High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

[vacuum]

^ That all sounds good, and all but you have to look at the evidence objectively regardless.

There are some users here that refuse to do it because it goes against what they have been subconsciously trained to believe, or simply just want to believe.

Most of these individuals are faith based religious types.

It is impossible to look at anything objectively; we are all biased in ways we can't know or predict. This is the fallacy deductivists make. Only when one realizes that he is not objective can he begin to become more objective.

It's easy to see others flaws such as faith-based types, but unless you are questioning every assumption, you yourself have the same flaws. You should read at least the first essay.

[Serpo]

It's an observation that holds true. There is a distinct tendency, and direct correlation. Suppression of physical evidence over a belief system.

It's an observation that holds true
hahahah

[joboo]

It is related as you are saying everything was blown to tiny pieces just like this passport was meant too but didnt.

No I'm not saying that. If people want to link up unrelated info then that's their own flawed line of thinking.

I'm talking about one specific incident. If someone wants to trail off elsewhere, and make other unrelated conclusions, and link it back as "proof", then that's simply idiocy.

"A passport was planted geographically elsewhere so it was a missile" it about as stupid as it gets.

The passport was planted there... everyone knows this. It has nothing to do with physics.

[joboo]

It's an observation that holds true
hahahah

If you don't see the connection then you're simply not thinking. It's the religion v.s. scientific approach argument phrased differently.

[Serpo]

Are you kidding? Do you really believe this ass believes the total bullshit he spews here with impunity? Don't you see, a plane traveling at 600 mph isn't a missile at all - it's just a plane! After all, it has wings!

What transparent bullshit artistry. Another thread getting crapped all over by the resident ADL/SPLC interloper.

How many of these interlopers on GSUS have we had....lost count ......jewboy is the latest

[Serpo]

If you don't see the connection then you're simply not thinking. It's the religion v.s. scientific approach argument phrased differently.

Who cares joboo,you seem to be the problem here and yet you cannot see it......

this forum can see thru people with a false agenda

you have a false agenda too me........ie NOT REAL

[joboo]

It is impossible to look at anything objectively; we are all biased in ways we can't know or predict. This is the fallacy deductivists make. Only when one realizes that he is not objective can he begin to become more objective.

It's easy to see others flaws such as faith-based types, but unless you are questioning every assumption, you yourself have the same flaws. You should read at least the first essay.

If you see three apples on a table, and form the conclusion there is three apples on a table. Is that biased?

Something tells me no.

[joboo]

Who cares joboo,you seem to be the problem here and yet you cannot see it......

this forum can see thru people with a false agenda

I see very well.

If you took the time to read the link I provided, and evaluate that site, and make up your own mind you would see this. I'm going to bet you did not take the time.

[joboo]

How many of these interlopers on GSUS have we had....lost count ......jewboy is the latest

The issue is some of you are so wierded out over the whole GIM breakup thing it has scarred you intellectually into a permanent level of paranoia. Some of you refuse to look at any information rationally despite what the evidence shows.

At some point in the future you might realize it.

[vacuum]

If you see three apples on a table, and form the conclusion there is three apples on a table. Its that biased?

Something tells me no.

What happens when one of your peers says he sees only one apple?