Quote Originally Posted by MAGNES View Post
Write a book, train people how to mock others, I'll read this carefully later
but this is what it looks like so far. Whose promoting the book ? NYT
best seller, rofl !

Hasabararats everywhere.
Don't forget the author's day job is editorial director of the National Post (Newspaper). The Capstone of Canada's largest media empire (recently bailed out by GoldmanSachs) enabled by loads of debt, destruction after takeover of local news reporting and independent papers and TV by a "a prominent member of Canada's Jewish community, and a vocal supporter for Israel." -wikipedia. Wiki has not mentioned for the last 4 years or so he was also a supporter of Israel's Lukid party.

rabble.ca/news/2009/11/national-post-and-bankruptcy-media-convergence
In the court documents filed as part of the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings, we learn that the National Post has “had an EBITA loss of $20.3 million, $16.3 million, $13.1 million and $12.7 million, respectively” from 2005-08 and is projected to have had a further loss of $9.3 in the 12 months ending August 31, 2009. In 2001 the Post lost $60 million. Over seven years NP has been bailed out to the tune of $139.1 million.
Its not about 'captialism', its about making (destroying) nations of clay headed slaves.
_________________

However, I've not seen "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" mentioned in a National Newspaper till this book was reviewed.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle2021504/
Sometimes Kay’s prejudices get the better of him. Any liberal who comes even into peripheral view is dismissed as “smug,” a distorter of the truth, a peddler of “the man-made global warming myth” or an obnoxious champion of “identity politics” dedicated to the reconstruction or wholesale reinvention “of history according to the viewpoint of women, blacks, gays and other minorities” and so on. He includes John McMurty, “an influential truther who teaches at the University of Guelph,” in his sights. Too long to quote here – and I have to say that I don’t know the rest of McMurty’s work at all – the passage that Kay references concerning the George W. Bush administration, the benefit to the oil sector and the military-industrial complex, the rise and rise of security forces during the last decade, and the benefit to domestic policy of fighting a war, hardly seems a stretch.

The best moments in Kay’s very readable, often captivating journey through the renegade corners of American paranoia lie in his exposition of that pioneering bit of conspiracist bile, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the notoriously anti-Semitic hoax published in 1919 by czarist police and purporting to offer a Jewish plan for world domination, but more so in the personal encounters such as those with Jenkins and in crowd demonstrations.
Realistically though, based on a few reviews I've read (and the title of course) the book does follow what I'd expect is mentioned in one of those protocols. The author is not looking for truth about 9/11, but is about personality charactorization of a few people he has selected.

For some reason, some of the most active people who realize 9/11 story as told by government was incomplete, focus on the worst disinfo to make a case. Like a moth to flame. Like children with their heart in the right place unable to critically think much. And several more aware disinfo peddlers of course.

More of the review, Chutzpa:
Of The Protocols, Kay writes that “it was a lie that people wanted to hear,” and this is the crux of it.
First of he twice crosses (crux in Latin) up the issues to confuse. Previously before this statement he only claimed it was a forgery not a lie. He admits that people want to hear about The Protocols. People do not want to be occulted. I can think of two general reasons to want to hear something: Because something is a pretty lie, or an ugly truth. It is not a pretty lie. To argue so is like claiming victims like being victimized, like claiming your child is just acting like daddy abused him to hurt daddy. Since they are both editorialists in National Newspapers the father child example is valid. And for a third possible option, if anyone knows of a 'pretty truth' in poltics please share it with me.

Middle of paragraph:
Although Kay ultimately pays some attention to the effect of the Web on the truther phenomenon, it is hard not to feel that his emphasis is misplaced, that the character of the stories, rather than their agents, is what should be examined. Today’s Web technology has provided “truthers” a multitude of platforms for similar stories, and unparalleled means for their narrators to convene, if only virtually, and to spread their nonsense. But another fact of the Web is that the truth does, eventually, catch up.
The rest of the paragraph, the author's take away from the book, is pure evil. One of the worst Protocols get reccomended by both these National Newspaper writers. With the Chutzpa to reccomend it in a paragraph that also mentions The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in a National Newspaper. Followed by complaining that the future gentile animals will always have traits being somewhat aware of the crimes of those who rule over them.
(I guess that is what the genetic engineering is for, 1984 and environmental toxins are not enough.)

Their recommendation is: 'TEACH ALL THE CHILDREN THAT WHITE COLLAR CRIME DOES NOT EXIST'

con·spir·a·cy   
1.the act of conspiring.
2.an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

The process by which this happens is called education, and in the book’s third section, Kay makes the case for it, arguing for an anti-conspiracist curriculum to be taught in schools even as he concedes that conspiracism is a “stubborn creed” that will “never entirely go away, even as the passage of years fails to vindicate their theories.”