150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters

[crimethink]

In the case of a bench trial before a bias judge can the persons pronounced guilty appeal?

Only if the Ninth Circus agrees there is an "error in application of law."

It is a rebuttable presumption that a judge is not biased. But we know how shysters stick together over all else (witness Gorsuch and the Seattle judge recently).

Comment from Redoubt News

The disinformation site from rabid Zionist and "former" US intelligence agent James Wesley Rawles?

If anyone is a legal expert, I would like to know how a judge can waive a defendants right to a jury trial.

There remains this nonsensical concept that the "justice" system is "fair."

How does a black-robed whore do this? He simply directs the clerk to record it as a bench trial. That's all. The "rules of court" allow him to do so.

Been researching it and cannot find one instance in which a judge refused to allow a trial by jury and presided over a bench trial.

The author is clearly ignorant about how things really work in the jew-dicial system. A demand for a jury trial is routinely ignored.

All the government needed to do was show proof by title that they did in fact have jurisdiction on the land and the occupiers would have been forced to leaved without a fight.

LOL

Written Law is not relevant to the regime.

I think Ammon and the other ranchers knew the government could not provide the proof, and that is why it turned arrests and assassination.

The current regime uses violence as its modus operandi. Comply...or die. Political power proceeds out of the barrel of a gun.

With all due respect to the resistance, it was woefully naive to think their endeavor would not end in violence.

I reiterate that Rawles' operation is a disinformation operation. It incessantly repeats the lie that one can "deal" with the regime "peacefully."


http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quot...y-54-46-03.jpg