Quote Originally Posted by Joe King View Post
Sorry Pat, but you didn't get it at all.

It was meant that Book doesn't like anyone who doesn't goose step with him.

That's all. It's an analogy for someone who is of rigid thinking with no tolerance for anyone else who is even slightly out of step.

Kinda like Hitler was too. Those that resisted his vision were sent away, or learned to hide how they really felt.
Kinda like how some on here don't always speak up because they know what happens if they do. They get taken to task for having their own opinion.

Edited to add: Since Book wants to acts like a little Hitler, it's an obvious choice to use the goose steping reference. It also means that I think Book looks funny when he does his thinking. Just like Hitlers troops looked funny when they marched.
Just so everyone's completely clear then JKing, you don't mean to cast condemnation towards people who are sympathetic to revisionist views regarding the Holohoax Controversy, and you maintain that readers who got that impression from your first several posts in this thread would be mistaken?

I'd also appreciate hearing your answers to these former questions,

Quote Originally Posted by PatColo View Post
Do you agree that Western governments should cease prosecuting, imprisoning & fining those revisionist-historians who propose/evidence alternative narratives re the holohoax? [Irving, Rudolf, Zundel, Zundel's defense attorney, etc]

Should Bishop Williamson have to pay the 6,500 euro fine which the German court just upheld, for his holohoax thought-crime?

[...]

Jking, doesn't these Western states' treatment of holohoax-revisionists eerily resemble you nazi caricature?

Quote Originally Posted by Joe King View Post
You know, the way the Nazis were, both in their funny looking march, all in lock step unable to think for themselves and if they did, off to the work kamp they go.