Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

Much of this Judicial Watch Weekly Report of Saturday, July 16, 2022, deals with Fauci and the military's denial of exemptions from having to take the "COVID vaccine."

____________________


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtfI9mMwed4



FBI Investigating Fauci? Plus—Biden Betraying Our Troops!


Judicial Watch
494K subscribers


Judicial Watch President @TomFitton discusses brand-new documents we uncovered from the NIH revealing the FBI probed the agency's gain of function research grant money--plus, what you need to know about critical race theory in America--WATCH NOW!

[Dachsie]

The Centers for Disease Control IS the disease.

______________


https://www.breitbart.com/social-jus...tivism-occult/


CDC Directs LGBT Children to Secretive Chats About Sex Changes, Activism, the Occult



Spencer Lindquist


Billie Weiss/Boston Red Sox/Getty, @qchatspace/Instagram



The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is promoting to youth an online chat space that discusses sex, polyamorous relationships, the occult, sex change operations, and activism, and is specifically designed to be quickly hidden while being used. It also mixes LGBT adults and children and is run in part by Planned Parenthood.

Called Q Chat Space, the platform is advertised on the CDC’s LGBT Health Youth Resources page, archived here. The chat service, which describes itself as “a community for LGBTQ+ teens,” is available for those ages 13-19, can be hidden from parents, and focuses on a number of mature themes.

Q Chat hosts conversations on a number of different mature and sexual topics, including “Drag Culture 101,” “Sex and Relationships,” and “Having Multiple Genders,” intended for ‘Bi/Pan Youth.”

One chat celebrates Ru Paul’s Drag Race while another is called “Queer Youth Activism,” which is intended for “youth of color.”

Q Chat also features conversations on “Gender Affirmation Surgeries,” as well as on hormone replacement therapy. The chats are used in part to tell children “where you can find resources” related to their transition.



Above: Screen Shot (2022-07-14 at 10.47.08 a.m.) from Q Chat Space

There are also chats on astrology, including “self discovery in astrology” and one titled “Queering Tarot,” a reference to tarot cards commonly used in occult practices.

The sexually, politcally, and even spiritually charged material is intermixed with content that appeals to young children, such as conversations on video games, Pokemon, and StarWars.

One meme posted on Q Chat’s Instagram page displays a Trojan horse, explaining that children may realize they’re queer after “learning about queerness” from their friends.

The chat seems specifically designed to be concealed from parents and family members. Each section of the website has a large button on the bottom of the screen that says “Click/Tap here for a quick escape …” and shows a stick figure running towards an exit. When clicked, the button takes users to the Google homepage, hiding the site.

The site also notes that users can get reminders that obscure the name of the chat, explaining, “There are 2 text message reminder options: Discreet or Detailed,” going on to explain that “Discreet text reminders are private, they do not include ‘Q Chat Space’ or the name of the chat.”

One of the rules of Q Chat is to “Keep confidentiality” and agree that “what’s shared here, stays here.”

An academic article about Q Chat, published on the National Library of Medicine website, praised the service for its ability to be hidden from parents, saying that “The platform’s chat-based nature likely helps youth avoid concerns about family members accidentally overhearing their conversations.”

But while the chats are designed to be hidden from parents and family members, one chat session was called “Finding Chosen Family,” while another was titled “how to deal with family during the holidays.”

The conversations are facilitated by leftwing activists from a number of organizations. Some facilitators use alternative pronouns like “xe/xem,” with one identifying as “Black, genderqueer, gray-ace, and neurodivergent.”

Another facilitator is a self-described “drag artist” and is “Black nonbinary queer asexual.”

When children apply to join Q Chat, they are asked a number of different questions regarding their race, gender, and mental health. The application asks children their racial and ethnic background, how often they feel depressed or hopeless, what their “sexual/romantic” orientation is, and how they feel about their gender identity.

Q Chat is run in part by Planned Parenthood, which Breitbart News recently revealed offers hormone replacement therapy to minors and has claimed that transgender identity can be “cemented early in elementary school.” Planned Parenthood has also promoted Q Chat in a video posted to their Tumblr account.

Breitbart News revealed in May that the Arizona Department of Education has promoted Q Chat.

The CDC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Spencer Lindquist is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SpencerLndqst and reach out at slindquist@breitbart.com

[Dachsie]

https://brownstone.org/articles/dr-b...tm_source=push



Dr. Birx Praises Herself While Revealing Ignorance, Treachery, and Deceit

The December 2020 resignation of Dr. Deborah Birx, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under Trump, revealed predictable hypocrisy. Like so many other government officials around the world, she was caught violating her own stay-at-home order. Therefore she finally left her post following nine months of causing unfathomable amounts of damage to life, liberty, property, and the very idea of hope for the future.

Even if Anthony Fauci had been the front man for the media, it was Birx who was the main influence in the White House behind the nationwide lockdowns that did not stop or control the pathogen but have caused immense suffering and continue to roil and wreck the world. So it was significant that she would not and could not comply with her own dictates, even as her fellow citizens were being hunted down for the same infractions against “public health.”

In the days before Thanksgiving 2020, she had warned Americans to “assume you’re infected” and to restrict gatherings to “your immediate household.” Then she packed her bags and headed to Fenwick Island in Delaware where she met with four generations for a traditional Thanksgiving dinner, as if she were free to make normal choices and live a normal life while everyone else had to shelter in place.

The Associated Press was first out with the report on December 20, 2020.

Birx acknowledged in a statement that she went to her Delaware property. She declined to be interviewed.

She insisted the purpose of the roughly 50-hour visit was to deal with the winterization of the property before a potential sale — something she says she previously hadn’t had time to do because of her busy schedule.

“I did not go to Delaware for the purpose of celebrating Thanksgiving,” Birx said in her statement, adding that her family shared a meal together while in Delaware.

Birx said that everyone on her Delaware trip belongs to her “immediate household,” even as she acknowledged they live in two different homes. She initially called the Potomac home a “3 generation household (formerly 4 generations).” White House officials later said it continues to be a four-generation household, a distinction that would include Birx as part of the home.

So it was all a sleight-of-hand: she was staying home; it’s just that she has several homes! This is how the power elite comply, one supposes.

The BBC then quoted her defense, which echo the pain experienced by hundreds of millions:

“My daughter hasn’t left that house in 10 months, my parents have been isolated for 10 months. They’ve become deeply depressed as I’m sure many elderly have as they’ve not been able to see their sons, their granddaughters. My parents have not been able to see their surviving son for over a year. These are all very difficult things.”

Indeed. However, she was the major voice for the better part of 2020 for requiring exactly that. No one should blame her for wanting to get together with family; that she worked so hard for so long to prevent others from doing so is what is at issue.

The press piled on and she announced that she would be leaving her post and not seeking a position at the Biden White House. Trump tweeted that she will be missed. It was the final discrediting – or should have been – of a person that many in the White House and many around the country had come to see as an obvious fanatic and fake, a person whose influence wrecked the liberties and health of an entire country.

It was a fitting end to a catastrophic career. So it would make sense that people might pick up her new book to find out what it was like to go through that kind of media storm, the real reasons for her visit, what it was like to know for sure that she must violate her own rules in order to bring comfort to her family, and the difficult decision she made to throw in the towel knowing that she has compromised the integrity of her entire program.

One slogs through her entire book only to find this incredible fact: she never mentions this. The incident is missing entirely from her book.

Instead at the moment in the narrative at which she would be expected to recount the affair she says almost in passing that “When former vice president Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election, I’d set a goal for myself—to hand over responsibility for the pandemic response, with all its many elements, in the best possible place.”

At that point, the book skips immediately to the new year. Done. It’s like Orwell, the story, even though it was reported for days in the world press and became a defining moment in her career, is just wiped out from the history book of her own authorship.

Somehow it makes sense that she would neglect to mention this. Reading her book is a very painful experience (all credit to Michael Senger’s review) simply because it seems to be weaving fables on page after page, strewn with bromides, completely lack in self awareness, punctuated by revealing comments that make the opposite point of what she is seeking. Reading it is truly a surreal experience, astonishing especially because she is able to maintain her delusionary pose for 525 pages.

Recall that it was she who was tasked – by Anthony Fauci – with doing the really crucial thing of talking Donald Trump into green-lighting the lockdowns that began on March 12, 2020, and continued to their final hard-core deployment on March 16. This was the “15 Days to Flatten the Curve” that turned into two years in many parts of the country.

Her book admits that it was a two-level lie from the beginning.

“We had to make these palatable to the administration by avoiding the obvious appearance of a full Italian lockdown,” she writes. “At the same time, we needed the measures to be effective at slowing the spread, which meant matching as closely as possible what Italy had done—a tall order. We were playing a game of chess in which the success of each move was predicated on the one before it.”

Further:

“At this point, I wasn’t about to use the words lockdown or shutdown. If I had uttered either of those in early March, after being at the White House only one week, the political, nonmedical members of the task force would have dismissed me as too alarmist, too doom-and-gloom, too reliant on feelings and not facts. They would have campaigned to lock me down and shut me up.”

In other words, she wanted to go full CCP just like Italy but didn’t want to say that. Crucially, she knew for sure that two weeks was not the real plan. “I left the rest unstated: that this was just a starting point.”

“No sooner had we convinced the Trump administration to implement our version of a two-week shutdown than I was trying to figure out how to extend it,” she admits.

“Fifteen Days to Slow the Spread was a start, but I knew it would be just that. I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them. However hard it had been to get the fifteen-day shutdown approved, getting another one would be more difficult by many orders of magnitude. In the meantime, I waited for the blowback, for someone from the economic team to call me to the principal’s office or confront me at a task force meeting. None of this happened.”

It was a solution in search of evidence she did not have. She told Trump that the evidence was there anyway. She actually tricked him into believing that locking down a whole population of people was somehow magically going to make a virus to which everyone would inevitably be exposed somehow vanish as a threat.

Meanwhile, the economy was wrecked domestically and then all over the world, as most governments in the world followed what the US did.

Where did she come up with the idea of lockdowns? By her own report, her only real experience with infectious disease came from her work on AIDS, a very different disease from a respiratory virus that everyone would eventually get but which would only be fatal or even severe for a small cohort, a fact that was known since late January. Still, her experience counted for more than science.

“In any health crisis, it is crucial to work at the personal behavior level,” she says with the presumption that avoidance at all costs was the only goal. “With HIV/AIDS, this meant convincing asymptomatic people to get tested, to seek treatment if they were HIV-positive, and to take preventative measures, including wearing condoms; or to employ other pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) if they were negative.”

She immediately hops to the analogy with Covid. “I knew the government agencies would need to do the same thing to have a similar effect on the spread of this novel coronavirus. The most obvious parallel with the HIV/AIDS example was the message of wearing masks.”

Masks = condoms. Remarkable. This “obvious parallel” remark sums the whole depth of her thinking. Behavior is all that matters. Just stay apart. Cover your mouth. Don’t gather. Don’t travel. Close the schools. Close everything. Whatever happens, don’t get it. Nothing else matters. Keep your immune system as unexposed as possible.

I wish I could say her thought is more complex than that but it is not. This was the basis for lockdowns. For how long? In her mind, it seems like it would be forever. Nowhere in the book does she reveal an exit strategy. Not even vaccines qualify.

From the very beginning, she revealed her epidemiological views. On March 16, 2020 at her press conference with Trump, she summarized her position: “We really want people to be separated at this time.” People? All people? Everywhere? Not one reporter raised a question about this obviously ridiculous and outrageous statement that would essentially destroy life on earth.

But she was serious – seriously deluded not only about how society functions but also about infectious disease of this sort. Only one thing mattered as a metric to her: reducing infections through any means possible, as if she on her own could cobble together a new kind of society in which exposure to air-born pathogens was made illegal.

Here is an example. There was a controversy about how many people should be allowed to gather in one space, as in home, church, store, stadium, or community center. She addresses how she came up with the rules:

The real problem with this fifty-versus-ten distinction, for me, was that it revealed that the CDC simply didn’t believe to the degree that I did that SARS-CoV-2 was being spread through the air silently and undetected from symptomless individuals. The numbers really did matter. As the years since have confirmed, in times of active viral community spread, as many as fifty people gathered together indoors (unmasked at this point, of course) was way too high a number. It increased the chances of someone among that number being infected exponentially. I had settled on ten knowing that even that was too many, but I figured that ten would at least be palatable for most Americans—high enough to allow for most gatherings of immediate family but not enough for large dinner parties and, critically, large weddings, birthday parties, and other mass social events.

She puts a fine point on it: “if I pushed for zero (which was actually what I wanted and what was required), this would have been interpreted as a ‘lockdown’—the perception we were all working so hard to avoid.”

What does it mean for zero people to gather? A suicide cult?

In any case, just like that, from her own thinking and straight to enforcement, birthday parties, sports, weddings, and funerals came to be forbidden.

Here we gain insight into the sheer insanity of her vision. It is nothing short of a marvel that she somehow managed to gain the amount of influence she did.

Notice her above mention of her dogma that asymptomatic spread was the whole key to understanding pandemic. In other words, on her own and without any scientific support, she presumed that Covid was both extremely fatal and had a long latency period. To her way of thinking, this is why the usual tradeoff between severity and prevalence did not matter.

She was somehow certain that the longest estimates of latency were correct: 14 days. This is the reason for the “wait two weeks” obsession. She held onto this dogma throughout, almost like the fictional movie “Contagion” had been her only guide to understanding.

Later in the book, she writes that symptoms mean next to nothing because people can always carry around the virus in their nose without being sick. After all, this is what PCR tests have shown. Instead of seeing that as a failure of PCR, she saw this as a confirmation that everyone is a carrier no matter what and therefore everyone has to lock down because otherwise we’ll deal with a black plague.

Somehow, despite her astonishing lack of scientific curiosity and experience in this area, she gained all influence over the initial Trump administration response. Briefly, she was godlike.

But Trump was not and is not a fool. He must have had some sleepless nights wondering how and why he had approved the destruction of that which he had seen as his greatest achievement. The virus was long here (probably from October 2019), it presented a specific danger to a narrow cohort, but otherwise behaved like a textbook flu. Maybe, he must have wondered, his initial instincts from January and February 2020 were correct all along.

Still, he very reluctantly approved a 30-day extension of lockdowns, entirely on Birx’s urging and with a few other fools standing around. Having given in a second time – still, no one thought to drop an email or make a phonecall for a second opinion! – this seemed to be the turning point. Birx reports that by April 1, 2020, Trump had lost confidence in her. He might have intuited that he had been tricked. He stopped speaking to her.

It would still take another month before he would fully rethink everything that he had approved at her behest.

It made no difference. The bulk of her book is a brag fest about how she kept subverting the White House’s push to open up the economy – that is, allow people to exercise their rights and freedoms. Once Trump turned against her, and eventually found other people to provide good advice like the tremendously brave Scott Atlas – it five months later when arrived in an attempt to save the country from disaster – Birx turned to rallying around her inner circle (Anthony Fauci, Robert Redfield, Matthew Pottinger, and a few others) plus assembling a realm of protection outside of her that included CNN reporter Sanjay Gupta and, very likely, the virus team at the New York Times (which gives her book a glowing review).

Recall that for the remainder of the year, the White House was urging normalcy while many states kept locking down. It was an incredible confusion. The CDC was all over the map. I gained the distinct impression of two separate regimes in charge: Trump’s vs. the administrative state he could not control. Trump would say one thing on the campaign trail but the regulations and disease panic kept pouring out of his own agencies.

Birx admits that she was a major part of the reason, due to her sneaky alternation of weekly reports to the states.

After the heavily edited documents were returned to me, I’d reinsert what they had objected to, but place it in those different locations. I’d also reorder and restructure the bullet points so the most salient—the points the administration objected to most—no longer fell at the start of the bullet points. I shared these strategies with the three members of the data team also writing these reports. Our Saturday and Sunday report-writing routine soon became: write, submit, revise, hide, resubmit.

Fortunately, this strategic sleight-of-hand worked. That they never seemed to catch this subterfuge left me to conclude that, either they read the finished reports too quickly or they neglected to do the word search that would have revealed the language to which they objected. In slipping these changes past the gatekeepers and continuing to inform the governors of the need for the big-three mitigations—masks, sentinel testing, and limits on indoor social gatherings—I felt confident I was giving the states permission to escalate public health mitigation with the fall and winter coming.

As another example, once Scott Atlas came to the rescue in August to introduce some good sense into this wacky world, he worked with others to dial back the CDC’s fanatical attachment to universal and constant testing. Atlas knew that “track, trace, and isolate” was both a fantasy and a massive invasion of people’s liberties that would yield no positive public-health outcome. He put together a new recommendation that was only for those who were sick to test – just as one might expect in normal life.

After a week-long media frenzy, the regulations flipped in the other direction.

Birx reveals that it was her doing:

This wasn’t the only bit of subterfuge I had to engage in. Immediately after the Atlas-influenced revised CDC testing guidance went up in late August, I contacted Bob Redfield…. Less than a week later, Bob [Redfield] and I had finished our rewrite of the guidance and surreptitiously posted it. We had restored the emphasis on testing to detect areas where silent spread was occurring. It was a risky move, and we hoped everyone in the White House would be too busy campaigning to realize what Bob and I had done. We weren’t being transparent with the powers that be in the White House…

One might ask how the heck she got away with this. She explains:

[T]he guidance gambit was only the tip of the iceberg of my transgressions in my effort to subvert Scott Atlas’s dangerous positions. Ever since Vice President Pence told me to do what I needed to do, I’d engaged in very blunt conversations with the governors. I spoke the truth that some White House senior advisors weren’t willing to acknowledge. Censoring my reports and putting up guidance that negated the known solutions was only going to perpetuate Covid-19’s vicious circle. What I couldn’t sneak past the gatekeepers in my reports, I said in person.

Most of the book consists of her explaining how she headed a kind of shadow White House dedicated to keeping the country in some form of lockdown for as long as possible. In her telling, she was the center of everything, the only person truly correct about all things, given cover by the VP and assisted by a handful of co-conspirators..

Largely missing from the narrative is any discussion of the science gathering outside the bubble she so carefully cultivated. Whereas anyone could have noted the studies pouring out from February onward that threw cold water on her entire paradigm – not to mention 15 years, or make that 50 years, or perhaps 100 years of warnings against such a reaction – from scientists all over the world with vastly more experience and knowledge than she. She cared nothing about it, and evidently still does not.

It’s very clear that Birx had almost no contact with any serious scientist who disputed the draconian response, not even John Iaonnidis who explained as early as March 17, 2020, that this approach was madness. But she didn’t care: she was convinced that she was in the right, or, at least, was acting on behalf of people and interests who would keep her safe from persecution or prosecution.

For those interested, Chapter 8 provides a weird look into her first real scientific challenge: the seroprevalence study by Jayanta Bhattacharya published April 22, 2020. It demonstrated that the infection fatality rate – because infections and recovery was far more prevalent than Birx and Fauci were saying – was more in line with what one might expect from a severe flu but with a much more focused demographic impact. Bhattacharya’s paper revealed that the pathogen eluded all controls and would likely become endemic as every respiratory virus before. She took one look and concluded that the had unnamed “fundamental flaws in logic and methodology” and “damaged the cause of public health at this crucial moment in the pandemic.”

And that’s it: that’s Birx grappling with science. Meanwhile, the article was published in the International Journal of Epidemiology and has over 700 citations. She saw all differences of opinion as an opportunity to go on the attack in order to intensify her cherished commitment to the lockdown paradigm.

Even now, with scientists the world over in outrage, with citizens furious at their governments, with governments falling, with regimes toppling and anger reaching a fevered pitch, while studies pour out by the day showing that lockdowns made no difference and that open societies at least protected their educational systems and economies, she is unmoved. It’s not even clear she is aware.

Birx dismisses all contrary cases such as Sweden: Americans could not take that route because we are too unhealthy. South Dakota: rural and backwater (Birx is still mad that the brave Governor Kristi Noem refused to meet with her). Florida: oddly and without evidence she dismisses that case as a killing field, even though its results were better than California while the population influx to the state sets new records.

Nor is she shaken by the reality that there is not one single country or territory anywhere on the planet earth that benefitted from her approach, not even her beloved China which still pursues a zero-Covid approach. As for New Zealand and Australia: she (probably wisely) doesn’t mention them at all, even though they followed the Birx approach exactly.

The story of the lockdowns is a tale of Biblical proportions, at once evil and desperately sad and tragic, a story of power, scientific failure, intellectual insularity and insanity, outrageous arrogance, feudalistic impulses, mass delusion, plus political treachery and conspiracy. It is real-life horror for the ages, a tale of how the land of the free became a depostic hellscape so quickly and unexpectedly. Birx was at the center of it, confirming all of your worst fears right here in a book anyone can buy. She is so proud of her role that she dares to take all credit, fully convinced that the Trump-hating media will love and protect her perfidies from exposure and condemnation.

There is no getting around Trump’s own culpability here. He never should have let her have her way. Never. It was a case of fallibility matched by ego (he has still not admitted error), but it is a case of enormous betrayal that played off presidential character flaws (like many in his income class, Trump had always been a germaphobe) that ended up wrecking hope and prosperity for billions of people for many years to come.

I’ve tried for two years to put myself in that scene at the White House that day. It’s a hothouse with only trusted souls in small rooms, and the people there in a crisis have the sense that they are running the world. Trump might have drawn on his experience running a casino in Atlantic City. The weather forecasters come to say a hurricane is on the way, so he needs to shut it down. He doesn’t want to but agrees in order to do the right thing.

Was this his thinking? Perhaps. Perhaps too someone told him that China’s President Xi Jinping managed to crush the virus with lockdowns so he can too, just as the WHO said in its February 26 report. It’s also difficult in that environment to avoid the rush of omnipotence, temporarily oblivious to the reality that your decision would affect life from Maine to Florida to California. It was a catastrophic and lawless decision based on pretense and folly.

What followed seems inevitable in retrospect. The economic crisis, inflation, the broken lives, the desperation, the lost rights and lost hopes, and now the growing hunger and demoralization and educational losses and cultural destruction, all of it came in the wake of these fateful days. Every day in this country, even two and a half years later, judges are struggling to regain control and revitalize the Constitution after this disaster.

The plotters usually admit it in the end, taking credit, like criminals who cannot resist returning to the scene of the crime. This is what Dr. Birx has done in her book. But there are clearly limits to her transparency. She never explains the real reason for her resignation – even though it is known the world over – pretending like the entire Thanksgiving fiasco never happened and thus attempting to write it out of the history book that she wrote.

There is so much more to say and I hope this is one review of many because the book is absolutely packed with shocking passages. And yet her 525-page book, now selling at a 50% discount, does not contain a single citation to a single scientific study, paper, monograph, article, or book. It has zero footnotes. It offers no go-to authorities and displays not even a hint of humility that would normally be part of any actual scientific account.

And it nowhere offers an honest reckoning for what her influence over the White House and the states foisted on this country and on the world. As the country masks up yet again for a new variant, and is gradually being groomed for another round of disease panic, she can collect whatever royalties come from sales of her book while working at her new gig, a consultant to a company that makes air purifiers (ActivePure). In this latter role, she makes a greater contribution to public health than anything she did while she held the reins of power.

Author

Jeffrey A. Tucker

Jeffrey A. Tucker is Founder and President of the Brownstone Institute and the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press and ten books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He writes a daily column on economics at The Epoch Times, and speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.
By Jeffrey A. Tucker July 16, 2022

[Dachsie]

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/w...m_medium=email

What would I do if someone I loved was hospitalized for COVID?

I would line up a doctor, nurse, equipment, and meds and check them out of the hospital ASAP.

Steve Kirsch
Jul 14, 2022



It’s not COVID that is killing people in the hospital: it is the hospital COVID treatment protocols

We know from all the surveys that we do that it isn’t COVID that is killing people from COVID: it is the hospital treatment protocols.

Hospitals maximize their revenue and also avoid liability by following what the CDC says. So that’s what they do. It’s not rocket science.

It’s not about your health or superior outcomes. It’s not about compassion. It’s about maximizing revenue for the hospital and avoiding legal liability when you die from the protocol.

This is why the protocol never changes over time.

People die, the hospitals are rewarded for each death, and the government protects them from liability. That’s just the way medicine works today.
Here’s what I would do

Here’s what I would do for myself, or for someone who urgently needed to be hospitalized.

The single best thing is to get all the recommended supplements and meds on hand BEFORE you get COVID. A little advanced planning goes a long way. When I got COVID, I had all the meds handy and started them immediately on a positive home antigen test and COVID was a non-event for me. I got my meds from myfreedoctor.com.

Note: DO NOT make the mistake of taking a steroid unless you are more than 7 days post infection and you’ve already cleared the virus. A lot of people make the mistake and take all the meds at the start. Taking a steroid while you are fighting the infection is a mistake: it makes things worse. I never needed to use a steroid. Most people won’t need it if they follow the protocol and treat COVID early.

Do not make the mistake of thinking that if you’re already recovered from COVID once, you don’t need to take any drugs. This can be a fatal mistake. We had a family member of someone who recovered from COVID, got it again, didn’t treat it, and died the second time he got it.

If you have limited funds, for the non-prescription items, partner up with your neighbors so you buy one set of supplements, nebulizer, etc which then can be used by the person who gets sick, and then replenished (by the person who got sick). That gives you an inventory at minimal up-front expense.

PLEASE: Take COVID seriously, prepare in advance, and it will be a non-event.

If the person didn’t get early treatment and if the person needed immediate hospitalization because you don’t have the items needed to treat the person at home, you have no choice: check them into the hospital, but with a medical power of attorney delegated to a family member.

Then I would VERY quickly line up a doctor (who could be remote) and nurse (who should be local) who could coordinate healthcare at home. In my case, I have this lined up in advance, but you should be able to line this up quickly.

You can use the list here or here to help you find a doctor/nurse.

The nurse should quickly procure the needed equipment and medicines, e.g., an oxygen generator, a nebulizer, distilled water, salt, budesonide, IV delivery, IV drugs (vitamin C, etc).

Once everything is in place, the responsible party should check out the injured person against medical advice (AMA) ASAP and transfer care to the physician/nurse team who is lined up to treat the person.

It’s not that complicated.

I hope this advice saves a lot of lives.
For more information

See ProtocolKills.com

See Hands for health and freedom for help in extricating someone from the hospital and help arrange oxygen concentrators at your home, caregivers, etc.

Read the comments

[Dachsie]

https://www.americaoutloud.com/publi...tional-rights/

Public Health Policy Collides with Constitutional Rights

by Dr. Peter McCullough | Jul 16, 2022 | Health, Politics

Listen to the article on America Out Loud.
0:00 / 3:14
BeyondWords
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As the third year of the Coronavirus crisis grinds on, the news cycle continues to fill with a fundamental tension over public health policy intended to “protect the population” and individual rights such as free speech, religion, life, and liberty. While masking, lockdowns, and testing have received their fair share of attention, no issue has been more significant than mass vaccination with untested and unproven genetic transfer technology using mRNA or adenoviral DNA.

If the US vaccine program had the proper structure with a vaccine program administration (separate from the CDC/FDA/NIH), the FDA could do drug safety evaluation and pharmacovigilance advised by independent critical events, data safety monitoring, and human ethics committees reviewing safety data each month.

With this structure, if the program was limited to nursing homes, high-risk elderly, and senior care workers, the main groups where there was documented spread and serious risk of hospitalization and death, then the US COVID-19 vaccination program could have had a reasonable start and with the hopes of doing some public good while dealing with a hazardous evolving safety story on this new form of treatment.

In this scenario, the US vaccine program probably would have been shut down in February of 2021 for excess mortality in our seniors, but the government and biopharmaceutical stakeholders could have made the case that 40% of the deaths were in senior home residents and the vaccines albeit rushed and poorly conceived, represented a best effort to help in a dire public health situation.

The focus has been anywhere but the nursing homes in years 2 and 3 of the pandemic; instead, children and infants are the news cycles with hypodermic needles poised to plunge below the infants’ skin. In a final regulatory coup de gras, the vaccine manufacturers now have an understanding with the FDA that large clinical trials will not be needed for new COVID-19 vaccines that are “substantially similar” to the failed prior versions.1

These new products will be advanced as “better” and “safe and effective” with no clinical data (hospitalizations, deaths) to make or refute these claims.2 At the same time, lawsuit after lawsuit has been filed to keep at bay the advancement of the illegal mandates (n=789 according to JacksonLewis), job loss, censorship, reprisal, and personal injury all centered on mass vaccination every six months or more frequent with unwanted biologic products.3

If this sounds like a horror movie, it could be — instead, it is modern reality.

On our show this week, we have Dr. Shelley Cole, OB/GYN from Central Texas, to give us an update on the expectations of telemedicine as well as her experience in pandemic response and how the Omicron BA5 syndrome is different from prior strains.4

So let’s get real, let’s get loud; on America Out Loud Talk Radio, this is The McCullough Report!

The McCullough Report: Sat/Sun 2 PM ET Encore 7 PM – Internationally recognized Dr. Peter A. McCullough, known for his iconic views on the state of medical truth in America and around the globe, pierces through the thin veil of mainstream media stories that skirt the significant issues and provide no tractable basis for durable insight. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. Each episode goes to major podcast networks early in the week and can be heard on-demand anywhere in the world.

References:

1 https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pres...accine-booster
2 https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-re...apted-covid-19
3 https://www.jacksonlewis.com/practic...ate-litigation
4 https://healthysuccessworks.com/

[Dachsie]

Dachsie comment:

I strongly disagree with the following statements of Dr. McCullough. Give a totally unknown experimental injection to one of the three most vulnerable groups of people under a rush rush basis, "nursing homes, high-risk elderly, and senior care workers, the main groups where there was documented spread and serious risk of hospitalization and death.

"documented spread" of scientifically exactly what pathogen or "virus"

and

"serious risk of hospitalization" Hospitalization from what exact diagnosis ?

(Hospitalization used to be a good hope for very sick people. Now it is like sending them to their death. !!!!!)

The elderly and the disabled and young children are the groups that need most to be protected from the rush rush plan and agenda that has proven to have nothing to do with healthcare. The agenda appears to turn those three groups into two groups - dead and seriously injured.

___________________________

"With this structure, if the program was limited to nursing homes, high-risk elderly, and senior care workers, the main groups where there was documented spread and serious risk of hospitalization and death, then the US COVID-19 vaccination program could have had a reasonable start and with the hopes of doing some public good while dealing with a hazardous evolving safety story on this new form of treatment.

In this scenario, the US vaccine program probably would have been shut down in February of 2021 for excess mortality in our seniors, but the government and biopharmaceutical stakeholders could have made the case that 40% of the deaths were in senior home residents and the vaccines albeit rushed and poorly conceived, represented a best effort to help in a dire public health situation."

[monty]

Dachsie comment:

I strongly disagree with the following statements of Dr. McCullough. Give a totally unknown experimental injection to one of the two most vulnerable groups of people under a rush rush basis, "nursing homes, high-risk elderly, and senior care workers, the main groups where there was documented spread and serious risk of hospitalization and death.

"documented spread" of scientifically exactly what pathogen or "virus"

and

"serious risk of hospitalization" Hospitalization from what exact diagnosis ?

(Hospitalization used to be a good hope for very sick people. Now it is like sending them to their death. !!!!!)

The elderly and the disabled and young children are the groups that need most to be protected from the rush rush plan and agenda that has proven to have nothing to do with healthcare. The agenda appears to turn those three groups into two groups - dead and seriously injured.

___________________________

"With this structure, if the program was limited to nursing homes, high-risk elderly, and senior care workers, the main groups where there was documented spread and serious risk of hospitalization and death, then the US COVID-19 vaccination program could have had a reasonable start and with the hopes of doing some public good while dealing with a hazardous evolving safety story on this new form of treatment.

In this scenario, the US vaccine program probably would have been shut down in February of 2021 for excess mortality in our seniors, but the government and biopharmaceutical stakeholders could have made the case that 40% of the deaths were in senior home residents and the vaccines albeit rushed and poorly conceived, represented a best effort to help in a dire public health situation."

I questioned the rush to vaccinate the elderly an nursing home residents early on in this “plandemic” . It was nothing more than a death sentence.

[Dachsie]

Dachsie comment regarding posting # 3447



Dr. Yeadon tells the whole truth. (So does Dr. David Martin ) - both PhDs

Dr. Yeadon could see that the whole study designs were deliberately twisted to produce desired results. The evil regarding this "illness" and this "pandemic" was planned for arranged from at least 2016. It is about destroying economies of sovereign nation states and facilitating and hastening the "great reset." It is Satanic evil from the pit of hell.

If you go along with the official narratives of any of the presidents and leaders of the big countries and it turns out Dr. Yeadon is right, there is no coming back from what these evil leaders are promulgating. They have been plotting our harm and demise for decades at least.

Dr. Yeadon has chosen to fight now.

He said we should avoid in every way a "mandatory digital ID" or "passport" because that will close off medical freedom forever. That will close off your food and money and healthcare based on your constant surveilled behavior. (The people who are pushing for a mandatory ID (I was fighting the "Real ID" back in 2006) are the same people who perpetrated this evil PLANdemic to inflict a One World Death and Slavery System for ALL.

And avoid and work to stop Central Banking and digital currency for all.
(You will find that already businesses do not want to take checks or cash and if they take checks they will treat it as a debit card and run the check through a machine to get the routing number and stamp the check and hand it back to you.
The paper or metal money for day to day spending is absolutely necessary and it is directly connected to autonomy and freedom and anonymity/privacy.

Listen to the last 5 minutes of the show where Dr. Yeadon offers those solutions.
His solutions show that he realizes we are on the brink of the end of civilization as we know it.

Hold on to and deal in CASH as much as possible and ditch the digital.

[monty]

Dachsie comment regarding posting # 3447



Dr. Yeadon tells the whole truth. (So does Dr. David Martin ) - both PhDs

Dr. Yeadon could see that the whole study designs were deliberately twisted to produce desired results. The evil regarding this "illness" and this "pandemic" was planned for arranged from at least 2016. It is about destroying economies of sovereign nation states and facilitating and hastening the "great reset." It is Satanic evil from the pit of hell.

If you go along with the official narratives of any of the presidents and leaders of the big countries and it turns out Dr. Yeadon is right, there is no coming back from what these evil leaders are promulgating. They have been plotting our harm and demise for decades at least.

Dr. Yeadon has chosen to fight now.

He said we should avoid in every way a "mandatory digital ID" or "passport" because that will close off medical freedom forever. That will close off your food and money and healthcare based on your constant surveilled behavior. (The people who are pushing for a mandatory ID (I was fighting the "Real ID" back in 2006) are the same people who perpetrated this evil PLANdemic to inflict a One World Death and Slavery System for ALL.

And avoid and work to stop Central Banking and digital currency for all.
(You will find that already businesses do not want to take checks or cash and if they take checks they will treat it as a debit card and run the check through a machine to get the routing number and stamp the check and hand it back to you.
The paper or metal money for day to day spending is absolutely necessary and it is directly connected to autonomy and freedom and anonymity/privacy.

Listen to the last 5 minutes of the show where Dr. Yeadon offers those solutions.
His solutions show that he realizes we are on the brink of the end of civilization as we know it.

Hold on to and deal in CASH as much as possible and ditch the digital.

I have been using cash as much as possible since (((they))) have been promoting a digital ID or passport. Everyone, including me, needs to get rid of their smart phone.

[Dachsie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X85T_EYQ760



Federal Judge BLOCKS Biden Admin From Punishing Unvaccinated Air Force Service Members

12:39 video runtime


Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
800K subscribers
�� Secret White House meeting finally Exposed �� https://ept.ms/SecretWHMeeting_FULL

Resources:

�� Sekur:

https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

�� Epoch TV:

https://ept.ms/SecretWHMeeting_FULL

�� Court Order:

https://ept.ms/3oasHvL