Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kIJ...&start_radio=1



Deaths Represent 1.3% of Reported Side Effects: Peer-Reviewed CDC Study; CDC Changes Risk Formula

Topic of interest ends at 13:10 on video track.

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov

756K subscribers
�� Escape the censorship! Try Epoch TV for free �� https://ept.ms/FreeTrial_Roman

Resources:

�� Sekur:

https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

�� CDC Side Effect Study:

https://ept.ms/3i4R6Qr

https://ept.ms/3MNMH2m

�� CDC’s New Formula:

https://ept.ms/3IfDJr4

�� CDC Call Transcript:

https://ept.ms/3tYDWK2

�� Fauci Emails:

https://ept.ms/3Jf7pGB

https://ept.ms/3JhqSX2

https://ept.ms/3MNMM6a

https://ept.ms/3yTRHvL

[keehah]

Austria's corporate fake news devils, politicians and public servants were forcing the most totalitarian experimental clot shots injection regime on their citizens so, while politician and public servants all over the west are at this time fast loosing their will to commit the crime of forcing unsafe and ineffective injections in as many citizens as possible, loss of this criminal will in Austria is notable and good news.

Sadly so many of these state and corporate mandates were being dropped at the time (or just after) their must be clot shoted or loose your job deadlines. So only those who were prepared to, or did actually lose their jobs over this, are now being invited back to work without needing all the clot shots. Thus those those forcing clot shots on their employees did maximize the number of victims without using additional physical assault against their citizens or employees to inject them with the chemical and biological assault.

euronews.com: Austria to suspend its controversial COVID vaccine mandate

09/03/2022
Austria will suspend its mandate for all adults to get vaccinated against COVID-19, the health ministry confirmed to Euronews.

The government was the first in the European Union to require people to be jabbed against the disease.

The measure was announced last autumn when the country was in the midst of an upsurge in cases. A national lockdown was imposed to slow infections.

On Wednesday, Austria's constitutional minister, Karoline Edtstadler, said that the vaccine mandate was "not proportionate" to the situation, public broadcaster ORF reported.

The vaccine mandate included a grace period between 5 February and 15 March for people to comply with the requirement.

From mid-March, police were expected to carry out checks with those who could not prove they were fully vaccinated facing fines of up to €3,600.

But the measure will be suspended for now and reassessed following a review, said health minister Johannes Rauch.

Nearly 70% of Austria's population are fully vaccinated against COVID-19, according to the health ministry...

The decision to temporarily suspend the mandate came following an expert report that said waiting to implement the vaccine mandate would be a "milder encroachment on fundamental rights compared to immediate implementation".

The report warned however that a new massive wave of COVID-19 in fall 2022 was "very likely".

As much as the movie Idiocracy portrayed an idiotic, uncaring and incompetent health care system, it would have been unbelievable just a few years back to imagine state healthcare devolving to the point they appear unable to comprehend sniffles are a normal fall and winter phenomena.


patriotrising.com: All the ‘experts’ were wrong on COVID. Now they’re forced to admit it

March 14, 2022
Countries around the world are signaling they are “done with COVID.”

Like asylum patients who have finally been taken off their sedatives and allowed to think for themselves, even the most zealous lockdown maniacs — like Ontario’s Doug Ford — have come alive and are singing a new tune about “moving on,” and seem to have a little more pep in their step.

All of the sudden, natural immunity, human rights, the rights of children to breathe fresh air, and a whole host of other sane ideas are the new normal.

It is fascinating, even if a bit surprising. However, the change is welcome — even if the leaders are disingenuous in their change.

[Dachsie]

https://trib247.com/articles/abomina...ign=Newsletter

'Abomination': No 'independent press' and 'no oversight' of ongoing gene editing



by: WorldTribune.com 03/15/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com

Science experiments are increasingly confirming that the mRNA Covid vaccines "have far-reaching and disturbing permanent genetic effects," a columnist wrote.

The many Big Media fact-checkers who claim that mRNA injections cannot change human DNA "are wrong," Igor Chudov wrote for The Covid World on March 13, adding that it is "no longer a conspiracy theory" that Moderna "was secretly working behind the scenes to modify human genes."

Chudov previously reported that the mRNA Covid vaccines "unexpectedly reverse transcribing into human DNA and creating strange DNA genetic codes in human cells, including the code of a p130 tumor gene, as well as a permanent DNA code to produce spike protein."

This counters the so-called fact-checkers who insist the “Covid vaccines make harmless spike protein that goes away in 2-3 days.”

"Since then, I came across new information about Moderna going full speed with commercializing mRNA technology that alters and purposely edits human DNA," Chudov wrote.

According to a Nov. 2, 2021 report in Fierce Biotech: "We finally know who Moderna has been courting behind the scenes to make the big jump into gene editing. The famed biotech has signed a research partnership with CRISPR gene editing company Metagenomi."

Chudov noted that the Fierce Biotech article "inadvertently confirmed" some of the allegations he had made in previous articles.

Specifically:

• Moderna has been working actively on modifying human DNA in the past — DNA modification was work in progress, not a “known impossibility.”

• Therefore Moderna knew that mRNA technology is capable of altering human DNA.

• Moderna knew full well that its mRNA nanoparticles target the human liver.

What is Moderna seeking in its deal with Metagenomi?

"It appears to be two things," Chudov wrote:

• A “system that allows for precise integration of large DNA fragments into genomes”. As we know, Moderna’s mRNA Covid vax does create DNA segments, however they might not be properly integrated into our 23 chromosomes and thus could express themselves in an uncontrolled manner.

• Additionally, while Moderna excelled at creating nanoparticles that preferentially settle in liver, ovaries, testes, etc and create long living Spike-producing DNA, it does not have core competence in deciding what specific gene edits can be commercialized: “Metagenomi’s discovery platform finds DNA from natural samples that can be sequenced to create new tools for gene editing.”

So, what could go wrong?

"We have essentially no oversight of gene editing," Chudov wrote. "Moderna is conducting potentially very dangerous 'gene editing' experiments in total secrecy. The fact of 'total secrecy' surrounding experimentation on most basic human code is by itself an abomination and likely unethical, if not outright criminal."

Additionally, Chudov noted, "we have no independent press that reaches the general population that is capable of any kind of skepticism or questioning towards the 'sacred cows of Covid," that is, Pfizer and Moderna. These billion dollar corporations throw their ad purchases, lawyers, lobbyists etc and shamelessly hire regulators coming out of the revolving door or government."

A number of these genetic changes "have far reaching and not at all obvious consequences," Chudov wrote. "Genes do not operate like on/off switches. They epigenetically express themselves depending on conditions, just as computer code with IF or WHILE statements is also executed conditionally. Thus, changing one gene may have completely unintended consequences down the line, decades or generations later, same as with software codes."

[ziero0]

Man is under a death penalty. Humans are toxic. Transhuman s are in vogue. Get the RealID™ and a vaccination card and let Monsanto™ patent your DNA and you will surely feel better.

[Dachsie]

Edward Dowd said Moderna is definitely headed to bankruptcy but maybe Moderna will morph into Metagenomi.

The overall universal distrust of BigPharma and injections and lab-created things called "viruses" is the wonderful exposure and transparency we are finding now.

Unfortunately, the trust in the once-superior medical care in the USA is dissoving fast too. They have sold out the Hippocratic oath for the hypocritical oath.

[monty]

Edward Dowd said Moderna is definitely headed to bankruptcy but maybe Moderna will morph into Metagenomi.

The overall universal distrust of BigPharma and injections and lab-created things called "viruses" is the wonderful exposure and transparency we are finding now.

Unfortunately, the trust in the once-superior medical care in the USA is dissoving fast too. They have sold out the Hippocratic oath for the hypocritical oath.

I think the transition from once-superior medical care to big pharma’s “ask your doctor about this drug or that drug” after Medicare and the HMOs came into existence. Another failure caused by government intervention.

[Dachsie]

Dachsie comment:

Here is an example of one of the honest sounding YouTube doctor propagandists.
His overall purpose is to say that myocarditis evidence in Phizer just released trial data is of little or no importance because Phizer redacted info on number of doses distributed and show different age group parameters for different studies and reports.

It is morally wrong to minimize myocarditis. It will greatly shorten the life expectancy of the injured person. Phizer has taken great pains to hide data and is only releasing data now because they were sued and lost and a judge ordered it. Right now, Phizer is playing the "run out the clock" game. They will release the ordered documents as slowly as allowed and they may redact as much as they can and claim that they are redacting proprietary information about their product.

Meanwhile there may things that can happen that could delay the document release, like a World War or a "hack" at Pfizer.

Dr. Been is trying to make money on his packaged lectures/media (for 87% off at $67) price and by doing his monetized YouTube videos.

I do not know what kind of "doctor" Dr. Been is or what country he is from to account for his accent, and I do not care. Any doctor reporting on "COVID" and "the vaccine" on YouTube is a Mark Zuckerberg owned and operated entity.

I had to stop listening when I could see that his overall message is that there really is no evidence for myocarditis and even if there were a little bit of evidence, it is not a serious condition. Damnable LIE !

____________________________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQNOUYRykUI



54:21 video runtime

been Medical Lectures
551K subscribers
Pfizer Vaccine Side Effects of Special Interest From the Court Ordered Documents



As part of the freedom of information act case Pfizer and FDA have released their first set of documents. One of the document has gotten a lot attention. This document contains the adverse events of special interest (AESI). Let's review the information contained in this document.



If you like this content and want more, I am doing a special lifetime membership offer. Click here:

https://www.drbeen.com/yt-special/



Want to support this work?:

Buy me a coffee :-) https://www.buymeacoffee.com/DrMobeen...

Become my patron: https://www.patreon.com/mobeensyed?fa...

PayPal: https://paypal.me/mobeensyed?locale.x...



#drbeen #koolbeens #COVID



Disclaimer:

This video is not intended to provide assessment, diagnosis, treatment, or medical advice; it also does not constitute provision of healthcare services. The content provided in this video is for informational and educational purposes only.

Please consult with a physician or healthcare professional regarding any medical or mental health related diagnosis or treatment. No information in this video should ever be considered as a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional.







URL list from Tuesday, Mar. 8 2022



DrBeen: Continuing Medical Education Online | USMLE Prep | CME and CE marketplace | Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant Training Programs | Medical Student Training

https://www.drbeen.com/



Pfizer's Documents - Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/



pfizer-doc-5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp...



Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021 | Cardiology | JAMA | JAMA Network

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...



New study: 133x risk of myocarditis after COVID vaccination | Israel National News - Arutz Sheva

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/ne...



Emergency Use Authorization for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Review Memo

https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/down...



Children's Health Defense • Help Children’s Health Defense and RFK, Jr. end the epidemic of poor health plaguing our children.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/



https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Page 30 of this document

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/...

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/ne...

https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/down...

[Dachsie]

Reply to Monty's comment...

"I think the transition from once-superior medical care to big pharma’s “ask your doctor about this drug or that drug” after Medicare and the HMOs came into existence. Another failure caused by government intervention. "

You are right.

But then there are people like us who know what the bible says about pharmakeia

And we know how when Pullitzer prized journalist Gary Webb exposed the drug problem in L A caused by the CIA drug trafficking, he was found suicided by two shots to the head.

[Dachsie]

https://vaticancatholic.com/pfizer-c...op-infections/



Pfizer CEO Pushes Fourth "Booster" – Admits It Doesn’t Stop "Infections" - 28 second video

March 15, 20220 Comments

Video on Twitter

[Dachsie]

Dachsie comment"

There are three embedded videos in this excellent article. Please go to original article for fully hyperlinked text.

The advisory committees of these federal agencies are not doing their job in keeping these important public health agencies honest.

This is very sad and evil in every way.
__________________________


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-fda-documents-contradict-covid-vaccine-safety-narrative/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=3e8d 1bc3-0c8c-4cf7-a17a-34207a85089a

03/15/22
•
COVID › Views

Pfizer, FDA Documents Contradict Official COVID Vaccine Safety Narrative — Is This Fraud?


The evidence laid out in official, legal documents used to issue an Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and a license for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, clearly contradicts safety information provided to the public.
By
Meryl Nass, M.D.

How do we get information about the vaccines we take?
We get it from our doctors, our friends and the media. We hear experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Rochelle Walensky talk about them.
We see advertisements for the COVID-19 vaccines. And we see COVID vaccines in the news, day in and day out.
On the other hand, there exist official, legal documents that lay out precisely what the evidence showed when decisions were made to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and a license for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine.
These documents tell us what information Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are willing to stand by.
The documents also establish the legal requirements for issuing the EUA and license for Pfizer’s vaccines.
It may come as a shock, but what the FDA said when it issued both the EUA and the license for Pfizer’s vaccines was very different from what you heard from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the media and other sources.

Messaging around vaccine safety in pregnancy conflicts with what is known

For example, the CDC strongly encourages vaccination during pregnancy, although as late as December 2021, the FDA and Pfizer claimed the information available was inadequate to determine risk in pregnancy.
Here is the precise language on the Comirnaty label:
“Available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.”
That is a pretty clear “We don’t know.”
Yet here is CDC Director Walensky assuring us the vaccine poses no health risks with regard to pregnancy or fertility:
Five months later, in October 2021, her message is the same:
In August 2021, when the Comirnaty license was issued, Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, confirmed vaccination in pregnancy is safe:
Here are the talking points provided by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to obstetricians and gynecologists on how to convince women to be vaccinated, even during the earliest stages of pregnancy, when risks from most drugs and vaccines are highest.
One of ACOG’s “key recommendations is:
“Vaccination may occur in any trimester, and emphasis should be on vaccine receipt as soon as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health.”
Yet the CDC, in its own Jan. 7 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, stated there was insufficient data to make any determination of COVID vaccine safety in the first trimester.
So, while the federal agencies had no reason to believe the vaccine was safe in pregnancy, and made sure their legal documents said so, they nonetheless advertised the vaccine as safe for pregnant women.
Then ACOG, a nonprofit professional organization of obstetricians, not only provided their members with false information on vaccine safety, but furthermore instructed them on the use of propaganda to convince expectant mothers to take the shot.
CDC guidance contradicts Comirnaty label
The CDC guidance in some instances is inconsistent with statements on the label, or package insert, for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine.
The label, a legal document, was last updated on Dec. 20, 2021.
Here are three examples of inconsistency:
1. The CDC made the false claim on its website that anaphylactic reactions occur at approximately the same rates after COVID vaccines as after other vaccines. (I just looked for the citation and see the claim was removed).
Now, CDC informs us that “safeguards are in place” in case you do develop anaphylaxis after a COVID shot.
The Comirnaty label and CDC website make plain that administration of the vaccine is limited to only those facilities able to medically manage anaphylactic reactions.
A March 2021 study, led by Dr. Kimberly G. Blumenthal of Massachusetts General Hospital (where Walensky was chief of Infectious Diseases until January 2021) showed the rate of anaphylaxis among employees of Mass General Brigham after COVID vaccination, using standard criteria, was about 50-100 times higher than the rate claimed by CDC, which was equivalent to the rate calculated by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (in which underreporting by a factor of 10 to 100 is believed to occur).
I wrote about this in The Defender in January 2021, revealing how the CDC used inappropriate and inadequate data to derive such a low rate.
2. While the CDC website suggests episodes of myocarditis are mild and resolve quickly, the Comirnaty label plainly states:
“Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae [an aftereffect of a disease, condition or injury, or secondary result].”
3. Vaccine makers, health authorities and others claim COMIRNATY and other COVID vaccines could not possibly cause or stimulate cancer or cause fertility problems. What does the label say?
“COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility.”
Early messaging did not reflect FDA’s EUA review
Around the time the FDA granted EUA for the Pfizer vaccine — at warp speed — on Dec. 11, 2020, the FDA issued an EUA review memorandum.
Although people who had already had COVID were encouraged and sometimes forced to be vaccinated, the memorandum states “very few cases of confirmed COVID-19 occurred” among the 3% of clinical trial participants who had evidence of prior infection.
“However, available data are insufficient to determine whether such individuals could benefit from vaccination,” the FDA memorandum stated.
Although the FDA on Dec. 10, 2020, gave Pfizer authorization (an EUA) to vaccinate everyone age 16 and up, the FDA document points out, “only one confirmed COVID-19 case was reported” in the 16- to 17-year-old age group.
In other words, there were no data to support efficacy in this age group. No wonder four members of the FDA advisory committee voted no, and one abstained from supporting authorization.
My suspicion is that authorization of the vaccine for 16- and 17-year-olds was needed in order to put COVID vaccines on CDC’s recommended childhood schedule despite lack of supporting data, so the FDA pushed it through.
And sure enough, the CDC advisory committee on Aug. 30, 2021, voted 13-1 in favor of putting the vaccine on the childhood schedule. This will provide it a different form of liability protection, and open the door to mandating the vaccines for school attendance.
However, I just searched and did not find evidence that the vaccine was subsequently added to the childhood schedule. Very interesting.
Pfizer not required to test vaccine for asymptomatic infection
Even though the specter of asymptomatic infections drove masks, social distancing, school closures, working from home, etc., the FDA did not require Pfizer to test its vaccine to see if it prevented asymptomatic infection.
The FDA memorandum states:
“Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against asymptomatic infection ….”
Yet the entire point of vaccinating to achieve herd immunity, allegedly, was to prevent spread from person to person.
How is it possible neither the FDA nor Pfizer sought out evidence that the vaccine prevented transmission?
The FDA states:
“Data are limited to assess the effects of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.”
Risk of vaccine-enhanced disease remains ‘unknown’
The biggest concern of scientists everywhere, including Fauci, was the potential for the vaccine to cause antibody-dependant enhancement, a problem that had occurred occasionally with new vaccines and had occurred with a coronavirus vaccine prototype.
However, Pfizer did not test its vaccine for the risk of vaccine-enhanced disease.
The FDA memorandum stated:
“Available data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and or licensure.”
Pay close attention to this language. First, the FDA notes that the risk of the vaccine causing worse disease “needs to be evaluated further.” “Needs” means it is necessary.
But just one line farther down, FDA states studies to do so “could” be conducted later, letting Pfizer and itself off the hook for conducting any of these “needed” trials and studies.
The bottom line is that the CDC, FDA and National Institutes of Health have not been working to protect the public during the COVID pandemic, but instead to protect themselves (in the case of the FDA) and to broadcast false information to the public regarding vaccine safety (in the case of the NIH and CDC).
Do these lies rise to the level of fraud?
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

Suggest a Correction


Meryl Nass, M.D.


Meryl Nass, M.D., ABIM, is an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, chronic fatigue syndrome, Gulf War illness, fibromyalgia and toxicology.