new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

[joboo]

I actually view the possibility of this being fake, and that conclusion being arrived at by a lot of people to be bigger than the gun debate. Here's why. In other threads, I've brought up the idea that we are quickly moving to a situation where we have to choose the lesser of two evils. This is what's always done...they get us to accept doing something bad to ourselves by giving us the option between bad and worse. The possibility that the gun issue could be eclipsed by the mass realization of a fake event transcends the plans of the armed civil war within the country. It's called the population waking up and saying enough: no more fake wars, no more fake laws, no more fake money, no more fake science, no more fake religion. It is not acceptable for me to submit to you, it is not acceptable for me to fight you, it is not acceptable for me to comply with you. I won't believe you, I won't fear you. That's where the real change in the future will come from. The fact that they either can't, or refuse, to publish the evidence for the tragedy that will give them their gun control makes no sense. I won't comply with them any longer. I won't believe anything. If they choose to provide evidence then I will accept it and accept whatever the evidence suggests. However, if they choose not to provide evidence, I will not believe them. It's their choice. I can't see why they wouldn't want to, but I'm not going to voluntarily twist my own perception of truth for them any more. I'm not bigoted, rather their AAA credit rating as far as believability has dropped so far over the last few years that I'm forced to take this position till they can show me the money. Stop telling me they're good for it.

Yes, the plan is to consolidate control over everything as easily as possible. You still have to keep a head level head over it, or at least outwardly be an ambassador for others, and keep away from the fringe associations at every opportunity.

You could spend days debating whether or not they photoshopped make believe people, and pictures of dead people with the president, over other more credible realities, and totally undermine your efforts to anyone that reads it, and thinks you're on to something.

Why drive people away by going straight to crazyville, and dance around that fire, when it ultimately doesn't help anything? The pentagon thing is the same deal. Any solid evidence for a missile? NO....none...zero. Any solid evidence for a plane? YES all kinds, but they didn't release other camera footage, and some windows didn't break, so it was 100% a missile. (facepalm).

This is where people get driven away, and the situation totally undermines itself as looney toons. Same deal with hate based sites. They might have good accurate info also, but people look at that, and roll their eyes as well. It's like shooting yourself in the foot....both feet perhaps.

I'd go so far to say whoever made that president dead girl youtube video is cointel. Total disinfo scenario there. People look at that, roll their eyes and think "Oh boy...yeap.... the conspiracy nuts are at it again."

At a certain point you have to ask yourself, "am I hurting the cause or helping it?"