Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

  1. #11
    Administrator JohnQPublic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    8,926
    Thanks
    890
    Thanked 2,266 Times in 1,345 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    Welcome to the slippery slope. It all started when they changed the Hyppocratic oath to the Hypocritic oath.

  2. #12
    Iridium Awoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    7,603
    Thanks
    798
    Thanked 591 Times in 309 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    Just posting a link to a relevent thread on the Jaffe Memo.
    Time is running out, make all the jokes you want, but the future isn't so funny - General of Darkness

  3. #13
    Great Value Carrots iOWNme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wise and Prepared
    Posts
    4,327
    Thanks
    1,658
    Thanked 2,086 Times in 925 Posts

    Angry Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    Seriously, Did anyone actually download the pdf and read it? It is 1000000% times worse that the headline.

    PDF here: http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/201....full.pdf+html

    From page 2

    "Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life. Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life: spare embryos where research on embryo stem cells is permitted, fetuses where abortion is permitted, criminals where capital punishment is legal".
    You see, just because you are a human (Read: A child of the Creator) does not mean you have a divine Right to life. Only the Communist STATE can declare whether you have any Rights or not. Just more justification of exterminating human life, under the guise of already public acceptance of such atrocities.

    On page 3

    "It makes no sense to say that someone is harmed by being prevented from becoming an actual person. The reason is
    that, by virtue of our definition of the concept of ‘harm’ in the
    previous section, in order for a harm to occur, it is necessary that
    someone is in the condition of experiencing that harm.

    If a potential person, like a fetus and a newborn, does not
    become an actual person, like you and us, then there is neither
    an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which mean
    that there is no harm at all. So, if you ask one of us if we would
    have been harmed, had our parents decided to kill us when we
    were fetuses or newborns, our answer is ‘no’, because the
    would have harmed someone who does not exist
    (the ‘us’ who
    you are asking the question), which means no one. And if no one
    is harmed, then no harm occurred.

    "
    You see you are not an 'actual person' until you have grown up and decided to serve the Communist STATE. Only then can you suffer any type of harm, according to these MARXIST Eugenicist.

    And if they decide to kill you before you are old enough to be programmed, then no harm has occurred.

    My Etsy store: https://twitter.com/xIOWNMEx

  4. #14
    Unobtanium Serpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    17,879
    Thanks
    3,459
    Thanked 4,437 Times in 2,790 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    Abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to viability.[note 1] An abortion can occur spontaneously, in which case it is usually called a miscarriage, or it can be purposely induced. The term abortion most commonly refers to the induced abortion of a human pregnancy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion


    To hell with there wording...................there is only way to desribe what they are talking about and that is .........after- birth MURDER

  5. #15
    Dangerous Donald Neuro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Absurdistan
    Posts
    21,254
    Thanks
    8,813
    Thanked 7,808 Times in 5,010 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    If someone, who is idiotic enough, wants to remove their offspring from the genetic pool no matter the dependants age, I am all in favor of that.

    Yeah I know sometimes the apple falls far from the tree but usually not.

  6. #16
    Unobtanium
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked 3,790 Times in 2,128 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    Quote Originally Posted by Korbin Dallas View Post
    So, using the logic of the authors, if Casey Anthony would have killed Caylee immediately after birth instead of waiting two years, we would have saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in court costs, and no one would even know who she is.

    No-no... Casey claims Caylee was born from date rape... so after birth abortion was OK...

    Pretty much anytime a child is unable to survive without the care of an adult, abortion should be an option... A kid only qualifies for human rights when s/he is able to scavenge and survive without aid, somewhere between 4-6 years old...

  7. #17
    Gold
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    564
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 382 Times in 188 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    It seems that "after birth abortion" is merely a question of access. Be careful what you wish for. Soon the state will claim the right to declare anyone they wish to be a "non person," which means that, since no "person" will be "harmed," killing them isn't homicide.

  8. #18
    Unobtanium
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Thanks
    1,955
    Thanked 3,790 Times in 2,128 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    Quote Originally Posted by ximmy View Post
    Pretty much anytime a child is unable to survive without the care of an adult, abortion should be an option... A kid only qualifies for human rights when s/he is able to scavenge and survive without aid, somewhere between 4-6 years old...

    At which point they should be ripe for child prostitution rings...

  9. #19
    Unobtanium Serpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    17,879
    Thanks
    3,459
    Thanked 4,437 Times in 2,790 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    We are NEXT........

  10. #20
    Frog Leg Whisperer chad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,487
    Thanks
    625
    Thanked 2,105 Times in 1,033 Posts

    Re: After-Birth Abortion - Journal of Medical Ethics

    fucking monsters.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •