Quote Originally Posted by PatColo View Post
JD: not sure which argument you're asking about.

I asked JKing one question which he has so far ignored,

Aren't you inferring condemnation towards all GSUS readers who disagree with the Official Zionist Holohoax Narrative? ... while at the same time inferring that you are of sufficient piety yourself to be in a position to condemn all those who you judge to "condemn those who disagree"
No. Not at all. As I already stated, I was merely trying to point out that I thought it funny that Book is ready to completely discount a persons opinion on everything simply because they do not agree with his World-view 100%.

Even if this thread had been about some other subject, and Books response been in the same context, I would have pointed out the same thing.

Just because a person has a different view on some things does not necessarily mean that they are wrong on all things.

Allow me to give you a personal example of what I mean, Pat.
Take Max Keiser. I do not agree at all with his views on global warming, but I do not reject him outright for having those views because if I did I'd miss out on the stuff he says that I do agree with. Not to mention the informative guests he often interviews.

I look at all people that way as I realize that everyone has good stuff sometimes....even Book and Ximmy post some good stuff from time to time. And I give them credit when they do.

Book phrased his own response, that I poked fun at, as though he had at one time supported the person in question.
In Books own words he posted..."He just lost my support".
To lose ones "support" implies via context that his support of the person in question did in fact previously exist.

So again, I thought it funny that Book did that and I just wanted to let him know that I did.
You know, in the same way he does to everyone else. I thought he liked that kind of thing.


and there's an inferred question to JK here, namely "isn't it true that independent holocaust researcher/revisionists today are treated in the same way as JK paints his "Nazi" caricature?", which JK has also ignored so far:

Ironic, that "Nazi" caricature you describe re alleged events in Germany +/- 70 years ago, and how it aptly describes what indisputably happens today in many western zio-kontrolled countries when their citizens dare to think for themselves rather than goose-clapping for Tinkerbell - off to prison kamp they go! [Irving, Rudolf, Zundel, Zundel's defense attorney, etc]


I'd be curious to hear whether JK agrees with the above point, or disagrees & why?
It wouldn't have been relevent to compare him to Mao Tse Tung, now would it have?

I compared him to Hitler because that's what Book seems to act like on the forum....a little Hitler dictator guy. You know, just like the cariciture of Hitler and his merry band of men goose-stepping down the road.

Besides, I thought Book would like being compared to what seems to be a hero of his.


As far as what happened in Germany during WW2 and the Jews, I personally have no idea of what really happened as I was not there. Nor was I even alive at the time. Nor have I researched it much. Which is why I tend not to get into the meat and potatoes of whether it actually happened or not.

IMO, any hard evidence that would prove it conclusively one way or another has likely been destroyed by now, so IMO it all comes down to whatever a person chooses to believe happened.
Maybe it did, maybe it didn't.....or is somewhere inbetween both extremes.


The main thing that needs to be pointed out is that I made one little post trying to point out Books sillyness in rejecting someone he used to support over one sentence the guy used.
....and then I was instantly taken to task for it and accused of derailing the thread all because Book can't take his own medicene that he expects others to willingly take.

Now that I've responded to you after you asked Pat, I will probably get taken to task again and accused of derailing the thread once more.
...but you did ask me my opinion.

I appologize for the late response as I had previously not seen your post that I am responding to as I was being kept busy in other threads by those who seem to not like my honest opinion of various things.
Such as freedom and Liberty for all Americans.