So Book, why is ok for you to twist others words in your attempt to be "funny", but if anyone does it to you, they are automaticly a "Jew"?
Where's your sense of humor, pal?
I've just been learning from the master as to how to tear others posts apart in the name of humor.
One, one-line post....just like you do. Are you mad at me because I didn't use a pic, too?
Fixed it for you...Originally Posted by Joe King
Attachment 420
You don't want to hear about this jew who saved his tribe from wandering in the wilderness for forty years searching for the Auschwitz Bagel Bakery? How he followed his nose to the smokestack in Poland and led his people out of Egypt?
you don't want to hear about the famous Moses Snozzle?
http://www.anunews.net/blog/wp-conte...acking-car.jpg
You are now famous here for insisting that we should never judge INDIVIDUAL black people as a group.
the mp3 for this show is now posted,
07/25/2011 Monday - 1st Hour: With Anthony Hall and Joshua Blakeney. 2nd Hour: More With Anthony Hall and Joshua Blakeney.
FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
"If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz
Game over !classic Straw Man Argument mischaracterizing Book.
Ironic, that "Nazi" caricature you describe re alleged events in Germany +/- 70 years ago, and how it aptly describes what indisputably happens today in many western zio-kontrolled countries when their citizens dare to think for themselves rather than goose-clapping for Tinkerbell - off to prison kamp they go! [Irving, Rudolf, Zundel, Zundel's defense attorney, etc]
Aren't you inferring condemnation towards all GSUS readers who disagree with the Official Zionist Holohoax Narrative? ... while at the same time inferring that you are of sufficient piety yourself to be in a position to condemn all those who you judge to "condemn those who disagree"Shades of the very Chutzpah Maneuvering this thread exists to discuss... rock on JK! 8)
And dropping those ADL emotion-trigger words memetically-engineered to instantly halt rational thought among well-programmed blue-pillers, you know, goose-step, oven, Nazis, Hitler...
Game-set-match = pat colo.
Al Gore said the global warming debate is over as well.
Calls for ending an argument is usualy to try and stifle the other side.
Please remember.... once the pin is removed, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.
wrong...comparing pats well researched posts to al gores hysterical propaganda is criminal. the debate was lost to your side on your inability to refute his stated facts.....as you just showed us in your last post by misdirecting and keeping things off topic....so pass the laptop to another adl hack and have a bagel.
Where have I heard our argument before.
RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
R
ULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420684/posts
Like I said you use the tactics you suposedly dispise.
Yet you call some one else a ADL hack.
Classic
Please remember.... once the pin is removed, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.
back on TOPIC. please just
ONCE..refute ON POINT and with FACTS pats argument.....ok, so WHO's diverting shilling etc?
remember the veterans here have already been through hundreds like you 3 stooges...at least a few were clever and they made it fun.....standard adl tactic, when confronted with truth, divert attention TO the poster, claiming he's diverting attention....yawn. no more bullshit either prove pat wrong or admit defeat.
Posting Permissions
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
Reply With Quote