Are the Dominoes Falling for Standard Cosmology?

[Ares]

It is of course clear that there is an emission of these particles coming from the sun (as can be seen in the General path they are traveling). However the question is whether the emissions detected is from ultra high energy gamma rays or from low energy neutrino's. Both have very low likelihood of interaction with matter and penetrate deeply. I don't know whether they would have very different behaviors in a fog chamber when interacting. I would imagine so since we are talking multiples of magnitudes difference in energy levels...

Which also has an issue with E.U. theory since GRB (GBR's) are typically witnessed during a supernova. I read an article on Thunderbolts (who proports the E.U. theory) and this is what they had to say about GBR's.

According to conventional theories, the redshift of this galaxy determines its distance at about two billion light years. To appear as bright as it did, the GRB must have given off more energy in that one-tenth of a second than the entire galaxy gives off in a year. The only mechanisms imaginable in a gravity-dominated universe that could be this “energy-dense” are extreme supernovas and neutron-star or black-hole mergers. Because no supernova was observed and because the GRB occurred at the edge of the galaxy (most black holes are thought to reside in galactic cores), this GRB is considered to be the result of a merger of neutron stars.

This explanation makes sense—if redshift is indeed a measure of distance and if the universe is composed of insignificant amounts of plasma. Unfortunately, redshift has been shown for decades NOT to be a measure of distance, and the composition of the universe is 99.99% plasma.

This GRB and its “host” galaxy are closer, probably much closer, than standard theory calculates. The energy of the GRB is therefore much less than standard theory calculates. The small, faint “host” galaxy doesn’t appear small and faint because it’s far away but because it really is small and faint.

Probably I'm supposed to take this theory with any grain of salt when I can't get any evidence and the explanation of a GBR is that the galaxy is "probably" closer? Really??

Here's a test, take a Telescope, point it the Andromeda Galaxy which is absolutely enormous, and then point the same Telescope at Galaxy that had a GBR to compare the sizes to eliminate the "small and faint" in galaxy size. I do know of issues with red shift, and have never really considered it an accurate measure of distance between galaxies. However E.U. doesn't have a theory or model for measuring distance either.

Gamma Rays are a very strong sign of nuclear energy, not electrical.