Quote Originally Posted by PatColo View Post
Let's try this approach: You copy/paste a specific line/point made in each of the 2 ZCF blogs, and respond something like,
"[specific line pasted from ZCF/Dawson blogs] is not factual/ lie/ nonsense/ totally destroys their own credibility...brutally/ Schizoid x 1000/ Deep into moonbat territory BECAUSE _________."
[where you fill in the blank with your specific, sourced explanation for why the given ZCF quote fits your negative description].

Let's see it that ^ approach can help get us through this "row"...
What is your confusion at this point?

I think both articles top to bottom, full stop, are lies.

BECAUSE..........they are both comprised of one outlandish nonsensical lie after another.

BECAUSE.........there is nothing in them that is factual.

BECAUSE........both links are total horseshit made up by paranoid delusional 15 year old's tweaking on mountain dew in their parents basement...which totally destroys ZCF's credibility as a source of anything worth reading by anyone with a sane mind.

Do you need further clarification?

I know I would like some, because you're coming off as one seriously batshit crazy mofo.


Now what would be nice from you is to perhaps stop being such a $%^$ goof, and have an adult conversation by letting ideas flow in both directions.

What is your contention? What is the issue?