new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

[lapis]

Here's another good one:

The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions

[Glass]

Here's another good one:

The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions

Interesting. Didn't someone run the plate on that vehicle and confirm it belonged to the Christopher Rodia? i think they did meaning the stuff about the radio transmissions and different cops calling in different plates is meanlingless.

The green car with bullet holes I think is explainable. On the radio feed you can hear the office arriving and reporting that two men are running and shooting. You can also hear 2 shots and they are some distance away from him so it is not him firing. I'd guess there was a short exchange of gun fire in the parking lot before the 2 guys did a runner to the woods.

I'd like to know how long after the event was first called in was the helicopter footage taken. There are a lot of vehicles parked, no vehicles moving, no crazy traffic jam of vehicles trying to get in like cops and other responders. Everyone is there, parked and milling about so it seems the footage is from sometime after the event was called in.

interesting to know radio reference has more audio on this. I'll have to take a look. I also thought the helicopter footage was interesting because there is digital transmissions being made. You can hear them on the helicopter footage. I wonder what is being transmitted there. Maybe it's the footage itself, maybe somethng else.

[slvrbugjim]

Well ok, but the problem also is that Rodia's car was photographed in the News to be Lanza's and the plates to belong to Rodia, so no I do not yet buy that Rodia was not somehow involved, possibly just his car was used.
This is like the JFK Murder aftermath at light speed with current technology they can throw out dozens, hundreds of false trails to go down that will eventually cause most people, after these false pieces of evidence are proven false, in the publics head, if one is false they all are in the past this has been the case at least.

[PatColo]

few item's from Tracy's blog, he was on No Lies Radio Jan 12,

Sandy Hook: Unanswered Questions _ on Anti-War Progressive Teach-in | NO LIES RADIO
edit: this is a replay of Tracy's Guns & Butter radio appearance

Taft Union High School Drill Becomes “Real Life”


Tracy's blog points to these from Rappaport,
How TalmudVision will shape the new gun-culture in America




What government fears most: blacks and whites united with guns

[PatColo]

2 hour Kevin Barrett radio show, I just started listening, not sure what this guy's deal is- supposedly a skeptic/debunker (re-bunker?) of S.Hook conspiracy theories. here's the MP3, 2 hrs 27 MBs, must FF through the comm breaks:
01/09/2013 Wednesday - 1st Hour: With Jeff Prager. 2nd Hour: With More with Jeff Prager.

Charles Giuliani & guest spend most of today's show deconstructing Prager's appearance on Barrett's show,

Truth Hertz with Charles Giuliani 2013.01.16

Guest Greg in Seattle.

Archive
Show Notes

Download MP3

[sunshine05]

more whining from Anderson Cooper

http://www.cnn.com/video/standard.ht...harassment.cnn

[Hatha Sunahara]

more whining from Anderson Cooper

http://www.cnn.com/video/standard.ht...harassment.cnn

Anderson Cooper and the two others in this video appear to be part of the hoax. Never mind the facts, you have to believe us because we are the MSM. Would the government lie? Would we lie? Please, if those conspiracy theorists managed to turn your brain back on, turn it off. You know that thinking for yourself isn't healthy.

Cooper must be desperate. They can see that people aren't buying their BS any more, and asking questions. And it freaks them out. Bravo!


Hatha

[PatColo]

CIA Spokesman Anderson Cooper Sent by Masters to Discredit Independent Sandy Hook Investigations

here's a vid embedded above, it's a longer version of the clip at the CNN link in reply 966, just more of the same faux 'righteous indignation' shtick from AC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaQwpqnnhm4

[Horn]

Vacuum's find

[vacuum]

ok guys, I have an extremely paranoid alternate theory of what's actually happening. I'm mainly posting this just to get it on the record.

It's possible that the shooting was real but intentionally made to look fake. It could be a false hoax. Once a truth movement is built and is really going strong, they could then release all of the hard evidence. The pictures, security footage, names, autopsy reports, etc. Everyone would feel horrible (it wouldn't be their fault though because evidence was withheld).

Why would they do such a thing? To shatter people's faith in each other and themselves. It would be very similar to the comet Elenin thing - hyped, perhaps intentionally, then nothing. People will be extremely skeptical about any other comet story in the future. It's no different than the silver market. They artificially pump up the market sometimes so that silver bugs panic and buy, then they not only remove the artificial support, but then perhaps artificially depress it so that people really have their confidence shaken.

The other thing is that, once the fact that the "hoax" is destroyed, the question of whether it was a false flag will then never be able to be discussed. Because "the hoax theory has already been debunked, you despicable person" even though that fact would have nothing to do with whether it was indeed a FF.

Why did I come up with this extremely paranoid theory? Because this whole thing seems to have so many problems it's hard to believe they really tried. Chad has given some conflicting reports. And also, as I mention, it's not unheard of to actually pump up then crash 'the alternative' (whether doom dates or metals prices).

With this theory clearly articulated beforehand, if it does come about, we can come back and point to this to prove that we were indeed not out of our minds, but were simply rationally responding to evidence presented to us. We aren't simply making conspiracies up as we go, as would seem to be the case if we later claim it was a "false hoax but still a false flag" if they purposefully hold back the evidence while purposefully giving false evidence, then at a later date release the real evidence. It's neither our fault nor improper thinking or behavior if they were to do such a thing.

Anyway, carry on...