High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

[vacuum]

Its all a pile of evidence for whatever happened and as there is no photo of an incoming plane .......if there was a plane it would here in this photo..............more fast thinking..........
http://www.freeworldalliance.biz/Pic...agonImpact.jpg

There are two key things to state here.

First is that the fireball pictured above does not look like an explosive. Explosives generally combust almost instantaneously because they don't require oxygen. They are basically a flash + smoke and debris.

On the other hand, fuel will create such a fireball. It requires oxygen to burn, so the vapors will be heated and move upwards, and create a bunch of flame in a cloud. It's like the difference between a firecracker (flash + smoke) and a cup of gasoline (fireball).

So the missile must have had fuel inside of it rather than a strictly explosive load. The other possibility is that this fuel could have been pre-planted on-site.

http://beyondpoliticsand911.com/phot...from-above.jpg

Second, if the missile detonated at the exterior of the building, it would not have been able to make it through 3 rings. Was the missile inert and penetrating? Or did it explode at the exterior? These seem mutually exclusive unless it was either a special non-stock missile, or they pre-planted either the fireball explosion on-site beforehand, or they did something to make the penetration cross-section in the building.

If it was one of those really big missiles that was specially loaded with fuel, it's possible some of it could have detonated at the exterior of the building and the momentum of the rest could have created the hole. But it definitely wouldn't be an off-the-shelf missile imo.

[Horn]

But you're saying this based on information coming from people that you think are lying to you about everything.

You trust them on this data but everything else is completely fake?

Not at all.

Mine eyes and the physical evidence presented is all that I need.

[joboo]

Not at all.

Mine eyes and the physical evidence presented is all that I need.

What evidence? Who produced it? Where did you get it from?

[Horn]

What evidence? Who produced it? Where did you get it from?

Saw it on the T.V.,

I just watch the pictures, the sound is off, music on.

Tchaikovsky is a favorite.

[joboo]

Saw it on the T.V.,

I just watch the pictures, the sound is off, music on.

Tchaikovsky is a favorite.

Three frames of a grainy blob hitting the pentagon or are you talking about 1,2, & 7?

I wasn't aware you switched to another subject.

If the whole Pentag0n thing is considered to be a gigantic deception, then everything they are telling you must also be assumed to be a deception.

It can't be both ways just to make it work the way you want it to.

Oui/non?

[Horn]

A soon as I saw the slope from the highway to the base of the building.

This guy breaks it down somewhat with elevation markers.

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2.../a1-Frame1.jpg

The hole at the opposite side was ancillary.

[PatColo]

joobo, as the self-posturing 'sane & rational' 911 researcher you are, what role if any do you speculate "Arab/Muslim Jihadists" played in 911? http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/s...20%2820%29.gif

You on the other hand....and you make it racist™ on top of it all!

please quote whatever I wrote which triggered your highly tuned waycism-detector... again...

Go back and take a look.

right-o, looked again, still find no indication of your views on either what role if any you speculate "Arab/Muslim Jihadists" played in 911, nor on what specific quote written by me has triggered your highly tuned waycism-detector... again...

please advise,

[joboo]

A soon as I saw the slope from the highway to the base of the building.

This guy breaks it down somewhat with elevation markers.

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2.../a1-Frame1.jpg

The hole at the opposite side was ancillary.

But the guys that faked everything are producing this info for you to control what you think. Right?

How can you trust it either way to form a conclusion if it's all based on lies and deception?

Maybe they only released that one specific video on purpose to elicit an expected reaction?

Do you know for certain?

[Horn]

Do you know for certain?

In your estimation, what is the distance between the highway and the Pentagon, joboo?

Is there a change in elevation from highway bridge to Pentagon base?

At what height is the exit hole?

Do you want to know one of the only pieces equipment built by man that could achieve a level change over that distance at speeds indicated?

[joboo]

In your estimation, what is the distance between the highway and the Pentagon, joboo?

Is there a change in elevation from highway bridge to Pentagon base?

At what height is the exit hole?

Do you want to know one of the only pieces equipment built by man that could achieve a level change over that distance at speeds indicated?

You're basing the elevation on the information that they told you was on the black box. They released a second report afterwards with new black box data. You are trusting it all to be true.

Who knows what evidence has been withheld, released, altered, and for what reasons?

Capture all the information, i.e. videos from across the street, and all the other cameras, pictures etc..then release only certain information that is controversial, little bits and pieces at a time, wait....gauge public reaction, then withhold or release more to control the desired result.