![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
You all should take this to the shed. The THUNDERDOME.
I want to see you bleed.
You all should take this to the shed. The THUNDERDOME.
I want to see you bleed.
Originally Posted by TheNocturnalEgyptian
Joe wouldn't make the trip to the outhouse, he'd stop short & take a dump in the flower bed just outside the back door.
Hey, I was just trying to get you to understand how impractical your idea was. Getting a man-made object to leave Earth orbit to the Moon or Sun or wherever you proposed using rockets to send them to, is not an easy nor cheap endeavor.
...but all you seem capable of answering with is fanciful theories and insults.
Brace for impact: Scientists warn ANOTHER out-of-control three ton telescope is hurtling towards the Earth at high speed
By Allan Hall
Last updated at 6:29 PM on 10th October 2011
Earth has been told to brace for a possible satellite collision as an orbiting telescope weighing nearly three tons has spun out of control and is plummeting homewards.
ROSAT, a German X-ray telescope built with British and American technology, has been orbiting the Earth since 1990 and has provided invaluable data on stars. But they lost contact with it in 1999.
It is now predicted to re-enter Earth's atmosphere at the end of this month.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...96_468x286.jpg Heavens above: An artist's impression of the ROSAT satellite, which is expected to plunge to Earth at the end of the month
The German Aerospace Center has warned that 30 'individual pieces weighing a total of 1.6 tons may reach the surface of the Earth'.
ROSAT’s heat-resistant mirror in particular may not burn up upon re-entry and falling debris may include razor-sharp shards.
More...
- Full-blown space storm could send 750 meteors streaking across the sky every hour... but will we see them?
- Could we live inside a supermassive black hole ... and have aliens already done it?
- When stars collide! New study shows how gamma-ray bursts could end life on Earth
However Professor Heiner Klinkrad of the European Space Agency assured: 'Until now in the more than 50-years of space history not a single person has been harmed [by pieces of falling satellites].'
ROSAT was launched on June 1, 1990, from U.S. launch site Cape Canaveral for what was originally intended as an 18-month mission.
It actually operated for more than eight years, finally shutting down on February 12, 1999. It is now expected to hit the Earth at some point between now and December.
Odds are long of anyone being hurt, but emergency services in Germany are practicing drills to deal with debris injuries just in case - although there is no evidence that it will land there as opposed to anywhere else.
Last month the German space agency estimated that ROSAT has a 1-in-2000 chance of hitting someone - higher than the 1-in-3,200 odds Nasa gave for UARS, the last satellite to fall to Earth.
But any one individual's odds of being struck are 1-in-14trillion.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...08_468x407.jpg Bus-sized: Nasa's six-ton Upper Atmospheric Research Satellite made its final fiery plunge into the Earth's atmosphere last month
Heiner Klinkrad, head of the Space Debris Office at the European Space Agency, said in a webcast posted on the German Aerospace Center's website: 'It is not possible to accurately predict ROSAT's re-entry.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A SATELLITE PLUMMETS?
Astronomer Dr Ian Griffin, from the UK Association of Science and Discovery Centres, says the Earth's atmosphere slows down falling satellites a great deal.
Much of any satellite crashing to Earth will be disintegrated by heat, caused by friction with the atmosphere. It's the reason we get shooting stars - created by meteors burning up in the upper atmosphere.
Space vehicles experience incredible stress on re-entry. The load can be as much as 10Gs. An F1 car experiences around 5Gs with maximum braking from high speed.
The reason why the location of a crash site is so hard to predict is because the density of the atmosphere varies so greatly higher up, producing different amounts of drag.
A prediction that was wrong by even a few minutes would mean the satellite landing a huge distance away, owing to its speed.
'The uncertainty will decrease as the moment of re-entry approaches.
'It will not be possible to make any kind of reliable forecast about where the satellite will actually come down until about one or two hours before the fact.'
Last month, Nasa's six-ton, bus-sized Upper Atmospheric Research Satellite made its final fiery plunge into the Earth's atmosphere.
Americans had been warned that the 20-year-old orbiter could cause injuries and damage to property as it dropped about two dozen pieces of debris on to Earth weighting up to 300lbs.
The satellite was far smaller than the 135-ton Russian space station Mir, which fell to Earth in 2001 or the 100-ton Skylab that fell in 1979.
So far this year, two large Russian rocket stages have also fallen to earth without inflicting any injury.
Mir fell into the South Pacific, while Skylab hit the Indian Ocean and parts of sparsely populated western Australia. Because two-thirds of the Earth is ocean, space debris usually hits water.
Nasa urged anyone who finds a piece of the UARS satellite not to touch it.
I'm sure Overweight and lazy Romans said the same about indoor plumbing.
There is nothing impractical about escaping Earth's gravity, its been done on numerous occasions.
Face it, Joe.
You enjoy shitting at the dinner table.
Yes, and at considerably greater expense than it costs to launch to low Earth orbit where most satellites are.
Besides, even if they did what you say and launched every satellite with a rocket "strapped to it" in the anticipation of 10-15 years later using it to "eject" the used up satellite, how many would end up not working due to age and/or micrometeorite strikes? Then you'd have fully loaded rockets re-entering the atmosphere and blowing up.
At that point you'd probably suggest strapping rockets to the rockets already strapped to the satellite just so it doesn't fall on your kids swing set. lol
BTW, did you even look at the link I posted that showed the lift costs per pound of various rockets and also the relatively small payload they are capable of lifting?
...and then consider how much the fully loaded rocket weighs that you want strapped to every satellite and times that cost by its weight, and then build a bigger rocket to launch all that stuff together, to low Earth orbit?
Face it Horn, you don't think your theories through very well before you spew them out as a "solution" to non-existant problems.Face it, Joe.
You enjoy shitting at the dinner table.
That you'd be willing to spare no expense to prevent something that's never happened, tells me you are truly and genuinely worried about this.
Do you also worry about falling off the edge of the Earth?
Thunderdome!!! That way i can call you bitches out on your stupidity.
Jackie did it and you know it!
Joe has diarrhea mouth... it keeps flowing and flowing...
If that's the case, why you keep eatin' it up?
http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...8&d=1311900858
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote