passed this test, because the so-called Revised Statutes have never been enumerated and enrolled.

The point of this is that Title XXXVII (37) which causes all the problems for civilian "Uniformed Officers" is part of the Revised Statutes that have never been rendered into Public Law. They remain merely the private "policy" of the governmental services corporations masquerading as our government.

So--- all the "requirements" that doctors and lawyers and Indian Chiefs be "registered" and/or licensed, or that they have to belong to some club or union like the American Bar Association or be approved as a member of the American Medical Association are nothing more than Public Policy of a corporation and its literal franchises, the States of States organizations.
People think its "law" but it's not.

That is the First Issue.

The Second Issue is that a corporation does have the right to set Public Policy for itself and its employees. Your employer can make you wear an ugly brown uniform and an orange gingham apron as a condition of your employment.

In this case, they can demand that in order to take advantage of company-sponsored insurance, their employees can only receive treatment from a "licensed" professional the Company approves of and licenses for that purpose.

So who are their employees?

Obviously, all the federal civilian and military workers and their dependents.

But, thanks to the Great Fraud, they also claim that everyone who has ever been "registered" in their system is a corporate franchisee, with the result that they claim that all Social Security participants are government employees and subject to their rules, too.

You can "retire" from this presumption any time you like, but you also need to know that this is being presumed against you before you have any motivation to object and notify Social Security and the IRS and the rest of the alphabet soups that you made "a mistake" and/or that you have "retired".

With nearly everyone enrolled by fraud and error in their corporation's "Social Security" program they have a mighty hammer to use against us until we "retire" and serve notice of our return to our birthright political status, or serve notice that we made a mistake and were not meaning to or required to enroll in Social Security. Or both.

The end result is that if you are seeking medical care and expect Social Security to pay for it or Medicare or Medicaid or any other government program, the Company has a right to demand that the provider is "licensed" and meets their criteria. Which they do.

So they enforce Title 37 even though it isn't Public Law via de facto commercial contract and coercion under monopoly inducement.
This cuts down the choice of "covered" service providers and also "covered" services, so that even if Doctor A has a cure for cancer, people diagnosed with cancer will be obliged to go to Doctor B, whose services are covered under the Company insurance, aka, Medicare, etc., and their treatment options will be limited in the same way that their choice of doctors or lawyers is limited: by commercial contract and coercion under monopoly inducement.

As a further inducement, hospitals and clinics which receive government corporation grants and aid are forced to work only with "licensed health care professionals" operating as civilian uniformed officers --- unpaid employees of the government monopoly.

You can go to any physician you like, licensed or unlicensed, in a public (licensed) capacity or private (unlicensed) capacity, but you have to pay for it yourself. You can also obtain any service or undergo any treatment you like, so long as you pay for it yourself.

Doctors who wish to conduct their business as "private physicians" may do so, too, so long as they provide all their own services and equipment and operate their own clinics as private enterprises, and of course, they can't accept Medicare or other government program insurance for services.

It is the "Company Store" phenomenon as recorded by Tennessee Ernie Ford singing, "Sixteen tons, and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt! St. Peter dontcha call me 'cause I can't go! I owe my soul to the Company Store!"

In this case, the monopolistic corporations serving in place of your lawful government, are forcing you and millions of others to receive their services and only their services at the price and under the conditions they dictate.

They have already taken all the money you might have otherwise had to spend on medical services as taxes over the course of your working life, and now they want to dictate who you can receive service from and how much you can pay for such service and which services you can access.

Lawyers and Indian Chiefs are in the same bind, more or less.
You don't have to be a Bar Member unless you want to work for "the government" or one of its "franchises", but since they have worked it to arbitrarily define almost everyone as a "franchise" belonging to their corporation, the vast bulk of the work is only available to Bar Attorneys.

Similar to the hospitals receiving "government" grants, the courts can only employ Bar Attorneys as officers of the court, because that is what the Company policy dictates.

You can be a private lawyer, called a "Counselor-at-Law" and you can assist your customers (not clients) to navigate whatever jurisdictions or processes are required, but its an uphill go, because most people don't know the difference between a "Bar Attorney" and a "Counselor-at-Law" and so don't have sense enough to seek your services out.

And meanwhile, the Company is ruthlessly passing more policies that make sure that only Bar Attorneys can use all the services and facilities of the courts, while you have to provide all your own clerks and receptionists and paralegal services.

We are dealing with two oppressive old-style monopoly-interest parent corporations acting "as" our government, and while we can --- and some of us do -- continue to operate as private and independent health care professionals and lawyers and tribal chiefs, our customer base is shrinking and the options that people have are shrinking, too, until we all wake up and operate the lawful government we are heir to.

The THINGS in Washington, DC, and all those THINGS operating in your State Capitols are only corporations like J.C. PENNY and Dairy Queen, and they actually have no more authority or lawful control over your lives than any other corporations --- so long as you make it your business to hold them to their limitations and to exercise your own rights and prerogatives.

Begin by reclaiming your own Trade Name and all your Assumed NAMES and removing them to a permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth State.

And then get busy and boot up your State Jural Assembly.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

23 hrs ·

Bingo, Crime and Politics
My article the other day mentioned the fact that political parties are lobbying organizations and need to be regulated the same way that other lobbyists are scrutinized and limited. Color that a timely end to all the shenanigans, the Diebold Machines, and the Clinton Foundation.

For some reason, that idea came as a huge surprise to many people who had never thought of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party as political lobbies.

And the next thought that arose like a lightning bolt was: "OMG! They are supposed to be lobbying Congress, not running it!"

Bingo!
In the lawful American Government structure, there are no political parties per se. There are opinions and there are those who support those opinions in an organized fashion for purposes of debate --- the Federalists vs. the Anti-Federalists, for example, but there are no permanent, organized, fund-raising political parties.

Political parties and the billions of dollars of graft and criminality that go with them are the creatures of the Territorial United States Government and its brand of Territorial "United States" Congress. They are part of the Territorial "democracy" that somehow never achieves a mandate, not part of the actual government owed to the States and People of this country.

So why do we put up with political parties at all? They have come ashore on our land and soil and had a "party" all right --- 150 years worth of "partying" at our expense.

These obnoxious lobbyists pushing their "agendas" back and forth on Capitol Hill have no reason to be there, and should be offshore in some place like the Virgin Islands or at their new IRS Headquarters on the Mariana Islands, plotting how best to convince our Congress to spend our money.

Instead, they have been masquerading as our Congress and passing themselves off as our "representatives" and the only limits to their bad behavior and deceits have been what they thought they could get away with and whatever curbs the demands of their differing agendas have applied.

The Democrats, if you look at their voting history, have a long tradition of stealing our money and assets to provide bribes and pay-offs to their constituents, and then, an equally long history of stabbing those same constituents in the back. This is so marked, so predictable, that I think of Democrats in terms of passive-aggressive psychosis. Donkeys, indeed.

The Republicans, if you look at their voting history, have a long tradition of promoting big business, manipulating commodities, services, stock markets, and currencies, and all aimed at control and profit, profit, profit. But they suffer from their own brand of mental illness and can't tell when enough is a enough; gluttony and compulsive hedonistic tendencies take over and they consistently squander the Greater Good for the sake of petty profits and short term goals.

Elephants are simply big benign animals that are not subject to any appetite compulsions that I know of; pigs should be the logical Republican emblems instead, if logic and voting records have anything to do with it.

But what do you expect from lobbyists? Leadership? Morals?
That's like expecting a hired cheerleader to earn a Nobel Prize in Physics.

No, the "Missing Piece" is you and your Congress, and that has been the missing piece for a long, long time.
These Territorial Yahoos are not supposed to be encamped on Capitol Hill running rampant and spending your money. They are supposed to be lobbying your Congress to spend your money. And you? You are supposed to be sending your own Deputies-- accountable fiduciary officers of your respective States-- to conduct your business in Washington, DC.

Until you wake up and take back your own birthright nationality and non-citizen political status, and until you attend to your own business, boot up your own Jural Assemblies, reconstitute the Federal States of States, and call your own Continental Congress into Session, this is the Mad House scenario we've got, where unaccountable lobbyists pretend to "represent" you and also pretend to have your authority and your permission to do whatever they want, which is only limited by what they can get away with.

Here is an example of what happens when people get fed up enough with lawlessness and idiots "representing" them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_GGCgFij3s



We have a good system of Law and Governance provided for us by our ancestors. All we have to do is operate in our natural capacity and take the responsibility for exercising our rights and running the lawful government we are heir to. No insurrections. No arguments. No way for your employees, including "your" hired lobbyists, to say one word about it.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

Yesterday at 1:57 PM ·


As Things Now Stand
The assets of the bankrupt States of States (Territorial United States) and the liquidated STATES OF STATES (Municipal United States) have been claimed and rolled into the associated State Trusts doing business as, for example, the Maine State (Trust) and Wisconsin State (Trust) since 2016.

This was done by the Priority Creditors to protect the assets from the Secondary Creditors --- international banks.

Meantime, the guilty government of France has launched "The Republic for the United States of America" as a replacement Territorial Government and the guilty UK Government has launched THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA as a replacement for the Municipal Government.

And they have both proposed, apparently with Mr. Trump's ignorant blessing, to continue paying themselves with our money, based on borrowing against our assets, without our permission and in fact against our actual instructions.

Therefore, as of yesterday, all the State Trusts were rolled over in-to the actual sovereign States and both The Republic for the United States of America and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA were hit with Agricultural Liens and seized upon.

Apparently, neither the UK nor France have learned that "No means no." and they have somehow convinced Mr. Trump that the Operation of Law related to Delegated Authorities doesn't work with the regularity of gravity.

Even though it does.

Their attempt to continue the same old scam on a different day has been thwarted and our assets are now safely off their playing field. From here on in, it becomes a matter of head-to-head debate.

When the Donor and the Heir to an Estate held in trust are one-in-the-same, that person can act as the Donor to collapse or amend the trust, or as the Heir to receive benefit from it. The Trustees in the middle have nothing to say about the actions of the Donor and must obey.

In our case we were coerced and defrauded into unknowingly becoming Donors of our Estates and conveniently not told about all the actions taken by the Trustees acting "for" us. We were, as the saying goes, kept in the dark and fed horseshit for a very long time.

Emerging into the bright light of day, it appears that although our Donor status was engineered within a few days after we were born and were still helpless, and that this was accomplished via deliberate falsification of our public records, the equal presumption that we intended to be the Beneficiaries of our own Estates was not deduced by our brilliant Trustees.

So the Donors have "come back from the dead" and made our Will in the matter explicit and clear: yes, we are the Heirs of our own Estates. We didn't give them away to England nor to France nor to Donald Trump, for that matter. Sorry. There has been a mistake.

And this Ship of State is not headed where we want it to go.

So, Trustees, get your girdles on and prepare to do some honest work.
High above the squabbling of commercial corporations masquerading as the governments of nations when in fact they are merely "service providers", there exist actual sovereign States and Governments.

In this country, each actual State is sovereign and unincorporated.
Our actual Government in the international jurisdiction, The United States of America, is also unincorporated.
We bear the actual responsibility, and therefore, we are the Powerholders.
Since those who formerly held the Delegated Powers have plotted to vacate the constitutional agreements --apparently thinking that that would give them even more liberty to plunder on our shores--- we have called them on it.
The Federal States of States were disabled during the bogus "Civil War" and "held in abeyance" --- so color them gone, along with the original Constitution.

The Territorial Government went bankrupt this past year, as did the Municipal Government in 2015. Count both of them gone, along with whatever ragged claims they had to any constitutional authority at all.

The so-called "International Organizations" which have proposed to replace the Territorial and Municipal Governments owed to this country have been rebuffed and the actual government, The United States of America [Unincorporated] has accepted back the Delegated Powers, and has extended Donald Trump a month-by-month contract and bond, enabling him to get his ducks in order.

The Trustees, both the Queen of England and the Pope, have been given more than adequate Notice and Demand from the Donors that continued interference in our affairs and sequestration of our assets is not acceptable. They are under demand and so is the "Congress" in whatever capacity it pretends to continue to exist and operate -- to deliver our assets back to us and to our control without further obfuscation or delay.

Anything less will be considered a criminal Breach of Trust and will appear so before the entire world.

Delivery and funding of basic government services under Mr. Trump's direction is to continue, including the funding of public and military pensions, which includes Social Security.

Congress does not have access to our assets to borrow against, so we hope that wherever that $716 billion in war-making expenditures was going to come from, they are prepared to ante it up all by themselves. Perhaps they could use some of the over $20 trillion that has been embezzled.

Pope Francis, the Vatican Chancery Court, the Roman Curia, the Queen and Westminster are all under demand to make amends to The United States of America and to our States and People for the great wrongs which have been practiced against us. It is in keeping with the Double Golden Jubilee that all should be returned, free and clear of all debt or encumbrance. It is also in keeping with established Law that those who have been harmed by fraud and breach of trust are owed additional compensation for their innocent suffering and loss: we are thinking now of the many millions of Americans who have paid "federal income taxes" they never owed and "mortgages" they never owed and "utility bills" they never owed, either.

We have suggested full disclosure of the circumstance and facts, allowing individual Americans to choose whether they wish to be considered State Nationals or British Citizens, and following that election for there to be a full and permanent and internationally recognized severance of all other legal presumptions created by the purposeful falsification of our public records and the pernicious offering of adhesion contracts disguised as "government mandates".

We note that although the Queen's Territorial Government has widely described itself as being a "democracy" it has yet to establish a single public mandate for its existence, much less any of the actions which it has taken to cause so much pain, misery, disruption, theft, and war for profit.

Again, if there is any question on this point, we suggest that Americans be offered full disclosure of the history and the facts, and be allowed to participate in free elections to determine whether they wish to live in a "democracy" sans mandate or in their own State Republics.

There is no need for war, only a great need for new understandings and an honest foundation for going forward.

Our assets need to be returned by our Trustees, so that we can operate our own lawful government without any undo interference or financial manipulation. We are not proposing any great disruption of the world banking system nor are we proposing a lot of physical action moving or removing assets on deposit, but we do require the return of title and access to our assets.

While it was laughed at by everyone on Capitol Hill except its lonely sponsor, the original NESARA provisions should be accepted and passed by those few members of the "Congress" who are actually eligible to vote on the matter and the rest of the "Congress" should be ordered to fully fund every iota of it. "Ordered" we say, since every Bar Member currently sitting in the "US Congress" is under the command of the Queen and obligated to do exactly as she wishes.

Passing and fully funding the original un-amended NESARA legislation would at least be a token of repentance and renewed Good Faith between the UK and the American States.

We note that the Law supporting the originally proposed NESARA has already been enabled and that all that is necessary is a swift kick in the keisters of the American Bar Association members and our permission to fund it. Consider that permission granted.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

9 hrs ·


Lions, and Tigers, and Bears....and oh, my! World Trusts!
First, there was the "Unum Sanctum" --- "One Sacred" Trust, published in 1302. It gradually gained traction and assets and network connectivity that spanned the Globe.

Like most human endeavors, it had its upsides and its downsides....

Upsides include a global postal and banking system which allows us to communicate and to trade on a global scale. Those strawberries from Ecuador that you are eating in January would not be possible without the work of the Unum Sanctum Trust.

The idea of public hospitals and public charities and public schools for the masses are all the work of the Unum Sanctum Trust. The idea of foundations devoted to things like Public Broadcasting and Art Museums and Public Libraries---- all from the Unum Sanctum Trust.

In fact, much of the modern world as we know it, and much of the good that has been accomplished, has in one way or another been guided or implemented or expedited or planned by the Unum Sanctum Trust and we take this all for granted as if things like the Postal Service just sprang up out of the ground like mushrooms in the fall.

Not so. It took many generations of sacrifice and inspiration and donations by --- largely Catholic supporters --- to make all this possible.

And now for the downside..... over many generations, things got out of control and the power and connectivity and wealth of the Unum Sanctum Trust began to be abused for political and criminal purposes. The so-called "Middle Crown" of the Trust, the Romanus Pontifex was dissolved in 2011 as a result.

And then we had the ill-fated One People's Public Trust --- the OPPT, organized as a result of the work of the Paradigm Project --- an attempt to "take over" the assets and resources of the Unum Sanctum Trust and redefine it and garner political support by giving away little dribs and drabs of assets while retaining the vast bulk of the "foreclosed upon" assets for purposes unknown.

This is in common terms known as "rolling over" a trust. When one trust ends, another begins. Or so that theory and means of dealing with the situation has it.

It is one of the great ironies of the world that Bar Attorneys are generally speaking the only ones who know how to foreclose assets, but they also have no standing as owners with respect to the assets they foreclose. They are the eternal middlemen, foreclosed themselves from entering into the Kingdom.

Well, according to some of the most ancient texts on Earth, somebody had to be the Gatekeepers.

And then, there is "Manna World Holding Trust" that has been making a bid to take over and control all the assets of the world.

Same story as OPPT, different day, more sinister provenance.

Some hackers at MIT in concert with certain loose canons in the so-called "defense community" developed a means to transfer information from the current banking system and lock down accounts all over the world. They have since been thumping themselves on the back for their illegal acts and touting their own horns as if they have done a great thing.
Not.

We expect that when the dust settles they will all be tracked down and scrutinized and while they may make some claims that they did it for "national security", I believe that a very different motive will emerge. They are trying to roll over the World Trust Assets, just like OPPT. Only they serve their own masters and their own peculiar agendas.

Apparently, our simple idea that the assets need to go back to the countries and to the people to whom the assets naturally belong is too hard for all these power-hungry genius-types to grasp.

And in cases where nobody knows any longer who the owners are, simply put the unclaimed assets into an investment fund and use the proceeds to fund infrastructure in underdeveloped countries and to provide aid to those affected by natural catastrophe or war?

Once they deal with the fact that the American assets --- as in our assets --- are not "unclaimed" and that our government isn't in any kind of "abeyance", the larger part of all the land and other assets they were planning to divide among themselves disappears from the table and the whole issue gets cut down to size.

And the World Trust is no longer a single juggernaut poised to destroy all national governments and impose a single world government administered by some kind of global "meritocracy", either. It dissolves like a paper tiger in the rain, melting back into the National Trusts that are owed to the people of every country.

Sometimes going forward means going back, retracing and rethinking. A single World Trust --- or even half a dozen such trusts -- is a bad idea, because it concentrates too much power in the hands of too few people, who then become subject to the corrupting nature of such power.
Instead of universal brotherhood it resulted in universal enslavement.

So scratch that one. Erase the drawing board. Start over.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

9 hrs ·


The Department of Injustice
I am re-posting this seminal article from "Four Winds" for all those who need to know the nature and status of the "Department of Justice" --- and the fact that it's an Executive Branch entity not connected with the Judicial Branch of government at all.

This makes the "Department of Justice" an instrumentality of political policy and executive power and divorces it (from inception no less) from any actual role vaguely related to ensuring any kind of justice for anyone, including the President of the United States.

This is why you are continuing to see the DOJ Witchhunt in the national media: it is a political organ, and always has been. Ironically, as you will see, DOJ is also meant to be a creature under the thumb and forefinger of the President, and a means for him to exercise Executive power.

Always remember that your actual land jurisdiction government, The United States of America, [Unincorporated] has never been at war, never been bankrupt, and is not subject to any form of martial law.

And when you reclaim your birthright, neither are you affected by any of this drama.

All this "reconstruction" --- is within and a function of the Federal Government operating under Delegated Powers. And now that the Delegated Powers have
reverted by Operation of Law to the Delegators of those "Powers" it is time for us to settle this hash once and for all.

It is left to us, those who are awake and alive, to determine the fate of the "Federal Government" and finish not only its reconstruction, but determine its role in the modern world. Read on--- and all our many thanks to the original "Four Winds" who dedicated many years of worthy scholarship to the effort:

U.S. Under Martial Law Since The Civil War
Four Winds
Please be aware that what you are about to read will be very difficult to digest. All our life we have been living under a lie to keep us enslaved. The truth is now known.

The problem is, what do we do now? Like you, I became aware of this same truth today and I don’t where to go from here.

I learned judges in California are not “public officials” I wanted to know why, if they are elected by the people.
Now I know why, and so will you after reading this information.

It will take many educated and creative minds to solve our problem. I pray you are up to the challenge.

Further proof that martial law remained in effect after the Civil War can be found in the “Congressional Globe” (now called the “Congressional Record”). The following are excerpts from the April 20th through 29th, 1870 “Congressional Globe” concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT MARTIAL LAW nearly five years after the end of the Civil War:

“The following bureaus shall be established in this department [the Department of Justice]: a Bureau of International Law, a Bureau of Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Naval Law, a Bureau of Postal Law, a Bureau of Land Management Law.”

Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:
“This Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and the cognizance of all subjects of military and naval law, except that portion of the administration of military justice which relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the supervision of records.

“If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of military law which relates to military justice.

“In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of the union, their right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions, will be limited.

The Judge Advocate General will perform duties administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.
“But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been proposed in this Bill. If this had been done, the Bill would have encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get through Congress.

“But so far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent, this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government. It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers of the United States.”

WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT:
These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials. This appeased the military leaders, who didn’t have the foggiest idea as to what was really going on.

Had the traitors fleeced the military of all their powers during their tenure in office, the military would have realized and possibly taken some military action. But as nothing was happening at the hen house, they slept through this entire situation which resulted in an overthrow of the Constitution — an overthrow under which government pretended to operate in 1933, and under which it continues to pretend to operate today.

The traitors were now faced with a very serious problem, namely, what to do with the powers of the Office of the Judge Advocate General when their tenure in office expired. And they solved this dilemma by adding the following amendments, detailed in that same “Congressional Globe”:

Congressman Jenks: I move to amend Section 3 by inserting the word “naval” before the words “Judge Advocate General”.
The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelburg stated:
I would suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this Bill by inserting after the words “the Naval Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General” the words “who shall hereafter be known as Naval Solicitor”.
Mr. Jenks: I have no objection to that amendment.
This amendment was also agreed to, and the Office of the Judge Advocate General became known as the Naval Solicitor. Thus, when the existing tenure was over, the new office would have a different set of rules and regulations so that the Bill accomplished the great purpose which it had in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government without the power of the Office of the Judge Advocate General getting in their way.

This was a necessary step to bring the President into the position of dictator over America.

But they had one other problem facing them, namely, DIRECT ACCESS to the Treasury for the Department of Justice without interference. They accomplished this by the following three sections of the Bill:

“…The Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to make all necessary rules and regulations for the government….

“…The Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making appropriations, past March 3rd, 1859, as provides that money drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby repealed….

“…The Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the United States, shall be exercised by the Attorney General….”

It is important here to remember that under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the District Courts of the United States are:

“…hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise and all such orders and decrees and to issue such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this Act.”

It is here that we find out that the district attorneys, marshals, clerks and other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice. That seems an obvious statement, given the state of the nation today. But the REAL PROBLEM — given the broad scope of powers granted the District Courts under the Trading with the Enemy Act — is that the Department of Justice is *NOT* a part of the Judicial Branch of Government!

According to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the Department of
Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are

*ALL* under the Executive Branch of Government.

All of the above departments are under the Executive Branch–which raises quite a few questions about the balance of powers between the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches of government.

How can this be? There is no balance of power under a declared state of emergency. And we’ve been living under a declared state of emergency ever since the Civil War began, and have been living under a declared state of martial law ever since the Reconstruction Act.

This overthrow of the Constitution occurred long before the War Powers Act, and if we are going back in history to find our roots of legality — and if we stop our search when we reach the War Powers Act — we are NOT going to succeed in this venture.

Where is the separation of powers if the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch? Shouldn’t it be part of the Judiciary? The answer, of course, is yes; but it’s not. Again, just check Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code. There is no Judiciary!

If only Congress has the power to regulate Commerce, under Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, why are the Department of Commerce and the Department of Transportation under the Executive branch and not under the Legislative branch?

And if only the Congress has the power to coin money, according to the Constitution, why is the Department of Treasury under the Executive branch?

The Commerce Department (from Title 5):
“…part of the Executive branch of federal government, headed by a Cabinet member, the Secretary of Commerce, which is concerned with promoting domestic and international business and commerce.”

To further illustrate the take-over by the Executive branch of government via martial law rule, the following offices, bureaus, divisions, and organizations are under the Department of Justice. And remember, the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch — NOT under the judicial branch.

The Office of Solicitor General
The Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Drug Enforcement Agency
The Bureau of Prisons
Immigration and Naturalization
United States Marshal Service
Office of Justice Program
United States Parole Commission
United States National Central Bureau
The Office of the Pardon Attorney
Executive Office of the United States Attorney
Criminal Division
Civil Division
Anti-Trust Division
Civil Rights Division
Tax Division
Environmental and Natural Resource Division
Community Relations Services
Foreign Claim Settlement Division
Executive Office of United States Trustees
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Justice Management Division
Office of Legal Counsel
Office of Policy Development
Office of Legislative Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Office of Liaison Services
Office of Intelligence and Policy Review
Office of International Affairs
Office of the Inspector General
Office of Professional Responsibility; and
Interpol — (Note: Interpol is a private corporation, yet it comes under (in this country) the Executive branch of government.)

In my opinion: if the matter of the repeal of the Reconstruction Act and the old H.R. 1328 are not addressed, we will remain in a state of declared martial law. But few people do any research anymore, and even fewer read the results of research done by others. Yes, we are already, and have been all our lives, living under declared martial law.

The source of this law is from 1875.
‑CITE‑ 2 USC Sec. 118
‑EXPCITE‑
TITLE 2
CHAPTER 4
‑HEAD‑
Sec. 118. Actions against officers for official acts
‑STATUTE‑

In any action brought against any person for or on account of anything done by him while an officer of either House of Congress in the discharge of his official duty, in executing any order of such House, the United States attorney for the district within which the action is brought, on being thereto requested by the officer sued, shall enter an appearance in behalf of such officer; and all provisions of the eighth section of the Act of July 28, 1866, entitled ‘An Act to protect the revenue, and for other purposes’, and also all provisions of the sections of former Acts therein referred to, so far as the same relate to the removal of suits, the withholding of executions, and the paying of judgments against revenue or other officers of the United States, shall become applicable to such action and to all proceedings and matters whatsoever connected therewith, and the defense of such action shall thenceforth be conducted under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General.

‑SOURCE‑
(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, Sec. 8, 18 Stat. 401; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 1, 62 Stat. 909.)
‑REFTEXT‑REFERENCES IN TEXT
The provisions of section 8 of act July 28, 1866, ch. 298, 14 Stat. 329, referred to in text, were contained generally in R.S.Sec. 643, which was incorporated in the former Judicial Code, Sec. 33, and was repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 39, 62 Stat. 992. See sections 1442, 1446, and 1447 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Other provisions referred to were contained in R.S. Sec. 771, 989, which were also repealed by act June 25, 1948. See sections 509, 547, and 2006, respectively, of Title 28.

‑CHANGE‑
CHANGE OF NAME
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted ‘United States attorney’ for ‘district attorney’. See section 541 of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
‑CROSS‑
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Judgment against certain public officers, satisfaction of, see Rule 69, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
‑SECREF‑
SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
This section is referred to in section 118a of this title.
‑END‑
Statutes Relating to Commissions, Appointments, etc.
Sections in this file relate to required commissions, oaths, etc., for officers and employees of United States government and the government of the District of Columbia. All sections have been pasted directly from the 1996 CD-ROM edition of the United States Code produced and distributed by the Government Printing Office. Notes in Italics that follow the sections list regulations for each section listed in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules.It is significant that the “Seal of the United States” is no longer affixed to commissions of “judicial officers” appointed by the President with advice and consent of the Senate; commissions are filed with the Department of Justice under the D.O.J. seal, which is an executive seal. This is suggestive that there are no longer any Article III[constitutional] judges in the United States.
-CITE-
4 USC Sec. 41 01/16/96

HERE’S THER REAL KICKER
THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS

The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates authority to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C. Sections 331-335). Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state government. Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a rebellion. Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under federal laws. Section 333 was enacted to implement the Fourteenth Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

7 hrs ·


To Be Clear About the Paperwork
Destry Payne did not do the paperwork I recommend that every American do.
(See Article 928 on my website: www.annavonreitz.com.)
Bruce Doucette didn't do the paperwork I recommended, either.
Neither did Stephen Nalty.
Neither did Ammon Bundy.
Neither did the Hammonds.
Neither did LaVoy Finicum.
Neither did Steve Curry.

I could go on all day long listing all the people who have listened with only half an ear to what I am saying, and who have paid the price for not doing a few hours of due diligence and maybe a half-day chore of recording some paperwork.

All these men thought they knew better. They all went their own way. They all trespassed into Federal Jurisdiction. They all suffered the consequences.

Rain falls from the sky. Water runs downhill.

We are living in a bogus state of manufactured political "war", which is considerably more phony than any $3 bill,

but until you realize what is being promoted against you and by whom and what, it is not possible to gain control of the situation or take any action to correct it.

Now, some people have done the paperwork and have still been arrested by highway patrolmen and so on.
Best be aware that there is no automatic computer-generated connection between what you have on file at the Recorder's Office and what the police have on their screens. You not only have to record it, you have to bring it forward. (Someday, hopefully quite soon, there will be a database connection, but not yet.)

When people do this and knowledgeably defend their position as landlubbers, miracles are happening.

Mortgages are being set-aside and "paid off". People are leaving jails, set free because they are not subject to statutory law. The Indemnity Bond is being honored.

The police, the judges, and the "Machine" are slowly waking up along with the rest of America, and beginning to come to heel, but these are early days and these atrocities against our States and our People have been going on for a long time.

Imagine that you are at the helm of a Supertanker far out at sea and you are trying to execute a 180 degree turn around and reversal? Even at "Full Speed" that kind of change takes time.

So is the paperwork a Silver Bullet?
Yes, so long as you don't murder, rape, steal or do other things that damage actual people and property. And so long as you get it on the Public Record prior to running afoul of THEIR law. The Truth will set you free, so long as you establish what your truth is and provide proof of it.

[Bigjon]

Anna von Reitz

7 hrs ·


Cancellation of All Powers of Attorney
Many people have been asking me, "Well, how do I cancel Powers of Attorney that I may or may not even know exist?" You record your Cancellation of all such Powers and make it another Extension of your Deed of Re-Conveyance.

Here is a bare-bones example of how it needs to be set up and what it needs to say:
"All prior Powers of Attorney granted by Anna Maria Riezinger are removed, cancelled, and permanently revoked effective June 6, 1956.

Anna Maria Riezinger is Attorney-in-Fact for all purposes related to the administration of her estates and all correspondence should be addressed to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652."

by:______________________________ this ____day of _______ 2018.

Public Notary Witness
Alaska
Matanuska-Susitna County

I____________________, a Public Notary, was visited today by the woman known to me to be Anna Maria Riezinger, and she did affirm and sign this Cancellation of All Powers of Attorney in my presence for the purposes stated.

by:____________________________Public Notary; my Commission expires on:______________________.
____________________________________

To my readers--- notice that the place this notary function is taking place in is "Alaska" --- the sovereign State, and also that it is taking place in "Matanuska-Susitna County", both of which are unincorporated entities.

Not the State of Alaska, not County of Matanuska-Susitna, Not a Borough. Not a City. Or any other incorporated entity.

And also note, that because this is taking place in the land jurisdiction "State" and in the land jurisdiction "County", this is a Public Notary function and not a "Notary Public" function.