http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoB80Yk9NYg

From: Rys2sense | Jan 13, 2012 | 11,667 views


Loading...
Newest War by Deception
Audio re-done,New clips, massive editing, info on tower access, enjoy and spread. The old film has about 120k views on the two names. Do not upload this to your page. I need media contacts able to find me without going through a bunch of links. I have set this film to private for now. Only a select few get to see it. If there are no glitches it will be publicly released 2012. If I see it on your page I will report you and you might have your account deleted. ... (more info)

(less info)

View comments, related videos, and more
^ I just tested the embed here at GSUS, and it plays, so not sure what's "private" about it?

I haven't watched this >3 hour bomber, but one thing I recall which was a yellow light about this Rys2sense guy was I watched one of his shorter vids one time, and in the middle of a bunch of truthy remarks, he dropped something about how anyone who doesn't believe a boeing flew into the pentagon is "disinfo" - and I know Rivero/WRH who's prolly the main reason Rys2sense is on the map, takes the same tact re the Pentagon question. This has been turned into a wedge issue for 911 truth the past couple years, and I concluded some time ago that those who took the "anyone who doesn't believe a boeing flew into the pentagon is disinfo" line were themselves, probably disinfo. This thread delves deeper into this wedge issue,
Thread: Conspiracy Theory with Gov. Jesse Ventura- 911 Pentagon Attack (Full Episode)

On that subject^, this essay just appeared at wtcdemolition.com, whose owner: "Real Truther/Gretavo" (< yes a dubious character himself) shares my skepticism over the "boeing really hit the pentagon" clique's strange insistence on their position,
Strange Obsession: 911Blogger and the Pentagon Mystery

So not having watched Rys2sense's 3 hour vid in the OP, I don't know how he handles the pentagon question- can anyone point to the minute-mark where he begins discussing it?

Basically the "tell" I'd be looking for in any 9/11 truth material in judging its integrity vs disinfo status is: does it leave in the reader/viewers mind the impression that arab/muslims ultimately did the deed? from the
Thread: 9/11 Hijackers Passports were issued by the CIA - US Consulate Whistleblower

Quote Originally Posted by PatColo View Post
I have no doubt that a group of arab patsies were led along in the months prior to 911, creating a more/less "documentable" legend of their general doings, as the spooks prepped for the big day.

But ON the big day, I don't believe these patsies had any role in "violently hijacking the commercial flights and flying them into the places which the 911 OCT alleges they flew them into". My first guess is the arab patsies who'd been set up with documentable legends in the months preceding 911, were then disposed of in some way on the morning of.

davidraygriffin.com

Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?
Conclusion

All the proffered evidence that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11, when subjected to critical scrutiny, appears to have been fabricated. If that is determined indeed to be the case, the implications would be enormous. Discovering and prosecuting the true perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks would obviously be important. The most immediate consequence, however, should be to reverse those attitudes and policies that have been based on the assumption that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11.
The other tell I'd also be looking for is how, if at all, Israel/zionism's culpability in the attacks is handled. These two questions are a pretty effective acid test to separate the real stuff from the slick disinfo.