Page 15 of 40 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 393

Thread: Kavanaugh accuser's lawyer is vice chair of soros funded org opposing kavanaugh

  1. #141
    Militant Wing of the Salvation Army midnight rambler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    24,445
    Thanks
    27,799
    Thanked 12,865 Times in 7,916 Posts

    Re: Brett Kavanaugh turns over calendar from summer of '82 to push back on allegation

    Third accuser's ex-boyfriend surfaces, "She threatened me and my family*...she's not credible."

    *to the point of being a stalker (given the time frame involved)?

    A whole lot more shit on the Dim side than vice versa.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/ex-boyfriend-filed-restraining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348

    "A man is to be held accountable for the thoughts he chooses to entertain." --Richard Alan Miller

    "If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable-what then?" --George Orwell

    "It's not a matter of what is true (reality) that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true (reality)." --Henry Kissinger

  2. #142
    Unobtanium EE_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    1,086
    Thanked 7,956 Times in 4,576 Posts

    Re: Brett Kavanaugh turns over calendar from summer of '82 to push back on allegation

    I say this whole scam falls apart tomorrow. The Democrats have gone too far this time. This could be a gift to flip the midterms to the Republicans Bigly!
    DON'T TAKE THE VACCINE!

    THE SHIT HAS HIT THE FAN!

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EE_ For This Useful Post:

    Ares (26th September 2018),midnight rambler (26th September 2018)

  4. #143
    Iridium Jewboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    9,985
    Thanks
    5,777
    Thanked 7,912 Times in 4,284 Posts

    Re: Brett Kavanaugh turns over calendar from summer of '82 to push back on allegation

    Quote Originally Posted by EE_ View Post
    I say this whole scam falls apart tomorrow. The Democrats have gone too far this time. This could be a gift to flip the midterms to the Republicans Bigly!
    Repub-controlled White House, Senate, and House and this shit show got this far?

    Repubs all deserve to lose now.

    Bring on the Civil War...
    I'm the infamous Fred of GIM - Jewboo kindly turned over his account to me.

  5. #144
    Unobtanium EE_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    1,086
    Thanked 7,956 Times in 4,576 Posts

    Re: Brett Kavanaugh turns over calendar from summer of '82 to push back on allegation

    Quote Originally Posted by Jewboo View Post
    Repub-controlled White House, Senate, and House and this shit show got this far?

    Repubs all deserve to lose now.

    Bring on the Civil War...
    Repubs only let the Ford case get this far, because the Dems/liberal media were trying to turn the woman vote against them if they didn't treat Ford right.
    If they do not get Kavanaugh confirmed now, you might get that civil war after Repubs lose the house and senate.
    DON'T TAKE THE VACCINE!

    THE SHIT HAS HIT THE FAN!

  6. #145
    Unobtanium EE_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    1,086
    Thanked 7,956 Times in 4,576 Posts

    Re: Brett Kavanaugh turns over calendar from summer of '82 to push back on allegation

    A man has come forward and confessed it was him that had the contact with Ford. Sen. Grassley reported on this and there has been two interviews with this man.
    If this pans out, it's over and Kavanaugh will sail through his confirmation. The Democrats will be in ruin. The red wave will become a red tsunami. Stay tuned....
    DON'T TAKE THE VACCINE!

    THE SHIT HAS HIT THE FAN!

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EE_ For This Useful Post:

    Ares (27th September 2018),Neuro (26th September 2018)

  8. #146
    Potmetal Cebu_4_2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    25,532
    Thanks
    4,874
    Thanked 6,457 Times in 4,275 Posts

    Wholee Fuk!

    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee as it prepares to hear dramatic testimony from judge and his accuser

    • Two different men independently said they had the encounter with Christine Ford
    • Ford says she was 15 when Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed, covered her mouth while she screamed, and tried to remove her clothes while his friend watched
    • Now two men are both claiming they were involved in the encounter with Ford, not Kavanaugh
    • The Senate Judiciary Committee have interviewed both but not identified them
    • Ford has maintained she believes it was Kavanaugh and passed a polygraph test

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Kavanaugh.html
    Jackie did it and you know it!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Cebu_4_2 For This Useful Post:

    madfranks (27th September 2018)

  10. #147
    Potmetal Cebu_4_2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    25,532
    Thanks
    4,874
    Thanked 6,457 Times in 4,275 Posts

    Re: Wholee Fuk!

    Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for Kavanaugh


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...kavanaugh.html

    As an extraordinary series of uncorroborated, lurid last-minute allegations threatens to derail his confirmation to the Supreme Court, nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Ford, the California professor accusing him of sexually assaulting her more than three decades ago, are set to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday morning.

    The proceedings may be upended by late-breaking developments: In a statement released Wednesday evening, Judiciary Committee Republicans revealed that on Monday, they conducted their "first interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his [sic] complaint." They conducted a second interview the next day.

    On Wednesday, Republicans said in the statement, they received a "more in-depth written statement from the man interviewed twice previously who believes he, not Judge Kavanuagh, had the encounter in question with Dr. Ford." GOP investigators also spoke on the phone with another man making a similar claim.

    Those claims, too, are a matter of dispute. On Thursday morning, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham told “Fox & Friends” that one of those individuals is “crazy as a loon … the one that I’ve heard about, I think, is not reliable.” He did not name the individual, and the committee would not release further details about either person when reached for comment by Fox News. Another source, though, said “there’s no reason to doubt they’re both of sound mind and are both sincere in their claims.”

    Ford has previously said there is "zero chance" she would have confused Kavanaugh for anyone else.

    In response, an aide to Democrats on the Judiciary Committee reportedly unloaded on Senate Republicans: "Republicans are flailing," the aide said, according to NBC News. "They are desperately trying to muddy the waters. ... Twelve hours before the hearing they suggest two anonymous men claimed to have assaulted her. Democrats were never informed of these assertions in interviews, in violation of Senate rules."

    The aide, before again calling for an FBI probe into Ford's accusations, added, "This is shameful and the height of irresponsibility."

    But Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, shot back on Twitter late Wednesday, writing, "Some might find it exceedingly difficult to imagine Judiciary Committee Democrats expressing this complaint with straight faces."

    Some might find it exceedingly difficult to imagine Judiciary Committee Democrats expressing this complaint with straight faces.https://twitter.com/seungminkim/stat...950535169?s=21
    Seung Min Kim

    Democrats, who have already been furious over the handling of the investigation of these allegations, had not been told of the following interviews by GOP until info was publicly released tonight, per senior Democratic official. Ds had asked for all relevant evidence

    Ford first brought her allegations to the attention of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., in July, but Feinstein didn't disclose the allegations to her Senate colleagues or federal authorities until days before a crucial Judiciary Committee vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation earlier this month. Republicans have accused Feinstein's office of compromising Ford's anonymity by sitting on the allegations until she could deploy them for maximum political gain.

    The stakes for Kavanaugh could not be higher: Key swing-vote senators have said Thursday's hearing, which will begin at 10:00 a.m. ET, presents a pivotal opportunity to assess Ford's credibility and determine whether to advance Kavanaugh to the nation's highest court.
    The hearing, which for days had been in doubt, will be a chance for the public to see Ford, in person, explain in detail what she claims happened at the Maryland house party in 1982 where Kavanaugh allegedly jumped on top of her and tried to muffle her screams -- and why she didn't tell anyone about the episode until 2012.

    The proceedings will commence with opening statements from Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and ranking committee member Feinstein. After taking an oath, Ford will deliver the prepared remarks she has already provided publicly, according to a schedule provided by the committee. Each senator on the committee will then be afforded a single five-minute round of questions, with the opportunity to ask questions alternating between Democrats and Republicans.

    Polygraph examiner: Ford's responses are not indicative of deception. Mike Emanuel reports from Capitol Hill.

    Republicans have retained Rachel Mitchell, an experienced sex-crimes prosecutor, to handle some of their questioning, saying it will help avoid an overtly political atmosphere. Grassley has hammered Democrats, including Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., for "grandstanding" during the confirmation hearings earlier this month.

    Democrats have indicated they intend to ask their own questions. After Ford's testimony is completed, the process will repeat for Kavanaugh.

    "It's bad -- it's doing damage to the Supreme Court."
    - Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
    In her prepared remarks, which Ford's attorney's released in advance on Wednesday, Ford will tell senators that she "thought that Brett [Kavanaugh] was accidentally going to kill me," and "I believed he was going to rape me."

    President Trump says the 'many false charges' made against him have impacted his opinion of the allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

    She will explain that she remembers "four boys" being at the party, including one "whose name I cannot recall." The people she did name -- Kavanaugh and his classmates Mark Judge and P.J. Smyth -- have denied under penalty of felony knowing anything about the alleged episode.

    Ford will also describe one girl, "my friend Leland Ingham," as also in attendance. Ingham, in a previously released statement, has also denied knowing Kavanaugh or having information about the alleged assault.

    POLYGRAPH REPORT REVEALS APPARENT INCONSISTENCIES IN FORD'S CLAIMS
    Ford's letter to Feinstein in July, however, gave a different tally, saying that the gathering "included me and 4 others."

    Additionally, in a handwritten statement she provided the former FBI agent who administered her polygraph exam in August, Ford wrote "there were 4 boys and a couple of girls" at the party -- again apparently contradicting her letter to Feinstein.

    Republicans, through Mitchell, are expected to question Ford on the apparent discrepancies.

    Ford is also expected to tell senators that she finally decided to disclose the alleged assault during a therapy session in 2012 because during a remodeling of her house that year, she insisted on installing a "second front door" -- leaving her husband and others wondering why.

    Michael Avenatti

    @MichaelAvenatti
    Here is a picture of my client Julie Swetnick. She is courageous, brave and honest. We ask that her privacy and that of her family be respected.

    Additionally, questions have surfaced concerning the credibility of some of Kavanaugh's other accusers, who will not be present Thursday because they have not responded to overtures from committee Republicans.

    For example, Julie Swetnick, who emerged Wednesday to accuse Kavanaugh of participating in "gang rapes" and rape "trains" in the 1980s, had a restraining order filed against her by an ex-boyfriend, Politico reported.

    KAVANAUGH FIGHTS BACK, TELLS INVESTIGATORS ALLEGATIONS ARE A 'DISGRACE' THAT WILL KEEP GOOD PEOPLE OUT OF PUBLIC SERVICE

    “Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Richard Vinneccy told Politico. "I know a lot about her. ... She’s not credible at all. Not at all."

    Swetnick is represented by anti-Trump lawyer Michael Avenatti, who has refused multiple requests by the Senate Judiciary Committee to interview her in the past week. On Wednesday afternoon, 60 men and women who attended Kavanaugh's high school or sister schools signed a letter saying they had never heard of Swetnick or anything like the overt, systemic gang raping that she described.

    According to The Washington Post, both the state of Maryland and the federal government have filed since-resolved liens on her property in recent years for unpaid taxes totalling tens of thousands of dollars. It was not immediately clear exactly how Swetnick, who has held multiple security clearances relating to her work with the government, resolved both liens.

    President Trump says he supports a process to thoroughly vet Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, but questions Senate Democrats' tactics; chief White House correspondent John Roberts reports.
    Republicans, including President Trump, have repeatedly pointed out that none of the sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh has first-hand corroboration. In The New Yorker on Sunday, former Kavanaugh classmate Deborah Ramirez claimed that Kavanaugh had exposed his penis to her at a party decades ago, even as her close college friend denied ever hearing about the episode and suggested she was making the claim for political reasons.

    Ramirez, who also did not immediately respond to GOP Judiciary Committee inquiries, has acknowledged not being sure whether Kavanaugh had assaulted her until last week, after she spent days consulting with her attorney.

    Several other allegations emerged this week. On Tuesday, a constituent told the office of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., that in 1985, two "heavily inebriated men" referred to as "Brett and Mark" had sexually assaulted a "close friend" on a boat.

    The constituent, whose name was redacted in a document release by the Judiciary Committee but uncovered through tweets cited by the committee, recanted the claim Wednesday night on Twitter -- but several media outlets continued to report the allegations for hours afterwards.

    In Twitter posts, the person making the accusation had also evidently advocated removing President Trump from the White House by means of military coup. On Wednesday, a post on the accuser's Twitter account read, "Do everyone who is going crazy about what I had said I have recanted because I have made a mistake and apologize for such mistake."

    In a separate case, Kavanaugh was asked by GOP investigators this week specifically about a new claim in a letter received by Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., from an anonymous individual apparently in Denver, alleging that Kavanaugh "shoved" someone up against a wall "very aggressively and sexually" during an outing in front of four witnesses in 1998. Gardner's office received the letter on Sept. 22.

    "We're dealing with an anonymous letter about an anonymous person and an anonymous friend," Kavanaugh told committee investigators asking about the alleged episode. "It's ridiculous. Total Twilight Zone. And no, I've never done anything like that.

    "It's bad -- it's doing damage to the Supreme Court," Kavanaugh added. "It's doing damage to the country. It's doing damage to this process. It's become a total feeding frenzy, you know? Every -- just unbelievable."
    Jackie did it and you know it!

  11. #148
    Moderator madfranks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,761
    Thanks
    7,376
    Thanked 8,034 Times in 4,008 Posts

    Re: Wholee Fuk!

    Quote Originally Posted by Cebu_4_2 View Post
    Two men come forward to claim THEY had the sexual 'encounter' with Christine Ford at high school party and NOT Kavanaugh, reveals Senate Judiciary Committee as it prepares to hear dramatic testimony from judge and his accuser


    • Two different men independently said they had the encounter with Christine Ford
    • Ford says she was 15 when Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed, covered her mouth while she screamed, and tried to remove her clothes while his friend watched
    • Now two men are both claiming they were involved in the encounter with Ford, not Kavanaugh
    • The Senate Judiciary Committee have interviewed both but not identified them
    • Ford has maintained she believes it was Kavanaugh and passed a polygraph test

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Kavanaugh.html
    Well, maybe the repubs aren't just a bunch of pussies. Are they finally playing the game too?

    an aide to Democrats on the Judiciary Committee reportedly unloaded on Senate Republicans: "Republicans are flailing," the aide said, according to NBC News. "They are desperately trying to muddy the waters. ... Twelve hours before the hearing they suggest two anonymous men claimed to have assaulted her. Democrats were never informed of these assertions in interviews, in violation of Senate rules."
    This has got to be satire, the democrats can't possibly be serious in saying this. They're describing themselves in full detail, but because it's the repubs this time, it's bad. LOL
    "Liberty is so creative, and the government is so stupid, that I’m very optimistic about the future"
    - Lew Rockwell

  12. #149
    Militant Wing of the Salvation Army midnight rambler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    24,445
    Thanks
    27,799
    Thanked 12,865 Times in 7,916 Posts

    Re: Wholee Fuk!

    What a complete shitshow.
    "A man is to be held accountable for the thoughts he chooses to entertain." --Richard Alan Miller

    "If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable-what then?" --George Orwell

    "It's not a matter of what is true (reality) that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true (reality)." --Henry Kissinger

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to midnight rambler For This Useful Post:

    monty (27th September 2018)

  14. #150
    Bitcoin Miner Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,828
    Thanks
    6,611
    Thanked 8,817 Times in 4,307 Posts

    Re: Wholee Fuk!

    Quote Originally Posted by midnight rambler View Post
    What a complete shitshow.
    I haven't been able to watch as I am at work. Is it looking like the Repubs are going to lose their spine as well as their balls again?
    "Paper is poverty, it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself." --Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1788
    "The greatest threat to the state is when the people figure out they can exist without them." - Twisted Titan
    "Some Libertarians are born, the government makes the rest."
    "Voting is nothing more than a slaves suggestion box, voting on a new master every few years does not make you free."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •