High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

[joboo]

https://lh3.ggpht.com/_FoVQzQ-uj6U/S...2BExitHole.jpg
so much for the pulverization theory.......
There was a hole in the east wall of Ring C ...... approximately 310 ft from where the fuselage of the aircraft entered ..... the building." No further information is given.

http://bbcstory.blogspot.com.au/2008...ry-line-2.html

Thicker reinforced wall v.s. thinner walls. Which is why it went through more than one of them. The initial impact force is still the same.

So you get a compromise of what is instantly pulverized v.s. what remains. It all burned for a while as well.

[Serpo]

So this guy that works for IL is going against the missile narrative which makes the truthers sound crazy. Hmm. Who is he working for again?

If it is possible for a plane to do that, and they had all kinds of planes up in the air at their disposal complete with training exercises all over the place, and there's all kinds of plane debris, and planes (and people) do atomize at high velocity. 20 miles out...10 miles out....does the order still stand? Yes stand down. That was the pentagon btw.

So they smacked it with a missile, brainwashed all the witnesses, then ran into that burning mess in fire proof suits, then planted airplane parts everywhere without anyone noticing?

One side the evidence is there. The other side there is zero evidence, and it gets increasingly far fetched the more one looks at it.

They have plenty of video footage and wont show it.......means they are covering something up

[Serpo]

Thicker reinforced wall v.s. thinner walls. Which is why it went through more than one of them. The initial impact force is still the same.

So you get a compromise of what is pulverized v.s. what remains. It all burned for a while as well.

so no bodies.............

[joboo]

so no bodies.............

Like I'm saying the initial impact force was immense as indicated by the concrete wall video. 500mph.

You're not going to find anything recognizable in that level of impact.

And then it all burned in fire for hours. You're not going to find anyone in that.

[joboo]

They have plenty of video footage and wont show it.......means they are covering something up

Is it on purpose. Yes it most definitely is. Could it be to make people ramble on with wild assumptions of what it could be while ultimately not knowing?

It definitely could. It could even make them sound crazy.

Hmm...Just confiscate the video you say, and it will do that? Yup. Cool.

How bout we do that from now on? deal.....ff to sandy hook.

tada...

[Serpo]

Like I'm saying the initial impact force was immense as indicated by the concrete wall video. 500mph.

You're not going to find anything recognizable in that level of impact.

And then it all burned in fire for hours. You're not going to find anyone in that.

yes the teeth burnt down to nothing

Impact force against soft lime stone walls and steel dosnt account for a whole on the other side of the pentagon

[Serpo]

Is it on purpose. Yes it most definitely is. Could it be to make people ramble on with wild assumptions of what it could be while ultimately not knowing?

It definitely could. It could even make them sound crazy.

Hmm...Just confiscate the video you say, and it will do that? Yup. Cool.

How bout we do that from now on? deal.....ff to sandy hook.

tada...

I dont mind sounding crazy as I dont get too attached to ideas one way or an other ,but I do respect the TRUTH a great deal and the Admiral in this OP found out he was being lied too for 50 years or more.

I dont care about your opinion Joboo but I care about the Admrals opinion and you seem to want to ram your opinion down everyones throat which is an example of a hidden agenda

[Horn]

If you see three apples on a table, and form the conclusion there is three apples on a table. Is that biased?

Something tells me no.

joboo quit being a homeo-neutral posterboy for your masturbatory self.

There's no need to form conclusions above & beyond previously inflated ones.

[joboo]

yes the teeth burnt down to nothing

Impact force against soft lime stone walls and steel dosnt account for a whole on the other side of the pentagon

Burnt or shattered? They did say there were human remnants they were able to DNA trace. The imact profile is going to carry forward everything in front of it according to the area affected.

Why would a missile leave a hole like that might be a better question when it's equipped with an explosive warhead designed to blow everything apart in a wide pattern?

[Horn]

Why would a missile leave a hole like that might be a better question IF it's equipped with a explosive warhead designed to blow everything apart in a wide pattern?

Could be a dummy test to determine any number of future "bunker busting" technologies (soon to be required).

Speaking of dummy tests...