Police use Assault Weapons and Tank against Home School Mom wanting to protect

[Awoke]

Hahaha, santa.....

[po boy]

So what do you suppose might happen if everybody wised up and followed your advice, whatever that actually is?
Do you really believe the government would just shrivel up and disappear or something?

Well if they actually read the things they sign and comprehended them and acted in the best interest of the child and themselves most likely you wouldn't be reading stories like this and if this happened on a large scale...

"...a republic if you can keep it."

[dys]

The womans mistake was in accepting the benefit of public school, but then refusing to comply with the requirements that go along with that benefit.
ie she tried to "pick and choose" what she wanted to comply with.

Then she fired her gun while the police were there......bad move.
....and it didn't help her daughter one bit. In fact, by going off half-cocked she probably made her daughters situation worse.

So yea, the mom is responsible to the degree that she wanted something from the State, but didn't want to comply with everything that goes along with accepting the States benefits.
....and where does it say in the OP that the daughter was sexually assaulted?

I defy you to show me where the 'requirements' of this benefit are formally and specifically disclosed.

dys

[po boy]

I defy you to show me where the 'requirements' of this benefit are formally and specifically disclosed.

dys

There has been plenty of information posted all over this form if your inclined to look for it. Mick silver just linked a pdf of 'Invisible Contracts" also your local law library may have a copy of American Jurisprudence so you could look up citizenship, parens patria, also school registration and administration documents, laws/statutes regarding persons with disabilities act.

You could also look for a thread I started which links some of George Gordon's material or go to his sight and look for the common law series. That should keep you busy if your sincere.

[Joe King]

I defy you to show me where the 'requirements' of this benefit are formally and specifically disclosed.

dys

There has been plenty of information posted all over this form if your inclined to look for it. Mick silver just linked a pdf of 'Invisible Contracts" also your local law library may have a copy of American Jurisprudence so you could look up citizenship, parens patria, also school registration and administration documents, laws/statutes regarding persons with disabilities act.

You could also look for a thread I started which links some of George Gordon's material or go to his sight and look for the common law series. That should keep you busy if your sincere.

That's just it, he's not.

If he was he'd understand that if you want something the gov regulates, you have to play by its rulz.
Want your kid to go to public school? Then there are certain things you have to do in order to have your kid be able to go there.

Don't want to do those things? Then don't expect to send your kid to public school. Send 'em to private school instead, or home school them.

Remember, this lady didn't have any trouble until she tried to dictate how she was going accept the bennies that she asked for.


Do I think they went over-board with their enforcement? Yes, most definately.
...but remember, the 10 hour standoff with the SWAT team didn't start until she fired a shot inside her apartment.

If you have gov officials at your door and you pop off a cap, you should expect the po-po to be called on you.

[Serpo]

What irony. Detroit mother, Maryanne Godboldo, was just charged with child neglect for refusing to obey a Child Protective Services order to give her daughter Risperdal, a powerful psychoactive drug. Meanwhile federal and multiple state prosecutors are suing Johnson & Johnson for deceptively marketing the drug - including mismarketing its use on children - and hiding dangerous adverse effects. J&J now faces a potential $1 billion in damages.

Having earlier observed the drug's dreadful effects on her child, Maryanne was correctly pursuing holistic treatment for the child instead when the legal battle began. The jury's ruling, now handed down against the mother, is not only a travesty of justice, but a reflection of psychopharma's vast propaganda machine

http://www.naturalnews.com/033336_Ri...d_neglect.html

[Joe King]

Was she just charged, or has she had a trial already? Your post isn't very clear on that.

You're use of "the jurys ruling" sounds like she's already been on trial, but using the term "just charged" makes it sound as though only just been charged recently.

If she's only been charged, her atty should be able to introduce as evidence the fact that federal prosecutors are suing over the use of that drug in children.

[Awoke]

There has been plenty of information posted all over this form if your inclined to look for it. Mick silver just linked a pdf of 'Invisible Contracts" also your local law library may have a copy of American Jurisprudence so you could look up citizenship, parens patria, also school registration and administration documents, laws/statutes regarding persons with disabilities act.

You could also look for a thread I started which links some of George Gordon's material or go to his sight and look for the common law series. That should keep you busy if your sincere.

Every time you type the word "it", you owe me a beer. This is retroactive to the time you joined up to this forum as a member. It's an invisible contract. Pay up.

[dys]

There has been plenty of information posted all over this form if your inclined to look for it. Mick silver just linked a pdf of 'Invisible Contracts" also your local law library may have a copy of American Jurisprudence so you could look up citizenship, parens patria, also school registration and administration documents, laws/statutes regarding persons with disabilities act.

You could also look for a thread I started which links some of George Gordon's material or go to his sight and look for the common law series. That should keep you busy if your sincere.

This is a nonanswer. When I enroll my kid in school, for instance, they do not hand me a document listing the specific requirements associated with the so called 'priviledge'. The requirements may be vaguely insinuated by the American Jurisprudence, and in other places, but that is totally irrelevant as the American Jurisprudence is not contracting with parents enrolling their kids in schools. If the school does not hand me a contract listing the specific terms of said contract, then I have not contracted with the school outside of what is specifically and clearly disclosed in said contract. This is ridiculously obvious and you know that. If you and I make a contract for you to redo my septic system, for example, I cannot write an obscure internet document that says that you also have to do my electrical work, not tell you about it, and then claim that you should have known better and threaten to kill you. Fundamental common sense- the only things contracted for in contracts are those things that are specifically disclosed in contracts.
What else you got?

dys

[dys]

That's just it, he's not.

If he was he'd understand that if you want something the gov regulates, you have to play by its rulz.
Want your kid to go to public school? Then there are certain things you have to do in order to have your kid be able to go there.

Don't want to do those things? Then don't expect to send your kid to public school. Send 'em to private school instead, or home school them.

Remember, this lady didn't have any trouble until she tried to dictate how she was going accept the bennies that she asked for.


Do I think they went over-board with their enforcement? Yes, most definately.
...but remember, the 10 hour standoff with the SWAT team didn't start until she fired a shot inside her apartment.

If you have gov officials at your door and you pop off a cap, you should expect the po-po to be called on you.

Their rules? WHAT rules? Again, these contracts do not disclose what you say are their rules. LOL, actually, many of these contracts don't even come with a written document that both parties have to sign. What else you got?

dys