Feathercoin

[Neuro]

I think we will be merging with machines in the next 100 years. What past examples or life experiences can help us relate to that? The things that are happening in the world right now are absolutely mind blowing. We are in a world were less and less people can find work since machines are so efficient that frankly most SHOULDN'T have to work anymore anyways if we theoretically ran things efficiently with current technology.

I work and live in virtual reality. I have a strong tie to technology spiritually and consciously. I'm what you might call a transhumanist (the non-control freak NWO kind though.) I believe that technology is of course a double edged sword. Those of us who believe in freedom and liberty have to constantly use it to the max to free people or the bad psychopaths who wish to enslave/harm us will do so.

Buying Gold/Silver wont take down the bankers. Creating a decentralized free market system MIGHT do it though. We are all so used to seeing rigged markets all our life than when we see a real, unrigged one it probably looks like a scam or a joke. The Rothschilds have run this system for about 300 years now and its time to end it once and for all. I have no plans on selling my Gold/Silver anytime soon, and wont trade it for any cryptos at this point. Precious metals are something physical that will always have value, so they have an important place as money, but they won't change the world.

If we don't do this, or something like this, these bankers, these psychoapths in charge will enslave us in ways so unimaginable that there will be no returning from it. I don't see any other options than to fight fire with fire.

Exactly what do you think has prevented these bankers from buying up the majority of the mined bitcoins during the last year what's the 300 dma of bitcoins? $80? If they did, you can rest assured it will stay, but manipulated and diluted, with bitcoin futures, derivatives, ETF's, where they can soak up any increase in demand, by just issuing more junk paper, and they make their money on being perpetually short. The only difference with gold and silver is that they are tangible, and they are not replaceable with a similar looking metal in the periodic table, like crypto-coins are. And there are not a virtually endless supply of new metals waiting to be introduced into the periodic table.

Look I do understand your sentiment, I really think I do at least, but crypto-currencies can as easily be controlled by banksters as gold, probably more so (as it is much cheaper to buy into 12 million bitcoins at $80-150, than 5 Billion ounces of gold at $12-1500, and thus they are not a good vessel for our liberation. Silver may actually be a better liberty liner since probably most of it above ground is in common mans possession, and it has been too cheap for the über-rich to consider it as a store of wealth (a ton is only $650,000 a thousand tons is $650 million, which for many über-rich is a small part of their wealth).