And I kindly remind you to go back and do some research. The ONLY reason Americans never paid an income tax until much much later wasn't because of the Social Slavery system. It was because they didn't have to claim any income that which was BELOW $6,000.00. Ironically enough that still stands today. However due to the federal reserves intentional inflation. That little 6,000 limit ensnares just about everyone now who endorses private credit.
Hendrickson wasn't backwards he just couldn't see the forest through the tree's. He thought he had "Cracked the code" and attempted to put into motion what he learned. He never went and researched historic law to gain a better understanding of what a taxable exchange is. He believed he was using Lawful Money and not subject to an Income Tax. When in reality he was only using Legal Tender because he endorsed it as such.
Believe what you will about David Merrill, but I've spent 3 years researching his work as well as others in the Lawful Money vs. Private Credit argument on my own to apply it to my life now. I am not in jail, nor am I being harassed by the IRS. I haven't read a single instance of ANYONE who endorses Lawful Money being rounded up by the IRS since it first started circulating around 2005. I've even spoken to individuals who have been endorsing Lawful Money since the 1990's, they hear nothing from the IRS. No annoying letters, no threatening legal documents nothing. The same cannot be said about the followers of Hendrickson. A lot of them are in a lot of legal trouble and it started the moment they filed an amended tax form. They perjured themselves.
Socialist Slavery is evil, you are absolutely without a doubt right on the money. HOWEVER if you endorse lawful money they cannot by law force you to fund it. It is voluntary even states in the social security act. You cannot be forced into bondage, you have to agree to it.

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)


Reply With Quote
