I appreciate that. I am not your enemy, although we may have differences philosophically/spiritually/metaphysically/etc. I do not view you as an enemy either.
I knew you'd have words for me!Gonzo:
You have never been forthright. I have asked you direct questions and you have danced around with answers. I have expressed to you my stance on you in the past. I like you, but I am weary.
There are too many warning signs.
I disagree; I feel as if I've been as forthright as I can be without further compromising my 'privacy'. If you care to direct me to some questions that you feel I've evaded, I will do my best to answer them as clearly as I can.
Which god? How many gods do you think there are?I will not bother pressing the issue of your "ordainment", because if you wanted us to know which god you were ordained to, you would have told us all by now.
For all I know you have been ordained to Lucifer or Ba'al.
There is no God but God, and I don't call God "Lucifer" or "Ba'al"... and honestly I don't even like calling God "God", because words and names do not do God justice. Sometimes I'll say "that which men have called God", but it is still a poor attempt.
I hope you can see what I mean.
I AM white and I am NOT a jew. I've made multiple posts on this forum regarding my ethnicity/ancestry/family history.The most forthright I have seen you be is in your statements "I am not a jew" and "I am white"
Well, 90-something percent of the babylonian talmudists are not jews either, and they are white.
Also, I am not a "babylonian talmudist" or "talmudist" in general, although I have read some of it. There is some sick, twisted shit in the talmud, as well as a bunch of boring minutia, but it is certainly not something I follow or encourage others to follow. The talmud teaches that any jew who teaches goyim talmud ought to be put to death! Needless to say, "jews" don't really care for us reading it. So I would say most "talmudists" identify with being "jewish", considering that the talmud is the pinnacle of modern jewish thought (which sadly trumps the torah/tanakh (the hebrew bible)).
I can't help but take that as a compliment.All I know for sure is, you are intelligent, studied, and cryptic.
lolBa'al fealty predates Christianity. Babylonian talmudism predates Christianity.
Christianity didn't exist until Christ came and died on the cross.
I owe no fealty to Ba'al or anything/anyone else. I don't worship demons or anything.
I have tried to "be saved". I am either incapable of "receiving Christ into my heart", because Jesus doesn't like me, or because I am incapable of deluding myself into feeling "saved by the blood of the lamb", unless I truly am.People in this thread are saying "This or that was around before Christianity", and indeed they are correct. The thing that people are not realizing is that Christianity only exists because we strayed so far away from the Lord God that we were beyond salvation.
The only reason Christianity exists is because we were so corrupted and heretical that God himself had to come to earth and die as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of us all, because our conduct was beyond forgiveness through the means outlined in the Old Testament.
So yeah, This or that was around, and this or that is 6000 years old, etc etc.... Well so is Satanism.
Christ is the way, the truth and the life. The only hope of salvation.
He came here because the people were engaging in heretical paganism to begin with.
If I am meant to be saved, then it would have to be a Saul-on-the-road-to-Damascus-moment. Saul did not *want* to be saved or *ask* for salvation; he was simply struck by the grace of God by God's Will, not his own.
So perhaps one day I will be saved in the fashion that Saul was. If not, then I will likely be damned to eternal Hell according to christian scripture.
Either way, God's Will will be done, no?
God may seem "upset" at the way things are going, but God is the ultimate shot-caller. "Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven."
There is not a grain of sand out of place in the Universe!
My mention of Old Time Religion was just a friendly poke at Magnes reminding him of the Mysteries of ancient Eleusis.So when I call something "New-age", understand that I am not a shallow fool who actually thinks that these are "New" concepts in spiritualism. I use the term new-age for two reasons:
1) Because that is the term that the occultist PTB have coined, in an attempt to fool modern people into believing that the pagan cults of antiquity are "New".
2) Because that is the term that the occultist PTB have coined, in an attempt to fool modern people into believing that Christianity in an outdated, repressive model of religion.
I will also take this opportunity to state that Blavatski is not the pioneer of satanic occultism. I feel too much credit is given to this witch. She was a follower of ancient rites, just another misled soul. It's unfortunate that she held such influence over people and taught them these ancient evil ways.
New-age is not new at all. New-age is luciferian rebellion, apostacy from God and His will for us, rejection of the Creator. It's embracement of the "Divine Cosmos", as stealthily portrayed in books and videos like "The Secret".
A lot of "New Age" shit is "Old Time" shit dumbed down and rehashed and contorted, and some is just new made up shit.
That sounds pretty karmic there.... I'm not sure this is the thread for it, but some people have speculated that Christ encountered dharmic/karmic thoughts during the "missing years" (from the bible) of his life.So back to what I was saying as it relates to Karma, Jesus Christ tells us (paraphrased) "you reap what you sow", and "As you do to others, you have done to Me" (You have done to Christ).

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)



Reply With Quote