Hand It Over, Now!

[palani]

what does a banks signiture card have to do with the price of tea in China?

I presume you have no interest in the price of tea in China but rather the issue at hand?

Participation in banking was prohibited in Iowa for the first 11 years. Had you signed up for a bank account between 1846 - 1857 you would have been participating in a criminal activity based upon the organic founding document of the State of Iowa, the 1846 constitution. Why would you not believe participating in banking at the present day is not as criminal as during the first years of existence of the State? The State morphed into an entity that accepted banking activities so long as they got their share of the activity.

[7th trump]

I presume you have no interest in the price of tea in China but rather the issue at hand?

Participation in banking was prohibited in Iowa for the first 11 years. Had you signed up for a bank account between 1846 - 1857 you would have been participating in a criminal activity based upon the organic founding document of the State of Iowa, the 1846 constitution. Why would you not believe participating in banking at the present day is not as criminal as during the first years of existence of the State? The State morphed into an entity that accepted banking activities so long as they got their share of the activity.

I never assumed it wasnt a criminal activity Palani.....and what does it have to do with the price of tea in China anyway?
Also, why are you twisting this around?
I'm still waiting on an answer from you to show me a statute relating "banking" and/or "fiat currency" to the income tax reporting mechainism.....even an imposition statute would suffice.

Hey palani....whats in between the banking industry and the People?

I guess I'll just write off an answer from you like I do Merrill......a no show!

[palani]

I never assumed it wasnt a criminal activity

Yet you have no problem engaging in this activity.

and what does it have to do with the price of tea in China anyway?

All right. I'll bite. Tell me what you know of the price of tea in China.

why are you twisting this around?

relating the topic to its' foundation is not "twisting"

I'm still waiting on an answer from you to show me a statute relating "banking" and/or "fiat currency" to the income tax reporting mechainism.....even an imposition statute would suffice.

Common law takes no cognizant of statutes.

whats in between the banking industry and the People?

What People?

I guess I'll just write off an answer from you like I do Merrill......a no show!

Where have you established that I have a duty to answer?

[7th trump]

Yet you have no problem engaging in this activity.


All right. I'll bite. Tell me what you know of the price of tea in China.


relating the topic to its' foundation is not "twisting"

Common law takes no cognizant of statutes.

What People?

Where have you established that I have a duty to answer?

Guess you're right palani.......you dont have a duty.....and neither do I.
Nice way of saying you cant find any statute linking the income tax to the use of fiat currency!
But then again you claim you dont have a ssn (no reporting) and yet dont pay income taxes....hmmmm!
I find that thats all the evidence I need connecting Social Security to the requirement to file a 1040. You're absence of a ssn is an exellent example of how the law is written and performs.

Dont feel bad Palani even your Merrill Van Pelt couldnt answer the obvious either.....and he doesnt want to.

It was fun chatting with you Palani.

[palani]

Nice way of saying you cant find any statute linking the income tax to the use of fiat currency!

Lots of interesting things are found by logic. Things that are not written are of more import than those that are.

But then again you claim you dont have a ssn (no reporting) and yet dont pay income taxes.

I don't have a feed bill either. But then I don't claim to raise livestock either.

You're absence of a ssn is an exellent example of how the law is written and performs.

I find improvising on a federal form under penalty of perjury to be a bad practice, don't you?