Police Officers In NC Advised To Divest Property

[palani]

I would like to hear more of your thoughts on Corporations , what the good and bad by being a Corporations ? thanks palani

You have a corporate side. Your name in all capital letters represents that entity. You animate it (become an agent for it) when you answer up to your name. This corporate side is also your estate. People work to build their estate. Gravestones are engraved with the name of the estate (in all capitals). The corporate side is what handles Federal Reserve Notes. Real men and women use gold, silver or copper.

Like joins with like. Corporations can only do business with other corporations. In order to survive in the world today in society you must do so through a corporation.

Rights do not come from government. They come from a creator. Yet the government must deal with both rights and duties and they do so through "persons". Persons includes corporations. That is to say, a person is ONLY a corporation and nothing else. Government attempts to hide this little detail by coining the phrase "natural person" and you are intended to believe this is a man or a woman. It is not. It is only a corporation.

Hobbes defines a person as 1) an action 2) a word or 3) representation. Government is representation. Agency is representation. Real men and women perfom actions like jaywalking. The action of jaywalking creates a person. The person has rights and duties. Don't jaywalk and you will not create a person and will not incur a duty (fine). A word is also a person. Commit libel or slander and create a person, also punishable by fine or imprisonment.

On the rights side go out and discover a gold mine. Mark it out and go down to the land office to have your right recorded. You created a person. The person has rights rather than you.

I tend to call Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) corporate coupons. They only have value in the corporate world. They do not purchase anything because they do not extinguish debt. No ownership occurs because of "purchasing" something with a FRN. Government has it well established that they own everything that is capable of being owned.

Just a few thoughts. You might have some of your own.

[iOWNme]

They better find a way to put their blood in some one else's name, because that is what the people will be after.

As i understand it most Police Dept have blanket bonds for all the officers, they do not have individual bonds anymore, (as they are Lawfully required). I have not been able to verify this?

If i commit a crime, then move all of my assets out of my name for reasons of evading, i would have the book thrown at me.

[palani]

If i commit a crime, then move all of my assets out of my name for reasons of evading, i would have the book thrown at me.

That is why North Carolina is advising policymen to do it NOW before the liens start hitting the recorders office.

A local guy liened up a deputy sheriff. Did it by the book. Got his permission and all (silence). Now the deputy cannot sell his house until the lien is settled. Too bad. So sad!!!

If there were a personal bond in place the liability would be limited to the bond (I believe this to be a true statement but not verified). The lack of a bond makes an officer de facto. There is no limit to his liability.

[mick silver]

i have heard you can only take so much blood from a corporate so would that mean that you could only get so much paper notes from them if you were to sue ? if so would it make it so you could not cause a corporate to fail ?

[palani]

i have heard you can only take so much blood from a corporate so would that mean that you could only get so much paper notes from them if you were to sue ? if so would it make it so you could not cause a corporate to fail ?

You would have to have an ACTION against that corporation. What you can recover are dictated by your damages. Simply because a corporation is recognized to exist does not give you an automatic right to name it in a suit.

There is a concept called "piercing the corporate veil" that allows damage to flow from a corporation to the individual man or woman (their corporate identity that is) who actually did the damage. As far as I know this a one-way concept. You don't go after the individual to get to the corporate assets. You would go for the corporation and try to show that it is used as a front for the individual.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercin...corporate_veil

[beefsteak]

Governments and states are separate entities. States erect constitutions to rule the actions of their governments and governments cannot exceed the mandate they are given.

When I say state I mean YOU. A state is a body politic and at its' most elemental level that is a single individual. Turners republic does not change these ideas a bit. Simply stated it is easier to gain attention when a group of people become interested. Turners' state is no more sovereign than my own or yours.

PALANI...last time I respond to anything you post, you arrogant JERK!

I was giving Turner as the SOURCE for you to listen to the Bond V US discussion w/r/t your opening N.C. post. THAT is where I found the reference to what is going on in North Carolina and Why, from Turner's own lips. You can hate TUrner or whatever on your time, but don't you dare dump crap on me for posting a source of pertinent follow-up comment in regards to any of your opening posts.

It is the SUPREME COURT'S DECISION/DEFINITION of what a Sovereign is, and where I got the new intel, not YOUR definition/decision/imposition crap.

I don't need CRAP from you for posting a source when I responded to what I thought you wanted in your opening post, which was any additional comments regarding NC.

If you "knew about the Bond V US decision" and didn't feel like the rest of us sovereigns needed to know about it, that's on you. And it certainly begs the question as to why you didn't feel the need to "share..."

Sucks to be you, pal. I ain't posting squat to you in the future, since you are such a friggin' know-it-all, your way or it's no way. You may be a sovereign/state/pimple on a gnat's ear, but you act like an asshole and I'm callin' you on it.


ticked off BEEFSTEAK

[palani]

You can hate TUrner or whatever on your time, but don't you dare dump crap on me for posting a source of pertinent follow-up comment in regards to any of your opening posts.

I have never met Turner and don't believe I have even heard him speak. That said as there is no requirement to hate anybody then I choose to stay neutral on the subject.

You may be a sovereign/state/pimple on a gnat's ear, but you act like an asshole and I'm callin' you on it.

You can tell that from a few sentences? I'm truly impressed. You must be worth a fortune.

[Spectrism]

I briefly whisked through these posts but never saw Palani as described by beefsteak. Hey Beef- you got PMS again?

[beefsteak]

Spec...
instead of bragging about not reading, why don't you read...

PMS==You mean, Perturbed Male Sydrome...
Yeah, that's the way I signed my name to my post, joker.
Not surprised you couldn't see it...
I get PMS when I see your name too, come to think of it, Spec....

[Spectrism]

Dude... don't know what is eating you, but you have been wound too tight for a long time.