-
26th September 2022, 06:18 PM
#11
Iridium
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.americaoutloud.com/breac...amily-outrage/
Listen to the audeo on the website.
Breach of COVID-19 Bedside Medical Ethics Leads to Family Outrage
by Dr. Peter McCullough | Sep 26, 2022 | Health, Politics,

The two principles of medical ethics that all physicians, nurses, administrators, and patients understood before the COVID-19 crisis were: 1) patient autonomy and 2) informed consent. When these two principles were upheld as they always were, families and patients routinely participated in a time-honored practice of shared decision-making on diagnostic and therapeutic management.1
Since the patient and or their insurance company is paying the hospital bills, these processes of care made the system move along for millions of Americans who are hospitalized every year. With the COVID-19 pandemic and the declaration that the US government would pay for hospitalizations as an emergency countermeasure, there were sweeping changes and immediate dissolution of the principles of medical ethics as they apply to those under duress. Loss of autonomy was seen with the practice of isolation, patients were not given choices on what happened to their bodies, and even worse, once semi-conscious, or on the mechanical ventilator, they lost all control over what happened to their bodies.
Informed consent was lost with EUA products, most notably remdesivir, the failed viral polymerase inhibitor. Hospitals and doctors failed to inform patients that the WHO, after completing the largest clinical trial of remdesivir, declared the drug should not be used in acutely hospitalized patients with COVID-19 since it did not lead to a reduction in mortality and it could complicate care or contribute to death through the mechanisms of acute kidney injury and hepatic damage.2
Despite this warning, the NIH and hospital protocols featured remdesivir in conjunction with hospital bonuses on payment from HHS. As a result, the majority of a million Americans lost their lives to COVID-19 in the hospital, not at home, putting the totality of in-hospital care up to the tests of autonomy, informed consent, and shared decision-making.
Did the patients and families feel all of these rights were fulfilled, and patients received the maximum treatment possible? Sadly, many families think none of these standards were met, and to that end, lead attorney Daniel Watkins3 has filed the first class-action lawsuit in California.
This week, we have a wonderful show that summarizes news events over August and September, including contributions from Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson, California Surgeon Scot Youngblood, MD, and Dr. McCullough’s speech on stage in Fresno, CA.4,5,6,7 This week’s music selection comes from Rachel Trotto and is “Progress” by country star John Rich.8
_____________
Dachsie comment:
With the COVID-19 pandemic and the declaration that the US government would pay for hospitalizations as an emergency countermeasure, there were sweeping changes and immediate dissolution of the principles of medical ethics as they apply to those under duress.
I did not know that but it is true. I think this places a feeling of obligation and indebtedness so that the patient and family may feel they do not have a right to question and not go along with their treatment. That appears to me part of the Plan to make people go along with this radical change in medical ethics and treatment standards.
This information makes me think that this PLANdemic is more evil and sinister than I already thought it was!
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules