Supreme Court Rules: Police can search you ANYTIME, ANYPLACE, for ANY REASON

[palani]

they'll just leave Palani alone, he really knows his shit

Chances are palani will be left alone because he is not an insurgent; however there are no guarantees. One must simply follow his own nature and be responsible for his own actions and not become agitated over irrational actions of others when the goal is to be made whole.

[Libertytree]

Chances are palani will be left alone because he is not an insurgent; however there are no guarantees. One must simply follow his own nature and be responsible for his own actions and not become agitated over irrational actions of others when the goal is to be made whole.

Chances are, your chances are as good as ours no matter what language you choose to speak. But......I wouldn't be surprised if your IP was from the DC/VA area. Insurgent?

[palani]

I wouldn't be surprised if your IP was from the DC/VA area.

I have no IP.

Insurgent?

It's a status reserved for those who profess one thing and practice another.

[Libertytree]

I have no IP.

It's a status reserved for those who profess one thing and practice another.

No IP? Really? That in itself is interesting.

So, you're an insurgent?

[gunDriller]

i thought this case was about strip-searching when you are in police custody.

e.g., if you're pulled over by a cop who's fishing for a traffic violation ticket, and pulls you over for a bullshit reason. he can write you a ticket, but you won't be strip-searched unless you, for example, smack the officer and they take you into custody.

[iOWNme]

i thought this case was about strip-searching when you are in police custody.

e.g., if you're pulled over by a cop who's fishing for a traffic violation ticket, and pulls you over for a bullshit reason. he can write you a ticket, but you won't be strip-searched unless you, for example, smack the officer and they take you into custody.

It says you have to be under arrest, then they can search you. The arrest could be for ANYTHING it appears....

[palani]

No IP? Really? That in itself is interesting.

I don't know why it would be. You might have a drivers license in your wallet but it doesn't belong to you.

So, you're an insurgent?

I don't vote. Being insurgent is a requirement to vote. You figure it out.

[palani]

It says you have to be under arrest, then they can search you. The arrest could be for ANYTHING it appears....

Except what they currently consider an arrest is a citizens arrest. No peace officer has the authority to arrest. The sheriff has not the authority to arrest. The sheriff lost his shire leet court centuries ago and now only has the authority to execute process.

Nobody can arrest you. You volunteer.

You can be required to post a recognizance bond and you can be held until you do so.

[Cebu_4_2]

Nobody can arrest you. You volunteer.

I certainly did not volunteer to be arrested for walking down a road minding my own business while talking on my cell phone... BUT I WAS.

[palani]

I certainly did not volunteer to be arrested for walking down a road minding my own business while talking on my cell phone... BUT I WAS.

1) "Am I under arrest?" ... answer "no"
2) "Am I free to go?" ... answer "no"

This results in a constitutional seizure. No arrest ever occurred.