Anyone know if Dawson is also a "No Planes @ WTC" advocate? That "theory" is even more idiotic than the "commercial jetliner hit the pentagon" theory!

Talk about a "Sunstein Cognitive Infiltration" gambit so obviously designed to bait honest Truthers into becoming an ineffective & irrelevant "chase our tails debating/infighting over exotic theories movement"

"9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory" - PDF by Anthony Lawson:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4rvTxcMSY



"What Has Happened To Veterans Today?" - Lawson again

Conclusion from the first Lawson PDF above,

What happened, initially, in New York was obvious, because real people saw it happen, and because so many videos captured what happened to the South Tower. But, once again, the planes were not forensically identified and were almost certainly not the planes that were allegedly hijacked that morning, so the official story was a total fabrication. Although the no-planes-in-New York theorists have been recognised as either fools or monumental liars—by those who can think for themselves—they have given many a mainstream-media lackey an excuse to bundle all of those who are genuinely seeking the truth into one single category:

Foil-hatted nutters who don't even think that real planes hit the Twin Towers.

This nonsense really has to stop, and not hosting disinformationists like James H. Fetzer on otherwise serious websites will go a long way to dispel this very damaging image.